Anti-Economic Warfare

Fairness doctrine towards communist china. with regards to a new case again I guess.

2011-09-19T01:37:00.000-07:00

On this cite, I attack the Republicans the Democrat's and President Obama, along with multiple cultures and ethnic citizens. My mains stay in the MSS of course. As there is no website in the world on them. Except for mine. They have trillion dollar enterprises run by their single party and fascist military entities in the US as propaganda tools. So just that alone means if anything the Fairness doctrine is on my side. As they are more than able to propagate against anything I collect, infer to, or think unprofessionally.

Along with that I have stated multiple times. At any time if somebody does not like this cite. I will take it down, or even remove specific content on the matter. The MSS knows who I am as they threatened my life and I believe made two pass at it.

I am not advocating for anything except for what they had agreed on. Which is to stop using SOE's like a military activity, and to transition into a full check and balance political competition arena for their citizens. Currently the Communist Chinese do not even allow their citizens to read such articles on their atrocities in economics or the world. So that alone states that there is no fairness in Communist China. As their people can't read my cite. So they do not even know what their country is doing bad to vote them out or vote to stop them.

Will I transition them. If this book with a weird looking cover does predict the future, yes. They will become a full fledged Democracy with two parties and third party contenders. Will I get their vote. That is something I will never use the book for. As that would allow me to forget curious when I start MEI and that is the skill I want to build for the Galatic President Bid. As dealing with space weapons and miner's and girls of the salon's and hotel owner's not easy business if my Old Western relief reading is correct. We going to definitively build some galactic motorcycle cruiser's.

Rider I

So back to looking for job and being poor. Until Kossinger say hello.

2011-09-19T01:03:00.001-07:00

I have spoke with attorneys, professional in field's, my old bosses, sent our resume's, sent things to temporary agencies. Nothing back. I mean nothing. I am going to try a new industry next week.

Just got down looking in the research industry. Nothing without a specific degree and I have a muti degree background.

Next week I am going back to looking into the grocery store area. However, with Walmart and Target and K mart all expanding into places they stated before that they would never go when they first had lobbying wars to stop such ideas. I doubt I find a job. As all of the grocery stores are having to lay off very old well paying jobs to hire folks for nothing. However, if they still have good paying $15 an hour jobs I will apply. As that is my going rate. According to the calculation of entry of wages. I was earning around $18 an hour at my last job, as I made $13 an hour plus my benefits which where added as abilities to use yacht at anytime I wanted, and had access to attorney's legal research files to help me learn. However, I will take $13 if they offer it.

I doubt they hire me. As most folks see me as to old and over qualified like I have heard before. However, in two months I start for sure my bid for Galatic President experience through the creation of my own Non Profit as my grandpa and lineage since the 1900's have dream of having a Mac in Galactic President seat.

Who knows maybe I get a good clerk job at a grocery store and go to school and start Non Profit. Or maybe I stay no job next week and start Non Profit and go to school. Either way, I am going to fight for Galatic President Seat. Cause I think after this world's creation of US mutiplicty through Mac history a Mac deserves it. I am going to be a Mac Daddy of ten.

I expect my MEI experience to be better than any other possible candidate. As it will not be about space or war, or even how well you did as a greedy CEO. But how well you can prove working in a stressful environment balance a report sheet on cultures and politics each day. Which is the plan.

The idea is that one of these industries as I keep applying in my base industry will hire me. However, I doubt it. The temp agency in my own industry never even got back to me. As I when went in before I am sure they are thinking like the last time there are a lot of people with more experience. As I know 20-30 year experienced legal assistance out of work right now.

Rider I
And yes it does not matter what happens. The area of recent reports is my end game is my boys as space mining cowboys then my bid for Galatic President as we all figure out how to harmonize on the space mining so we can start galaxy hopping.

As nobody reads this anways.

2011-09-19T00:07:00.000-07:00

What I am doing here is trying to set myself up to be Galactic President. So when we all start going to explore the Galatic area around US. I can have a good creditable use of multicultural diplomatic very intriguing article writing and society debating on issues for all in moderation.

As the day will come and I would like to lead the space cowboys. Just like American's lead UN, NATO and other muticultrist societies seeking peace and exploration of ability to live in harmony.

Nobody gets it all my marketing since I was a kid, my name every where close to idea of such action. Oh well hopefully it will work. I mean, if I can prove myself in MEI, I will be good moderate of Galactic Senate as CEO and Executive officer. As it is going to happen, baby and I sure it is an American as we are the world's best and brightest multicultural society. As the Commy landers are fascist single mono culture thinkers. They never vote me anyways. Unless I get them to finish their transition into a Democracy and everyone love me for it. Then I get big hug.

Nobody knows that Goober Smoocher Patrol, Rider I man from ancient family of Christ's cite and Druid wiseman lineage will be President of Galatic Senate. If I play my cards right.

If anyone wishes to sue me at anytime. Please post the petition on my cite.

2011-09-03T04:17:00.000-07:00

In international court law, along with domestic law of civilized countries. To sue a person, you have to post the petition to their person. The easiest way to do that is to post it electronically on my cite. Again, I tried many times to contact people with regards to their IP. However, no one ever contacted me back, I made a good face attempt to constantly write articles then just post it at the top to say I will take it down if it offends you. I also can back all of my accusations and articles with regards to articles I have read.

If you wish to attack me legally. I dully understand. However, you must make an attempt to contact me, at that time. I will take down the cites. As I am currently working on collecting all of my citations that I have collected in public along with my notes for my book. In my jurisdiction, I have the right to free speech with such atrocities of civil rights violations as economic warfare, terrorist funding, oppression of freedom of political association and right to poll for leadership, along with a myriad of other issues, my one cite works on with regards to the MSS.

I make no assertions of being a professional. I do back up my cite with my college degree's. Which shows my ability to analytically make a nexus from one point to the next. I have written this blog post to be as non believable as possible. Where I tell stories using my cultures of Druid/Christianity story telling. Which is what my great prophet I pray too, and my great elder's who taught that prophet human electromagnetism believed in. As a Druid's life is story telling. I take this idea of the Bog Bri Oilscoil. Which is in my opinion jotted down as Blog, which just means soft, and the sentence means soft power school. As the way my ancient forefathers, from Jesus to the three wise men, all the way to Noha and the creation of collected intelligence, as my cultural defense as a way of telling a story of something that is violating in my opinion the human soul's cognition of civil rights.

Please let me know and if so attacks on me. I will take it down. As I am going professional soon, and will then follow all laws as without ability to cloak under fair use, speech and debate, non professional belief and cultural heritage.

I believe I have sent a message to every major news source in the US. Along with many magazines. Which hold the world's foremost article writers. Many of which I cite. As that is my good faith attempt to seek request. Along with that I contact the President at least 3 or four times a day. Sometimes I say pretty not smart things. So I am sure as he loves me and I him, even though I am not a Democrat anymore (because of President Clinton), it does not matter. We have the same beliefs in liberty. I also contacted many of the book writers and sent a letter. Some of which might have been a little on the romantic side. Nobody has said anything to me. Along with that I know the MSS know's I exist. As I watch their news propaganda station and specific MSS agents in it. In which multiple times when I posted a heavy heavy note article. They addressed it in public. So they could also send me a anonymous post, as our CIA does when others write about them, if they do not like it. I have made the best good faith attempt I can, to do research, like Jesus my saint and lord, as he walked around collecting stories of the current day's religion and tried to make it a better civil liberties belief.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYZKZfdr3ac

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8QJ4JGMQek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D38LdpvNRrg

Rider I

I have received a warning shot at my cite.

2011-09-02T15:28:00.001-07:00

I will not stop all actions with regards to this cite. Collect and then properly start a professional entity.

I do apologize. No more actions via this cite will occur. If you have a civil rights comment. A mere post will take it down. Thank you.

I guess they did not like me causing at them five or six times a day. geese.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf670orHKcA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LxC3M-Yngs&feature=related

So I ran a time elapsed trial.

It will take me about 25 hours to collect everything off this webpage and place it on a paper. So I can store it and start to then categorize it.

2 posts are collected per minute around 3,000 citations. So that is around 1500 minutes then around 25 Hours.

Ok I started the collection. I will have to spend 8 hours day for the next three days to get them all collected. it is a long process. Without the ability to program the Google program to collect the links in an algorithmic program.

Rider I

Dear Senator McCain

2011-07-29T00:40:00.000-07:00

Senator McCain

You can call me a smart butt I a sure I deserve a smacking. The idea that we are at war is the idea of what I think is a few literal extremist leftist groups called the Weather Underground. We saw Van Jones and Locke literally sell out our green tech industry to foreigners via 80% of our stimulus went abroad. Which was treasonous as the industry is analogous to our nuclear and physics industries of the last cold war. As I have already demonstrated how your lands and realm have been attacked twice by green tech weaponry possibly by satellite beam or even normal hand held tech, along with a sand storm which is also creatable. However, we do not have the tech to trace it as we do not have the mass industrial base that we had like in the nuc and physics days of our great industrial projects.

As such, I am all for killing those who want Sharia law and those who are Communist Muslims extremist like Al Queada. However, I am all against the Communist Chinese SOE being allowed to invade the US via SOE Free trade zones to colonize the US for their own genome and single party like they are doing in Africa. So the only way to deal with that is to create our own industries enough to create jobs to stop the lower level's from crawling on hands and knees begging the Communist Chinese to come to their states for jobs.

Rider I

CCP and MSS are Done If this is true

2011-07-29T00:31:00.001-07:00

If this is true
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/06/14/china-us-afghanistan-mineral-mining/
Then via my Mission Impossible pure common sense we are killing our people to secure Communist Chinese world domination. As Charlie Wilson did to the Soviets to get the KGB and their intelligence units to concentrate more on the Afghanistan's than their economic warfare.

Rider I
By they way don't blame my team. The mission impossible cognition scaring me.

I am just being smart butt tonight.

Dear President Obama

2011-07-29T00:14:00.001-07:00

Did you know that there are more people that die in Washington DC where guns are banned than do in Afghanistan. Along with that ability of the same terrorist in Washington DC to get a hold of Nuclear weapons is higher there than in Afghanistan. The idea then becomes in a root cognition we are basically over there because we are to afraid that we can't secure our boarders. Even though we have satellites programs that hang over our boarders and water boarders and see everything through cars and containers. So then we get back to liquidation war.

Rider I

My concluding remarks.

2011-07-28T12:19:00.001-07:00

I have done extensive research for two years. I can say I am the master on this matter. In which as all I's know the one who own's it see's it. I have sent my legal and proper recommendations to the Templar's (which in number are in check to the Masons), I have sent my recommendations to the Illuminati, Masons, Anti World Communist League, FBI, CIA, White House, and a few other unnamed agencies against world conquest of single party or genome, or religion. Along with that I sent my letter to Opes Dei explaining their preachers have probable been being brain washed for decades by the MSS into pedophilia. As that is a simple brain washing experimenter.

I have found the MSS guilty of funding Osama Bin Laden and his terrorist Camp. I found them guilty of funding genocide so their own genome could take over. I have found them guilty of not following international treatise via the WTO to disband or stop massively subsidizing their State Owned Enterprises which are controlled via the SASAC as an MSS espionage tool of economic warfare. I have found the disrespect of the CCP's diplomacy is not because they are children but because they know the CIA is failing against them. I have also found that their new espionage agencies will be used to colonize other countries via economic engineering of their free trade zones. Which they will use liquidation wars like Charlie Wilson used against the Soviets to force entry of their SOE's and allow colonization of their genome and single party.

I find guilt in their actions. My order are legal and proper. I am done with this project. I now Isotope the collection cites, and leave them from my Democracy crews to read and see if my orders and findings fit their liking.

I find the MSS in line with the SS and KGB actions. However, there seems to be no government office willing to defend the US against their espionage activities. 3,000 MSS espionage bases, and a literal forced stop of a cognition against their flag, even though they have played a Communist propaganda song in the white house from a movie where they slaughter US soldiers, and have created games where their citizens slaughter our soldiers. I am no King I join the ranks and seek legal sword ship. I will clean my vulgar statements and do some dit bits on this cite to make it legal for our children to read if necessary.

I find that the MSS is responsible for the world economic crash via their constant subsidizing of the SOE's and also through massive espionage algorithmic coding. Which you would have to know who Dr. John Nash is to understand the depth of espionage algorithmic coding and terrorist puppetry.

Your King Illuminati Druid

The Kid

2011-07-28T03:20:00.001-07:00

Dear CIA

you all are sure fucking us over good aren't you. I just read that the SASAC is buying lands oil sands full malls all over the USA. I mean really a Communist Party being allowed to buy all that after they funded Osama Bin Laden to attack us. Fund the Pakistani intelligence terror cells. You guys are idiots. How long do you think the right is going to allow this to happen. I mean instead of coming up with new propaganda and movies like our forefathers and mothers did to stop the SS and KGB from literally destroying us via economic warfare via their SOEs. You all just play re runs. I want a full investigation into units allowing this to happen. The right is fuming as you know the Templars are in the Millions in numbers. Yet for some reason claimed eighty six. You know what eight six em means.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-chinese-government-is-buying-up-economic-assets-and-huge-tracts-of-land-all-over-the-united-states

Rider I

Thanks for fucking us over buddies.

CIA doing a good job fucking us over.

2011-07-28T03:16:00.001-07:00

Dear CIA

you all are sure fucking us over good aren't you. I just read that the SASAC is buying lands oil sands full malls all over the USA. I mean really a Communist Party being allowed to buy all that after they funded Osama Bin Laden to attack us. Fund the Pakistani intelligence terror cells. You guys are idiots. How long do you think the right is going to allow this to happen. I mean instead of coming up with new propaganda and movies like our forefathers and mothers did to stop the SS and KGB from literally destroying us via economic warfare via their SOEs. You all just play re runs. I want a full investigation into units allowing this to happen. The right is fuming as you know the Templars are in the Millions in numbers. Yet for some reason claimed eighty six. You know what eight six em means.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-chinese-government-is-buying-up-economic-assets-and-huge-tracts-of-land-all-over-the-united-states

Rider I

The lost skill of the arts of defense against Communist SOE cartels and the pending invasion of the free markets via the MSS SOE's to centralize our resources and market place to the CCP.

2011-07-01T07:17:00.000-07:00

Currently the Communist Chinese are using their SOE's to create a strangle hold on the world. They are not a developing country. Their specific economic model is fascist. Which uses major state owned enterprises to centralized the international market's jobs and taxes. Which then force countries to have to take out loans from them to keep buying produced products. Along with that the SOE cartel then creates a major resource centralization to their single party.They then use this to take more jobs. After this process the invasion process starts. Which is when the SOE cartels that are supposed to be minored as per WTO contracts are now invading countries via Free Trade Zones. Again they are not a developing country they use a fascist economic model based around major SOE cartels. That where not disbanded but just conglomerated and expanded.

The following is some notes on the matter. Please excuse me. However, you seem to have interest in the matter and sway. Again I heed the idea that they are a developing country. The MSS has major propagation units that push that for the oh you are so cute syndrome. Along with that they just opened a numerous amount of new espionage bases for the MSS to keep up their 97% of the worlds resources campaign via their SOE cartels. That we have seen them bully everyone, and force the US to break its own constitutional vows.

I need you help. The Communist Chinese and the MSS are creating genocide and destroying countries to dominate the world.

The Communist Chinese are supposed to be disbanding their SOE's and centralized resource and wealth hoarding. However, they are using this document to create world domination. In which they create genocide, bully, and destroy countries with their SOE's exactly like the Soviet Union did. If we allow their SOE's into free trade zones. Which is pretty much just part of their country. We will see the same thing that happened in the international economic market place happen in each domestic market place. There will be a centralization of resources, wealth and jobs in that area specifically to the Communist Chinese Party. Which is exactly what we are seeing in the international community.

Please we have to stop this. I have six college degrees, was a Senator of a College, had four years of debate and speech competition, mock trial, moot court, have worked with confidential to secret documents (none of which I ever leaked to anyone). We need to stop this. I am very logical and this reasoning is sound.

Dear Dr.,

There is a very serious document I need you to rebut. This document is deadly.

The Theory and Practice of Free Economic Zones A Case Study of Tianjin, People's Republic of China

This document is allowing the Communist SOE cartels that are supposed to be being disbanded do the same thing that they did to the international economy, which is centralize resources, jobs, taxes, and treasuries to them, as it will do to countries domestic economies.

http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/volltexte/2003/3244/pdf/fez-meng.pdf

This document is deadly. We have seen what the have done to our international market place with those SOE's. It will be even deadlier in ten years after they are allowed to do the same thing to countries domestic markets. They will become more powerful and single totalitarianism.

http://en.21cbh.com/HTML/2011-5-23/wOMjM1XzIxMDIwOQ.html

http://www.dailypaul.com/155091/257-foreign-trade-zones-across-america

I hope you boys are working on this stuff. We have nobody refuting their massive propaganda department. This is the same Soviet Style plan that they used to create weakened countries and then invade them for their resources.

Rider I

You very poor assistant with no pay.

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/

I need funding our current intelligence agencies can't either keep up with my traces, or they are just not trying.

Error 1.

It is unconstitutional to allow in or have the government give privilege to a specific religion. Communist Chinese State Owned Religion Confucius has been allowed into our schools.

Outline

Show their Temples, Followers, Churches, how they pray to and leave offerings to Confucius like we do for Christ or Buddha, and then go to public schools and show how we allow them to teach not only language, but culture and religion. I learned Chinese culture in school without their Confucius religion. Serious intelligence foundational coding.

My thoughts on the matter I would like you to master.

These are my thoughts and opinions.

Hammer being used in many Communist Chinese districts after I tried to rebut Confucius into US schools, with Lockean in their schools, makes me think it is heartable to take them out of our schools.

Foreign Coding of our children brains through Character, Culture and Religious teachings.

I am only backing this up with research properly for you lazy non willing to pay folks, cause they killed children and teachers to keep my code out. Yes, I can prove preponderance of brain coding and killing to stop my codes. Easy I started to give orders to prepare cognition of code to lobby for Chinese teachers unions and governance. So instead of them doing the Democracy thing to allow my marketing of lobbying to be brought to debate. They coded death, to get military into the schools to stop any dissent to pure Marxist code in schools. Nobody pays me though, the would rather starve me out. This was easily traced as I had traced a couple other international brain coding's I had thought the MSS was doing to prepare puppet game. In which the every District in Communist China had the same action taken out in their schools against their teachers and Children. A Hammer to their children's skulls and teachers brains. Exactly like the Soviets would do in Gulags to those trying to teach to stop the brain washing.I actually proved it against myself in dark court, because I felt so bad about the non ability to understand their level of intelligence.

How bad does it have to become when a DK has to not give a whoot about telling the truth about the dark courts. I mean nobody is listening and nobody will pay me to do a proper job. All of sudden it is like Soviet style economic implosion is gone from out countries memory. That nobody remembers it or the cycles, and for some god loving reason a civilian analysis does. Oh I forgot just because the Communist Chinese allow a little bit more free enterprises that are still controlled by death or jail by the party do to exactly like they are told. They are not like the Soviets and Communist world domination is dead and gone. read the cite. The best part is when I get some punk kid trying to tell me that the Soviet Cold War was a political thing, or the McCarthy was trying to destroy free speech. Then I say, well, no communism is not political it is economic terrorism at is most refined, McCarthy did not try and hurt anybody for like Karl's Marx's or its principles. He based his theories on those that acted out wishes to be foreign espionage agents through contacts to foreign espionage agents. Trust me McCarthy could have had every Marxist book in the country burned, he did not want that. He was trying to stop the Communist Soviets from destroying free speech all for all those that hated his him so much.

The basic idea is that there is a Communist Propaganda news machine in this country that dwarfs all free enterprise news media along with small state ones. Which you should see the algo they have to destroy free enterprise news agencies. But you are all to blind to it. you like your freedom to say when somebody hurts you, you know nothing of what political and economic powers in Communist centralized countries get to get away with because nobody can tell others to protect you.

Hellow Camp my name is the Rider I

I am a Communist Cold War Activities Analysis. Which just means I watch their Political and Economic movements. As they still are a Single Totalitarian, Fascist, Genocidal, Monopolistic Regime (2). Therefore, I am calling today with regards to a document:

http://asiasociety.org/education-learning/chinese-language-initiatives/20-schools-named-confucius-classrooms

There is an Emphases on Confuscisism. However, I have no problem with the teaching of Chinese Character teaching is find. Along with that their great Culture of that great country great is a great study too. I know I have studied it. Those books had little to do with Confucius as they where created for public schools use. However, religion along with other three, in public grammar schools and high, no. The problem them becomes that we are priveleging the Communist Chinese State Run Religion of Confuscism as it has:

Temple's

5 million Followers that treat it like a religion

Deity, as they pray to Confucius like Buddhist Pray to Buddha or Christians Pray to Christ

Spirituality the whole teaching is about how to live with ones soul to be good.

Prayer The pray to Confucius the elder spirit along with their other elder spirits as their teachings tell them tool.

and Churches which I believe is the rock and the anchor to the idea that it is a religion.

Therefore, our government is privileging their religion over other religions, by allowing it into our public grammar and high schools. As we do not allow in the State Run Religion of Rome which is Catholicism. Neither do we allow in the state run religion of Israel which is Judaism, neither do we allowing the state run religion of Saudi Arabia which is Muslims.

This is because it is unconstitutional. In the US we do not allow all three to be taught in the same class by foreigner's. Especially if the program was created by the foreign military. As such, the US's dissects such foreign brain coding and manipulation into specific classes, to lessen the brain coding. We allow the teaching of symbols and sounds, separate from the teaching of culture. Which like we do with Roman culture we do not teach about religion, like the ways or the teachings of Christ, which is analogues to Confucism. As the current program being allowed into the US specifically uses the teaching of characters along with the spiritual and religious teachings of Confucism to braind code those taht just want to learn about Chinese characters or culture.

Along these lines, it is unconstitutional to allow in the teaching of Religion in the US. Along with allowing any privilege by the government for a religion. This is because our forefathers new very well that state run or state religions or religions allowed to play a party to government would cause civil wars between the many religious tribes via normal persecution and other things our forefathers sawy during their times.

As such, the allowance of Confusim is not only unconstitutional but it is a serious national security issue. As the CCP knows well enough to kill their own children to stop my entrance into their children's schools. A foreign intelligence officers, which is military, unlike me. Could easily create lessons to enter codes into children's brains for foreign constitutional perspectives.

Rider I

Finish the rest tomorrow night. Time to sleep sun is coming up, neighborhood will protect me while I sleep.

Confucius boot.

1. Allowed into Public Schools

http://asiasociety.org/education-learning/chinese-language-initiatives/20-schools-named-confucius-classrooms

2. Single Totalitarian Fascist Genocidal Monopolistic Regime

http://www.deathbychina.com/DBC-excerpt.pdf

3. Illegality of Privilege of religion to one over the other, and violation of allowance of Church in State:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States

4. Confucius Temples

http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&source=hp&q=Confusious+temples&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=b662302092e7427b&biw=1280&bih=685

5. 5 Million Followers

http://www.victoriapacking.com/religioninfo.html

http://books.google.com/books?id=G81HonU81pAC&pg=PA489&lpg=PA489&dq=5+Million+Confucius+followers+Scholarly&source=bl&ots=0yi253E_GR&sig=0MEPcBjnEJiXKHd0uF7dB1vypKs&hl=en&ei=9j3_TYy7C_HRiAKPwaD0BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://english.taichung.gov.tw/internet/english/docDetail.aspx?uid=3524&docid=13376

Statutes of Deities in Confucius religion.

http://blog.designtoscano.com/blog/home-and-garden-statues-and-sculpture-experts/statues-of-gods-and-dinosaurs

"A Man Who Offends Heaven Has No Wear to Pray"

http://www.scribd.com/doc/55313477/24/The-Gods-the-Spirits-of-the-Dead-and-the-Afterlife

Students seek solace, good luck at Confucius Temple

They not only pray they leave offerings like Catholics light candles.

http://beijing.globaltimes.cn/society/2011-04/539386.html

8. List of Confucius Churches in the US ROCK AND ANCHOR, BOOT OUT.

http://www.placenames.com/us/p1838998/

http://start.cortera.com/company/research/k7q0mqr7k/confucius-church/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFrNJb130j0

http://www.yellowpages.com/salinas-ca/mip/salinas-confucius-church-8188622

http://www.yelp.com/biz/confucius-church-of-sacramento-sacramento

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr80qyDQzoU

http://www.kcra.com/news/22628099/detail.html

http://salinasasianfestival.com/events/venueevents/2-confucius-church

http://www.manta.com/c/mm8163d/confucius-church

9. More coming

http://blog.oregonlive.com/higher-education/2011/04/chinese_delegation_announces_1.html

I want them out. They are not willing to allow Lockean Democracy Free Markets into their schools via elective or grammar schools then we do not allow their's in.

Rider I

Religion in public schools is illegal. Piece is golden political power house will draw tons of attention. Stand and be brave.

Error 2

Communist China has an illegal cartel and anti trust violation strangle hold on the worlds resources

Currently the Communist Chinese are using a string of illegal international violations of cartels in their SOE’s. Which is run owned and managed by a single entity the SASAC specifically for their intelligence agency the MSS. They have been able to accumulate over 97% of the worlds rare earth resources. Not because they are the only one’s with them. But, because they are constantly grabbing up foreign lands resources, so they can control the world’s supply chain lines through their cartels and illegal anti trust violations.

Please read the Book Death By China Confronting the Dragon A Global Call to Action

We need all small countries in the area of Asia to stop this world resourced domination conquest.

The Cycle of World Economic Conquest.

Before, countries where smaller and more separated. We saw the world conquest based on the necessity of resources like gold, water, humans for slaves etc. In which was used new high technological weapons like metallurgy or otherwise to conquer as much land as they could get before they felt they went far enough. However, in today’s world we see a different kind of economic world conquest. In which we saw countries become obsessed with centralizing power and economy to a single entity. So that single entity could thrive outwards and find more resources so they could become richer and more wealthier. Much similar to the old kingdoms of old. However, instead of using new weapons they used new ways of diplomacy and economic advancements.

In which we saw the German Socialist party use such economic advancements as cartel systems and the monopolization of resources to specific single managed entities under the power of the party. Which allowed them to control the management of resources without any competition of fair spread of wealth among their people. This then allowed them to be able to build more military might for the spread of their single parties power and economic dominance. As such, these economic advancements where seen by many as atrocities to the power sharing and individual freedoms that Democracy and Free Markets represent.

Then we saw the Soviet Union. Which took the economic advancement of world conquest one step further. Which instead of just centralizing the resources to SOE’s and single management. They centralized the whole economy and the power structure. So that single actors could move and create specific strong points in international conquest for specific foreign land acquisitions. This then allowed them to do such major events like take whole countries with a specific economic strategy. Which usually was dumping cheap products, gaining jobs, then exporting loans and gaining interest. In which they would go under and not have resources or military might. Which then would allow them to move in their SOE’s and political espionage and sabotage units to force the country into their satellite regime of single party control. This allowed them to conquer vast lands with a basic economic conquest of centralization of power and economy to a single political party.

After them we see the Communist Chinese. They see the mistakes of those that came before them. Thus they are trying to resolve those mistakes and not make the same ones as they try and the same thing. The Communist Chinese know well the international opinion of the use of military. As such, they use it at slight of hand and most of the time cloaked by illegal or legal immigrant soldiers that act more like mercenaries than they do government backed soldiers. Which then allows all of their movements to be cloaked as basic illegal activities. Along with that they saw the strength of the same entity at the same time. In which their military build is used in similar fashion in the high tech game as the German Socialist Party used their physical militarizes. In which the Communists are able to create anger, show force, then see if they are weak, if not they use natural technology to hurt them, with a long line of after affects of other high technological weapons of those countries being conquered for resource control.

Furthermore, they are able to see the ability and power of a unified front of a single superior race. In which they try and implement in their ranks through various possible propaganda like forcing the minorities that are supposed to be allowed to be left alone in their conquered lands of Tibet or inner Mongolia to go through abortions or even forced procedures to stop birthing. This then allows them to take this even one step further. In which they actually fund foreign genocides like in Zimbabwe. As they can use their superior race mentality as the way to allow such killing of foreign cultures. In which after they force the Dictator via their superior race mentality views to allow the Dictators resources to be raped at very low costs. They then create a similar subordinate view in the Dictators mind to their superior race. As such, allowing them with ease to import more of their own race to the area to take up more jobs, allocate more resources and to force the Dictators country folks to cater to their every needs. This superior race mentality then strengthens the bonds of the Han Chinese especially the elite guard of the intelligence of the MSS and other covert agencies, that are fully staffed with only Han Chinese Communists.

Furthermore, they are able to see the military strategy and use it as an economic strategy, much similar to their predecessors before them. In which they use an economic blitzkrieg to force their way into foreign lands via their SOE’s. Exactly like the Soviets did with their Eastern Europe conquest. However, the Communist Chinese are specifically attacking the African’s and American’s before they enter anywhere else. This is because they know that they have the rest of the world tied up to their resource centralization supply chain cartels. However, the most important part is where all of their predecessors failed. Which is international diplomacy.

This is the ability in which a country is able to create propaganda that cloaks their very interests so that they can use soft power to get what they want. There is no better an agency than the MSS, the KGB was great and GRU too. However, the MSS knows that they had to take in and mutate their oppositions best power which is the decentralization of power to free markets. Before their opposition would allow them to do something that they did not allow any of the other economic world conquers. There were able to do this by keeping a strangle hold on any free enterprise via a centralized power structure as they slowly let go of some of the market. However, the party never really let go of the market. As they still use a centralized agency to deal with SOE’s and Free enterprises alike. This is because the party is able to control the supply chain of their free enterprises and SOE’s, via the SASAC and other MSS agency activities. This then allows them to be able to destroy any opposition to the parties wishes and deems. Along with the fact that free enterprises business owners before fear was implemented. Where well known to go missing or even lose everything they had, while along with ending up in retraining school to be obedient to the single fascist party rule. Therefore, in reality the party never really did let go of the market to become a free market. As they still controlled it via their centralized economic control. However, to their international diplomacy. It allowed the whole opposition to let down their guard. In which the leaders have forgotten about the cold war all together. Even though the last wall in the DMZ still exists, and the last Communist puppet regime grows stronger everyday via their military hoarding’s.

We then see that this great international diplomacy based on a cloaked lie has been able to gain the Communist Chines favor and complete lackadaisical activities via any defense cognition’s to stop them from doing what their predecessors did via their economic invasion tactics. Therefore, allowing the Communist Chinese to enter whole ares of countries and to start to control them and implement economic and political power shifting to their party. Which is done through their ability to use their supply chain cartel to hoard all of the worlds resources to their single party fascist regime. With an illegal monopolistic and monoposonic international anti trust cartel holding of over 97% of the worlds resources and growing. Which is 37% more than Saudi Arabia even has. While also not having to have any debate or opposition to their centralized power holdings like Saudi Arabia has in OPEC.

Therefore, as I wrote the Blitzkrieg outline over a year ago. We now see that we are in last part of the invasion tactics. In which their cloaked lies have been able to get them to the point of complete let down of defenses to stop their economic world conquest via their SOE’s and totalitarian subordinate style control of power and economy. Which is radiating out of their home land now right into the very heart of the USA.

Rider I

Stand for Democracy and Free Markets, stand against World Resource Hoarding

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/

Lobby to Remove UN's Communist Chinese Economic Warfare Chief Dr. Pingfan Hong. Notes on the matter.

I will call some folks to try and get this hear fella out of his chair.

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/organigramme/gem.shtml

As first of all the Communist Chinese are the worlds worst economic warfare regime. They own 97% of the worlds resources, they help genocide folks in Africa for more resources, they have used their resource hoarding against their neighbors like Japan who need their ocean mines. Which the CCP and MSS are currently bullying their neighbors for more resources. This fellar should not have such a Democratic seat, from such a greedy country.

Rider I

Just Because those CIA boys and girls moonlight for your free enterprises you have taken over and forced into SOE cartel joint ventures does not mean the dark cite is not out here still. LOL

And you thought we where done, the world saying the US is done for, well you don't red necks, lol

I am going to call him personal and tell him to step down. lol

I love calling folks like that that are absolutely sitting in a chair for specific purpose. I mean, it was like my best friend trying to talk to me, and I could see down every cognition she made to me, via the algorithms that I know exist in her head. It was horrible, I just told her buy me more drinks. Cause I know.

Not to mention I am about 70% sure the CCP and MSS are puppet-ting the Extremist Muslims against market places now. Especially since right after we picked up Osama Puppet, they instantly would not help us pick up the rest of the Puppets. However, Russia and the US called each other and we where there arm and arm to see who is puppet-ting. Neither we tired of world domination theory happy with sovereign countries. However, the CCP and MSS are the new bullies at the table they no want to help create peace by stopping puppets.

The reason why is we can easily take the model we creates to find puppet masters for the Soviet Union and implement it to the CCP and MSS. In which it would seem they meet some of the first planks.

"he Hill’s Congress Blog

China’s naval harassments cannot be tolerated

By: U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Link to Op-Ed

Over the past twelve months, China has been carrying out calculated acts of naval harassment in the South China Sea. This is just the latest from Communist China, a country which -- for several years -- has declared much of the South China Sea as its exclusive economic zone. This has threatened the other countries (nine in all) of the region who have overlapping claims to the 1.35 million square miles of water.

Not even the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, signed by China and the ten member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, has helped in reaching a peaceful resolution to this dispute. China needs to receive a clear message that their continued harassment will no longer be tolerated.

That is why Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) and I introduced a measure calling upon the Communist Chinese government to stop harassing ships on the high seas while sailing through the South China Sea. As highlighted in our resolution, China’s unacceptable acts include:

February 25, 2011: A Chinese frigate fires warning shots at three Filipino fishing boats near the Jackson Atoll near Palawan Island, Philippines.

March 2, 2011: Two Chinese maritime patrol vessels threaten to ram a Philippine government energy research vessel conducting a seismic survey in the Reed Bank area near Palawan Island.

May 2011: China announces a unilateral fishing ban for the northern part of the South China Sea from May to August.

May 2011: Vietnam alleges that Chinese naval vessels fired on four Vietnamese fishing vessels near East London Reef and Cross Island.

May 2011: Chinese vessels lay steel posts and a buoy in the Amy Douglas Bank, southwest of Reed Bank, within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zones.

May 11, 2011: Two unidentified fighter jets, alleged to be Chinese, are sighted near Palawan Island.

May 26, 2011: A maritime security vessel from China cuts the towed survey cables of an exploration ship from Vietnam, the BINH MINH, in the South China Sea in waters near Cam Ranh Bay. This use of force occurred within 200 nautical miles of Vietnam, in an area recognized by international law as its Exclusive Economic Zone.

June 9, 2011: Three vessels from China, including one fishing vessel and two maritime security vessels ran into and disabled the cables of another exploration ship from Vietnam, the Viking 2. The incident also occurred within Vietnam’s exclusive economic zone.

Clearly, the number of incidents over the past 12 months has increased, as Beijing becomes more confident in violently asserting its claims to fishing and oil resources in the area. Commentators in the region uniformly believe that this “pattern of assertive behavior” by China is “another indication that the South China Sea dispute continues to trend in a negative direction.”

Seeing this negative trend, which threatens the freedom of navigation as well as the national security interests of the United States and its allies in the region, we introduced a Senate resolution. It is simple: Communist China, halt your aggressive behavior and return to the pledge you made in 2002 to resolve this dispute peacefully.

I understand that the Chinese Embassy has been working hard to defeat this resolution or water it down, but facts are stubborn things. And the fact is that only the Communist Chinese have engaged in a set of violent and dangerous actions against its South China Sea neighbors. This must stop.

Our resolution puts their deplorable actions on record. It reaffirms our strong support for a peaceful resolution of this dispute while supporting the continuation of operations by the United States Armed Forces to assert and defend freedom of navigation rights in international waters and air space in the South China Sea.

The Senate must act swiftly and decisively on this measure to signal our support for our allies and register our strong displeasure with China’s actions. In so doing, the Senate would be on record as supporting freedom and a peaceful resolution to the dispute.

Senator James M. Inhofe, serves as the Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs. He is also a senior Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee."

http://inhofe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.ColumnsOpEds&ContentRecord_id=b37eaafb-c6af-d07d-31e1-f970434992dd

2011-06-30T19:56:00.000-07:00

These are my notes on a line by line bases. In which I will edit, and then add proper citations and backing documents to my critique of the Levy Institutes paper regarding the idea that China is not a cause of the global imbalance. After that I will write a full page article on the ideas in my critique and present backing documentation to blizt the papers vulnerabilities in theories and improper rhetoric direction. This will take me sometime. However, I fill as my theory revolves around China's part in the imbalance as China blamed the whole thing on the US. That the Levy Institute needs a good eyeing. Candles up, books out lets battle.

I will read this paper and go line through. As I have already found logical fallacies in the last paper I read. As their calculations did not properly input cartel activities, political inspirations, economic warfare, military acquisitions, nor State Owned Enterprise activities through the scope of my theory of Blitzkrieg which is the theory that China has a SOE trade surplus stage, then an acquisition stage. In which the last two American Business cycles blatantly show that my theory is proper. This is as easily shown if the Levy Institute would look at the .com service driver of the two times ago business cycles trough and thew now mortgage service industry recession trough. Then apply strategic economic warfare theories to such a test and graph and see that there is no way that you can deny that China is blitzing the free market societies during their troughs, recessions and possible next a depression as the US keeps loosing liquidity at the end of it business cycles were liquidity is needed for the US to inflate its economy, or pay off its accumulated debts, or to be able to properly slow or stop any hard hitting credit crunches, which inherently stop the flow of capital.

As such lets begin the dig (paper that gets my bright eyes, and sword and shield with intent to make sure your statements where fully certified, calculated and properly when you address my country Levy, as China so dearly blamed the whole crash on the US and you seem to back their theory. Fighting words. Lets battle) http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_617.pdf

This statement troubles me as obviously. " We reject the prominence widely attributed to China as a cause of global imbalances and the exclusive focus on the renminbi-dollar exchange rate as misguided."Incorrect.

Just to make sure I am fighting the right folks here lets skip to the conclusion and see "Our analysis denies the paramount role widely attributed to China as a cause of global" Ah ya I think I am right and we are only on page 7 and you are so wrong. As a matter of fact I have turned some many statements against your primary statement and conclusion that this paper can easily be dislodged. Sure body maybe you did not read your paper after you wrote it, or maybe I am so into this topic that it just seems like I am reading the primary statements the wrong way. Or maybe I am. Does that mean that you think that China is not the paramount reason for global imbalances? Cause I am thinking your paper says the opposite thing than your primary statement and conclusion. Wow so confusing. Not confusing yout think that China is here to help, ok I am right to fight you. You getting your but whopmed. Its like I sting like a bee and fly like a butterfly on this topic. Your hurting right now. Dislodged.] of course that is if your primary statment and conclusions is so easily turned and disproved. Houes of Levy can I write for y'all. I mean who makes a primary statement that China is not a cause of the global imlabaces then says things like, they have high FDI, they have high GFDI, they have high development, they have shielded their system, and then shows graphs of exatly were China only allows more imports after they are under the gun from the world going through recessions. Really though, oh my lord I have found what I am good at.
imbalances in the precrisis era

As any good economists knows it takes more than one factor to play into a recession. Along those lines unless the Levy Institute applies proper cartel activities and anti-trust Sherman law applications I will right off the bat dislodge the paper and the applicable statement as irrelevant. As such a strong statement would have to come to grips with China's SOE cartels and their as stated in another paper high subsidizing to create their padded market as even the Levy Institute admits to "In the case of China, this was done by protecting certain capital and technology-industries, giving them monopoly positions and subsidizing them through various price distortions, including suppressed interest rates." pg 29 pdf pg 27 article http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_611.pdf . As such since the Levy institute went to such grave measures as to reject China as a cause of global imbalance. I must say, as a up and coming young economists this paper better do justice to cartel and anti-trust laws and theories of detriment regarding unfair market places. However, I can tell right now by that theory as I am narrowed on the top the Levy Institute has not.
As a matter of fact Levy Institute, I will leave the light on for you after this one.

Along those lines it is also acknowledged that China uses high subsidized industries as per my study on banking loans to SOE's SME's and PCB's when the Levy institute states "The objective of the first type of policies is to resolve economy-wide market failures that affect broad sectors of the economy (e.g., provide subsidies to innovation, relief financial constraints for SMEs)" id cited pg 38 PDF pg 36 document. This is an acknowledgement that China does have restraints on its SME's. However, yet the Levy institute specifically states that that is an area of concern. However, I get the feeling when they made their statement of China being no cause to the global imbalance I am sure before reading this paper they did not calculate their own statements of findings into this paper I am about to read.

After my disclaimer to the statement and pre common knowledge theories of the Mr. I. I shall began. Had to get a beer and my tobacco pipe going battle write got to battle write proper like. wait I have to turn on some music too. Alright we will grove Real Life; Send me an angel for this battle. Bare knuckles no under the belt, first to hit, the ladies will stop us if we get to mad.
And we emphasize that China's response to the global crisis has been exemplary"
China only made any movements to help the world after they were afraid to be placed in the spotlight at the World meeting. Prior to that China and its military we threatening to start economic warfare by selling American debt to cause harm to the US dollar. In which they ended up doing right before they were to purchase a free enterprise steel company with one of their SOE's. Not exemplary.
Exemplarary is fighting words compared to the arrogance that China has shown to international cooperation and the actually threatening to start economic warfare because the US and other asked for it to raise its currency to a normalized production to value level. Their production levels went up why would not their value of their currency. There gold stocks went up along with their foreign currency holdings and foreign debt holdings. Why would not their currency go up pg. 1 statement fails.

"Apart from acting as a growth leader in the global recovery by boosting domestic demand to
offset the slump in exports." This is a strategy to create intra value by creating service sectors. In which again your very id cited paper stated was necessary for economies to create value for themselves.Along those lines it is another form of strategy called acquisition. Were Chinese SOE centralized boards stop worrying about trade surpluses and strategically concentrate more on acquiring economic infrastructures of military and political strategies. pg 1 statement as standing alone fails

"Apart from acting as a growth leader in the global recovery by boosting domestic demand to offset the slump in exports, China has in the process successfully completed the first stage in re balancing its economy, which is in stark contrast to other leading trading nations that have simply resumed previous policy patterns." This is a false statement as the US was the only country that I know that went through major financial trading overhauls thanks to our Chief and Commander with an appearance from nano as depicted in the news media picture after he announced that it went through. Plus the US did this right away and without threatening anyone with economic warfare or trying to say that it was someone Else's fault like China did. Truly it was China that went back to its same policy. After making hallow threats to the US. This again shows that Levy did not properly address China's SOE cartel activities or the idea of what China has been doing during the US and free market troughs and recessions. As if Levy would have seen they would see that the detriment caused by the Chinese switching gears actually creates more of an unfair market place. Because of instead of concentrating on their own economy. They are still concentrating on foreign acquisition. statement fails in part however, is true in part as this domestic import levels going up is part of their strategy. pg. 1

"We argue that this will be best supported by continued reliance on renminbi stability and capital account management, so as to assure that macroeconomic policies can be framed in line with domestic development requirements" True statement. However, China has not properly advanced SME's or PCB's with financial matters, and is concentrating heavily on its SOE strategies in such that it is calling them SOE Champions. This then as stated in your paper would call for a failure as the Levy institute called for China to loosen its financial areas for SME's to help them proper address the balance of wealth in areas of high centralized economies like SOE padding or other dependant companies on SOE's. The stability of the renminbi will also help them keep up on their SOE cartel strategies. As currently with the calculation of such a low increase. It will not affect their countries economy nor the international market place to even out the playing field for underdeveloped countries. As the WTO stated that China can't have the benefit of an underdeveloped country as it is to massive in size. As they have gained such high comparative advantages in strategic industries like manufacturing and high technology along with rare earth materials that China can basically can keep its comparative advantages without allowing others to gain. As legalities of international law state that when a country holds a surplus for such a long time or even holds debts for such a long time they have allow for other countries to balance them out. China has not done this for 30years and currently is not on target to allow this now. pg 1true however, inadequate to level a statement that China did not have cause in the global imbalances. Along those lines, the basic legality of imbalanced trade, and financial matters shows that China is of course worried more about their own intra economy than they are fair international market places.

Introduction page 2

"This paper investigates the idea of China as a paramount cause of global imbalances, a view that is closely related to calls for a massive renminbi revaluation as the chief policy change to forestall their reemergence as the world economy recovers from severe crisis" This statement calls for a false dichotomy in the matter of stick person theory. As the idea that the world calling for China to revalue their currency wishes to cause them to not reemerge as or even stop or slow them. This is a false dichotomy. As the world does not wish to stop them from reemerging. and I am sure that papers like these are what cause the Chinese to threaten the US when it asked. As such this statement is a detriment in itself and is worded horrible. The wish for the currency revaluation was for fair international marketplaces and so that the US could create a balanced GDP equation. Along with the free market practices. Plus in a wider spectrum it was a test of China as a countries maturity. They failed, they threatened war like a teen gangster and then only helped out when they though they were going to be embarrassed at a meeting. This statement is itself is a bad statement and creates a false dichotomy. page 2 fail. Further more as a war economists I find it calculating and inaccurate to think that the US would want any country to not emerge being that we are the country that basically opened up China and helped both China and Russia along the privatized road so that they could gain security and freedom for their people. I am appalled. As a matte of fact if China would have followed a good instruction like we have been giving them for 30years now. We could have allowed other real underdeveloped markets to start to develop so that we all could have more markets to export too. Instead China wishes to keep its advantages for itself and wishes to further its SOE trade surplus and acquisitions strategies. Failed. To be a leader my young grasshopper pitching in for the community is a necessity, especially when all are to blame and everyone has their part.
I am sorry that F word just come natural to someone who can't share blame or be friendly and pitch in without threatening or acting childish.
"China’s response to the global crisis has been exemplary." pg 2
I would like to define exemplary for you: then I am going to critique your statement based on common definition:
"1a: serving as a pattern b: deserving imitation because of excellence 2: serving as a warning: monitory 3: serving as an example, instance or illustration."

Ok so I could create a false dichotomy and run a stick person theory on the idea that you mean exemplary to mean they deserve punishment and or a warning. Much like the Levy institute did regarding the reason why the US and world wanted China to raise its currency value in line with its production, gold holdings, foreign debt holdings and foreign currency holdings. So that as through international legalities the countries being held against could have a fair chance to gain back their holdings. Were again the Levy institute create a false dichotomy of the reason why the US and world wanted China to raise its currency was because for some backwards reason the very country that has been helping them along did not want them to re-emerge.

However, I will not do that. I will take the definition and statement in context with true nature and feel of the paper.

As such exemplary in context of the natural feel for this paper is that China is to be followed and used as an example regarding this economic imbalance. Ok so lets apply that to in a macro version to one single country and then vaguely throughout.

China already heavily subsidized their SOE' markets with unfair loans, and the non enforcement of cartel or anti-trust laws. Along with that China did not want to change their currency and then threatened the major asking party and counseling party on the matter. Along with that China blamed the Us for the worlds crash.

So lets take that exemplary action and apply it in mirror to the US.

If I take your statement without a false dichotomy for face value through a definitional expression. Then the US should heavily subsidize its SOE's, then it should also make it harder for their SME and PCB's to gain financing which is against your very counseling in id cited paper as there are only two on here. Along with that the US should have come right out and acted like China and should have blamed China for the imbalance and did nothing until the US felt they might be pressured at a meeting. Along with that the US should have threatened China with economic warfare, like steel tariffs, rare resource export quotas at a high recession rate of 72% and the US should have used its massive SOE cartels (which we do not have) to economically attack China. Well Levy, that would have caused war. And as big bro does not want to go to war and we are a defensive country. Our chief and commander took a leadership role and immediately made repairs to possible areas of interest, did not threaten China, and did not attack China's economy with bunker busting tariffs, quotas or SOE economic weapons. So as applied you used the wrong word. I would not say that China should have been followed in any circumstance of this economic imbalance which was as much the free markets fault as it was the neo-mercantalists fault. page 2 again this statement fails.

"Apart from acting as a growth leader in the global recovery by boosting domestic demand to offset the slump in exports, China has successfully completed the first stage in rebalanced its economy in the process, contrasting with other leading trading nations that have simply resumed previous policy patterns. The second stage in the rebalanced will consist of further strengthening of private consumption—supported by the continued reliance on renminbi stability and capital account management, so as to assure that macroeconomic policies can be framed in line with domestic development requirements." already failed these statements see pg 1 rhetoric.

By they way again I do not work for the government and I have the freedom to br brass and blatant so I am. Welcome to my stadium which is economic warfare.

"The analysis begins in section 2 with a brief account of China’s economic miracle and chief contributing policies" This statement in itself creates the thought and cloaking of what China did was something we could not fathom or understand. We know what China did. We allowed them when their were underdeveloped and up & coming to use SOE's in the contractual statement that they would start to privatize them. However, China has not they have kept upwards of 40% of their GDP for the SOE's and instead of actually selling off those SOE market shares to SME's or PCB they just conglomerated those market shares under one SOE name in which they wish to create the biggest government subsidized SOE cartels in the world as so Called Champions. China's economy was not a miracle. It was the free markets being nice to China so that they could become stable and secure so that they would not be left in the dark or in an anarchist state. The cloak is not allowed to be in a proper economists paper. Especially when making such a strong statement as China had no cause in the global imbalance. Cloaked removed statement is now proper criticized and can say it fails as China's economy is not a miracle. pg 3 failed

2. CHINA’S ECONOMIC MIRACLE AND ITS FOUNDATION page 3

"Starting from a low level of income and high incidence of poverty in the early 1980s, China’s catching-up process has ensued at a breakneck pace" This statement is true. This is predominately because the US did not want to go the same route that it went with Russia. As the end game of Russia caused to many dad's and moms to be scared that some Red Communist terrorist would get nucs after the Soviet Union collapsed. So this time we tried to do an infiltration by infiltration. Which is a game theory were the US and free markets allow the neo-mercantalists into the free market place in hopes that they will see the benefit of the free markets and wish to obtain such freedoms of economics for their people so that the US and free markets can have someone to trade with. However, though this strategy I believe was better than the Soviet Union strategy. It is now time to shift gears. As the benefits of the trade with China now do not out way the detriments. Such things as loss of high technological trade, loss of resource contracts, becoming a satellite country dependant on China's financial stimulus of debt purchasing are all signs that the US and the free market need to make sure that China is held to their contract of their SOE's being sold to private markets. As of recently the Chinese have seen more benefit in keeping their SOE's strong than in competing in the international market place fairly in regards to anti-trust doctrine and cartel doctrine which is used to control relative comparative advantage once it starts to become a problem in the international market place. Comparative advantage has a red line. Much like the space economic theory. Once certain spaces get filled up and others have nothing then it becomes unfair. As such China's space economic calculation is starting to get filled relatively high compared to other countries that also need to be civilized and secured. However, China wishes to not help out in civilizing other countries via industrial manufacturing as they are just as afraid to let go as the old Capitalist as in Senator Sherman's days. However, the balance must be at high costs be kept. It is imbalanced because of a current over crowing in the international marketplace by one country. This statement is true. As the US and other free market sectors have pushed heavily for China to privatize their markets. However, they have stopped at a very high level. Which as detriments go for cartel and anti-trust doctrines causes huge detriments to the producers and consumers by keeping out competitor producers, and causing consumers to lose jobs through exploited comparative advantage theories in which wish to become relative absolute advantages.

Oh the gleam don't let it burn your eyes ladies and gentiles.

"While the 1980s and early 1990s were somewhat volatile, including a slump (1989–90) and episodes of high inflation (1988–89, 1993– 95), GDP growth was both high and stable from the mid-1990s until the global crisis hit China in 2008 (see figure 1). GDP growth had slowed around the time of the Asian crises in the late 1990s, but picked up speed again in the 2000s, peaking at 13 percent in 2007"

This is a statement of fact and see not how it presumes your primary statement of rejecting that China was a cause in the world economic imbalance. I am sure you will use it to build a statement. Still have not heard any effects on how Chinese unfair markets or centralized strategies affect the international market place.

"Annual growth of the real capital stock has been even higher and exceptionally steady, indicating a focus on capital accumulation in China’s development plans."

This statement along with the understanding that Levy has about China's high subsidized market place and restrictions on SME's or PCB's shows that if China is a capital market. They therefore wish to gain capital. One of the best ways to do that with a country that is bent on not properly privatizing SOE market shares is to use the SOE's to gain the capital through strategic campaigns. As such this high wish for capital can cause economic imbalances. This is because again instead of China thinking about helping other countries develop through trade or industrial revolutions. China is thinking about is own capital wishes and how to sustain a high 10% growth rate. This then shows that there is inherently an imbalance in international economics. As through legalities if China does not allow other countries to compete fairly with them then they are acting in cartel and anti-trust fashion. As a matter of fact China is so into gaining Capital. That it is currently seeking free trade agreements with countries that could not compete with its Massive SOE cartel activities and China knows that. This again will cause a basic imbalance as China uses its padded markets to move into foreign markets and set up government entities much like a military would set up bases. pg 4 with outside sources that point can be used against the primary statement that you do not believe that China was a cause in the economic imbalance.

"Confirming that China’s growth process has been capital rather than labor intensive, annual growth in labor productivity has only been little below GDP growth (on average, about one percentage point since the 1990s)." This Can be explained in a hybrid economic theory. Were the reason why labor is not growing is because China is using comparative advantage to specialize in those trades that it only finds itself needing to keep gaining capital. As such China has found that manufacturing and high technology are two areas that can gain it capital. Therefore, China has not really gained any labor points because it has just moved the labor from one point to another. This is inherently because it is a Communist State were it heavily regulates its industries. As such i would think that the actual labor pool would have started to decline a bit because of privatization. However, because China has such high State Owned Enterprise market share they do not feel the full blow of the economic imbalance. This is due much to a centralized economy. This can be shown by unemployment records. Were China had a low 4% unemployment while the US and other free markets ran and run upwards of 10% unemployment because we do not pad our markets. This again creates an economic imbalance. As because China has such a high protected market place due to SOE' it allows it to artificially procure free market enterprises so that it can push up its capital investments. This then causes the free markets to lose more liquidity in their business cycles. As the US has lost its job sectors primarily due to SOE cartels entering the US without any kind of proper weight on them. This then allows China to keep is economy relatively stable while the US and the free markets have to fluctuate because China will not allow more imports into their country. Will not raise their currency to a proper rate so that other countries can gain comparative advantage to create more secure and safe market places to export to and therefore, causes a ripple in the international marketplace because of China's inability to share with other countries much like the free markets shared with China. As such this statement is again a statement of fact. pg 4

"During this period the GDP share of the agricultural sector has shrunk from 40 percent to below 10 percent, while the services share increased by six percentage points to 36 percent and the share of industry by 20 percentage points to 55 percent, with the agriculture share in total employment declining from over two-thirds to around one-third and the urban population share rising from 20 to 45 percent." So China's economy is rising that is great more statements of facts. However, you conclusion is derived that because China's economy is rising it has something to do with the China not being part of the economic imbalance. As a matter of fact this is false. The real nature is that China wishes to keep its high growth rate that it has seen for the last 30 years. Even thought it has caught up up with the other 1st world economies already. These data sets of facts that have been used show nothing more than a natural conclusion that if China wishes to keep growing they have to keep the international market place at an imbalance because the other countries that are less fortunate and need to grow will not be able to compete with China. As the date sets of facts that show the growth rate of China in effect to the allowance of other countries to gain comparative advantage for their space economic theories is not here. As such China wishes to keep the mansion and the absolute advantages much like the old Capitalists in which Senator Shermani had to fight against their comparative advantage exploitation as it was causing a huge economic imbalance. I hope that these statements of growth will be better backed by data sets that explain ho China's interior growth is helping the international market place. Because through Shermani theory's of cartel and anti-trust such monopolized heavily subsidized and SOE protected markets as applied through old capitalist style monopolies and cartel actions cause huge detriments and rifts in the market place much like we have been seeing in the international market place.

"Meanwhile, annual population growth has slowed down from 1.5 percent in the 1980s to 1 percent in the 1990 and 0.5 percent in the 2000s; labor force growth slowed from 3 percent in the 1980s to just over 1 percent in the 1990s and just below 1 percent in the 2000s. With a population of 1.33bn and labor force of 800 million (in 2008), China is far advanced in its demographic transition and the demographic profile of its working age
population is near its peak (partly owing to the one-child policy of the 1980s).1 Remarkably, in purchasing power parity terms, real per capital income increased twenty-fold since the early" That is great more statement of facts. Its going to slow down a lot more too. That country can't sustain such a high population growth. They are going to have to start allowing more freedoms to slow the creation of new human beings in that country.

"1980s; based on a poverty line of $1.25 a day in 2005 prices, Chen and Ravallion (2008) calculate that China’s poverty rate declined by 68 percentage points over 1981–2005, leaving 635 million fewer people in poverty." More statements of a growing country that I believe have nothing to do with proving the point of being at fault for economic imbalance.

"As to the foundation of the Chinese economic miracle, three factors may be singled out
here: industrial policies, controlled integration into the global economy, and heterodox
macroeconomic management." Now we are getting somewhere. Industrial policy SOE cartel activities and concentration of export then acquisition soe cartel strategies. Controlled integration, could be that they were controlling their industries through unfair uncompetitive subsidies and red phoneSOE's. Those are all stick person theories that I just took a statement out of context and tried to make it look like it was stated that way much like Levy's false dichotomy.

Poverty data set very proud to say that China has become a civilized world based on Lockean Economic Principles and a basic stream natural theory of economics. However, their strategic SOE actions are causing trouble in the field. I need to write a full article to bring back the imperative detriments to monopolies and cartels and ant-trust activities in the international market place.

"Through a fine balance between government planning and market forces these three factors have acted as interdependent engines of fast-track development." Well that is arguable.Fine balance would mean that your statement about private enterprises or SME's needing to be more nourished would be false. So this statement would inherently go against the Levy Institution doctrine of ideas. However, it may be different writers. There is not a fine balance. This is because China has created a padded economy. This economy allows China to sustain world economic imbalances,while the rest of the world crashes.

"As Rodrik (2009: 2–3) observes, all growth superstars have in common that they “based their growth strategies on developing industrial capabilities, rather than specializing according to their prevailing comparative advantages.” This shows again that China has actually done well for itself. I am very proud of them for being so secure and so stable. I still am looking for the correlation in this paper to the primary statement of rejecting the fact that China was a cause in the economic imbalance. Building a foundation is always good just doing a line by line.

"He identifies the production of tradables as the main mechanism through which high productivity growth can be harnessed for fast-track development through industrialization." pg 5 This is true as my theory goes that products that can be trade internationally bring value to a country in which is simple economics. This then allows that country to become strong and have a stable economy in which makes it a very good precursor for balancing out its monetary value with the high countries that can produce at high levels. However, currently find it cheaper in a fallacious theory of absolute advantage to have it all produced in China. So this citation can easily be turned for that fact that China did not want to raise their currency because of such articles of false dichotomies and perpetual backwards theories. As such if this citation is saying that China specifically was building its tradeables to create capital in which it could then keep its growth going. Then it would be necessarily easy to transition and show that this statement is actually more for China being part of the economic balance than not. This is because China has for the last 30 years kept the highest growth rate I believe ( i will find back ups to my one page criticism right now on my specifically narrowed common sense brain tech). So in natural economics it would be that if China is the one doing all the growing and other countries like Turkey, Russia, India and Pakistan are still having pockets of terrorism because of lack of funding for intra security personnel. Then again it would fall to China to stop their padded economics to allow other countries to catch up with China and the high producers. As this statement is saying that China again is going for tradables for capital build up. This then would mean that China's economic strategies are to keep this going. As such then China would find ways to keep outs its competitors from going through the same economic revolution as they have. However, again China did not want to help out, China has gained a huge portion of the international market place, at levels of the highest trade surpluses, very high compared to other countries that need to be secured and productive for foreign reserves and foreign debt holdings. Again this statement goes more for the side that China is part of the economic imbalance because they are rude, crude and they are being greedy in their productive capacity, thats why this I am on it, well lets say the mean streets have made me a little harsh. Further it would also link into theorist who believe that China needs to concentrate more on its service industries so as to raise quality of life for their citizens. As such one way for China to start building its interior for a higher quality of life is through service industries. As service industries create intra country value and not international value. This then would be a good cause for raising China's currency and showing that China has been a part of the international economic imbalance. Because China has already started to take the advice of this theorist though modest and not as honorably as the US Chief and Commander standing up and stating we will fix our economy through financial reform. In China we see still high financial backing for tradeables and not so much service industries for their quality of life. As such, this statement I believe if a failed statement to include in a paper that wishes to claim that China is not a part of the economic imbalance. pg 5 failed.

"In China’s case, too, industrial policies based on successful government planning have played a vital role." This is a very true statement. However again failure for your primary statement. This statement is better shown that China is using a centralized economic strategy by way of SOE's and padded economy and actual currency manipulation. Because of instead of following natural economic principles of were you have more gold, more foreign reserves, you produce more, your country is more secure than others as a natural consequence you currency should be raised and you should start concentrating less on tradeable capital and more on service quality of life capital. pg 5 failed.

"In this regard, the focus on tradables involved a controlled opening up to trade of the Chinese economy, with merchandise exports targeting markets in advanced economies and imports of foreign direct investment (FDI) from advanced countries supporting the production of industrial goods in China." This statement is also a good reason why China has been such an impactor on the international market place. As everyone knows that everyone supported China in their years of security and stabilization through production and industrial revolution. However, the last 5-10 years when China should have been leveling off their economy to start to also join in on helping other countries in the pact of an advanced economy through allowing such countries as stated previously to start importing more. China kept a high trade surplus strategy. And as I theorize will go right back to it once the free market business cycles start to boom after 2014 when the uses new business cycle driver the insurance service industries picks up. As such this statement shows that unlike as China thinks it was the free market places that helped China gain such success with the free markets counseling and allowance of certain annoyances which have now become imperatively detrimental as China wishes to keep high tradeable capital and not start to join the pack of helpers. Which then can cause China to be placed in a bracket of were the Soviet Union was and Russia is just now coming out of. A centralized economy that is worried more about its own high wealth and not a balanced economy so as to help smaller or underdeveloped countries gain security and productivity. As such this statement shows a similarity of China's egotistically belief's that they did it all themselves much like their dishonorable theories of the economic instability was all the US's fault and that China had no cause in the international instability. pg 5 failed.

"After spending several decades following WWII as an almost closed economy aspiring to self-reliance, figure 2 shows that the Chinese economy has become remarkably open in the process—with foreign trade constituting 50 percent of GDP or more since the time of WTO entry in 2001." Previous criticism on their left over dishonorable theories of Centralized economy through SOE's which control more than 40% of their economy and the idea that China is doing good so the rest of the world is at fault for economic instability not China. Which is very dishonorable. Again shows that China was helped by the free markets to its current condition of security and productivity. It did not get their by itself and the annoyances of the centralized economy and unfair practices shall no longer be given child like treatment. After this last spell of finger pointing. embarrassing the world that helped it by stating they would not help and then allowing its military and economic advisers to threaten the US with selling off mass amounts of US debt and reserve holdings to shutter the US economy. Which by the way maybe China does not know, we are the world goal. To be free secure and be able to have a bi party political system that allows for more civil rights. Freedom is what all free humans and scholars fight for the balance between it and the pursuit of liberty and happiness. You can't survive on your owned your current strategy to hurt the world through export quotas of rare resources and the SOE attacks on free markets even if the guardians do not defend against it (however I say we need proper observance as the detriments to the long awaited failure of a neo-mercantlist economy will surpass our lives and personally, I like high welfare (public servants, justice, security, taking care of poor, elderly and sick), and good jobs and good taxes for the US, and security for underdeveloped countries, so lets not wait for this to happen) and go to intellectual armories. Will still based on good of natural economies cause your economy to fail in the long run. So my harsh criticism is not just trying to help the US and underdeveloped countries to compete fairly in the international economy for security, peace and freedom but it is also worried about you my troubled child arrogance and greed are not to be highly positive vibrations in the world. the stream of energy of nature takes not to stagnatism, negativity and detrimental ideas as through greed, there is a reason why every good book on spirituality has spots of study on such activities. Siddhartha and the stream of natural economies pg 5 failed. oh buy the way just given countries security items or loans will not help them stay secure. They must be fostered in much the similar way that the world fostered China, and its economy. However, at there are times when a country must be winged, and either join the the helpers or join those in the centralized economic self reliant box of high observance and economic scarify.

"Figure 2 also reveals the sudden surge in exports and China’s trade surplus as GDP shares in the mid-2000s, providing a first indication of the marked impact of the global crisis on the structure of aggregate demand." Ok now we are getting somewhere. However, but I quote, "marked impact of the global crisis" guess your primary statement is looking even less strong. pg 5 failed

Love the graphs:
pg 6 proves my point and theory

There was a recession of the late 90's .com service industry business cycle started to see high government research in the 99-00's as the Fed began to react to the service industry leading the business cycle by high interest rates. This then probable caused a lash out at China for such high trade surplus. As such the graph on page 6 shows a stall of exports and a leveling out. In which then China allows a high peak in imports to show that they are not strategically keeping the international economy imbalanced for their own tradeable capital. This then again goes to show back to the point of the mortgage service industry driving the business cycle. The exports of 05-08 show that China was once again in the clear to begin their Surplus trade strategies as I theorize with their SOE cartels. http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_617.pdf Then in 2009 I know when I began the trace and I am sure the Federal government and the people did too. China then goes through the same routine. They lower exports, probable from demand, observance and basic understand of upset countries. Then they start to allow more imports as we see a high peak in imports into China. That is funny. To go even further back when the US had its saving and loans recession from 90-91 China pretty much wen through the same thing, decreasing exports and increasing imports to switch gears from trade surplus to acquisition strategies. Then once they were in the clear they went back to high trade surpluses. So graph on page 6 failure shows more of an economic imbalance. As since the inception of China into the free markets China has spent more time keeping its exports above everyone imports. As such causing an international economic imbalance as China seems to only allow more imports when they are under the gone from international recessions. This statement would go well with a Chinese SOE strategic acquisition chart, along with a recession chart and this chart of imports and exports in which I believe shows my point of strategic economic imbalance keeping. However as it is possible that the MSS with their high concentration on cyber unconventional warfare regarding the US, Canada and other free markets might try to do a data wipe and replication of different dates and data. I have seen this strategy before for key indicators, at least I believe I have seen it before.

Furthermore on this Graph House of Levy. How could you say that the asking of China to fix their currency is misguided when right before the international recession. China had a huge export surplus, and I believe also dumped many US stocks per SOE financial advisers. Can't find that citation though, The Knight I has gone under I believe. The Rider is still here. Good luck Knight. Study hard and bring forth the truth. See you when you come back to the living. Remember the beer and bread are for sustenance and not for normal consumption. I had to learn the hard way the first couple of weeks. LOl just joking. oh ya plus there is nothing like that water fall purified cold water for a shower. I tell you after 14 hours of eye drying, eye drops, beer bread and page after page of information that cold waterfall shower feels so good. Plus that straw matt that those monks sleep on is not so bad after working so hard. Pretty cool little translator technology too, just point and it translates the words. Those monks are going to make a killing off that device. Imagine go to a foreign land lost pull out the ...... and you can understand any language. Telling you, love those alchy's.

"As an integral part of China’s industrial policies and controlled integration into the global economy the authorities have actively—albeit selectively—encouraged foreign companies to invest in China, mainly in the form of Greenfield FDI." Well it would seem the Greenfield FDI goes against comparative advantage theories which call for specification of trade. As the Greenfield FDI is: "A form of foreign direct investment where a parent company starts a new venture in a foreign country by constructing new operational facilities from the ground up. In addition to building new facilities, most parent companies also create new long-term jobs in the foreign country by hiring new employees." This then is great for China and that Company. However, the direct investment via Green Field causes a sort of backdrop of unfairness for the free market societies. As they lose the ability to create jobs at home and then import those products into China much like China does with their companies. However, as China's biggest companies are SOE's and their government uses heavy cartel and anti-trust activities to keep free enterprises below SOE's by conglomerating smaller SOE market shares into bigger one named SOE's. Which causes the free enterprise of China to lose the availability of those market shares thus causing them to not be able to overshadow the governments entities. It makes it very difficult for China to do GreenField investments in free enterprises. Then again, when China does do Green Fielding in underdeveloped countries it is statistical that they bring their own employment and that other countries do not enjoy the same actuality of Green Field creation of employment as China does at home. Much like what we see in Africa. Were China owns more than 800 SOE's with a high employment rate of Chinese employees. I believe as per articles. This then would mean again if my citations are correct once I collect and produce. That again this statement shows how China is actually causing international instability by unfair economic practices of Green Fielding by creation of jobs for their employees via foreign companies but then turning around and Green Fielding in underdeveloped countries but then not allowing that foreign country to have foreign employees of their own. If my citations I have seen are correct and I can gather them again. pg 6 failed statement. still economic instability creation.

"China has been the number one destination among developing countries for FDI inflows for many years, reaching $108bn and $95bn in 2008 and 2009, respectively."

FDI Means that other countries have participated heavily in China's growth. Again showing that China's thoughts that their own strategies are wait has lead them to this point are not true. Along with the centralized buck passing points of this document that state that it is misguided to want to give back to the world for everything the world has given to help it is also a failed statement. As this statement again shows that China is gaining more and more investments from the world. As a matter of fact I quote " number one" this again shows that our guidance system ME hehe is right on point. That is because China is and has been number one in a lot of things. Foreign investment, foreign currency holdings, foreign debt holdings, trade deficits and very expensive resource holdings. These categories along show that China is a key player in the market place and folks like the House of Levy needs to stop babying them and thinking that by allowing this mass greed of the Chinese government to continue will help the world. As it will not. It will help China. However, China again has a strategy of economic invasion and not economic sovereignty for countries that it derived to be strategically important in their world domination of economics. Especially for the crown which is an international system based on exactly what China is doing. Kind of preempting their wishes to have a one world currency. Under the balance of international holdings. Again which makes the Chinese economy so dangerous. As the Chinese are on a strategic plan of SOE attack that wish to grasp as much foreign debt, reserves and economic infrastructure as they can. However, that goes more with my theory of Blitzkrieg and that has not been theorized properly yet, or tested, or backed. So back to my previous point. If China is getting the number one spot for foreign investments. That leaves out the smaller underdeveloped countries that really need it to lag behind China. This then means that those economies are not built to scale so that other countries can't import to them. As such this leaves much like folks like the House of Levy believe that China is the golden goose for imports and helping countries grow. However, to falsity it is the nature of the stream in international economic that will help. Not the trickle down affect proposed by folks like the House of Levy and others who wish to dam up at the top and allow it to trickle down. The House of I, I like that House of I. LOL, believes that by keeping up this high concentration of China even when they no longer need it as they are secured and safely on their way to a really good competition for number one. However, they will be easily kept out because of their illegal acts of economic of protection and of massive government subsidies during times of troughs and of times of peaks.As such this statement proves again that the guidance is well and proper. As if CHia has held the number one spot for foreign direct investment for so long and at such high concentration it is but logical to think that they are keeping other countries from being able to gain their security and stability. Like Turkey, India, Pakistan, Russia and the others. I would think that the call to intelligence as heavy observance to Chinese economics is well guided. As instead of China allowing other countries to be competitive they wish to keep and exploit their comparative advantages for themselves. Were as teh US and free societies thanks to Tricky dick, they are secure and safe, however, they will use those annoyance to crush like they are doing ever trough. I have not heard anything yet about how China's massive expansionism is on its way or even how it is affecting smaller underdeveloped countries. So failed pg. 6 you are my subjects of my little intelligence battle. The house of Levy, you are not standing up to the guidance's system pin point vulnerabilities tests. I believe my one page article on this 28 page article will pick and chose specific pin point scopes to knock out the paper. many failures many easily turned points for the truth of China is just not sharing and kind of acting maybe a little spoiled from all the years of world and US love and affection. Time to share

"Since 2003 China has also become an important source of outward FDI, soaring to roughly half the size of inward flows in 2008 and 2009 (up from next to nothing in the early 1990s), with developing countries as the foremost destination of Chinese outward direct investments.2"

Again as this paper has not taken into the account of the Chinese Politburo, and their dictatorial democracy or the actual countries in which they back that constantly attack their neighbors in wishes for dominance like Iran which attacks Iraq and employees guerrilla tactics to keep them weak, North Korea which constantly attacks South Korea by small excursions, and Venezuela who is constantly playing the same roll as Iran. While the US is just having to have their allies sit their in hopes that the bigger stronger countries backed by China and their massive outward flow of direct investment will stop their guerrilla warfare or at least use some of that massive monetary inflow to secure their own terrorists. This statement again. Shows that a country that can act much like other major countries do and help build political structures and allied forces against guess most of the countries they are support I would bet hate America. So House of Levy your half style economic paper does not take into account the full picture along with that your statements that wish to show that China does not need to raise its currency or start to equalize its interior through services in which both statements were actually what is the world were you say one thing then say another. I mean in another paper of the House of Levy it is stated that China needs to concentrate on its interior, that would mean raising currency so that exports change to imports. So that other countries can compete fairly from the last 30 years of high trade surpluses. then in another statement the House of levey stated that China needs to help out its SME's which then would allow them to stop world domination of economics through government owned entities and allow other countries to compete in their market place and the international marketplace. so again failed page 6.

"Foreign-owned enterprises feature particularly prominently in China’s exports, more than half of which are processing exports.3"

This statement again goes to my redundant slash of GFDI, which then allows China to gain jobs and the taxes, while then taking jobs from other countries and holding GFDI. This statement is even further a point of why China needs to be guided on a path of equity for international balance. This is because China has a high GFDI which then allows countries business which once create jobs for their country to be moved offshore. This then means that instead of having those countries owners build at home and then export to China keeping taxes and jobs and productivity. China then eats the jobs, taxes productivity and the technological advacments that come with having a high industrial output in those areas of exports. For example lets take plastics as China as a huge market place and power on exporting toys. This then again also goes with China having a huge power in plastic resource chemicals and resources. Which then means much like we are seeing now. China believes that it can place high quotas in the form of tariffs so that other countries cant obtain the necessary resources to build those things. In which China then gains a military advantage as they can easily turn civilian production in military production at higher levels of output because it is not properly streamlined between international market places but stock piled in China. Along with that it allows China to control the industries by basic manipulation of resources like we are seeing in the rare earth sectors right now so that China can gain the upper hand by using upwards of 16 cartel SOE's to work together to produce green technology. This this high outbound Foreign Direce Investment by China comes with a two prong slash to the House of Levy, one is well if they can invest that much in others then maybe they should join the ranks of the high producers and equalise their currency so that its brothers and sisters can compete. 2 is that it becomes a huge national interest when China is turning around money invested by the US to then fund the US's very enemies. this statement fails too page 6

"The significance of China’s export-processing trade reflects the country’s role as the foremost assembly hub in regional supply chains that have Europe and the United States as key destinations for final exports (with Europe overtaking the United States as China’s most important export market in the mid-2000s)."

Again such a strong statement for a house that believes that China should not increase its currency value. It is seeming to me that r wish to keep the other countries down and allow China to stay the foremost hub. When India, Pakistan, Turkey and Russia and others all have need of production and jobs for their interior security. This statement is not gaining you points. You fail again. China being the number one hub means that maybe they need to equalize to the countries of old that were once the hubs. Like the US, UK, Canada and the such. Failed again. pg.6

"Suffice to add that while they are believed to be an important channel of foreign know-how and

state-of-the-art technology, overall, FDI inflows have played only a junior role in China’s fast rate of gross fixed capital formation, with its share declining from an average of 10 percent for the period 1995–2005 to 4 percent in 2009 (UNCTAD, WIR 2010)."

Well House of levy are you hitting yourself in the face there. Where is your primary statement. Oh Levy don't hit yourself you supposed to uphold your idea not turn on yourself. You ok, do you realize that your statements show exactly why the idea to have China raises its currency is not misguided. Maybe if you wrote a paper on how India is being attacked by leftist extremist guerrillas backed by Maoist theorist. and how Pakistan is being constantly attacked by Muslims terrorists. and should how that China is doing such a great job by allowing India and Pakistan and Turkey and for geese sakes Russia needs more money for its security officers too. I mean aren't they being attacked also. This makes no sense. If China is such a place were even the efforts of those who wish to keep the outsourcing of jobs because of the exploited idea of comparative advantage allowing technological advancements n the country that is exporting its jobs, as then is stated that China is believed to be a hub for state of art technology FAILED FAILED FAILED FAILED PG. 6 UPPER CUT TO THE JAW OH OH THAT HAD TO HURT.

"Nor have massive traderelated FDI inflows contributed much to job creation, but, as Liang (2007) argues, may have provided an important conduit for establishing labor practices that follow the neo-liberal “flexibility” ideal and tend to marginalize workers’ power" I will stand down on this one. I agree that the helping of China has raised their labor and marginalized workers power to a higher level. At such , take another hit their Levy, right to the old jaw for ya. I hope that the Chinese people keep fighting for more quality of life as that will help lower their birth rates, as they will have more to do and it will allow other countries to start to compete as quality of life is usually inherent for services. If their workers are seeking higher quality of life that means that it will be necessary for them to start with their service industry build up. As such levy what a better way to help them do that than by raising their currency and equalizing their trade levels so as to allow another up and coming country to build their security and stabilizing. . pg 7 ahh. I.rr

"Be that as it may, defying the wisdom of the Washington Consensus that has ruled in much of the developing world since the 1980s, China’s development has been promoted by thoroughly heterodox macroeconomic policies"

heterodox means this: ah not even old Websters training has me prepared for that one. Oh hit to the head, think some more. I see you mean Marxist economics. However you improperly used the term heterodox as the Marxist economics has been around for a long time and we have properly watched and observed to make sure that China did not become to free to quickly so they did not get the bends. However, they did give the world the bends because they came up to fast without proper regulations from their annoyances and unfair competitions via the biggest imperialist economics which is Marxism. As Levy punch to the I if you know the oh that is a nice cut there, oh brown eye, oh, that imperialism stands for a term used by our forefathers here at home in the US, in which they defined it as a basic unfair competition in economics. Were it was wished that those opposing would be placed own by economic imbalances and unfair competitions. So wrong term. Heterodox more would be for a hybrid model of what China is now, and has become not what is was developing into. Along those lines China was supposed to become a free enterprise country through contractual definition and obligations of those who supported it. However the politicians of new wish to create SOE champions and go back on their fathers and grandfathers obligations and contracts that state that China will form into a free market and will be guided by the principles of free and fair trade. Unlike what we are seeing now. Which is a return to high Marxism in a new form of economics. However, again Hetro. So is was not until recently did China become a heterodox economy. As China is now facing its obligations and turning its backs on it. As China has reinvested in their SOE's and wish to turn them into Champion SOE's in most facets of the market place. Along with the new hybrid economic model they carry. However, was not up until recently that they became this economic model. As before they were being guided to become a free enterprise economy. Much unlike were they have stopped and started fortifying their Marxists imperialist (which is just a hard way to say unfair or uncompetitive, however, the communist use it against free enterprises which is funny because how can a free enterprise compete unfairly with an SOE. It can't it is circular reasoning.) again why your statement is sort of untrue. As China signed obligations to sell off their SOE;s and privatize them in which they did nto keeping the market shares for major holding SOE;s that kept strategic holdings for China. While only now starting to defy their contracts, and obligations to become a fair and competitive market place. Also they did not start to defy the free markets until recently with a reverse in funding of the SOE's as per the old builders where funding heavily privatization. However as of recently the idea of the niceties that we have afforded China in their rise. They believe we wills sill allow them now that they are grown. It is like allowing a grown person to have a child's price. You knocked out levy. Heterodox defying just started recently their boy that big swing really went against didn't it.

pg 7 fail.

"The renminbi’s dollar peg established in 1994 has provided the key external anchor in China’s development strategy." So again unless you can back up this preempted statement with a theory logical data set of how China's pegging of the dollar and massive development has helped anyone except for China this statement fails. As currently, the US and free markets are at a high tech trade deficit with China, a machinery deficit I believe with China, a trade deficit with China, and soon China will have their government owned subsidies in a lot of free market entities economic infrastructures. So sounds like China's pegging is really only benefiting them As I can't see how the US having to keep borrowing money and value from China through way of foreign debt holdings and purchasing. Which then weakens the US market place to easily infiltration of heavy Chinese Government SOE Champions in which will become a staple in the US market much like COSCO ports, which I believe has the highest docking ratio and inputs need cite, along with now Ansteel which just started an acquisition strategy of a Mississippi free enterprise steel, company along with a Chinese SOE rare earth resource company needed for metal. In which would allow Ansteel to unfairly compete in the US as they would have the only connection to such rare steel at great prices. Them making Ansteel the major steel industry owner in the US in as little as 10 years. Again having foreign subsidized government owned companies in the US is a bad thing for free enterprises. As free enterprises can't compete with them unless the legislature properly regulates them like Senator Sherman did. So China pegging its dollar for high development then using that high development along with resource quotas, and tariffs on US steel companies has allowed the Chinese to weaken the US steel industries enough to be able to pick one up and start its acquisition campaign of the US steel industries. Much like Ansteel does in mainland China. Then again what Centralized economies like neo-meracantalist countries do is create fewer owners of business and more SOE's in which they then compete unfairly and unequally then slowing the stream of economics and damming it at certain points. SO once there was a thriving stream of steel industrial owners and market places then becomes only a few with high SOE competitors. So um pegging the US dollar for high development really has not done much for the US. Except take our jobs, take our debts, create debts, force us to lose gusto for manufacturing technology as we can no longer afford the R&D compared to the massive sized SOE Champions of China., page 7 failed.

"Starting in July of 2005 a gradual appreciation occurred vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar as the renminbi was officially referenced to an undisclosed basket of currencies." That is good. I believe they really have no choice in the matter. As the detriments of unfair trade provided by China is causing huge detrimental impacts like massive losses of welfare in free enterprise economies, and even other countries that should be able to compete with China not being able to afford enough security officers to fight terrorism.

"The de facto crawling peg episode then ended in mid- 2008 as stress in global financial markets worsened, by which time the renminbi had appreciated by some 21 percent vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar over a period of three years." So they were under the gun from the last service curve reliance to create an equally production playing field for new economies of underdeveloped countries after 2003. Then as the graph shoes around 2008 Chinese exports hit an all time high. Showing that China was still way below a proper balance of producing and currency. This statement obviously works against your primary statement as I believe you remember not your own graph as presented. pg 7 failed.

"Externally, the Chinese economy has been shielded by a system of capital controls (see People’s Bank of China 2008), supporting both the exchange rate peg and control over domestic financial conditions in line with domestic policy objectives."

When you say something like "We reject the prominence widely attributed to China as a cause of global imbalances [.] and the exclusive focus on the renminbi-dollar exchange rate as misguided. [.]" "This statement helps qualify the previous statement as a statement meaning they think that China is not a cause of global imbalances " And we emphasize that China's response to the global crisis has been exemplary" Which is a primary statement when dealing with such a huge issue.

Your really should not make statements that say that China is manipulating their currency by stating that they have "shielded their system"and they they have supported a peg, and control over the domestic financial systems in line with domestic policy objectives. This statement dislodges your whole primary statement and your paper is no longer valid. At the point when you admit that they are shielding their economy and using currency pegging and control over domestic policies for their own domestic polices. It becomes blatantly obvious that you did not remember your primary statement when writing this. The whole reason for the wish for currency focus, and equalizing of fair and competitive trade was because it is believe to be the exact statement you just made in trying to support your primary statement which in truth and light supports the reform and the truth behind Chinese currency manipulation for their own domestic polices, which are not inline with WTO or free market ideas of free and fair trade and competition. As global imbalances are caused by centralist countries worrying about only their domestic policies and not that of their brothers and sisters. Much like greed does in the fables of old. They worry not about their friends but only what they can gain for themselves. you paper has been dislodged. I will go further as I feel like being a young buch and bucking horns as it is that time of the year. So dislodged page 7. does not mean it is not a good paper. Just in this topic I am probable could be considered an elder maybe. Don't worry there is alwyas next time. learn from my critism and make your primary statement and primary conclusions stronger House of Levy. The House of I is strong in economic warfare analysis and defense strategies.

So lets keep going. Don't give up.

CCP and MSS are Done SOE definitions

2011-06-29T15:30:00.000-07:00

"A legal entity that is created by the government in order to partake in commercial activities on the government's behalf. A state-owned enterprise (SOE) can be either wholly or partially owned by a government and is typically earmarked to participate in commercial activities."

"Also known as government-owned corporations (GOC), state-owned entities should not be confused with companies with stocks that are owned in part by a government body, since these companies are truly public corporations which happen to have a government entity as one of their shareholders. SOEs are common across the globe, including in the U.S where mortgage companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are considered government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). "

government owned mortgage companies.

Rider I

CCP and MSS are Done Communist Chinese international protection of terrorists.

2011-06-16T16:09:00.000-07:00

Africa,
Communist Chinese fund Dicatators that kill their own people then export Han Chinese to Africa to take their farms and jobs.
Middle East,
They protect Iran, who funds Hezzbola,
Asia,
Right after the US found Osama Bin laden In Pakistan, the Communist Chinese expedited 50 jet airplanes and a whole ton of military weapons and funds to arm the terrorist groups.
United States of America,
The Communist Chinese are well known for human trafficking, RPG sales, illegal weapons sales, and funding of major anarchist groups.

As such if for the first time we allow in Communist SOE's to our hearts like we did the beach heads of our ports. Do you think they will love Democracy and free markets as they hate it in their own home land and kill Democracy folks and free market folks, along with Genocide those that are not their heritage.

What does the US do to Communist China, we allow Genocided, Mongolians, Tibetans, and Falun Gong to live here in peace and to protest. We do not fund them with weapons or we do not puppet protect entities that use terrorists to attack the Communist Chinese. We sell weapons to a country that is Sovereign and its own country. However, the Communist Chinese try and rape and force it to be part of their country like they did Mongolia, Tibet and currently are working on the Phillipines. Along with that no Taiwanese every has threaten to kill the Communist Chinese or bombed any of their people, let alone incurred massive terrorists camps inside of their boarders. Like the CCP and MSS help Pakistan do to India.

The Communist are well known diggers. They dig underneath their SOE's to create bases for intelligence offices and military generals. This is 100% true. It is their main way of fighting, they dig bases underground.

Outline Communist China's Military is ahead of the US. Chinese Military Superiority.

2011-06-06T00:19:00.001-07:00

When you government is 50% SOE and only one single power tribe. The majority of everything it does is military and for conquest.

Their opposing statement.
http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-06/06/content_12644363.htm

Submersibles:
The idea that the Communist Chinese military is 20 years behind is comical. The mere fact of the reality is that they are a head by years if anything. Their submericable technology is to the point in which the US has not bee able to reach, via stealth subs. In which have proven this to the fact of impossing on a US drill, and then firing ICMB's off the Coast of Catalina. In which the submarine was able to get through our supposed 20 years a head technology.

Cyber War:

Space Ships:

Amount of troops, via birth rates:

Puppet states:

Stealth fighters:

Proxy Agents:

Mineral acquisition's for fast production of war machines:

Guerrilla warfare strategies:

ICMB's:

Transfer of high technological weapons to puppet states:

Underground bases:

Underwater bases:

Control of their economy via the Military and Intelligence:

Foreign Intelligence operations:

Soldier healing packets and technology:

Drones and transfer of tech to puppets:

The ability of the US to keep any military technology a secret, Military industrial Espionage:

Shipyards and mechanical tech yards for repairs, foreign and domestic:

Massive underground water troop and tech transfer subs:

Political Corruption Units, Pro Communist Lobbying units, v Anti or Even Pro Democracy lobbying units:

Ability to break laws in Communist China for military activities abroad related to economic illegal cartelling and briberay, along with use of ability to transfer weapons to guerillas via SOE's:

Satellite Production:

Technology trade and the ability to produce technological weapons faster:

Technological plants domestic and foreign for tech warfare maintaince and repair:

You tell me, really 20 years commy. Do you really want me to fill this in. Because I will make you look like a beast compared to the US. As that is the reality, then again, I need a job, and why nobody is rebutting their propaganda just means that I have an even bigger niche and should really start MEI.

Shipping lanes for cloaked mech tech and US domestic Communist ladden deep bases with missiles and armament's:

Textile mills for proper clothing of full scale war and proper weather:

Manufacturing machines and tools necessary, along with skilled workers to produce:

Supply Chain Cartels:

Debt wars:

Stock wars via SOE financial Cartels of the CCP:

Nuclear war hidden hidden in underground manufacturing bases:

Female soldiers trained for the special opts and front lines along with massive amounts of first strike dames:

Suicidal Fascist Connections:

Radar systems that can detect cloaking:

Electrical magnetic cloaking devices for stealth bombers:

Electrical magnetic weapons:

International Pressure to downsize US bases domestically and foreignly:

Ip to downsize US Intelligence bases domestically and foreignly:

Intelligence officers as per numbers:

Cultural subversion bases as per Communist wish to re indoctrinate Chinese foreigners back into Communist China:

Ex ray weapon technology to see through walls, satellite and soldier arms:

Biological warfare, espionage and military:

Propaganda, way propaganda they are like 100 years ahead of us in that. I mean it is literally just me defining against it at an even prejudice level, (prejudice just means work ethic, in intel definitions):

Food storage and proper rationing systems, there food frozen bases are way bigger than ours and can support their whole muti million army and conscription units:

Currency and mineral reserves:

International Community Clout, IMF, UN, NATO etc:

Bioengineering:

Artificial Intelligence:

Production of computation devices for further strategic necessary needs and proper lining computations for propaganda along with massive oppressive military regimes against those speaking their minds, like they are the Communists fascist.

Covering the worlds eys's with a cloak as they surpass everyone sometimes two countries placed together, and lie the whole way, pressingly precious how cute it is that we are so inapt against their pro-panda, so cute, we are so nice and loving, f that no more. I am on your case commy PLA and MSS. biatches. That is Mack daddy and the Mack's, rich back at you, and guess what I will not even fill it out because I just blew you away with my outline.

Rider I

You know if you would just become a Democracy and allow other parties besides the brain washing school of the Communist to gain check power in your country, we could probable be the bests of friends, if you also got rid of your SOE's. I mean, just do it. I am going to kick your booty, I beat the Soviet's when I was a kid, I mean I am the Mack daddy baby. Just do it.

I mean just do us all the favor so I can get back to the space economics and stop with the SOE international conquest and share the political power. I mean you know I am going to kick your booty. I mean I was born to do it. The Mack's have been kicking fascist booty like yours since the ancient times, baby. Just do it. Fascist are all the same. think they can beat the Democracy gem. The funniest thing is I will win again and never have to pull a trigger or even use the government to do it. Just like the old goober days.

CCP and MSS are Done Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 53(b),

2011-06-05T01:24:00.001-07:00

The idea that the Communist Chinese where allowed to gain favor of free markets and Democracy. In which was done so through a policy and legal binding contract of disbanding and opening up their markets. Shows causes for such drastic measures of an injunction for not following through, and for actually breaking the legal binding contracts.

It is one thing to allow in their free enterprises which are part of their international contract. However, at this point in time multiple international attorneys are complaining about WTO, Free Market and Democracy trade contracts with the Communists Chinese. We must look into the matter. If we look into the idea of what is being complained about. We can easily see that the Communist Party is forcing their SOE's to expand. Therefore, if it is true that the Communist Chinese are forcing or even trying to persuade foreign entities to enter into contracts of joint venture with their Communist SOE's. We can easily see the breaking of the legal binding contract that the Communist had to follow to gain fair trading standards with the free market and Democracy countries.

Furthermore, if the proper international contracts states that the Communist Chinese are supposed to be opening their markets and allowing more free enterprises into their countries. In which they have turned on and are now pressing more for their massive Cold War Weapons of SOE's. Along with bullying of foreign companies after stealing their supply chain reliance (resources, labor through production and shipping) through unfair competition from their domestic market place. We can then see how the Federal Trade Commissions act Section 13(b), 15 U>S>C Sec. 53(b) should be imposed on all Communist SOE's.

It is not the free market or Democracies that have a problem with fair or even legal trade. It is the Communist Party that constantly threaten, molest and even force illegal trade via SOE's and cartels upon the world. At the point when the mother and father of the markets are allowing such molestation. I say the mother and father are just as to blame for the sicko Communists destruction of the sanctatity of the world's economy. You know what they are doing you are not doing anything. Thus the reality is the one's who know and allow are just as responsible as those that do. As such, those that know must do something.

That is really the analogy I can figure out why our leaders have a blatant disrespect for the US inner most sacred sanctity, our net.

Rider I

CCP and MSS are Done Well what if we do not want to share power?

2011-06-02T22:21:00.001-07:00

Then power corrupts and it becomes unclean and un-spread. Thus causing major disparities like genocide creation and oppression of the poor or weak.

Rider I

CCP and MSS are Done It is single Party Fascism or Democracy balanced power sharing.

2011-06-02T22:11:00.001-07:00

The idea is that in free markets that help keep stable the balance of power of governance tribes. Each individual that is strong enough to compete is allowed to do so. Which means that the power structure of the value of each individual is spread out a lot more than what we see in Communist Fascism. This then means that the spread of wealth is done through individual ownership. The reason for this is reality application. If the Single Party Fascism is allowed to control the market. Then you see major discrimination in the power balance. As those who have different skin tones, ideas or even beliefs are suppressed via power structuring and power balancing. This is because there is no check and balance of power or wealth.

So it comes down to the idea that Marxism never solved in a linear fashion for its very problem it stated to solve for. All it did was create a way to make that problem bigger and much complex. However, in Democracies they do not even try and say they will solve for anything. All they say is that we are properly sharing hear and all are allowed to own their own. Which then allows for the proper root balance of power and economies. It is truth. Communism is a over-complication. In which a single man and a rich man created a circular reasoning. As at that time they was not anti trust laws, or ways for the poor to fight against individual ownership of monopolies. Furthermore, as always I am not saying that nothing bad came out of the idea of sharing. I am saying, that the use of Communism as a single party fascism to control more than 50% of a countries economy via a single party is a complete atrocity to the human kind and power spread and value spread.

Rider I

CCP and MSS are Done The Problem with the allowance of Republicans to have state capitalism.

2011-06-02T21:28:00.000-07:00

The issue hear is that the Democratic party itself understands very well their own evils and desires to destroy their opposition via state capitalism. However, the Republican party as we see them doing deals with the worlds worst big government institution and fascist, the Communist Chinese. Is obviously avoid of their own evils. Their are many reports on political economic balance and the disruption that state capitalism causes in the normal flow and balance of a proper political adversary system. The best evidence ever is currently Venezuela. In which as we saw the erosion of free enterprises and free markets, we saw the erosion of political economic balance. Inside of Venezuela we see the worlds ultimate fascist a military genocidal man who was allowed to rule his country. Much like Gadafi military Generals if allowed such blood lust as genocide or even full control because of their ability to stay behind a line and point a finger on a map. Has been cause for the worlds worst economic imbalances.

We see over and over again through out the US's natural god given right to its own constitution. That they help our Democratic rebels. Who wish to believe in a power sharing balance. As the US sees specific tribes or human cultures that are discriminated against in a single area via a single party Fascism's. So it helps out if US obtain's such power as to place their own lives on the line. In every circumstance we can see that the main root of the inability of the general to be polite towards its opposition is because of state fascism. This then causes its own people to start to be impolite. As there is no fair competition allowed. As such, the opposition becomes belligerent and hostile. In which at mass, then takes up arms as it just wants to be able to speak its own peace and have the chance for its own tribe to seek leadership.

Thus, we see my cite. Which is taken up legal and proper arms against the Fascist Communist. As the US can't compete fairly in the international economy, for resources or even natural god given right to regain its economic surplus via exports. I have become legally and peacefully hostile. Inside of the US we see the allowance of such ability to fight peacefully and allow the transition of power of hand for those who are the brunt of the attack. this allow'a for the opposition of such fascism to be physically peaceful. I can go each day without committing a crime, or hurting anyone. As at the end of the day I feel like I said my peace. Which keeps me and my country at peace and out of physical wars.

Therefore, we see that the Republicans are starting to take sides with the Communist Chinese exactly like the Democrats did during the President Clinton years. This is not because it is in their belief system. As how a conservative could ever allow the worlds biggest government, most extremist leftist group, into its area is basically pure corruption and horrible political representation of their constituents. As the conservative party and the Democratic party believe in competition.. The fact that the players and characters allowing these things into the country are doing so because of bullying tactics, complete lack of respect for their political parties constituency, and constitutional beliefs, or they are pure corruption, in this matter. Stopping this allowance of SOE cartel's into the US is the only way to keep the US from being destroyed. Therefore keeping its complete nature from being taken to a supply chain centralization to the Communist Party of China like the Soviets tried to do.

The basic idea is that we should worry when you allow the Communist Chinese to corrupt a leader of the free world. This goes not different from any other leader that breaks the law in such a manner as to cause major imbalances in our countries economy of economics, or economy of politics.

You can't do such activities without being attacked legally and properly of course. The whole Communist single fascist wish to control the world via single fascist state capitalist will never come true. As long as US citizens fight for it legally and properly.

Rider I

Will it be alright?

2011-06-02T21:01:00.000-07:00

No it never will be. There will always be another fight tomorrow. I will fight till I die. I can fight legally and properly like a professional; with debates and evidence. The Communist 's main problem is they think like the Soviets That the Communist think they can stop the human soul from existing to compete and explore via competition of natural terrain, human interaction or even natural existence of human mating patterns. It will never happen. Marxism never solved for its very problem that it created. Which was a major void and vacuum in power. The basic theory goes is that it just creates fascism. No matter how you run it. There have been whole computer programs, underground fertilizes and fascist groups of hermits in underground caves. And it does not work. There is always the competition and need for freedom.

The feeling of angst and anger just deprived from one's soul so that the popular can tell others what to do. Instead of allowing the natural erge to fight, is horrible and a nightmare. The basic and best and brightest communal theory is natural law. In which it takes the nature as it is. Then thus tries to calm it and apprehend it so as to allow for freedom but stop harm and hate and things that cause frustration. The idea is like watching rats in a cage. In which you know the rats will eat each other if allowed to be stored in a fascist style storage container. The idea of force feeding them drugs and still placing them in cages together leads to the same thing. It is natural implosion. The human being has had this same feeling. Those who are so inert at their own consciousness as to stay in their minds and be able to use their bodies energy to force out their inner thoughts, have been known to literally just implode in thin air.

I learned when I was a kid that when I felt like I was trapped and that all things where being forced upon me. The freedom of a park or even the ability to compete with my friends via a game was the best relief from the inner fire and electrical storm that one can create inside of themselves. This then shows that even the human soul, as when it feels better is competiting constantly. In which if forced to act like it has to stop compete-ting will create a implosion.

If we then take this to a macro level, of entities instead of humans one would think the natural phenomenon would be the same as applied to economies. So we then take a look at the natural phenomena that is occurring in Communist China with the fascist party in control. We see the idea of SOE's and centralized banks forcing things to happen via their single insane non outlet of the Communist Party. This then forces either one of two things. The entity of Communist China to lash out violently at others, like we see with their SOE's. On the other hand to innerly have to allow more freedom for the entities to be able to flow with each other instead of the forced flow of a single group of thinkers.

The one would be shown easily through the international community via economics. The other would also be shown. As the CCP is no miracle. It is in a transitional state. In which the only reason why it has not ended up like other Communist Countries is because it transitioned part way to allow more free will and freedom in economics. Therefore, what some would say is a miracle is actually common natural law. The more freedom they allow the more spread of natural sanity inside of their country will occur. This is well documented inside of the US. As the US forced fascist to compete through non monopoly allowances we saw major spread of wealth via pro competitive laws for individuals. However, when the Communist use such things as SOE's for international dominance we see an actual decrease in the ability of the spread of wealth; via resources and reserves.

Therefore, will it ever be ok. No we will always fight. It is just how we are allowed to fight. Even if we are drugged to the point of insanity we will fight. If we are forced to do something via a single party fascist rule we will fight. If the fight is oppressed then they will find a way fight. As such, the best way to allow the fight is through political adversary and free markets. Why oppress something that is naturally apparent in the soul of the human being.

Rider i
Everything fights, it is just how they fight. I fear that someday the centralization of wealth in the Communist Party of China will cause my people to have to pick up arms inside of the USA. Basically because we will no longer be able to use our voices to stop rich elitist party members from gaining more why we gain less. This is very similar to what Senator Sherman believed in the idea of Capitalism via centralized monopolies of wealth to single humans or groups. It is exactly analogous.

The key then becomes. How do create natural peaceful weapons to stop such atrocities to the human soul and economic balance as we saw Senator Sherman due. This is key. We can't just use the legislation that Senator Sherman souled to stop Capitalist Fascism. As this is not proper and is obviously not working. Therefore, we have to scholar a new book and a new way to stop such imbalances of power. The US and the free world believes in adversary in which allows for the proper transfer and balance of power. However, once one side is allowed to gain more power we can easily see the tip of balance of power. For example, if we look at such state capitalism as we see in Alaska. We can easily see that the balance of power has been used via economic surpluses created to cause an imbalance of power in Alaska. If we then project in a bigger manner, we can see that state capitalism in Communist China has created a world imbalance. As such, how to create legislation on the matter of State fascism and state oppression of free enterprises is key to this issue at hand. I am currently not in the position to do that. However, I can fight via defamation and other views which can slow the onslaught of state capitalism in the worlds free est country and most prolific believer in individuals rights to own their own business and their own things. Which is in heavy decline since the loss of iniative to stop State Capitalism abroad.

If one where to hear the words of CCP meeting.

2011-05-20T17:16:00.000-07:00

Would one real at the hearing of the mention of the CCP Communizing the world as a one world entity, in which they will drive. Would one sit down and think why are we not more offensive towards this nation if these are their ideas. Would one hear the CCP specifically stating that they are creating major SOE's to conquer the market place via Communist economics. In which will force them to control capital and resource markets. What would you do if you had my ears?

Rider I

Water boarding LOL, give me a break, you kill our women and Children and you think we water board you, lol.

Water boarding is how people like me learn how to swim when children. How not to fear water. In which it is just an element you breath when the water is not in your passage of air. That is not torture that is an element of knowledge for surfing. Which any sufer knows when down for a long time make bubbles and breath those. If necessary use snot and your areas in your nose that hold pockets of small amounts of air.

Therefore, that is boring. I had a Professor once think he was funny by saying he would water board me if I did not join the board. I told him I do not have time I am starting a society for Mock Trial, am on Debate and Moot Court and part of the Alpha Phi and Senate, along with that Professor I was taught how to swim using water boarding techniques. He smiled and walked away very bewildered. Then that night I sent him a cite to some real torture stuff, top dog status. It scared him pretty bad he asked me not to torture him anymore. I asked him do you want to try?

I mean give me a break water and a board WTF, really.

That's like jr high summer man graduation material, if not taught when a child. I mean I remember my friends learning how to deal with drowning and not being afraid via a bucket and being tied down to a chair on the floor. They thought it was cool. We had a pubic hair party for all those who could prove they had hair on their arm pits after wards. Water boarding LOl

I mean most of us new how to swim. However, after the old Mac was done, with them they where not afraid to hit the rip tide on the ocean. I mean during the curial if you lose your board and are under you have to dive, if under to long breath bubbles out, trust nature and that there is a way out and believe, and if you do not panic you will either be with the lord or be free from the coral.

Don't water board them, no necky pictures, horrible place them in main hall Federal and it is much worse than those princy terroist jails with lights and music and water, I mean all you get in Fed is cock, fights, drugs and horrible food.

Now I could tell you what the tunnels uner their houses and the flys up their noses really do but then i would have to well not water board you.

F in princy oh no your own cell, your own food dish, no cock in your booty, necky pic's and al my good your own private rave with music and lights, shiat, biatch.

Get over it,

where is my Supply Side Surplus Legislation you mo fo's.

Put them in Fed with Bubba and get over it. Bubba get what every you want out of them.

I want my Supply Side Surplus!.

So here is the new place I will be collecting things against Communist Single Totalatarian Party Expansion Via Cold War Weapons

2011-04-12T18:00:00.001-07:00

For all you ranting raven loving readers of the Rider I's collection of Communist Chinese and individual economic liberty cognitions. Here is the new spot as this one full. I was on a roll two almost a full 24 hour round about when it filled up. I was going to go for a record two day up with no sleep and just keep collecting and ranting. However, filled up so:

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/

Rider I

This one after a half count then just guesstimate has 600 gadgets, and around 654 blog posts. That is the tally for this one. Easy peacy, debate my needsy. US 1 trillion in debt, Communist 2 trillion in surplus. Problem. Not to mention tons of trillion dollar Sovereign Wealth Funds that come from the cold war weapons of SOE's. Problem, problem, debate need evidence, ok, got lots of it, well educated on the matter, need masters degree to stop pending depression due to business cycle historical prediction. Ok next rider I already has a ton of blog posts and gadgets. So, doing good on my peaceful solution to the US's major problem 2nd in line for national security matters.

I mean I figure I need to pay my way through school. Which means there will be no profit as the schooling is specifically for the purpose of the non profit which is to look into the extreme amount of Communist intelligence agents in this country. The basic idea will be to investigate possible areas of symptoms of communist intelligence activities. Which I have been pretty good so far with my first three games at finding for free.

This will mean that I can actually get more funds to actually fund a real non profit and not some fly by night $3 a report non profit pbj. This also means I can fund science projects like the furthering of my tech equipment to pick up thoughts. Which would be great if I could get a warrant to use them in certain cases. I am sure I can get a judge to let me try it on a stack of pile of evidentiary my dear Watson that I have some where maybe no where.

How to create standing tall solar pannels that collect energy and do not reflect light.

2011-04-12T17:31:00.000-07:00

This is basic Idea. In stead of using the archeif view of laying pieces flat in a row across the ground which lose substantial amounts of vertical area of energy. It could be possible to create tall druid alters to the sun resembling the George Washington Memorial. In this manner theire should be the proper collection plates around the whole sun alter. Then there should be attached reflection grids that when the light is reflected from the towers is actually collect again. This then would creat a higher form of energy collection while utiziling the space better. Also the re collection mini panels would stop the glare from going into the world. This then could mean that the backs of thise mini reflection collectors could be painted green, blue or even have min cloaking devices that make it look like it is just part of the scenear using proper low electrical lcd screens on the outside of the sun later. This then creates a much higher wave of collection and also a prettier thing to look at. It could also be possible to make them look like trees on the outside of the reflectors if proper created. This then could allow each branch to not shade another aread if proper placed with the sun times, and the dial necessary. This then would allow the actual leaves and branches that are attached to the mini non reflection grids to also collect more solar energy.

Rider I
Ok now I have to set up another blog post becasue this old bunny ran out of energy. Sucks I thought it was going to go on to at least I entered my first tri's i.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6kx14FdbWQ

Oh and another warrior takes up a peacefull Democratic stop to Communist expansionism via cold war weapons. I feel I will be to late though, as our current tri's i's act with impunity for Democracy when they are threatened.

Posting on Communist Chinese Spy tried for Treason.

2011-04-12T06:41:00.001-07:00

http://pauldavisoncrime.blogspot.com/2011/01/spy-for-communist-chinese-sentenced-to.html

As a Free Enterprise how to deal with cold war weapons when they attack you.

2011-04-11T18:44:00.000-07:00

Currently I have been on two citizen run checks against cold war weapons which have unfairly competed against free enterprises. First, was the idea that Ansteel which started the rare earth resource cartel in Communist China should not be allowed into the US to buy a US steel mill stock. Nobody listened because we have a bunch of weak leaders who bow to economic warfare threats. Then I was on a citizen committee outside of the government NGO. That looked into the Communist possible attacks on the BP platform. As the relation ship between the explosion and death, the Venezuelan platform owned by an SOE going down smoothly and then Hugo stabbing his people and the his people's best economic ally in the back was to much to bare. As such, we where able to get a proper funded entity to write a report on the matter proving the Communist had actually been hacking the oil enterprise to compete unfairly with them by using their financial information for the benefit of the MSS and SASAC to plan future hits on static point and other bigger style economic and unconventional warfare so as to help their oil wells become bigger and better than the free worlds.

The main thing you have to understand in this world is that if you own a business and you want to go international you need an economic warfare analyst to help you. You can gain all the information you want. However, once the Communist find out you are going to go international they will see if you are weak or not and if you are they will shut you down by static point attacks on your business. The council has seen way to many business shut down and lose thousands of dollars and possible business transactions all because they where free enterprise's American enterprise and because the Communist wanted to give their business a better edge. This is illegal. However, if you are not a major corporation, or do not have a proper economic analysis watching your systems and possible major intelligence attacks, you are royally screwed. The funny thing is that this is even if you kiss their butt they will still attack you . For example a Canadian civilian committee watching communist economic warfare found the Communist too. They had actually attacked an entity that was being nice with the communist. But the Communist took the niceness as weakness and hacked the server which was lead back to an MSS and SASAC tied agent of Communist China run server system.

As such, if you really wish to have a small business go international you are going to need to pay a professional economic warfare analyst to help you out. This is basically because, the US has completely lost its nerve regarding cold war weapons and would rather be conquered and destroyed then create strong defense against cold war weapons of SOE's, cartels and the intelligence teams that manage the whole communist economy.

I would say that you need to find someone, who has the experience with server defense, economic basket reports, and the necessary defense skills to properly obtain areas of structural defense against static and other types of economic warfare. The US government no longer is able to protect its own business from the Communist Cold War Weapons. This is primarily because our representatives as a majority do not recognize in public the threat that the Communist Chinese SOE's and cartels have against US business. As this would upset the ruling single totalitarian party. They would rather keep being funded to allow the Communist to destroy our international market place and political clout than actually stand up and say no, your king style SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds are supposed to be being disbanded so your wealth can spread out in your domestic market place. So as to create a bigger market place for other developing countries to trade with their market places. Not to use your cold war weapons to own foreign market places with troops and intelligence agents.

Therefore, since our intelligence no longer can sustain a proper defense to the Communist Cold War weapons you have to protect yourself from a foreign government attacking you in commerce yourself. I suggest finding a professional to help you out and make sure you are either under the radar or if you are already being hit like some companies I went in and advised for. You might want to have a proper outline to be followed before you lose millions in courteous due to static point upsetness, lost business time due to dealing with minor problems constantly and many other areas that can cause a business with a few static points to completely crash. I saw one business lose thousands of consumers mainly because they would not listen to me when I told them what they needed to do. Then again, it is not like I am self proclaimed professional economic warfare analyst. Then again, the business I have saved where a lot nicer than that one. That business entity went against its very values that it preached. Nothing I can do if you don't pay me or if you do not wish to listen to the demo outline I gave them. I mean even the demo would have stopped major static point attacks long enough to catch them back up

Hiring me at this time will be costly. As this skill is a big niche and there are very few people with my skill set.
Rider i

The IMF is Favoring Cold War Weapons over Free Markets.

2011-04-11T17:14:00.001-07:00

The IMF is Favoring Cold War Weapons over Free Markets.

The IMF Recognizes the Free Market Soviergn Debt and the Cold War Weapons Soverign Surpluses. However, they still give more clout those entities which hold the cold war weapons and are supposed emerging markets. We can see this by the recent move of clout in the IMF from the Free Market Countries to the major Cold War or neo mercantalist countries. These countries are considered emerging. However, Germany, Russia and Communist China all have very big cold war weapon policies. In which centralizes their people's money in the governments hands and stop is from being able to properly spread out via the individual whims of the market place.

These differences of the free market versus the neo mercantalist economy then give the neo mercantalist countries a distinction of having more displaced income inequality. Which, the Communist Government has juts written a full scale report on the US's income inequality explainging that it is just as bad as the Communist Chinese. At this rate we see the other two Russia and Germany are really not in any shape to be called emerging markets. They are in no way a new economic stable powerhouse. They have a for long time been able to keep up with the free markets. However, they are just holding back on actually fully transitioning into free markets.

Then the IMF states that because they are transitioning markets they are allowed higher clout in the IMF. Then again, the Communist Chinese regime has come out and blatnatly stated they will not transition into a free market economy nor a Democratic Political economy. As such again, showing that IMF is really not properly dealing wit the neo mercantalist. All they are doing is favoring the rich elitiest countries that prefer to create income inequality via centralized cold war weapons instead of allow a proper free market to spread out the wealth of the countries.

This then preference is actually because the IMF has been properly coutred by Colonial Maoists and Bolshevkian believers of Communism. These people then have decided that the world is a better place off if the countries of high cold war weapons have more clout in the International monetary system than the actual real true beleives in proper fair and just competititon the free markets. This again stands firmly with the idea that the IMF has created a single international currency reserver system. Which it has stated it wishes to use to take out individual countries and cultures currency and value of their currency and implment a Communist Bolshevkian idea of a single currency for international trading that is related to anti Democratic or even anti free market value system.

This favoring of the cold war weapon countries or better known as they are tyring to word turn, as the neo mercantalist countries at the top of the clout. This then means they get priveleages for loans and abilities to help other countries develop. Again showing how the Communist idea of a single international one world order and currency is taking over the IMF leadership. As the those nations with cold war weapons will develop countries in the image of the Karl Marxist manifesto instead of the Lockean, Smithian or Marshallian ideas of individual ownership of labors.

We already see this happening in developing countries. Where the Cold War weapon countries are gaining more favorable termsn from the world bank and the IMF. In which they then turn and are able to create more sales of durable goods and positive income creation goods to developing countries. This then leaves the free world in a service bell curve reliance which is a major detrement to the free world without a proper check and balance by a produciton curve to bring in positive income for the country.

This then further hurts the world. As the real countries that are developing like countries in the EU can't gain the proper fair loan treatment to create a more civil government and stable country via free market ideas they have accepted right away. Where as compared to the neo mercantalist that would rather keep their cold war weapons for power and reserves. This then does not help the neo mercantalist as they will not use the better terms of economic privelages to actually help their own citizens, nor the citizens of the countries they invade with their Cold War weapons. As such, this leaves not only the free world market big boys and girls out of the cold, but it stops the real emerging free markets from being able to deal with other real emerging markets so as to create even more markets for all.

This idea that the major neo mercantalist or cold war weapons holders should hold more power in interational affairs is very unatheical just out right disrepectfull to the basic ideas of the free market which freed most of the world from full blown communits cold war tactics. Along with that the IMF has more than smacked down in the face the way of the free market. As in Communist China's report to the world regarding US civil affairs. The US is not much better off domestically than is the Communist Chinese. At this point with the very lead neo mercantalist who took power in the IMF stating that the US is equal to them.

I must say the only differences I see in Communist China, Russia or German is there cold war strategies of SOE's and Soverign Wealth Funds as compared to free world markets individual whims and power to the people via leaving the ecconomic wealth domestically for individuals to trade instead of having government entities act like economic military take over machines to destory real emerging free market places. While also creating the worlds biggest oxy moronic idea that the real developing and emerging markets of the world like the ones that accepted the free market strategies in the UE should be crapped on and the neo mercanatalist who kept the Bolshevkian and Communist Chinese ideas of cold war weapons should be allowed to not only crap on those real emerging and developing countries but to destory any possible Soverign Wealth balance. As the neo mercantalist constatly create huge amounts of Soverign Wealth funds with their communist cold war weapons of SOE's, which take away from their domestic market place and strip foreign domestic market places of their ability to own their own labors.

Rider I

The Reason why Soverign Wealth Funds and State Owned Enterprises are a threat to the Free World.

2011-04-11T14:32:00.000-07:00

State Owned Enterprises & Sovereign Wealth Funds are a Threat to a Free Market

I. Freedom

Freedom in the sense of government does not mean that one gets something for free. It is a term of endearment for the natural order of things. This natural order as represented by the Druids ancient belief in natural things. Has come strong and holds strong inside of the US and other countries that believe in a free government. This then represents the closeness of the government of the people as to what nature would allow a person to have. The idea of Freedom is based on the principles of individual ownership of labor and property.

The root civil indispensable right of all humans to own their own labor comes to the form of a natural matter. In nature if humans where allowed to be. They would thus own their own food and chose to participate with the others in trade and barter for their trades. In which would be deemed based on the value of the market or the value of the community in which each material that an individual had was worth. For example, if the ability to catch and have butterflies around a spiritual human that told stories was considered a valuable thing. Then in that society that individual could sell their stories to people for the exchange of goods in the form of a place to own and have for their own and other things that that butterfly story teller deemed valuable to their selves. In today's world we call these people entertainers. Much like the Druid culture of old these individuals are valued at the highest form of value. This is mainly because they represent the freest form of wish that the majority see as the ability to be free. In which allows them to tell stories and create butterflies. This then shows the value of the society as a whole in regards to freedom based on individual labors. As, when a society places value on an individuals ability to create butterflies and tell good stories, this then shows that the the basic idea of enslavement to the commune is not a high standard.

This is because the ones that are enslaved in an unnatural order would then place the highest value on the enslavement of the human beings. Which is very similar to the opposite of a free market which is an State Owned Enterprise and Sovereign Wealth market. As these markets with regards to individual labor are seen with having the slave drivers at the highest form of wealth and value and the freest and most inspiration for natural freedom are at the lowest. In such the idea that artists are low scum and the enslaved are the highest form of value. This then is the complete opposite of a free market with regards to natural order of freedom. This being the regards to the ability to own ones individual labors it would be similar in a natural order that the human would wish to have their own area to call theirs and store their things so that others could not bully them out of it or even take from them without a fair competition.

Fair compensation for an individuals value usually comes in the form of one of humans most innate natural feelings. The ability of no matter who you are in the majority when you see an open space and it is roomy you feel free and your spirit flies high above the clouds and stars. This then explains the natural feeling of one allowing one to own their own property is such a high standard. One can see that in places where the human species has more parks or open space or even more square mileage for their own personal soul use, they are inherently happy. These studies have been proven by city builders and also soul cognitioners. One of the main things to help someone get over depression or other soul problems is to take them into a field and intoxicate them with proper chemicals and allow them to be free. Where as in places of high concrete jungle density. This being the idea of little to no open space and walls everywhere. It creates a sort of human consciousness of encrampment. Which usually leads to high levels of crime and other sorts of innate soul cognition able problems. However, the idea is then to allow the governance of the human to feel as free as possible. This then causes as little as necessary cognitional problems. Being primarily cognited through a form of a free market system.

I. Free Market

So with Freedom in the sense of government meaning placing value as close as possible to a natural form of human relation between each other. We now look at the main place in which people interact in a daily practice. As such causing the worlds biggest areas of concerns and basically ali wei know is that we have to interact with others to get through live in the majority. Along with that most humans are social beings. Therefore, the market is a place where folks can get together to interact for their values and whims. These whims are based on their individual tastes and values. As one person could like humus, and another person potatoes. These are different individual likes. As such, this interaction then becomes a necessary place for people to trade value and their goods for people who have the whimsical desire for their goods.

Thus if a market place is where humans interact to trade value for their whimsical desires of another persons values. While freedom means the ability of the governance to allow humans to feel as natural and without cramp as possible. Then we get a place where individuals go and natural through freedom trade their values with each other based on their individual whimsical desires. This then means that humans will be interacting with each. As when anything comes into contact with another things rules and values or fair interaction must be placed upon the interaction so as to fairly allow each to seek their individual whims without the other forcing via physical or other bully tactics their wish to have wealth via unfair and unjust manners.

                                                                      Bullies are usual the people that will try and enslave other people for the bully to gain further value for their whims over others. This then causes a major problem as it causes internal conflict and unrest in the free market place. This market place then no longer becomes a free market place and as such becomes a scum's slave driven market where they all work that one bullies ideas of whims instead of the proper spread out value and whims of the whole market being able to work for itself. This then centralizes the wealth to one bully and then starves out areas of the market place that could have otherwise been health and surviving if they proper individual whims of the market would have interacted without the bully getting involved in the pace of interaction.

                                                                      The interaction of the bully in the market without a proper check and balance then causes major imbalances and injustice via their unjust manners. The imbalances are caused by the bully taking the value out of the market and away from the individuals for the bullies whims. Which could be anything thing from international conquest to fancy things that impress the ladies. (the real Kings grail's do not care about wealth but love the idea of freedom and love for the people /||\) Either way it is unjust. As the value that would have spread the market out with a better cushion for the individuals was wrongly taken from the market place. Thus causing the market place to a leak in its values. This then becomes sort of a black whole. Which instead of helping create a moss style spreading of energy and value. Forces each individual to lose its ability to grow and expand as the bully then directs the market place in which it wishes so as to create more of its whims instead of the individual and the market place as a whole without the unjust behavior of the bully.

                                                                   The bully then must be dealt with properly. This is where we get to the free market as a free entity without bullies being involved in the market place. The idea then comes in the form of regulations and other forms of fair governance via a check and balance of other entities in the market place. This means that one person must have a fair chance to have their individual whims and value sold in the market place and a fair environment to be allowed to spread and grow. As such the bully who wishes to centralize the wealth of the market place for their whims then must be properly checked and balanced and forced out of the market place. This then was what the cold war was all about. The idea of taking out the single party totalitarian rule of the communist party out of the market place. As the Communist Party was using the enslavement and unjust bullying of citizens in State Owned Enterprises Carteld with each other, or Cold War Weapons for Short. As such, these Cold War Weapons create massive Sovereign Wealth funds that where bullied out of the free market to be used as international dominance and further proliferation of more bullies. As other countries can't compete with Sovereign Wealth Funds control and massive economic weaponry so they also have to build the weapons. Causing a bigger stealing of wealth from the individual whims so as to be placed into the hands of the bullies so they can use the stolen funds from the people for their idea of their whims. As the purest form of Democracy is to allow each individual to vote and have their own. As no matter how good one can represent no one can represent an individual better than their own ownership of labor and value. Thus, we see where the SOE's and Soverign Wealth funds become a huge detriment and threat to Free Markets.

I. State Owned Enterprises and Sovereign Wealth Funds

The State Owned Enterprise and Sovereign Wealth Fund is an ancient Monarchs way to control the masses via wealth centralization and control of the market place via the Kings court. These ancient economic warfare weapons against the people and which SOE and Sovereign Wealth funds still call today peasants, I dare say with hiss in my voice and little spiders in their hair. Or should say dragon flies and crickets, that a Druids first soul cognition start small and work big. Spiders move veer fast and are hard to connect cognitively with/||\ The ancient Monarchs used to force each individual to work for the King in a SOE in which was supposed to be for the whole of the community with very little pay. Which was just enough to barely afford a few scraps of food and barley anytime to collect material to create a home on the King's SOE and lands. Then the King would create Sovereign Wealth funds. Which where primarily for fighting against foreign Kings and so the King could create a bigger better castle to preserver his SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds. In which, where then used for such things as to create a close court of single party rulers that would help him rule over the land. Thus, forcing all of the people in the market place to live under the Kings whims.

Today, we still this idea used. However, today instead of actual ordained Kings we see more war lords and single party totalitarian rule. With a very few left ordained blood lines. However, the true mery one has given up its Sovereign Wealth Fund and SOE's for the people to have a fair and proper market place. All so the whims of the people can feel free and live a peaceful life in Democracy. These entities primarily use the SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds to create international political clout and control of other's market places via their bullying of their individuals free markets. This then allow them to create more places for their SOE's to go and bully and take from the proper spread of other free markets.

I. The Threat and Detriments to the Free Markets

of the State Owned Enterprises and Sovereign Wealth Funds

A threat is a perceivable possibility of harm that can be caused to something. In which the major factor in the threat has been perceived to be able to create a harmfully substantial affect to another. As one can threaten someone to give a smile to, and that is a threat but it is not substantial and some folks might be upset by a smile and a kiss, but others see it as nothing. So we will talk about the idea of a threat as a major or substantial detrimental impact to the free markets. On the other hand a detriment is something causes an actual impact to a specific target in which forces them to receive a harmful affect. This harmful affect then is something that is enough to destroy the value of the target being threatened. For example, lets say someone threatens to give someone a kiss. However, they have seriously disdained from the idea. Then that person gives them a kiss anyways. This could cause a possible serious life changing even in that persons life especially if they are married and very conservative in their relationship. Again, this is not a major or substantial detrimental impact. As such we will talk about things that seriously affect the idea of a free market. Which will be the these cold war weapons to eroding the very foundation of a free market.

The first attack from a Sovereign Wealth fund usually comes from the trade with an SOE. This is based on the idea that the holder of the cold war weapon will not do business with a free markets individually owned business unless they allow their bullies into their markets. This then being a threat to the free market system. As now the individual and groups of like minded individuals have to deal with whole countries have have their people enslaved to the King or single party rule This then means that they are constantly having to deal with threats from everything of having their business taken to actually full scale intelligence attacks by the government so as to allow their SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds to have an advantage on the specific industrial market place that the business are interacting in.

This one threat by a Monarch or Single Party Totalitarian rule allows others to follow in their foot steps a precedent to enslave their people for SOE's and Sovereign Wealth for the elitist rulers has been allowed. Thus, then we see a complete proliferation of smaller countries then saying that if free market countries want to do business with them they then have to allow their Sovereign Wealth Funds and SOE's in. As such this threat standing alone in itself threatens to completely destroy the very foundation of free markets. By proliferating more cold war weapons in the world instead of peacefully spread out individual whims market places where bullies are kept out and properly checked and balanced. We see that the idea of Democracy and freedom is completely destroyed. The best example is Venezuela. Where the US has allowed the Venezuelan government to keep doing business with them even though they have Communized their industrial entities under the SOE and Sovereign Wealth Funds of a Single ruler. Which is now using that monetary power to create laws to crush the idea of the adversary system. As such, forcing upon his people the idea of the worlds worst theoretician and biggest enslavement creator Karl's Marx's. Further, this then shows that a simple threat can easily turn into an actual detriment and cause major set backs to the spread of free markets and freedom via proper individual whims and the non allowance of centralized wealth for single ruler or party ideas.

The detriments of the cold war weapons are then easily seen. There are have been thousands of reports written on how SOE's and sovereign wealth funds cause poverty, starvation, corruption of power and the inability of the small person to be able to compete or even check and balance the elitist. This then causes major pockets of poverty. As we have seen in major cold war weapons holders. Like King ships and other non checked and balanced single entity rulers. Some of the King ships have allowed a proper check and balance on their activities as SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds making it a little better but the stealing from the market place in the cloak that it is for the whole, which is then given to the elitist to control is still a very big detriment.

If we thus take the minimal detriment to the free market and the spread of wealth via fair and competitive market places we see the most detriment of all. The smaller tyrannical economic countries usually have SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds just for things like oil or other major resources. However, we then can see the very impact of this smaller tyrannical action on the populace as a whole. This then destroys the idea that the people are the King and Queen and inputs it into the ability of serious harm to the market place as a whole. We will take the most obvious example and expand from there. OPEC which is run by mostly tyrannical entities like some very nice Royalty and other single party totalitarian rulers. We then see that the people do not have a proper vote and say in these entities. Which means that the people who have to pay taxes for the industry via protection and other forms of loss, then also lose out on the actually full benefit of the value of the oil. We can see this gain with the example of Venezuela and the anonymous leak regarding a single party ruler selling out his people's wealth to betray their best ally in the market place so they can then take over their allies business. This then could have caused a major back lass to the people as a whole. As the ruler did not act with authority of the real king the people. However, as the country that it backed stabbed is a very nice and understand country. We just alerted our personnel and properly tried to gain compensation for the back stabbing.

The stab in the back from the single ruler to the countries best ally in the market place, was based on loans in which they could have easily received without selling out his countries people's value. This was done primarily to show a supportive relation against his people's best and longest ally in the market place. In which we stood strong with them and helped them as much as we could. However, since he wishes to keep his single party rule he has to create an evil via Machiavellian theory to keep his chair instead of keeping peace and proper spread of the wealth. He centralized the people's wealth sold them out short, and created an enemy out of a friend and then locked his people into a bad deal. All in the name of his wish for power.

This then caused a major detriment to the free market place of Venezuela. As they had stolen the ability of other countries entities to do business in their country without the fear of actually having their entities stolen from them by the government itself. Which in a free market would not happen as it would be the strong and healthy individuals of that market place against the strong and healthy market places of others. However, they have decided to create weak and puny individuals in favor for a strong King and cold war weaponry. Along with that now any entity doing business in that country has to be a more powerful cold war weapon than their own. As any free market business will be afraid that they will lose their funds and entities as such making his whole country a threat to free market places. Again, causing more centralized wealth and bullies to deal with bullies instead of individuals competiting fairly with individuals. This then if one cold war weapon tries to take the business from another cold war weapon will cause full out scale physical warfare. As a country v. a country is war and an individual business v another individual business is just business.

This idea of my country v. your country then becomes a very detrimental impact not just to free markets but to stability in the economy of the world as a whole. We can see this by the Communists Cold War Push for more resources via their centralized controlled cold war weapons of SOE's and cartels of other entities working together under constant economic planning of a cold war intelligence agency of the MSS and SASAC. Very similar to affect of the KGB and its SOE run economic planner agencies. The only different today is that the Communist Chinese actually allow their individual business to become more powerful than other free markets while then trying to state they still need their cold war weapons to be competitive. Where as the KGB did not allow their black market free enterprises to get past the alleyway.

The worlds latest complete crash and collapse was primarily the fault of the Communist MSS and SASAC centralized cold war planning. Mainly so they could keep their single party rule in power and fulfill their desire to create more international clout than the Druid colony of America. Along with their Bolsheviks creators implementation of a one world currency and domination. In which the Communist Chinese did not want the Russians to run the world under the one world order so they helped the US and other free worlds stop the Soviets from creating a one world order. However, now that Russia is more on the side of freedom. The Communist Chinese party has gotten rid of the Bolshevkians. They think they can become the leader of the one world order. As in their warped mind they see the US as the leader. However, we do not lead anything. As all international matters are voted on in a Democratic free market manner. There is no leader of the world. There is a country that just seems to embrace the worlds cultures and ideas and wishes of all to be free, but definitely not a one world order idea of Bolshevkian theories.

The thing communist do not get about power that in a Druids mind or a Democratic or free persons mind there is no ultimate power, as power is always shared. Along with that there is no need for anyone to lead in the international manner as it would just cause unfair matters if there was a set chair of leadership. Much like what we see in the IMF with the Communist entities of China and old communist entities of Germany and Russia being placed in the lead of the IMF. We see a new world currency being created called the SRF. Which these still communist rooted countries wish to have someday be the one world currency. Again via bolshevkian ideological perspective. Also extremely against the idea of many different currencies and ideas of value coming together to work and debate on matters. The idea makes the pyramid to high and causes way to much disparity as we have seen in the very high peak creation of the Communist single currency in the Soviet Union and what we are currently seeing with the IMF's SRF currency. Which is favoring more cold war weapon countries of SOE's than free markets.

Therefore, today the worlds is being lead by the cold war weapons of the world. This is primarily true as we can easily see who owns most of the worlds resources, and holds the worlds most reserves. Thus, if there was a leader it would be the neo mercantalist countries that are controlling and stealing the free markets spread of wealth by centralizing the wealth in SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds. That is the funniest thing they are so enthralled about leading the world as the one world leadership. They do not even realize they have already lead the world into a crash. Which they will do again in their wish to obtain ultimate centralized power over the international market place and domestic control of the individuals and of their country.

I. Specific Case Study

Communist Chinese State Owned Enterprises and Sovereign Wealth Caused the Worlds Economic Collapse.

The Communist manifesto is based on a one world economic warfare strategy. In which the elite completely enslave the populace as the populace are not able to own or operate their own personal matters. In which the theory states that because of individual competition it causes more problems to society than just enslaving everyone to a few elitist who will either make decisions or will mandate who will do what. As the basic idea of Communism is based on everyone working for the community so as to be able to own nothing and yet own everything. This means that if this is taken into smaller portions of this idea being implemented into industries like the hotel, bottle, or grain industries we get a very powerful economic warfare strategy. As the main point of the Communist international and domestic policy is to use State Owned Enterprises and Sovereign Wealth funds to control the people who wish to dissent against the idea of a one world government supposedly run by the people. However, it is really just run by the bullies, as in nature, humans are greedy and Karl's Marx's was in my opinion one of the worlds worst sociological and government building theorist of all times.

                                                                The Communist then use these ideas of cold war weapons to implement their international strategy. This international strategy is used to centralize power in the communists hands. This is done by two major communist intelligence agencies with a very big employment and the worlds biggest intelligence spending on economic warfare. The main leaders of these agencies are economic engineers. In which they learned how to engineer via Karl's Marx's one world economic warfare strategy. This is done by first making sure that their cold war weapons can enter foreign countries. However, they can't have them enter a free market unless the market is weak and much more worried about other things.

                                                                These other worries usually come from a trough cycle or a crash of a countries whole industrial bases. As the free world is based primarily on services since it can't compete with Communist Cold War weapons we see the basic root foundation. This foundation is that idea in which the communist build up a major peak in international countries based on their cold war weapons dumping tactics. Which over feed countries with low wage products so as to make it impossible for the country to actually keep a stable positive economic balance in any industrial trade source. The industrial trade surpluses are then cut down as the country becomes more and more reliant on the service bell curve reliance. After this is done we see an implicit spike in the countries economy. This is done primarily through a major faucet of static point economic warfare on a major scale. This includes everything from stock dumping, to cause the rift, all the way to prior housing market speculation to help drive up the service bell curve reliance and the idea that the country can keep borrowing as they can't see the spike coming up that the MSS and SASAC are going to implement.

                                                             The spike after being properly set up with the economic warfare statics points which will not be written on this cite in a row fashion of placement. This is mainly because I wish to make a proper pay for paper or career catcher with these theories. These static points which are easy to see if you know anything about financing or even production curve economics. Then spike the economy. This then leads to a major downfall of the countries ability to create a proper economic balance sheet. As the income that was once coming in via investments is know gone s there is no more liquidity to keep them on the balance sheets. As the industrial production industries have all tanked and moved to the cold war weapons economy. The country has nothing to rely on for a proper way to pay its bills. Thus it is forced to borrow more and to create inflation just to make their bills and try and restart their economy.

                                                          This is where the tricky part gets in and definitely shows me we no longer have cold war economic warfare analysts working to stop US and free world implosion. At this point in the causation and foreign controlled economic collapse the free market actually has a chance to regather and create a way out of the foreign controlled market place. This is primarily by creating a two pronged reliance on a service and a production curve. This then is properly stopped by communist agents who make sure the folks who are weak minded to Karl's Marx's one world order and enslavement to everyone sell out the US. We have seen this two now in the last three service bell curve trough.

                                                          The first time I remember it was the President Clinton. Which received huge amounts of illegal funding from the Chinese Communist party. Then when they took power to help balance the economy they sold out the US military physical security. After rwhich the Communist strategically gained favor of a communist sympathizer and the idea of a one world order. Which in reality much like the Bolshevkians ruling the Soviet Empire, is just a Communist Chinese empire rule. After which the maggot sells the intelligence security of the US to a rat. Then the Communist Chinese had the physical and intelligence security of the US compromised due to the foreign control of the US economy. We then can see this again in this trough. The I's being me, worked really hard to get the green technological a stimulus package. In which somehow our voices where drained out and a rat was brought in. In which decided that all the world we did to create a domestic production curve to take us out of the service bell curve reliance was not necessary and Gorbeck and a Spanish Madrid club in my opinion was able to get that person again to believe in the one world order of economics. This is such, goes like this. Why should the US have a production service bell curve, we are a one world order, you like Marx's theory right? You should get them to give your people's tax money to foreign countries where the communist party members hold green technology industries. It will be cheaper for them and you will be helping your brothering. That is basically how the rat maggot game goes. Just opinion will be edited out later.

                                                       Then the Communist again have foiled any attempt of the free market to gain an actual international trade surplus in a production curves. The reason why this is the most important part of the whole communist foreign control of the free market via bullies is because of flow of currency. The service bell curve creates a reliance on something that will in the short run bring in more negative income via, debts and loans and foreign housing speculation. Which in turn will create the same cycle over again. However, the production cycle which has been shown in neo mercantalist countries that protect with dear threat of complete economic tarriffing, that it creates a surplus. This is because production reliance is basically something that a country needs. The reason why the green tech industry was so important was the stubbornness of the US to pull out of Iraq until they had a decent Democracy set up there. This was easily projected in the underground democratic movement to create a cognition without any help by other single party totalatarian controlled citizens to also want to be out from dictators like we did for the shining star of Iraq, protesting with signs full world embassies ya baby, ya.

                                                           Therefore, it was projected that the oil reliance on liquid fuel would become very unstable as those countries seek Democratic resilience and some minor changes to power to the people. Thus, we have missed the whole production curves and are now stuck. While the communist parties of the world have gained funding via our tax dollars. And the main international Communist party which is in China, has stolen the whole industrial trade surpluses for green technology. In everything from solar, to wind, to cars. As such we see the Communist SOE's and Sovereign wealth's gaining the full control of the free markets of the world. The idea is thus know they can penetrate the markets with their bullies. We are currently in the part in which what the ancient warrior call the killing field. In which the army has been completely weakened and the heads can literally go in and taint their swords and axes with the weakened armies units that are left.

                                                          This is then pushed even further for the bullies of the cold war weapons by the lying of the MSS and SASAC that they will get rid of their entities if they do not expand. This means that the heads of these SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds are now pressed to run into the very markets that the MSS and SASAC had completely killed. In which now citizens of foreign free markets can be completely enslaved to the Communist Chinese elitists. These entities then go in and where there was once a powerful free market where individuals owned their own labors and business. Now is a mass of SOE's and corporations as the only thing that can survive the killing fields thanks to weak cold war defenses is major corporations. Therefore, the Communist MSS and SASAC have completed their task to start to begging their push for a one world economic order like the Bolshevkians tried to do but where back stabbed by their supposed ally the Communist Chinese. This cycle then as the proper production cycle was stopped will start again with another service bell curve. The next time the free markets will be weaker. Thus, allowing the Communist SOE's at that time which will be the world strongest cold war weapons, will be able to easily either collapse and invade countries, or collapse and force countries to leave their international allies behind to be completely taken over by the Communist bullies.

I. Solution to the SOE and Sovereign Wealth Fund Threats and Detriments. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6kx14FdbWQ

                    Now one would think that the best solution to the whole thing would to just stop completely dealing with the Communist go around and pick up all of their agents and boo them all out. Then after that place some whigs on our heads and dump all of their goods into the ocean that where not already paid for by a buyer. However, this is not the proper Democratic way to deal with an opposing tribe. As this would cause un Democratic style resolutions and would be very similar to the thing we disdain so much; an action of a tyrannical nature. Therefore, we have to play the game within the rules of proper boundaries and make sure our party comes out victorious. As such I have come up with a plan to refute this constant neo mercantalist caused business cycle of the free markets that constantly sets the free market backs at least a decade.

                  Moss ogsti then this idea is very in depth for the specific nature of the very probable future depression of the US based on the last three service bell curve trough cycles. Along with a look at the ever deepening deficit and inflation rate. The idea is to get to the root of the problem then sit down with it and figure out what kind of remedy will allow the roots that where torn apart and destroyed to regrow. As such the roots that seem to be causing the US major economic difficulties besides the Communist Cold War weapons, is the ability of the US to properly defend its business cycle and keep it out of the trough. Therefor, at first glance one has to understand that the US is based on a free market approach which would then mean that our main policy is to keep hands off as much as possible. However, the main problem that we are having is that after each trough cycle we create another heavy reliance on a service bell curve. This problem seems over the historical view of my analysts to be just like breathing for the US.

                   As such then the idea would be to properly implicate a realization of the problematic weaving of our economic legislation to create new service bell curves. This can be done on a matter of instead of controlling the actual industries of economy itself by controlling anyone who wishes to create a service bell curve. This then will be a two fold weaver control. As such the first will be that if there is an economic legislation that is on the table by either side that a proper adjustment cycle dealing with will be dealt with in the economic legislation. At current the populace as a whole and the economic legislation as a whole does not seem to reflect this key ingredient to stopping major trough cycles. This is because any legislation that is made towards a goal of helping an service or industrial curve will create a boom bust and a proper business cycle. Therefore, an analysis of a projected boom and bust should properly be implemented in all economic legislation. This then will give a better range of possible areas where the economy might need a little more watching from foreign SOE and Sovereign Wealth Fund agents. So as to keep the domestic free economy strong and to stop any foul play in the areas of possible up turn or down turn. Along these lines a proper two fold creation of any economic legislation should be created. This means that if someone wants to create something will help the apples at at a certain time the apple business cycle another thing like peaches must be helped out so as to not allow the trough cycle to kick in. This is theory as I have not yet began my proper MA in Economics to prove it. Should then create a piggy back affect. Where one economic business curve goes up then before it is to come down its net catcher to soften the blow will begin at mid or even peak prior economic curve. This then should be implicated in a less stringent manner so as to not create another major economic curve. But so as to create a smaller one in the major one so as to slow down the economy instead of dropping it on its head. This then should create a proper adjustment cycle which should have been the key factor to begin with. A

                   In theory if the proper predication of the necessary adjustment cycle is done we can create key spots in the business cycles and predict certain areas where probable foreign SOE or Sovereign Wealth Funds agents might try and control the free market business cycle. Also the soft catch minor economic legislation to help the proper adjustment cycle should cause a much nicer slope instead of a major spike. This then will allow another proper economic legislation if something is found to be necessary. For example, lets say that the US has decided to increase its spending on defense. As such the military business cycle will create a boom and bust in this spending. Therefore, there needs to be a proper adjustment cycle done so it does not peak out and then spike out. Then once this is predicted a proper net catch affect like another minor economic legislation should be create like lets say something would coincide the best with that cycle to help it smooth out the sloop.

                   This theory is the best so far Democratic solution I could come up with. As such it is still in its theoretical stage, and I do not even know if someone has tried to do this before. However, on my basic very small research I have done into this matter. It seems that there is no such safety net for the economic legislation. Which form the mind of a weaver himself would seem a no brainer. That if you create something you have to plane for its many cycles. Much like a family. If you birth a child they are going to go through many cycles. In which a proper father figure should be studied on and read up so they can chose the best answers for their children's cycle activities as natures intellectual beings. As these questions should come from the proper grandfather units on each side. This solution should not be left behind.

In Conclusion

The idea is in American Legislation that when a problem is found that a written document on the matters of its problem and its historical nature, along with the necessary key elements to properly fix it should be coded in necessary codex. Therefore, as we have seen that SOE's and Sovereign Wealth Funds are major threat and detriment to the US. It would only be natural to state in writing that to preserve the economic security of the United States of America the necessary key elements of any economic legislation should include a proper adjustment cycle and a necessary safety net catch minor economic cycle creation. If the necessary need comes to arise to find the author of this root piece of mastery. Look to the Rider I

Ok so the idea was I was going to start another blog.

2011-04-10T18:04:00.000-07:00

However, I would really like to make this one look nice. The only problem is that I have so much stuff on this blog everytim I go to organize it into a structure of relation the thing takes 3 minutes to move one article from the top of the list to the bottom. Which is funny as I used to be able to do that very fast, now it is very slow. Static points I understand as I came up with the darn theory, so they are probable using it against me. So, my figurement is now that I want to get a research position. I have been looking for jobs and no one is hiring. So I figure if I can spurs this thing up, take down some vulgar speech, finish some articles then I will have a great example of how much I love to do research. The only problem is I really need to be able to move the actual articles from where they are to the proper place. For example, with my Communist Chinese Tesla hit on Japan theory. I have all the necessary key elements, the Plot which is they want the Islands and under water mines, The move which is where they test how much Japan will fight against their miltiary by having their stealth fighters past the Japanese Naval vessels in which japan then thought international sanctions literally days before their Tesla hit, then the Communist Chinese literally in salt them which is an old warrior term where one clan to tribe that would take over the next would take their salt business because it used to be the most power full and still is one of the most lucrative, then the key to what they wanted was the actual freedom to mine the islands which they are now doing. Now I have all these on this web cite but I just want to place them together under a heading which would be easier. As folks who read this could not see my theory. I also have the article that proves we have Tesla and that the Communist Chinese stole it from Russia during their restructuring process.

Rider I
Who knows.

Democracy is a Political Adversary System which is like the Judicial System of the Free Worlds.

2011-04-07T22:13:00.000-07:00

Democracy is a Political Adversary System

I. Democracy The People's Government

Demo means in a common text, to show part of, or to destroy. Cracy usually means the literally term of having one move from one side to the other, or to erratically have movements. This idea then keeps any one entity from gaining to much power and becoming tyrannical to a certain entity or group of humans that are living in their midst. The way that this work is that more than one tribe is allowed to gain power without oppression from another, as long as they are peaceful in their beliefs and ideas. This idea is the basic foundation in all free countries. As, history will show that anytime one entity like a family, or political tribe, gains to much power they are very likely to oppress a certain other tribe. The basic idea is order through chaos. The idea is that the human brain is a never ending area of thoughts and ideas. Which is naturally shown in the projection of the power that governs the human beings under a natural order. This means that the chaos is a never ending battle, done peacefully. Which is known as debate or forensics into things of nature or matters. These things apply to the people that are being governed by the major entities wishing to have their ideas in the spot light of writings being held by the middle ground. This then allows the people to live in harmony as they can know that their parties ideas as much as possible will be represented by one side or the other. This then creates a sort of non oppressive totalitarian calm over the people.

The opposite to this style of governance, no matter how you state it, is, a, single party totalitarian rule. Where only one party forces their ideas on all of the people underneath them without a fair and proper representation in the power of the governance. The single party totalitarian rule usually has an ego and they think they know everything. This means they think that they can do best for the whole of the people, because, they are smarter than the rest of the population. This usually as time has shown leads to the oppression of other ideas and the smart intellectuals who have opposing ideas. Therefore, the single party does naturally what all humans do when in power; they become tyrannical and oppressive. When there is no way to check them. This is a natural order of things as if you give a monkey or a guerrilla a stick in a group of others.Then only give that monkey the stick each and every time the gorillas meet. The guerrilla with the stick will do what ever it wants when the group meets. Then the other primates no matter how much they want to try and take the group a certain way will not be able to as long as that primate has the stick.

This then leads into major battles over the stick over time. Either the stick leader will lead the group into a battle against another force and upset their balance, or, the stick holder will not properly take care of its inner circle.Thus, others will get tired of having nothing and a major other primate will take it from that primate with force. Such, leading right back into another single party rule for the primates that have to follow that ruler instead of listening to the pack as a whole. In which would allow a proper movement of stick holding; via who should be peacefully placed into the power so as to move in a different direction. These peaceful movements stop the oppression of the inner circles and also give a proper check and balance from ego's getting their group involved with other groups.

This examples of primates can be seen in major human political groups over time that have lead groups of humans. Major examples of recent times can be seen in my examples. Primarily in those who have taken Karl's Marx's one world economic warfare weapons as their countries primary international policy. These countries include the Soviet Union, Communist China, and the Socialist Party of Germany:

During the Bolsheviks (Soviets for cover name) reign which is responsible for the worlds single party dominance ideas lasting long into the 21st century. In their reign they showed exactly how a primate with a stick can oppress hundreds of millions of people. Their single party rule, which did not represent any other ideas except their elitist of their parties ideas. Went around conquering other countries and just placing them under their name which they called the Soviets. These people then killed people for believing in religion and for trying to own their own things that where not owned by everyone. Which, usually, just meant that the biggest meanest bullies in the society that pushed for more, received more; as they would get away with it. This is because in a real life utopia humans that are not properly checked get very greedy in power. This then ended up horrible. The whole of their governance got tired of the oppression and depressed itself which collapsed that single party rule. Which then allowed the separate entities to become free to properly allow multiple parties representing multiple ideas. In which today are more able to battle peacefully instead of shooting each other in the head because one wanted to own thee other.

The Communist China was taken over by the Bolsheviks. which had plans to incorporate them into the Soviet Block under their ideas of Communism. The Communist idea was in no way a Chinese root idea. The Chinese had just come out from under the rule of kings and tyrants and wanted to be a national society of free people. However, as the Democratic countries did not have the power to stop the Bolsheviks invasion of China via intelligence troops and machines. The whole country became enthralled with Communism, that did not want to share power peacefully with the National party. Which landed millions dead who wanted to have their own lands and freedom. Mainly because the Bolsheviks marched their troops in under the Command of Colonial Mao; along with using the Bolsheviks machines and pilots.

However, after the National party resistance did not die off and had to go underground. They did not like the idea of the Bolsheviks puppeting their own leader. So they decided to properly fight against the Soviets take over. Which then became the reason today why the Chinese Communist are treated so differently than the Russians. Mainly as the Communist Chinese are the main reason why the Soviet empire fell. They stabbed the Soviets in the back very hard at every turn, thanks to National party dissidents cloaking themselves in the Communist party leadership. Who did not want to be part of a one world order idea of the Bolsheviks. This then allowed the Communist Chinese to make a proper deal with the USA and free world to become Democratic. When a cloaked National party member took power in the Communist government. That leader made a vow to turn its country back into a proper Democracy that they once wanted before the Bolsheviks invaded China. In which the Soviets tried to place them under a one world order. However, today we see the greed in the single party rule overthrowing the wish for a proper Democracy. The Communist Party is acting like the Soviets. They are starting to force three sovereign states to be part of the new version of the Bolsheviks one world international currency and order. The National Party and Democratic world are all still waiting and hoping they will let go of the greed and their international stick policy which wishes to create a one world order. I know the Nationalist party decedents are all still hiding in their caves hoping for that day that the communist can share power, Much, like, the Nationalist wanted a long time ago. Before they where genocided by Colonial Mao. Mao was considered a Colonial by the Bolsheviks. Primarily because he had very little strategy and the Bols generals helped him out with most of his major strategies. This is well noted in secret documents in old decedents of the Bolsheviks wine cellars. It is noted he mainly just sat their and took orders, then in the field acted the know it all. Then again the ladies would really have to love you sent and rhythm of your voice to get you that information. Daddy I, you love the limelight girl?

Next up, the worst government every known to the modern day, the German Socialist party. By the way which we can contribute to the worlds worst theories ever in governance. That's German Nordic wish to rule the world for you though. Its in the blood. These people used the Marxist idea of cold war weapons of enslavement of the populace to the elitist leaders to create the worlds biggest economic and military conquest. Event though their country was very small, Karl's Marx's theories when applied with military or intelligence is very powerful (hence the cold war's, lol). These people however, went one step above Karl and used Nicoli which then created an enemy of the state to create more power and centralization of hatred and economic power. Much like we are seeing today in the Chinese biggest conservative party the Buddhist religious folks. The German Socialist picked the biggest holder of free enterprises in the Germany society at that time. This was the Jewish populace. At that time the Jews believed in competition very heavily and would rather own their own business than work for someone else. They where good at it and Hitler new that. He confiscated all of their properties and monkeys (your being coded by the master I) and created a unified front via a bias which is a fascist idea. More or less, fascist are just communist with a bias, sometimes they are socialist if their non biased people own their own and are to powerful to have it taken from them. The German Socialist Party killed millions in the idea of Karl Marx's one world economic order They also went further and tried to create the most perfect commune via genetics. This is also part of the Communist manifesto; to perfect a blood line that is obedient to the commune as a whole and works without rebellion. It did not work. They finally upset the worlds biggest rebel country and we created to many rebels in their communist fascist regime which they then imploded. Got to love Bourbon and good old American Music, or should I say natural bio engineering. As music and alcohol makes the soul wild with ideas of freedom. As any neighbor hood where they served alcohol and listened to American style dance music, loved to rebel and accepted I. Druids know each others souls when they meet. As such, with these examples of human primitive government style ruling. We should look further out into the reasons why it is better to have a Adversary Political System; far out in the club of out of this world, she is.

I. Peaceful Adversary Systems

An adversary system is where you have to opposing forces in a same system with each other. This is a natural from of any house. As the majority of humans have to have some kind of mate to live with or be with. This means in a hetero example, the opposing forces in a house would be the male and the women. This then is a creation of two opposing forces with no matter what you do, or how close you are to each other, they will always be opposing as she is a feme (again don't call my grails females they will grapple to the ground, just me they are for them, if they like or love you then will be for each other). As such they will always have opposing ideas and will have to debate and come to a middle ground on issues. For example, for my favorite tear jerker is the choosing of linen for the house. Now me, being royalty, want a dark wood with candles on the walls and dark red and blue curtains, with leather chairs, and a fire place as my motif. However, I have not found a girl I have dated that would allow me to decorate the House that way, as it is very hard to keep candles lit and leather is cold. So I would have to debate on the matter and come to a middle ground. Then again, I will probable have to come to a middle ground where my office and underground armament is mine and everything else is hers.

This idea then can be magnified to bigger examples. In the primate example. We see when two primates are given a stick. At times they will go at it and they will try and overcome each other. However, the ones on each others sides usually stop the matter unless one has completely lost its ability to provide for its side. However, other times they will work together in separate but respected equals. If we then take this example to governments we can see the example of the US. Which is basically, as free as a government can get without actually allowing full scale tribal councils to work together in separate and distinct tournaments. This major political tribal action allows for the US to come to points and to balance. These balances are come out of the ideas with debate and proper forensics. This allows as much as possible the many ideals of the US citizens. As there are millions of different tribes in the US usually being able to side with one of about 10 major or minor tribes.

This idea is the actual true idea of human nature at its highest element of freedom. So much so, it allows for, instead of, a few strong humans in the society for millions to become strong and feel like they have a real part in their world. Where as a single party governance only allows a small few to get through to gain power and feel like they are actually representing the many tribes of their lands. Currently the idea of adversary systems is being seeing in the conservative parties of the US. In which the Conservative side has allowed the extreme Communist side to take to much power in the world . Therefore, we have seen a whole tribe come out based on the idea of throwing off the docks of America the single party political tribe of foreign that taxes us via debt and takes our civil and social security via loss of jobs and taxes for domestic consumption. This then means that the one side that felt that it was not being properly represented by the major tribe will now have to battle with its side that feels like it was being misrepresented. This then will end up in two ways.

History has shown in the US, one, is that the adversary to the major tribe will overcome and take over the current major conservative tribe. The other way is that the major tribe will overcome them in the long run and dwindle them down by regaining their ranks favor by properly representing their people in economic balance against allowing a foreign single party to run the US and cause high taxes due to single party totalitarian government run entities taking our jobs and taxes! I. Theses two ways of adversary system allow for a more proper balanced representation of the people's views of America and their anti-single party totalitarian government run entities, taxing the US citizens, by allowing a foreign power to take our market shares, and causing more taxes via their unfair economic warfare against US citizens. This then would allow each party via an adversary system to check and balance the imbalance that has been caused by the weakness in foreign policy.

I. The Tribes are the Jury of Who Should Represent the Ideas of Each Party

The Tribes or what we civilly call Parties. These are the people who have made it to the top of the ideological perspective of the representation of ideas. These can be anyone from a eye Dr. to a farmer, to a school boy with some college. It does not matter as long as they can adhere to what the Party believes is their sides ideas of how their people wish to be free. This then creates a proper adversary system within each party. This adversary system causes a proper balance of debates and forensics into each possible Warrior to go to the battles. This usually means who ever can raise the most value for themselves and the most votes. Will be able show that they have peacefully won their tribes adversary system to be taken to peacefully battle against the other tribes ideas. This then allows them to see if the masses prefer to have them govern this time around or another.

These Jurors are a representative of the populace as a whole. As anyone can climb to the top if they think that they are the proper representative for their side. They can also properly give value to the warrior they wish to have represent them. They, the jury of the tribe can always go around picking people up in buses if they wish to vote for the same person so as to their side win in the inner circle of the jury. This is the fairest, and most peaceful way to allow Children to go home at night, and for men and women to worry about their whims. Instead of worrying if their children can someday properly and peacefully represent their ideas of how they think that their ideas of the world would better govern themselves. On the other hand having to worry that someday the government will come and take you away for having different ideas from the single party rule.

I. The Peaceful Warriors of the Tribes Ideas

The Sociological perspective of the people is represented in the idea of public media broadcasting and written word of who can represent your mindset the best. Each set of tribes has their own ideas. From the idea of almost complete anarchy, where the strongest survive. To the complete idea that each individual should be enslaved to a complete sterilized THX environment to the commune. These ideas are the complete extreme and the majority of US citizens do not wish for these idea so they are moderate to operate living standards via debate and forensics into the constitution of freedom.

This means that there needs to be two advocates or more from each tribes ideas to help prepare the best peaceful solution to the necessary element. However, some times things are so against one sides ideas that they will never come to fruition, because it goes against ones ideas. Then if one side pushes to far it could cause major affects and political back lash which could cause complete destruction of the society due to one sides greediness of ideological perspectives. This is what the two parties work to try and stop. As each one will keep going they have to properly deal with the things that are placed in front of them. The adversary system is a balance that must be kept and proper adhered to. The Peaceful Warriors try the facts of their ideas in front of the judges. The judges are populace as a whole that they will be governed by the warriors.

I. The Populace as a Whole is the Judge of the Political Adversary System

After the Juror has picked the proper fact triers. Then the Warriors have create their peaceful strategy. They have to try their ideas in front of the populace as a whole. As there are millions of tribes which usually half of which are happy as long as their rights are not being taken away, or they are having to pay more out of their pockets for the government, in my opinion. As such, those folks who are in the battle and love their system of voting instead of swords, go for those who they think represent their ideas the best. This usually means some folks just vote purely on the name of the party. Other folks actually look into the candidates, and see if they are for their ideas in each individual category of. This is my preferred way to go as sometimes a party member can be very extreme. Thus ah, I do not like extremism, and love my basic rights and do not want them taken from me. Even though, I have not voted lately as I am choosing a higher calling which is keeping the middle ground and making sure the swing happens.Therefore insuring that no one gets to extreme or to powerful. Much higher calling, a very few partake and understand the ancient tradition of just loving freedom and being able to moderate the grounds. As no matter how much I feel about something, if I am asked to moderate I can take myself and my interests out, and then moderate based on weight. This skill comes from years of debate, and speech, along with moch trial and moot court tournaments, as we have to properly try all sides. On the other hand if I am left to my ideas there are only two I go nuts for, my 2nd Amendment and my 1st Amendment.

Thus, then people can have their own free will on how they will judge the Peaceful warriors and how well they competed for cognition of different tribes ideas of freedom. This allows then for each individual to feel like no matter what at the end of the tournament cycle each person can say, I voted, and I had the chance to either squire, or actually try and be the warrior for my side. If I lost then I have to adhere to the principles of the game. If I won, then I can gloat and get drunk and say boo ya. However, I am just happy now when the proper terms of the swing are adhered to which again is a much different feeling of true understanding of root peace, in the world.

I. In Conclusion

The Adversary system has been proven over two hundred years to be one of the worlds best ways to govern many multiplicity of ideas, and keep each in a proper adherence to peace. Freedom comes at a high price and there are those that take advantage of it and give it a bad name. However, the feeling of peace that is felt when you can go home at night and know, no matter what, there is not going to be a big war in my country tomorrow, is, the main principle of Democracy. There is no conspiracy to overthrow it. As the conspiracy is just one to get their warrior voted in. There is no way to overthrow it. As everyone will not deal with anything except a voting system of peaceful battles. In which no matter who tries to overthrow it they will just be thrown out via voting.

Of course there are problems in the Democratic system. However, it is the two or more party power sharing system that allows for the least amount of tyranny. As each party takes different sides and ideas. Which they then have to fight. If one side gets tyrannical then any-of=us can properly rebut under cover of the other party because it will make them look better in the next election.This is the basic root idea of Democracy. If you are a good person, and have ideas to use the proper peaceful ways to fight, you can, and will, be more than welcome in the house of your ideas.

Rider i

Atom Restructuering

2011-04-07T03:35:00.001-07:00

The basic principle of atoms is simple we have eletrons, protons and neutrons. This then means that everything is made up for these three things. So why do things look different?

We then look to protons to see the structure of the atom. If there are more or less and how they are placed around the nucleus accounts for these differences.

Then one starts to add more or less neutrons to that structure to get different building material for existance of cognitionable relativity.

Now I think we have all seen the charts. This is a very old code, from the reniassance, in which a group of people did not like the King or the religion of the day so they created their own wealth out of thin air using what was known as science. The thing was a basic idea for nantechnological application to structureing molecules based in a bigger form and already created, like using coal or iron to create gold.

Now what i am working on since the i have bettered that theory by just using purer sources of energy (sorcery, was all just the creation of energy by scientists, the most powefull where able to creat fire in their palsm then throw it via an eletrical application placed in their robes, it is very simple to reconstruct, via the scrolls of Merlin and some other ideas of the real, hence not edited Egyptian book of the dead.

Now what i want to do is basically and I believe I have seen it done in the old science club house is to take atoms out of thin air which would decrease oxygen in the room and then create large molecules and then apply them in a manner to create a material or liquid. That is my theory for my science degree i am working on right now on my other pysdo name.

Rider I
I am kind of an bung whole but then most Democratic leaders are, as they believe in debating and disproven e everything or proven what they say can't be proven. For example they tell me I can't create something out of nothing, I say f u, yes I can.

How to usher in the hay day of America.

2011-04-06T12:55:00.000-07:00

First I have to get my certificates, then I am going to go for plan A. If A does not work, then I wll go with plan B which I will have already tried to obtain during my last year in grad school. This is primarily the idea that I will run for office. Then I will find a very thick women with big bone structure, to birth me about 5 children or so. In which I will publize each other their births, and as I plan to be a proper representative as much as possible to all sides and loyal to the grounds that brought me, I believe my child rearing and family ethics might just make people want to have more children. Along withh that one of my platforms it to get US families in the green again and out of the red. Which means that folks like to birth and have big families when they have savings and a retirement. When they are all $45,000 in debt not for car or even house, along with there are not jobs with good pension plans anymore, well darn it having one kid is way to expensive as it is.

So that is how I am going to Usher in the new Hay day of America, that and my space mining ideas, pressure on the Communist Party single totaltarian cold war weapons and kingship to be Democratic, as they are not no matter what they say Democratic and I will ask anyone who says they are to gather themselves and mee me at the gym boxing ring, because that is just a Soviet Stalinist play on words to say they are Democratic when no, they are single party rule totaltarians, that is not Democratic at all.

Rider I
There is this lady that I have her number but I have not called her, she seems like she could handle my constant fascination with education and take care of whole team of future leaders. My other friend dates guys, but I feel werid because we still talk and I am really monogomous, it is weird, I do not want to have to be in a relationship during grad school so I think I will just have a relationship with my eletrical motorcycle build and leave them all behind. Women are scary unless you have stability and economic surplus.

The ideal intellegence report.

2011-04-06T06:32:00.000-07:00

A report is something that states a matter, and represents the views of the writer. If it is done for a state intelligence matter then it has to be as unbiased as possible. If a bipartisan group is interested this is of the utmost importance. If two different Senators from opposing groups ask this is still very important. The matter is and should be written with as many facts and middle ground thoughts and ideas for solutions that can be thought of. In which will give a balanced view of what the problem is and what the solution is. As such, the writers views should be necessarily their own but a matter of cognitive analytical perspective in regards to what both groups would think is important. So an unbiased report is very necessary, with proper application to the values that the US.

Another very important factor that I have learned over the years in report writing is write to your audience. If you know that a particular Senator will not actually even read the report but a young stallion clerk will. Then fill it full of good cognitive remembrance for later ideas when the clerk is working their way through proper areas of debate. If the Senator is likely to read the report then it depends on the Senators. Which means that some would call it brain washing, but in my field of the legal perspectives knowing your audience is just good game. As such, having a proper profile on hand that shows who your Senator is and what types of things they are likely to understand and not understand is also good. For example, lets say that I am a Senator. I will have 9 degrees in many fields but primarily Business and Social Studies. As such in these studies a writer could presume that I understand things of that nature, so as to just have to cite but not explain. However, if it is something that I dabble in like electrical motors, energy generators or the such, then a proper explanation with a multitude of cites that may not even be being used might jar my interests to learn further. Then such matters would have to make one say, that knowing your audience is a good call for a report.

Along these lines, I would have to say that the most important part of an intelligence report is to understand that you are the master and the most knowledge in the field when you write. As an I, there is no one else above and you are your countries back bone. They look to you and they expect that you have dug as far and deep as you could. While creating logical inferences for future questions, and also create specific table and data sets. The reason why this set of understanding is the most important is the fact that you have to write with full confidence. As the people who you are writing for are going to be making very big decisions based on your articles.

In the matter of article creation for written intelligence briefs, I would state that having a handy go to guide for the Senator would be a proper thing to do, if time is allotted. This is because, reports are long, and if the Senator has a place on hand when reading to write notes, and to highlight pages on the brief, then this can make the Senators life or the clerks life much easier while still allowing the writers mastery of the craft to be properly placed forward on the best grounds possible.

Rider i

Strategy in the Eltromagnetic Age.

2011-04-06T04:15:00.000-07:00

Electromagnetism is the idea that vibrations created in the air between molecules which transfer energy can be controlled and manipulated. These ideas where first found and perpetuated by Tesla. Who, after deciding what he had found was to powerfully for anyone country to own, in the name of Democracy, spread it out to the major powers of the time. In which the Russians where able to beat the US and the other's to a prefect working model. As such, we where able to see in the mid 1900's a perfect electromagnetic economic warfare hit perpetuated on New York city. This was done by using proper placement of submarines and ships along with satellites, in which where able to pulse the electromagnetic weapons through out New York city to cause a complete black out of all major electrical facilities. In which, caused major economic damage.

The Russian's went on doing this for sometime. However, they found that causing smaller damages at intervals was better than causing major damages. As, the US was very well capable of reacting to such attacks. The US then was able to come out with its own satellites and after which was able to repay the Russian favor of electromagnetism scare. As the Russian's did not understand the innate nature of all humans to want to own themselves and not be enslaved to others or to one. The Russian economy came crashing down.

Prior to this we could see during the World War II stories of the British messing around with their Tesla given cognition. This was primarily the so called Bermuda straights scare and the historical creation of other ships sinking in that area when foreign ships came close to the test grounds and had to be sunk. Then again, the British are a little more snug with their Freedom of Information acts than the US.

The strategy then comes down to today. In a world where countries can control weathers create earthquakes and level who countries without even setting foot on them. This then creates a necessary race for what we call magnetism. This magnetism is very similar to the nuclear war race we saw of old. As such this is primarily because there are so many ways that this idea can be used. Meaning that high technological parks have becomes today's old physicist parks of old. We can see the Communist Chinese easily getting away with creating massive high technological parks inside of the US. Primarily in Idaho where Communist Chinese have been allowed to buy a literal whole gold mine and they are currently being allowed via a Communist SOE to build a whole city around their intelligence base which the Communist Call the Torch program.

The defenses of the free world again are at a horrible placement. Where as before, it was well known and understood that electromagnetism and nuclear physicists was something we would never work with on a non Democratic country (no domestic checks and balances of power). Today we see a complete lack of electromagnetic strategy in the US's foreign and domestic policy. It is as if the new wave weapons do not exist and the government really thinks that they could ever keep anything from a people who's first and foremost right is the right to freedom of speech and assembly of media.

Therefore, the US's current electromagnetic and high technological strategies need to be very similar to the old electromagnetic strategies and physicists. In which, we took very seriously our ability to keep non Democratic countries out of the US's domestic industries so the US could have a competitive edge. As Communist and other totalitarian regimes can easily create a much better edge and stealth stolen technological advancements than a country that is more worried about its individuals whims and desires and making sure that freedom is a foot, rather than world domination via cold war weapons.

So, much like Russia was able to get one over on us. We now are seeing the new Communist regime power get one over on the US. It has been four years and counting that the US has been in a serious high technological deficit. With the newest form of energy the Green technological field being the highest and most valuable form of industry as it is an energy industry being given away at the rate of 80% of our stimulus money to the communist. While now, allowing the Communist to literally build electromagnetic and high technological Communist cold war weapons of SOE's named Sinomach in Idaho. There is no doubt we lack a proper consistent electromagnetic and high technological defensive strategy.

Rider I

The Fox and the Grapes by Aesop as applied the Communist Party of China

2011-04-06T03:47:00.000-07:00

"Driven by hunger, a fox tried to reach some grapes hanging high on the vine but was unable to, although he leaped with all his strength. As he went away, the fox remarked, 'Oh, you aren't even ripe yet! I don't need any sour grapes.' People who speak disparagingly of things that they cannot attain would do well to apply this story to themselves"

"The fox who longed for grapes, beholds with pain

The tempting clusters were too high to gain;

Grieved in his heart he forced a careless smile,

And cried ,‘They’re sharp and hardly worth my while"

"This Fox has a longing for grapes:

He jumps, but the bunch still escapes.

So he goes away sour;

And, 'tis said, to this hour

Declares that he's no taste for grapes"

In this story we see a cognitive dissonance. In which the fox holds two ideas inside of one mind as it is hard to obtain decides not to obtain it at all. This is similar today to the Communist Chinese party. As they are a single party. In which have so longed to obtain what the US and free world has of international clout where the world looks up to them because their people are so free and so very civily set. However, much like the Fox the Communist are not willing to try and come to a middle ground or even use anothers mind to find a proper way to obtain the grapes. Where as another morale of the story is that the Fox did not seek help, thus was not able to obtain what it wanted. In the US and other free world Democracies we see a buddy system. In which if one party has a cognitive dissonance of an idea of how their people would like to be governed instead of just saying oh well we can't obtain the whole populaces thoughts on the matter so we will just not obtain them at all. The US uses a competitive debateable system to properly forensic out between two cognitive disssonaces. Which in turn allows public policy to take some time and have the most possible and spread out allowance of ideas for the best governance. So we see, that the Fox did not come to a measure of resolution as they it could not figure out the proper way to obtain its wishes. While thus not seeking a buddy to help figure it out, therefore, causing injustice to the Fox's belly, as it was not able to obtain what it wanted. We see these detrements in Communist China today, where people want to be able to distain from certain elitiest leaders but the government can't figure a way to allow them to state their free opinions on specific leaders without imprisoning them, and again with economics. Many citizens do not like the idea of massive SOE's that take away their and others market shares, yet the Communist party can't seem to find a way to balance their cognitive dissonance of wishing for economic freedom yet wishing for international clout.

Rider I
In other words if the Fox would have obtain a buddy it would have had a better chance of obtaining the grape. Instead the Fox was sour and caused detrement.

The idea that the US is so far in debt do to an inadequate cold war team to the Communist it brought the vote for a tradition Owl Whooting.

2011-04-01T01:04:00.000-07:00

This blog cite has been brought to you by the Mutiplicty, Democratic, Druid, Christian, Buddhist, anti Communists, Anti Facist (same thing as Communist just with a bais), 1st Amendment loving, way overeducated, Trinity praying to fight evil everynight, Lord of the I's, and the King of America (one of the 300 million rulers of this country).

If you do not like it then say so I will humble adapt on my cloak. If you know my name as some due, then before you judge I suggest you look at the symbol on the 1, the First Amendment and how our fore fathers acted towards Soverign Wealth Funds, Kings single party totalatarian rule, their etiquet when writing in papers under psydo's at that time, and the institution and long tradition of Democratic debate and balanced peacefull battles, along with liberty and the rights for all for economic and civil that my chair has brought and the tradition wil bring from here until Kingdom Come.

Rider I
Little red harley awaits my Mac A Valley ride to see if I can make it through the valley of the Shadows of this great country to see if she will take me as her leader, before I ask the People in 26 years to take me as their wise old Druid.
Tas mas og's bri's not matter untill unce freedom is all a clatter.

90% of the worlds resources they invade the worlds most peacefull religious colony, and their SOE's that are supposed to be being shut down and disbanded and they are conglomerating to uncompetitive heights and massive fire breathing dragons that destory free markets with their neo mercantalist economic centralized intellegence units of MSS and SASAC. That is alright, we got a couple up and running specifically to compete and check as much as possible until I can take the helm of my first, public seat of they people will have my ideas of individual economics, and safety nets and right to defense and proper spread out homeland defenses secure and ready for all kinds of un Democratic style battles.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMRFEIj8pU

I have two kinds of ideas freedom and those who are like a King, I have 300 million kings and queens, all free and all just as strong as any person in this country. darn straight I am not for any single currency, nor am for any one world government.

Each culture under its own civil right to be alone as long as peacefull so to physically soe no harm upon those who wish no non Democractic fight.

It has been a long time since this country has seen a Druid Representative, and no propoganda believer the Druid culture did not eat or sacrifice humans again that is Satanic, and propogated by the Catholic church much like we see in wars when they want their people to think that their opposition is killing the innocent.
However, do not get me wrong along the way many have become very evil and oppressive in their wish for magic, or what today is known as science
I should have about 3 patents by the time I am to run, so I should be able to fund a good part of my own campaign. Along with that I am sure by then I will align with one party or mayb even a minor as it sounds like fun to bring a minor party and hold the helm on up. Who knows, maybe they will recruit as they will see me as a powerfull debator, or maybe they will not. I have already been recruit for one council run, However, I am not read for paid public service. I want to run on the ballot with my full Druid title of 9 Degrees.
I figure when most moderate folks go they look for those who they have heard of know is for freedom and title looks like an American Bad.

Of course that was when I was fresh before I served a master as an apprentice and a body guard. I know am very dull and need to get back into school. I am going to lower my asking price for my heart beats after I sell my car and get a motorcycle and plan to work at a clerk place, or my home research writing business. So far, I cant keep my comptuer going long enought to actually get my darn writing business up and running. This little one works for rants not for pulling and holding six or 7 articles at a time to create my ideas.

If I get voted in if my 28 year plan works like I think it will. I will be the first cloud nine every. That is if I make it past my natural country test and I gain all three graduate degrees's and the rest of the story without, oppression from the soverign wealth funds, or single party totalatarian rules. I know the Communist are working up on mean strategy to allow the Democrats to take over the US. However, they do not know the love hate relationship our two majors have for each other.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mycNvDcyjEA&feature=related

Then again I could end up in a mess of sludge or beaten with a baseball bat, or hung in a tree by some folks who do not like individual economics or civil rights to say what one feels. It could happen, or they could just cut my rotted whisked smoked out insides out, and try and eat them, but trust me I am bitter old soul and the crows have been known to attack those acting a fool around me, ask the sparrow in the street, or the pigeons on the window seals if they have heard of me, birdy knows who the natural Three symbols is. First time for a cloud nine, I bet the trees will be whooting and hollowering when I ask the people if I can represent them.

then again the Cloud nines have never tried before. So nature might love us but maybe the people will not vote. I mean truly I could not see the point of disliking kings and soverign wealth funds if a cloud nine ever cheated the Democratic way, anywyas he or she would be taken to proper judgement by another, as the check and balance goes for Democracy must be a check and balance. 28 years I should figure out how to get the people to think I am cool, and learn a good majority of their likes and dislikes. I really want to read the President Obama's journal and what he has said about me in it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrrGKR8Xii4

Is Hudson the Hawk still haning out in the Congressional Library? Darn Privacy I have to respect not like you could have left it in the public area for a quick peak or anything. I will always respect privacy. So I will just work really hard to try and get the people's likes and dislikes down so they will vote for me. I am not so worried about either parties ideas as it is the people i want to represent. Again though I have to chose a side for proper debate. I am just guessing, with my ego.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0TBwFLW4GY

weaver of time and thought, the idea of a 4 4 heart beat time is in every ryhm, the trees and winds are just party to the song, of a reality of gongs, in every ripple of word and thought has an affect you ride that wave for some time and something will probable show you what has happened to your ripples you have created.
It is an old weavers trick you say something, then you sit down and think of every possible outcome, then you start to mumble the words out loud like a chant, then after that you place some incense in a proper place, drink some wine and wait to see if the ripple leads to another ripple. I was taught it is like surfing the natural world of energetic waves. It is very interesting. However, if one is caught doing it in public they are thought to be pysco. The Pentagon, and any Druid will tell you what it is, start gazing some call it. I personally like to call it riding the ripples. The air is like water, in every thing has a ripple, if you can get a ripple close enough with your specific code in it, then you can feel the ripple affect of that wave. Thus, causing a compelte clarity of picture. it only works for those that the birds come to as children. At least that is the old folk lore regarding it Mums stated I was something special and she could not be around me because I was so powerfull she could hear my thoughts and see everything I did when she was close and she could get no peace of mind. I should have been taught by the Druids but they did not pick me up in time. as such, I smoked and drank until i was dumb.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0TBwFLW4GY

Then again, my lady friend just thinks I am pyscotically cute, when she hears me mumbling and tracing ripple affects of things I have said or written or placed into affect. I trya nd make sure they are peacefull as such, that is what chanting was created and called magic. it is what newbie pyschics can't figure out why they can't say more than a sentence or jumbled picture, and why my great granny taught me and my father stopped me. Then again, who knows rant on young raven.

I remeber the day she left, what the feeling was I will never know she said, that there was no one who could help me and that I was completely unatural as she was of the jesuit religions and not of the Druid. her grandftaher on her side told me how to stop bothering her with my thoughts, and told me to focus on nature that it was more fun, so i did. I remeber sitting down with birds and asking them to bring me things, it was amazing. Then my great grandmother found out and she wanted to tutor me, then my father found out and he thought they where all crazy so he told me to forget about it then I got a video system that just came out and I was able to almost completey cloud my mind with eletric static. Then I just went dumb till about age of puberty when it came back, then I just drank and lifted weights and banged my head against other helmets and it went away again. Sounds crazy, but I found a Druid through my great grandmothers teachings I remeber and he said the same thing, you should have been allowed to finish your training as a youth. Now it will come and go and it is better to ignore it as you can't control it and wil not be able tell what is memory and what is clarity.

I will work for BEER'S.

2011-03-31T16:47:00.000-07:00

Binary Eltromagnetc Entry Rotation System.

It is the idea to not only use the force of gravity and other theories harnessing it as such, but to also use the two metal rails entry rotation system. As this system is being developed on the ground to use rail gun energy to propell space ships, I wonder if it could be used to also help boost rentry via mining. The idea is mainly around the eletromagnetic rail guns system to help with the energy needed for massive pay loads. I believe it is just very tiny small part of the way bigger theories like FRETOS. In which might actually be able to gain some more energy if they implement the Binary Eltromagnetic Entry Rotation System.. More or less they need BEER's.

Rider I
Miningi s important to free enterprises and a free market, one must be allowed to own their own mines and compete fairl with others to own mines. The idea that governments or countries can own them, turns into another Stalin, Hitler or what we are now seeing with the single party totalatarian rule of the Communist party of China. A full out war to gain all the resources, due to state controll instead of individual and small group via non state actor competition.

When you have FRETOS, you might want to try BEER's to make it better.

How to bring the idea of debate to rural schools.

2011-03-30T17:32:00.000-07:00

The idea of debate is hand in hand with Democracy. I myself played the game and loved the idea of its teachings. The format is exactly the same as adults have to do when governing over people who have voted them in.

However, I believe in many rural parts of the world we find that children and adults do not know how to hold their tongue or even properly debate something that is so important that weapons can be reached for.

I have seen this in many cultures, from religous to economic fanactics, etc. I have my two which are hard for me to do. However, luckily when I played the game that is exactly what we where debating on. Which made it a lot easier for me to get over my non tongue holding.

The idea would then be to bring debate to every school around the world. Thus causing a necessary need for angels to help produce debate.

For example, the areas in which learn english as a second language to do business with countries that speak english could have implemented a debate system. This idea could be very fun for second language speaker sto go to foreign countries to teach how to debate in rural areas. I know of people who go to countries to teach folks how to learn english. But I have not heard of these types of programs being started for debate.

As the corner stone of peace is the ability to hear ones side and allow a fair judgment in the matter I would find that debate is a necessary element that should be implemented in every school.

In which I have tried to have implemente in every US school, as it would substantially calm down violence among youth if they could learn to understand the system of democratically fighting. However, must schools in the US have shortened their years, and pay and teachers which means any necessary improvements to our cognition of our children is gone for at least 5 years. Thanks to a bad economic policy regarding economic service bell curve adjustment policy. Which I have not even begun to trace who is responsible for that matter. I am getting to that one though.

Rider I

post-industrial, service economy

2011-03-30T17:09:00.001-07:00

What is a post industrial, service economy? I think the there shoul be a balance between the two. I mean new technology should be produced at home as it is very necessary for defense of cold war (econ war) or even miiltary wars.

Rider I

I sent this to the http://www.esa.doc.gov/Reports/engines-growth-manufacturing-industries-us-economy-0

2011-03-30T16:44:00.001-07:00

Dear ESA Policy Administration,

There is a flaw in our economic business cycle, that I think I have stumbled on. I have read papers that show people are onto the flaw but just have not properly addressed the matter yet. Therefore, I would like to address the problem in this short written letter:

The current problem is that the US is relied upon a service bell curve, historically including, the savings and loan, .com and mortgage service bell curves. These then create a boom bust as they start to flow money into the economy through the inflationary spending that was created by the prior one. This then leads us to a trough cycle as any graph showing you the major cycle can show, if you compare it to the actually service bell curve created by major legislation. This then forces the US to have to save itself using inflationary spending; each time. As such, our deficit has been rising and rising without the US being able to actually pay off its bills. Therefore, causing a major detriment from lost resource contracts, to lost ability of the US to keep judges and civil workers, etc.

Therefore, as my service bell curve reliance matter is correct. The solution is simple enough. The policy matter that needs to be addressed is with the problem of having the curve go up and then crash down. If we could possible create another industrial boom that could catch the service bell curve before it normalized we could then go into a major growth cycle. The idea I am having is in regards to creating a industrial production cycle right at the peak of before the peak of the service bell curve. The problem is we would have to keep those production jobs here at home. Thus, we could then shift the reliance on the service bell curve from a service bell curves to a production bell curve. Then as the production bell curve starts to wain, we could create another industrial boom.

The example I have is the upcoming service bell curve reliance; the health insurance. This service bell curve is going to be the biggest boom the US has every seen. As it is forcing a monopolized industry in which everyone will have to participate. Which means if not properly administrated and caught at the right time it will also create the US's biggest trough cycle. Thus, turning into a recession as we still have not paid off the inflationary debt from the savings and loans trough cycle.

So the problem is we rely on a service bell curve without it having a buddy to hand off the business cycle too. This means, it gets tired and crashes out. Which takes the US economy with it. Therefore, we need to learn how to do a relay with our business cycle, macro curve.

I am going to be writing a paper on this matter in my MA in Economics next year. It is mainly going to be based on a buddy system and a piggy back style administration of economic legislation. The main problem is the adjustment cycles are not properly being dealt with in the US Economic Macro Cycles.

Give me an email if I can help, I am unemployed right now and looking for work. However, I am also trying to set up an Internet business in which I can generate enough money to get me through graduate school. My plan is to get an MA in Economics, and a combined JD and MBA in law.

Rider I

How to properly use a service bell curve boom to boost domestic production industries.

2011-03-30T16:30:00.000-07:00

Conversely, in recent decades, the service sector has boasted a number of the economy’s

most dynamic industries—e.g., business services, communications, transportation, and

wholesale/retail trade. Analysis of these industries, like analysis of the most dynamic

industries in the manufacturing sector, can reveal the mechanics of the growth process

itself"

If that means cutting of heads of those people who want to give our tax dollars to foreign countries to produce it then so be it. We need to pay off our debt and at least balance our budget and touch down on solid ground, we have been under water for to long.

The Oil Industries and its application to US international markets.

2011-03-30T16:25:00.000-07:00

Interests I have are basically around to comparing it to the green tech industry. Along with that the study will be provided along with other material in my economic warfare case against those who sold out 80% of the US's highest technological stimulus money to cause detrement to US industries and allow our competitor to seriously hurt us in the short and long run productivity and monetary affects, and our ability to gain resource contracts, as if we are not producing it we do not need, the resources, which means our defense equipment can easily have back doors placed in it as it comes from foreign production.