This one is for Detroit and all those who lost their Childrens homes to Communist EW.

This one is for Detroit and all those who lost their Childrens homes to Communist EW.
This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded. http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/ Currently being edited. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=H9AfqVIxEzg If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Need to do a Balassa index for Manufacturing and Services between China base country and free markets, US potential lead example.

http://www.intracen.org/docman/JAG_8443.pdf

http://www.americaneconomicalert.org/view_art.asp?Prod_ID=1070

Really would like to find that report: "The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) puts out measurements of “revealed” comparative advantage based on an index that compares the share of a given sector in national exports to the share of the sector in world exports (known as the Balassa formula). "

I need to do a Balassa index with regards to the specialization of China in an absolute advantage with manufacturing technology and most other things, and the US and free markets taken on the services of the world at a higher GDP ration for service than a balanced GDP ration for service and manufacturing like China and other neo-mercantalist countries I hypothesise have. The necessary predictor of competitive availability of the free markets to compete in manufacturing in an absolute industrial advantage with China could be an area I wish to ease worries or to prove it is a pin point start point for more studies. Should go both ways and find a median, if one tilts more than the other one come to proper analysis of how to balance.

Revealed comparative advantage "Balassa's (1965) "
" measure of relative export performance by country and industry, defined as a country's share of world exports of a good divided by its share of total world exports. The index for country i good j is RCAij = 100(Xij /Xwj)/(Xit /Xwt) where Xab is exports by country a (w=world) of good b (t=total for all goods)."

Shall have to drink whiskey one night find the OCED and some other folks research and try and apply it to my hypothesis.

Interesting theory. This one shall be even more fun that the CCEB theory I am still waiting for that perfect mental cogntive sysnpasus energy flow to write it again, as you have to feel such a deep theory. I will have read more on this theory. I really think I want to do more with my disproving comparative advantage between two major economies were as a major economy and a minor economyc can truly benefit in my hypothesis, for comparative advantate. However, I believe and will see if true that two major economies do not have the favor of comparative advantage as it causes absolute advantages.
Page 5 below I have to go to bed.
http://www.haveman.org/EITI07/moenius.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment