At the United States Joint Forces Command, we are involved in both current and future operations – ready for today; preparing for tomorrow.
•We train and provide forces from all services to commanders around the world to work together as a joint team.
•We ensure the equipment each team brings to an operation is compatible.
•We provide teams with unique skills that can deploy at a moment’s notice to assist an operation.
•We coordinate our efforts with other nations to ensure we can operate together.
•We develop a blueprint for how our military forces will conduct future operations.
•We test this blueprint to ensure that it works.
•From this blueprint we develop solutions that can be put into the hands of service men and women who will be engaged in future operations.
I think I will take notes. But keep the meat of my strategy which is purely intellectual reading and writing and presentation maybe with some flair cause boring presenations make me sleepy. Much like oh well. First thought on the matter besides movemtns and other strategies I must considere before, properly presenting such a magnificant creation that I have been known to undertake from time to time to do a little bit of the old save."
Cool baby, we are in for nasty weather, there has to be got a better way.
That link is better less political biases, just the details please geese your blog monkey just get it done. Darn it.
I love how the Washintong Post completely demolished our intellegence workers with its report on contracted employees of the DOD. Yet we have more than 3,000 business in the US working for Chinese miltiary and political to gather and steal information and they were bully enough to attack their own countries defenses yet they did not attack the very thing that is cuasing more detrement and lose of money than any contracted emplloyee. Funny, really could of used a Chinese graph of business that might be working as Espionage fronts. Not really necessary to show the US's intellegence fronts that work to defend its country. Funny, useless information except for the foreign opposition to create watch towers against those business. Causing probly around a couple million dollars worth of lost data as now the Chinese espionage ring could easily pick up ones they did not know about. Then it probable cost hundres of thousands of more dollars to move contracts and certain employment areas. So WASHINGTON POST HERE'S A BIG THANKS FOR NOTHING AS YOURE REPORT COSTS US MORE IN THE LONG RUN THAT IT WOULD EVER SAVE. YET THE INFORMATION THAT I DO NEED LIKE FOREIGN INTELLEGENCE BASES THAT ARE ATTACKING THE US NOTHING. Nothing. thanks a lot.
No, the basic data I am collecting will show a need to properly stop the vicious cycle of base closures everytime we go through a major trough in our business cycle. Which is caused by Chinese unfair economics, as they are stalling their trassission into the next phase as much as they can.
It is not just an intellegence base it is a mind set and a cycle that has been allowed to happen way to long in this country. Doing without and weaken our infrastructure and defenses so that another country can become stronger, more political clout and a close ability to take the US on head on. This is about doing the right thing and keeping our military bases strong. As I believe we never re-build them when they close. As the West coast has shown. I know why China is after greece and what black opts tech they are working on. I also know exactly why China was after the west coast and what black opts tech they are working on. These closures of bases allow more for China while less for the US. YOU NEED TO KEEP THE BASES AND FIGURE A WAY TO MAKE MONEY THAT IS IT I AM PUTTING MY FOOT UP SOME FOLKS BUTTS. A general talking about economics, to many bases, yet China is setting up espionage shops in our allies and tons of other countries at the highest rate every. And the US wants to close more bases while China opens more espionage bases. Love it, I say keep the Joint command. Have them start up an espionage defense unit and then properly teach foreign countries how to defend against it so that the market place can stay fair and competitive so that China does not become the next Persian empire via economic warfare.
I have maps in my head with green dots that see each of China's wants for countries black opts tech that they are creating. Again why I know what each country is creating is much a mystery to me than I can ever explain. I can just read certain data about a country and figure out what they are working on. I would figure that China has I's like me too. Thus Greece would be my first choice if I am right on what they are creating. Along with that a powerfull presence on the West coast for espionage bases would also be a smart choice too.
Then again some general wants to shut down bases and further weaken our defenses because of economics. AS OBVIOUSLY HE CAN'T FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET MORE JOBS FOR AMERICANS
do people think america is invunerable. i mean i know all of our defense systems and centralizing bases causes less spread defenses against espionage for dod as fbi can't do it all and for the love of freedom red strike and red dawn strategies. it amazes american thought and our superiority complexes but hey i have one too.
you know for that defeatest class up at the national college of defense i would have suspected that it would have concentrated for its curriculm more on us and romes similarities of bad eco war defenese and the closining of intra country basese yet building of foreign bases. did not here it though. rome thought they were above econ war too.
union thought that too. however their liquidity lose is what happenned to them do to spreadinh thin much like the us is doing bow i believe. our business cycles are creating less valuable liquidity and more borrowing liquidity each time, because y'all cant figure out how to bring root jobs to america and our export import gdp ratio is being boxed in. but hey were americans nothing can happen to us. bs pluss aa to the 5th. stop the self deprivation and non intellegen econ warfare. we need to stop.
thin skinned and scrunny with big fists means one two hits your out.
you dont understand econ war or new wave war if you think closing bases will save you money. that logic comes from the same generation that gave us outsource to neo mercantalist and we wont go through troughs losing liquidity, military bases, technological advances, maasive loss of funding to fight espionage abroad and at home and huge gaps in time limits for bases to base protection. matter of fact theus does not even have an economic warfare school. i should know i want to attend. well pretty soon once china getseverone into fta's it wont be dependant on the us. dependancy isa good thing but the rev line is way over for a shift in gears.
future dig value of joint command product to the stabilty of the international marketplace through cooperation with allies on espionage from the biigest theft country china. i would presume, that americas cooperation with foreign countries on the matter would create a very valuable product. as econ espionage costs countries hundreds of millions of dollars. i wold bet if we put together a good espionage defense package the prodcutvalue would out weigh the costs. but you did not calcylate the econ war part of it did ya 10,000 attorney Chief D cause i am still taking on legions and gods like a good titan. well lets battle.
how much does econ espionage cost international marketplaces as it all funnells mone back to china?
does the joint force command have a econ war defen co=op unit that can carry itregarding product value?
what is the value of smooth cooperation from one unit to the next regarding int co-op, much like a domestict unit there is value on the training of working as a team, that is what boot, and other schools are for domestically, jfcom is similar as applied to int coop against such enemies as high espionage countries like china. or terroism, however china has thehighest i believe econ war terroism, i believe.
create new definition for econ war terroism if not found, send in to websters,
Let see I had to show the Chief E about our aggregate problems in economics. In which I just created an idea, I did not have time to do the research. I am sure the clerks handled it.
And now I need to show the Chief D economic warfare impacts and how we should not take the blows so hard to our bases yet let them roll off us like water, with proper reforming of old tech. However, I'll just say I like them old 350 small block engines, so easy to work on. I mean I remeber. i would sit there under my old 73 chevy pickup truck with a corvett small block in it and crank on that thing. Heads, pistons, polishing, cleaning, cherry pickers, headers, gaskets, gas lines, oh motor head, ah. Or the 66 Chevy Chevell oh let me tell you a big block 405 engine dark blue, smoothing chopped top about an inch, sing purr baby purr.
Dog will hunt:
with over 3,000 Chinese espionage bases alone in the US. I found that the Washington's post on Intellegence bases was quit moving and in deed a contrasted comparasion to a correlation of the last report on closing military bases. Ah yes, but they again, what is the price on keeping this country free.
How do you really learn that you closed to many bases. When their is a riot and the the only people around are the national guard as the military bases near the city was closed down, when a country infilitrates and then attacks, really these types of things have happened already and shown that we are leaving huge parts of our country vulnerable. Along with that merging different military intellegence bases is like saying that Boot camp should be merged with Airborn school, they are two different studies.
the reality is budd that econ war works on the country tearing itself apart then needing help, or having to seek help. It does not work on the theory of oh teh bases are farther apart so if they hit a city it will not hit a base. Well that does not work. If the bases are farthe apart that means if there is civil unrest lets say in a depression state, it can turn ugly fast. And if we can't obtain the amount of troops it is necessary to quell 7 million or so Americans with no jobs and massive inflation rates, that just up and decided they have had enough. Well then maybe we should have kept those intellegence bases seperate so we could protect against economic warfare and stop weaken our infrastructure becauses of economics that have not been properly correlated to economic warfare. I mean if these reports don't reflect the value of economic warfare then they are childs play reports. So far I have been digging for a while on this matter at least 2 hours or so and I have seen more reports for base closure than I have seen against. This is much like before I started my engine on Chinese Economics and started a galazy revolution of data that seemed to be dragged to the top by my searching. Maybe this will happen again as I search for the more reports against the closing of the bases. then again so far like my last start it is very biased out there. So lets light up the other side. I will keep digging.
Ok Oricales of old how depth dus thy mediation go did you leave any waves in the air for this enlightener to pick up on your thoughts of our time. Any ideas, tobacco pipe. some good medalladolic music, a litte of the old mental liquid. COme on military bases in the land of the free what you go for me old spirits?
alright I found lead. I am going to try and contact some folks to get any docs on how to stop base closures or data, stories or analogies of why bases should not be closed. I know we had hard power bases on the chopping block last time. This time it is Intellegence bases with Washington post leading the research on the closures. telling ya, some folks have no common sense. Why would we need a military bases out in the middle of now where? If you can't answer that question and fully understand the reason of why military bases were created and spread the way they were. Then you have serious doubtfull intellegence mentality and definetly should never be on a defense military committee. I could sit down with you and check you in less than 10 maybe 12 moves. Telling you serious doubt coming from the Pentagon's business intel deparment. Sorry doll this is business and my countries security is top priority right.
I need a list of allies to gather information from and couperate and boil down their research. How you do it, teach me let me learn and turn and burn.
Well Gents lets start a line up of possible digs for information:
stand and be recognized for trying to protect your country from economic warfare Some unsung heroes oh by the way lads MSS might come after you seats so hold down the hatches and prepare:
Gerry Tarantolo, mayor of Eatontown, N.J.,
Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J
Rep. Rob Simmons, R-Conn
He is going to be a little hard to find. looks like he got cut by a Democratic in his state.
"Under the proposal, 33 large military bases and some 150 smaller facilities from Maine to Hawaii would be closed to save money and to better suit defense needs."
Republican freshman Sen. Jone Thune
Some day when My kids tell their kids, something great about Grandpa it will be two things, he brought enlighted the world on economic warfare and created such a greate enlightement that economic warfare became very hard to do as everyone knew about it. Where as before, my little story listener grandpa's generation had very little light on the matter of economic warfare. 2 is of course the unification of Korea in a peacefull manner in such a way as to dwarf the falling of the Berlin wall. Thats right you old candle this light bulb is going to dwarf your show. lol.
Senator Jim Webb
Senator Mark Warner
Congress Scientist LOL Glenn Nye the science guy LOL sorry sir long nights in front of this computer volunteering my time, needs some amusements. LOL I loved that show though dude.
It seems I might be leaving my brothers and sisters from the red out I will find them soon too.
Congress Person Randy forbes
Congressperson, Rob Wittman
Oh by the way China, more like 35%. I don't like having to do this and we all need new places to export too. LOL
State of emergency, all night riders, I's and those who fly truly for the seeking of intellegence and security through peace and fairness. Lets fly, ride and dive. till we get it proper.
Congressperson, Bobby Scott
All artists of the free cloaks I need poems, songs, paintings, for the next movement. All this anti-American sentiement has really hurt us. I really need some good stuff, it does not have to be corny or to outrageous but lets bring it home. Safe and secure should be the world through economic freedom of commerce lets move, see you in the free world of dreams and shall we meet in song and dance. So paint all night get your dance lines right, write those lines like no one can write for freedom of spirit, learning, and the right to be artistic about what ever you want, this old lady america has smiled on all the those great artistic ideas of America and its bad qualities, shall we do some for her great qualities? LOL, ya baby, club soda? Lady America is like a very good debate coach when the debaters have had enough teaching and lectures and exercises and they turn on their coach and critisim them. She just sits there and smiles, thinking my little ones have come so far, need to controll the anger a little bit but ahh.
This is important from Sir, Senator Jim Webbs page:
"“Alone among the U.S. combatant commands, JFCOM is uniquely organized and tasked to develop the joint training, doctrine, and capabilities needed to adjust to the demands of 21st-century combat operations,” the delegation contended. “Unlike the Defense Business Board’s [DBB] cursory review, several in-depth studies each assessed joint force effectiveness and requirements to improve combat capability, and all reached a different conclusion than the DBB. None of these comprehensive reviews recommended the elimination or realignment of JFCOM. On the contrary, they recommended placing increased emphasis on joint warfighting.”"
It looks like peer review is not with the DBB. Well in intellegence arena that usually means you might lose the Vote on the movement. Peer review is very important, by oustide agencies of course not your own firewalls. By the way reminder this old blog is research firewall of one. Just Mr. I. Oh and if anyone ever wants to battle please let me know, as I let my battler warriors who I battle know when I critize their paper so they can defend themselves to their peers. House of Levy was placed on notice of my attack. The others I have not yet attacked so I have not told them yet.
As a matter of fact I believe that the proper legal constitutional firewall for our intellegence bases closure, or nice way to say closure is not being properly handled.
Sir, Congressman and Senators letters says it the best, shall I quote:
"Finally, we object to your plan to ignore the legislative intent associated with base closure and realignment limitations associated with Title 10 U.S. Code, Section 2687. This provision was established to ensure that Congress has sufficient time and opportunity to review DoD proposals that would result in the closure or realignment of significant military facilities. It also includes requirements intended to ensure that such decisions are made only after a comprehensive review of costs, impacts, and alternatives."
Now you at the DBB would not being trying to pull one over on Uncle Sam's I's would you. Ey. Crafting something in such a way to bipass proper legislation and firewall research as intented by the People of the US surely does place you in the light of possible treason, so I sure hope we do not have to pull a baby blue trace on you. ah DBB, such strategies are not proper. I would further hope that Congress would make legislation regarding the non permante chairing of the DBB as it is such a high council and should rotate to fixate a non proliferation of pin point infilitration by such that was found by previous economic warfare agents of foreign countries. Maybe, that might be a nice whatch what you are doing when it comes to our security and defense, little growl legilsation to the DBB. Just a growl, as they did construe such a strategy as to bi pass Congress's research firewall. MMM, I think a growl is necessary. Rotating chairs if not already done.
"Although compliance with 10 USC 2687 would result in only a few months’ delay in implementation of your recommendation to eliminate JFCOM, your closure strategy appears to have been crafted to avoid the need to comply with its statutory requirements.
Ok have to go to bed. Tomorrow is another day and many more thoughts about the Rider I. Someday, I hope my kids, make fun of me for being so nerdy. My angels I lay my head to rest, may my spiris of watch come to see me through, and my the lord of the world give me the power to fight against evil and to bring peace to the world. I. good night.