My Service Industry Bell Curve theory explains what is happening and predicts the next crash. All rights reserved to the RI R&A. No stealing, without proper ciation. I want to see my pysdo name like my forefathers before me published and properly, please. You may use the Service Bell, along as cited properly. Again (R)

Figured i would drop in my theory again.
Heads up.

Simply demand and supply graph explains the service bell curve theory.
The horizontal line is demand for services
The vertical line is the Allies employment rates
Then the graph shows as demand is awakened, through lenient service jobs laws i.e. loans for specific, need of employment with proper laws etc, or even a force, then the demand for the service will go up as more employees look for and persuade clients to purchase the services. Then after the the demand starts to pick up you will see employment rise as the better client seekers will be able to teach others how to do the same thing through law, persuasion etc. Then it will peak, where the service industry country has reached it's full capacity for that service. Then the demand for the service will start to go down, as clients only wish to at this point seek cheaper services as they already are provided for. Then employers will start to lay off employees to bring prices down. This will keep happening all the way the service bell curve. Until, at the point of normalization for that industry and the bell has rang.
We have seen this cycle run twice so far with the .com and then the mortgage. The effects are disastrous for the government, and economy. As legalisation is based on the ripple effect of the service bell curve. Along with investments of humans pensions, retirements and government funds. However, once the Bell is rang and it is normalized there is a huge fall out of all those who now do not have a job losing all of their investments as they need them to live, and they can't pay all of their loans because they do not have the jobs after the bell has rang. Then we go right back into exactly what the Communist want us to be.
We borrowed money from them after the .com, mortgage and we will more or less have to do the same thing after the service bell is rang. This allows the Communist to further their military, political and SOE acquisitions as they are able to purchase and go on spending sprees when the bell has been rung. This leaves the US, Canada, and the EU at a huge detriment to allow the Communist to use their SOE's who own 40% of the Chinese industrial marketplace to keep our labor and production jobs that we need to stabilize or economies.
As you see the correlation between , com crash and the mortgage crash and the unemployment levels are obviously similarly. A service industry goes up so does employment. Once that service industry has gained all the workers and the clients are serviced, then prices fall and workers are laid off. As the clients have their providers and the acquisition part is gone. Then we go through the loss of wages and movement of money and the ripply effects and we again crash.
The only way to get past it is to find a root manufacturing ability like Green tech to sell to the
The Bell curve goes up and goes down, service industries run their cycle no matter what. It is the root manufacturing of technology that stabilizes a country. This allows a country to help other countries through underdeveloped construction by selling products, equipment and machinery needed to help them produce a civil society. That is why the Communist Cartels wish to have a strong hold on technology lines, resources, and shipping lanes. Because, they they can control whole governments and countries by just one little twist of a basic economic infrastructure. If the control the whole market place with proper strategic placemen of SOE cartels, then they can keep a government under a certain well strategies economic theory. If I can do it, I bet you a room full of communist economists helping prepare SOE state secret strategies can do it.
Facts of backing
The US and other free society markets have lost their manufacturing sectors to the Communist SOE padded markets. Countries based on my service bell curve theory that crash the world because of reliance on a cheaters market of SOE Cartel strategic economics.
Countries based on my Service Bell Curve theory:
Canada 76%
EU 70% of GDP is based on Services
US 70% of GDP is based on Services
UK 74% of GDP is based on Services of GDP is based on Services: The SOE Cartels currently have an economic strategy to take a hold of each of the US's allies to slowly erode the power and influence of each country over the Communist Blocs.Just ask I can help you defend against it. I just need enough money to live on to do it. For some reason I just see this clearly as day, or through an owl's eyes at night.
So more or less if the Cartel activities persist and a balance of proper manufacturing and service does not return; we will see the Communist countries becoming more and more powerful after each SOE Cartel strategized crash; politically and militarily. You say it is hard to find the nexus, I say is because you are looking to closely. The strategy is played over years and decades not seasons or quarters.
Again trust me if this economic defense strategist can create an economic strategy so can the Communist.
Rider i
Anyone could not have done this or they would have done it already, so do not under mind my genius theory and defense against the Cartels strategy. The genius of it all is that it really is that simple when you put it together and the defense is the enlightenment process. As minds light up, they will have no choice but to defend against it and I will create a ripple effect of enlightenment much like my predecessors during the dark economic middle ages.
world. However, we are letting high technological producing jobs go by the thousands; 80% of our Green Technology stimulus was spent on foreign job creation and importation of parts to allow other countries to further their technology advancement of manufacturing and creation. So really, I would buy property now as it will go up in about 10 years then sell when it peaks. As after the insurance service bell curve starts to bend downwards prices of houses and commodities will again start to fall as more and more people lose their jobs as the loss of one job that cannot be replaced it creates the ripple effect overtime to the loss of three jobs correlated with one.: based on the ripple effect of 1 good job creating 2-3 other jobs. I still have to solidify the ripple effect for you, however, it should be a blatant study as anybody knows you shut down the manufacturing plants you get a Detroit effect of no good jobs then the other jobs go too.

How to stop the loss of owernship of labors and individuals ownership of their business's.

The US is like a house of soul for freedom. In which it has blossomed. Here freedom has become the best and brightest theory in the world. Many elder countries have fell in line behind the great land of freedom. Yet, we are finding again and again, that instead of the people of this country living happily we deprive our people by raising the take from our ownership of wealth and labor. This is as each individual owns their own labor with as minimal as possible given to the whole for the sick and elderly. In which the poor are supposed to give for themselves. However, as of the US's last major three business cycle curve crashes it seems the the US is more likely to sell its house and deprive its occupants of economic infrastructure.

This is seen through a  basic study of the last erosion of our infrastructure. In which we can see through each service bell curve leading way to more and more civil losses and higher taxes. As we allow the opposition to freedom which is dictatorial back words, circular, win win Communist theories of a two class system those leading and those working to play unfairly in the system. We have allowed those in sin to be saved by giving our house so they can build theirs like a good soul full country should. However, at what point does it become a sin in itself to give to much and for gluttony and greed to kick in. It is well known that country folks of the US will and do give the shirts off their backs for those in need. As the US has set the way for philanthrophy and volunteer systems.

It becomes a sin in itself when the inhabitants of the US lose the very purpose of its values. The well groomed spread out welfare of the US. With fair and competitive market places for the majority to be able to own their own business and be their own bosses. However, to compete against the Communist we have gone the other way. With Walmart being created to compete against COSCO. In which the US's only way to survive economically was to allow corporations to take more shares from the individual and the medium size infrastructures to compete with the massive sized SOE's of the Communist centralized economics.

This can easily be seen as the biggest employer in the US is a single business. Which is Walmart. Which if you understand economic intelligence was specifically created and allowed to be created to keep up with the idea of Communist soe economics and a defense to international market shares. The theory was to allow a the Communist to have their sins eaten so that they would become free and be less of a threat to international conquering and dominance of military and political motives. However, this theory has worked for the economic principles. It still has not yet worked for the political and international dominance principles. The Communist show strong ties to not wanting to reform the single dominant imperialist political party. As its opposition is a bi party system with political checks for different kinds of people.

This has become a huge problem. As the US does not know when to stop giving its shirt off of its back and to stop President Nixon's strategy against the Communist. This has allowed the US to be torn to tatters. I have seen this with my own eyes. Walking around the US and following JAC's teachings of walk abouts and keeping the spirit free like the birds. The very idea has created a backwards theory inside of the US due to redlining the helping of the Communist political party to transform into a freerer society and less of a totalitarian society.

However, this has caused the US to become more totalitarian. This is because the US has to inflate its economy to keep consuming a countries goods that due not play fair and are the world's 6th highest country in the domestic protection scene. We have left our fellow Free societies and developing Democracies/Republics in the back burner while the Communist centralized economic strategy has been allowed to thrive and develop huge amounts of economic warfare weapons. The mere fact that both Germany a former Communist country now turned neo-mercantalist and the very last surviving Communist Dynasty tried to blame the US for the worlds economic instability.

This then was the last straw. The mere fact that China had an ego at such a point that it would not even think about helping out the world with its problems until right before the very event in which would become all about them. Instead they raised up their currency just enough to pass world inflation rates. While then both Germany and China try to focus our leaders on our domestic policy. When in reality the infrastructure for our welfare and least amount of loss to individual ownership of labors is already stable. The only thing that is missing, besides of course the normal every now and then revised policy, is the international positive capital inflows.

This is shown through the US's account balances. Which are extremely low for a so called developed country. This strategy of relying on consumption and sin eating to help totalitarian countries has become detrimental to the soul of the US.

We can see this by both the Republicans and the Democrats stand point. Not to mention the weak scarce warriors to anti-trust as Walmart and centralized single dominant business like the Chinese Communist theories have been allowed to dominate the world international market place. The Republicans have a hard time voting against the Communist trade surplus as they see that free trade will trump everything. While the Democrats can't figure out how to compete against them without destroying the US's ability to keep a majority of citizens being able to own their own business with a smaller group of centralized single business.

Nothing less than royalty I will provide for you. The key is in Senator Sherman's wishes to fight capitalist unfair market places structure of fairness and competitiveness. Not to allow the Communist into the battle field but now to force them to play fair. This is easily done. There were and is societies created in the international community that were specifically created to deal with the Communist wishes for single currency dominance and unfair SOE centralized economies. The Chines love their new found freedom of economics. It has allowed them to become the worlds new super power. Thus, it should be easy to structure a plane of further finishing moves to make sure they dissolve all SOE's that are not for poverty market share levels. However, the Communist wish to take their new found weapons and allowances to create specific international dominating units, along side their already protected free enterprises.

One theory is to engage them in their SOE and protected market place centralized economics through business like Walmart. This is a sin in the idea of freedom. As what it does is crushes the ability for Americans to own their own labors or business. While dropping the quality of life substantially through the loss of a class system. In which we see in Walmart there are more lower wage earners below the ability to live than their  are middle class workers.


The business cycle of the US is like clock work. There are very few extremities in which can't be predicted. This is easily seen by how many including Dr. Doom who predicted the rise and crash of the last service industry. Along with all the Bull's who had less soul than me and made money on the matter. I could not, some of my friends told me that you should make money now so you could do good when it comes down. I could not do it, along with that I did not believe them.

However, this means that each countries business cycle is like a jig saw puzzle. In which they all fight together for a fair place for their countries business. However, some countries use more centralized economics than others. These countries play unfairly and it is easily traced on how their scale of centralized economics and use of state owned enterprise in the international market place cause huge amounts of devastation specifically for them to pick up more property and shares during the free privateers down cycle due to an inability for their governments to make sure that the market place stays fair for them to compete in.

Thus simple what needs to be done is show them the nature of unfair market places and what has become of the world's economic freedoms due to their use of neo-mercantalist centralized economics and massive SOE cartels. In which the affects of shying away instead of jumping in the cage of economics is, well more loss of the ownership of labors, with centralized free enterprises and higher taxes, and at the worst point would be complete loss of freedom and competition with SOE's gaining higher than poverty market level shares in industries, at a saturation point in which 1984 or even the worst dreams of the cold war come true. In which a one world currency exists, a single dominant political party takes over the world and freedom of labors and love are gone back to feudalistic style kings and queens.

Before I forget, to all the Che Guevaras and Lennon's and Mao's out there. Remember don't end up like Che Guevara and get sent on a suicidal mission after finding out that Communism's is the ruling classes theory and Lockean my cap wearing friend much like the Grey's say, is, well, the people's theory. .

Rider I

Thanksgiving economic historical roots, of private property.

"Every fall in my Econ 101 course, during the last class period before we part for Thanksgiving, I share a lesson from early American history. It is particularly timely, because it deals with those we credit with the first American Thanksgiving, the Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony.
Upon arriving in New England, the Pilgrims shared “their meat, drink, apparel and all provisions” in common. As inevitably happens under collective ownership, the incentive to work disappeared. The grim result was food shortages, hunger, starvation; indeed, half of those who sailed on the Mayflower perished.
With the colony’s survival in question, the survivors reintroduced the principle of private property. Each family was assigned a plot of land. They adopted the apostle Paul’s dictum, “if any would not work, neither should he eat” (II Thessalonians 3:10). Thereafter, food production soared and the Pilgrims prospered.
The political-economic lesson here is obvious, and I won’t belabor it. Instead, let’s consider another important lesson imparted by this historical episode: We humans need to be challenged."

This came from a website that was one sided politically. As I am on a bipartsian move to stop sin eating China's economic wickedness and to start sin eating the middle east. I shall not take sides, plus, being a wannabe hound means I have to try and stay as middle ground as possible. First we must remove the dark matter we have taken into out soul. For that we are going to need our brother and sister sin eaters to allow America to climb out of its last place account balances and grow to the top again. So we can sin eat another area of the world that needs our light and strong soul of freedom.

Sorry about the not citing professor, your heading is really biased. I need both sides to stop terrorism and China's world economic conquest.

Rider I
I am thankful for the citizens of this world that pay in their blood to stop enslavement of soul, body and mind and the hurting of innocent (Soldiers of free societies), I am also thankful for those less known heroes of mine who have to stay up nights and days worrying if their information is right and how many which ways and what ways the actual knowledge will impact the world. Plus, all those who know not the business cycle of America who are trying to survive in this trough between service industries. Fa(u)(r)ther I is working on slowing that cycle so it does not hurt us so much. Gonna take time, keep your self's good and proper, there is work, enjoy the little things until we can get the big things back. That is my thanks for this search engine, oh ya were would I be without Google, the open source heaven for research and presentation. Thank you too, plus all those leaders covering our butts from totalitarians when we speak out against them here at home. And the birdies, they fly. :)

I mean it was not that long ago that communist killed millions of free society citizens. Well we took them out with love and sin eating. The Extremist Muslims have not even put a dent in the death toll that the Communist had. So I think I can do it, plus I have to finish off the last extreme communist country North Korea with love and sin eating. Yet these things take lifetimes, as my old candle said, take your time and do it proper. I mean now look at the Communist they have come light years with our help. I know I can conjure up a good economic sin eaters theory for the middle east if we could get the last remaining communist dynasty the Chinese Communist Party to free up on its world economic domination and the brothers and sisters of the free society to help us climb back up to a healthy sustainable level. However, those are the first to big obstacles, as the Chinese Communist party still thinks like the old ways of dominance over sharing and carrying. Were free enterprises are ruled heavily by anti-trust laws that force sharing and caring on all. Long road I have chose, good path though, makes my should feel good. I have to get some more titles under my belt before I can become a bigger mountain mover and shaker.

Happy Thanksgiving. Don't forget there is always someone poorer than you. Enjoy the little things, be happy with what you have, go to school, work and do right and you will make it up the latter. Just stay away from those that will weight you down. Fast and Efficient up the ladder. Sometimes fast and efficient when you are climbing to the top still takes time.

Stop enslaving my brothers and sisters in thier freedom of mind, soul and body. Or we shall ride. LOL :) on you.

As I calm down my study of economic warfare to go into my next study of scholar:

"The righteous considerth the cause of the poor: but the wicked regardeth not to know it. Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he."
Proverbs 29:7, 18 (KJV)

Thus those who understand that economic competition when done fair for the small individual free enterprise, the corporate free enterprise and those SOE's found needed to build a foundation only see what causes the poor. However, those that wish for uncompetitive behavior for dominance without care for sharing among competitors or opposition see to be wicked. Which one comes is under the son. May my web cite to those passing by bring enlightenment to an understanding of how to properly create fair economic competition between neo-mercantalist countries, and free enterprise countries. Peace be with the ones who care for the poor but compete fairly within the strong.
Riderth Ith, Saintth Cuthbertth, like the th's. LOL good reading enjoy my tombs. They shall be edited before the close of the new year.
Church, son. Even one of the good books understood economics.

Never catch this old owl sleeping when the world needs help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8uH8hMv_is
Down to keep riding.

Anti-trust regulatory Senator Sherman'i life dreams and wishes for freedom of economics for all to be able to compete fairly against the goliath, state, friend or foe.


 It is like that long ride back to his wife and his children after a long drive after a good days work of helpin society become better.
Midnight rider. That feeling of riding.



Nothing like feeling the wind and the freedom of the ride.

I found some good new books.

They were on sale. I love when books are on sale. I just looked through them and the one that excited me the most was the one on Antitrust. So I guess that is were I need to go. I should base myself in economics and then try and specialize in that area. As I did the test of soul. I placed the books down, then walked away. Then walked back in then I just gravitated towards the Anti-trust book first. So then I looked I opened the table of contents. I read it and my insides felt very good. Then I looked at the other books, and the same feeling was not there for those. So I guess, the test is passed, it is economics base, anti-trust specialization, and law for the sword. This I think shall make my soul the happiest so I can be the most fruitful. Unless of course some major event in ,my life shifts my necessary study because of personal attacks on my life.

Rider I
I love freedom, the choice is mine, and I understand the study of the soul and the meditation of the energy around me along with good moral teachings from the good book. So I have become sensitive to basic intellectual likes and dislikes. However, I am no weakling I can do pretty much a lot, just some things make me happier and I did the test today of all days when my soul is feeling dark and well I feel brighter now, I have a new book.

American Ninja for Patriotism of every individual and country person.

For those patriots past and present and for those in the future. May the wind be with you and may the sun shine not a shadow. Life free and prosper.



Home is under good hands.

This what I feel like when I think about my future and my strategy being done right.



By the way if you ever get a chance to read some stuff from this research cite. It is pretty good.

You could imagine what the opposite feeling is like. the pictures I found to depict I can't place on here.

How to get funding for a new financial and economic crimes committee.

Well let see. About the time I am strategized to graduate from combined graudate school. We will be in the begging of a new service bell curve. So I would guess that the funding will be there. Yet, however, proper reports will have to be done on my candle light hours. So that it sticks like my first country report to help out. Which seems to have worked. Well big guy, hope you make it past this hurdle that has been placed infront of you. Keep your head up and do right, always when scared and frightened educate yourself on the matter. Good luck bro. Keep those Senators intersted and keep the US strong. keep your head up Rider, no matter what you have a good niche kid.

Rider I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SOEoD7H9RQ

Much like Yeller Belts fast or the person from Communist country. They new that the small cracks is were the vulnerability is to the US freedom of economics. To bring them down they must find them. Well then, much like Mr. ..... I shall fill those cracks. One way to do that bubbba is to create an economic & financial crimes committee. So that folks who have economic crimes committed against them do not get put on the, what, list. By the way hate to say it but from my studies thta is what it is a, what list. Well let's just say i can woa some Senators with stories from my educational studies and real life studies. then again those cracks wil be filled in time. I shall pick you back up and make you whole. This is America, land of the free and home of the brave. Like me.

Like Yeltzer from the Communist country he new that the Us could easily watch the whole but would not be able to watch the guerrilla economic warfare communist. We have still yet been able to deal with the guerrilla communist economic warfare agents in the US. I think a Financial and Economic Crimes committee could make sure that funding was given for proper local agencies to be committed. Could you imagine. So vague right now must narrow it later. Well, maybe for the days with the Harley under the tree writing and publishing.

US Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

I see that Nigeria who has the world's biggest market for economic and financial crimes via the Internet has such a Commission. However, it seems the US does not think economic criminal activity is important enough to actually have a legislative branch to make sure that enforcement and proper funding is being dealt with it. I know the negative affects of the US's economic and financial crimes each year should be enough to warrant such a committee or commission. I will keep searching. I think this will round out my web. As I have to move concentrations very soon.

http://www.efccnigeria.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=573&Itemid=67

I guess this will be another propelling point for me in graduate school. I know only the top socialites and educated scholars get good  $100,000 - $150,000 jobs. As such, this will be a point of push for me to further gain my ability for my end game which is a ranch with my kids, wife and folks asking me for good advice via Internet equipment while I grow and own my own food sources. Ted Nguyen style.
Ted's cool, can't wait to see him again.

Rider i
Senators you are in trouble when this boy scout comes a nockn.

A personal matter has started to attack my life.

I thus will be shutting down the Rider I early. I will try and resolve this matter within the next week. However, I have to plan for the worst, thus that means being very educated on the matter that is hurting and scarring me.

Royal pain it is.
I will properly edit this before I leave it for the long period though.

I am keep riding. If I have to do some time away from my study. Then don't you worry I will always remember this cognitive process, with easy presentation or speech at a moments notice on this matter. You just call  me. My JFCOM presentation is also in jeopardy. I will thus have to re-strategies my presentation.

Rider i
I apologize to BRAC I will send a formal letter apologizing. However, the situation at hand is not for the public leaders. I will also try and send in my brief. However, it is not like the presentation of a citizen presenting it in person though, it loses the whole affect and meaning behind its cognitive creation. I will work through this and see if I can still make it. At this time it looks bad.

I have three search engines programmed to help me on this matter on auto pilot. As this one is not as specific as the Rider i study so the search engines should be able to pick them up and develop them for me easily. I have to properly defend myself, especially when it hurts.

Root Cause of civiliaty

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/rangel-trial-spotlights-flaws-in-house-ethics-process

This article said something about closing the ethics committee. Right away my mental cognitiion remeber my teachings of how competition creates civility. on break. do this weekend. write some ideas then write a lobby to keep it open.

Definition of Humaniscity. I created it, may stick may not.

New Word Decentralized freedom of cultures and bipartisan international currency controlls. (there is not best to have one currency for the international world, this theory goes along with the idea that in international we see the Euro and the dollar used in trade. This allows a check on each other. Were one world currency could actually crete problems like we saw in the Soviet Style one currency order. Again the I's do not wish for a one world order. Some rich folks may get lazy, like I have heard about Soros and think that a one world order is easier. However, royalty has to remind them sometimes, freedom is based on checks and balances not complete control. 

New Word Order

Humaniscity: the natural occurring phenomenon that humans will gather in a certain place to create home and family to maximize the consumption of the individual. The idea that even tribes in the rain forest have the scientific natural occurring economic theory of humaniscity. In which they gather in a marketplace to better help themselves consume. With at a more advanced level we see free formed cities and states created based on consumption of the individual.

Humaniscity: the gathering of individuals to maximize their consumption in a marketplace with as little oppression from a human or group of humans. Thus allowing more individual freedoms as to maximize consumption one must be free to entertain their souls desires to maximize their production. In which will then allow that maximized production to create maximized consumption. Which then creates a free market. similar: free association, opposite: animalistic, in which one animal rules via force or a group of animals rule via force, with as little freedom for the whole of the group as to what is received by the forceful leading group.



Charter 08

This document cited below is a document written by scholars. Passed out in hopes to create an enlightenment to move forward on reconstructing the political system of China. Much like China has reconstructed its economics (still a ways to go though). This document then was passed out in much the same way that poll takers go around and take polls on people's ideas or theories. In the US we have all seen the scholars standing around with a note pad and a piece of paper to get what you believe and then your signature to let the bi-partisian political groups know that something should be done. However, in China the Communist party still does not want to allow a proper political party to check it in equal power, like we have the Democrats and Republicans in pretty much an equal balance, which change hands with the times. Read it it is well written.
   I went on a walk about in Washington to draw attention to economic warfare. I was scared but proud to be able to complete my first amendment pilgrimage. In which I was able to get the legislation to start a legislative act that was passed through the house of congress. At least I wish it was me, I probable helped a little bit. This is America is what we are about. However, the Chinese single autocratic empire is causing huge amounts of economic instability as they will not let the Democratic party of China equalize in power so as to check the Communist economics of SOE's and cartels that are still left around. The US and free markets do not need these unfair markets to live well and spread welfare. However, the communist party wishes for single economic dominance much like they wish for single political dominance.

You want to know why the Nobel Laureate of sociological justice was imprisoned. Here it is, Imagine if Glen Beck, or George Soros was imprisoned based on their political beliefs and public speeches or wishing to seek people to follow or believe their ideas (some are good and some are bad, they are only human). By the way Dr. Beck and Dr. Soros are my heroes, two different parties great orators and in two different fields. One of private media broadcasting and one in economics. I could no imagine if they were arrested based on their political beliefs.

So I guess I am going to be arrested if I go to China. Then again if I go to China it is because I hold sway, or I am being dropped into Mongolia for some long country hoarse back riding.

To Dr.   Liu Xiaobo
   He was arrested for testing the Communist. However, his strategy in a totalitarian country was off by doing it during a time when they look for folks to make examples of, which was the Olympics. However, were a man's heart is you can't stop specially when it is peaceful.

Dr. you devoted your life to your country people. The scholars of this world bow humbly to your service to peaceful freedom and fair competition. May the lord take you in as an Angel in your next life, and may you be able to fight the battle of good behind the scenes. I bestow on you the highest soulfully privilege of angelic wishasprastas. may the lord pick up your spirit after you have gone through a wrongful hell on earth. I know the divine personally most titans do, we have played chess on some matters before.

"

CHARTER O8
Below is the full text of Charter 08 as published on the 60th anniversary of the UN Human Rights Declaration, December 10 2008

I. FOREWORD
A hundred years have passed since the writing of China's first constitution. 2008 also marks the sixtieth anniversary of the promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the thirtieth anniversary of the appearance of the Democracy Wall in Beijing, and the tenth of China's signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
We are approaching the twentieth anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre of pro-democracy student protesters. The Chinese people, who have endured human rights disasters and uncountable struggles across these same years, now include many who see clearly that freedom, equality, and human rights are universal values of humankind and that democracy and constitutional government are the fundamental framework for protecting these values.

By departing from these values, the Chinese government's approach to "modernization" has proven disastrous. It has stripped people of their rights, destroyed their dignity, and corrupted normal human intercourse. So we ask: Where is China headed in the twenty-first century? Will it continue with "modernization" under authoritarian rule, or will it embrace universal human values, join the mainstream of civilized nations, and build a democratic system? There can be no avoiding these questions.

The shock of the Western impact upon China in the nineteenth century laid bare a decadent authoritarian system and marked the beginning of what is often called "the greatest changes in thousands of years" for China. A "self-strengthening movement" followed, but this aimed simply at appropriating the technology to build gunboats and other Western material objects. China's humiliating naval defeat at the hands of Japan in 1895 only confirmed the obsolescence of China's system of government. The first attempts at modern political change came with the ill-fated summer of reforms in 1898, but these were cruelly crushed by ultraconservatives at China's imperial court. With the revolution of 1911, which inaugurated Asia's first republic, the authoritarian imperial system that had lasted for centuries was finally supposed to have been laid to rest. But social conflict inside our country and external pressures were to prevent it; China fell into a patchwork of warlord fiefdoms and the new republic became a fleeting dream.

The failure of both "self- strengthening" and political renovation caused many of our forebears to reflect deeply on whether a "cultural illness" was afflicting our country. This mood gave rise, during the May Fourth Movement of the late 1910s, to the championing of "science and democracy." Yet that effort, too, foundered as warlord chaos persisted and the Japanese invasion [beginning in Manchuria in 1931] brought national crisis.
Victory over Japan in 1945 offered one more chance for China to move toward modern government, but the Communist defeat of the Nationalists in the civil war thrust the nation into the abyss of totalitarianism. The "new China" that emerged in 1949 proclaimed that "the people are sovereign" but in fact set up a system in which "the Party is all-powerful." The Communist Party of China seized control of all organs of the state and all political, economic, and social resources, and, using these, has produced a long trail of human rights disasters, including, among many others, the Anti-Rightist Campaign (1957), the Great Leap Forward (1958–1960), the Cultural Revolution (1966–1969), the June Fourth [Tiananmen Square] Massacre (1989), and the current repression of all unauthorized religions and the suppression of the weiquan rights movement [a movement that aims to defend citizens' rights promulgated in the Chinese Constitution and to fight for human rights recognized by international conventions that the Chinese government has signed]. During all this, the Chinese people have paid a gargantuan price. Tens of millions have lost their lives, and several generations have seen their freedom, their happiness, and their human dignity cruelly trampled.

During the last two decades of the twentieth century the government policy of "Reform and Opening" gave the Chinese people relief from the pervasive poverty and totalitarianism of the Mao Zedong era, and brought substantial increases in the wealth and living standards of many Chinese as well as a partial restoration of economic freedom and economic rights. Civil society began to grow, and popular calls for more rights and more political freedom have grown apace. As the ruling elite itself moved toward private ownership and the market economy, it began to shift from an outright rejection of "rights" to a partial acknowledgment of them.

In 1998 the Chinese government signed two important international human rights conventions; in 2004 it amended its constitution to include the phrase "respect and protect human rights"; and this year, 2008, it has promised to promote a "national human rights action plan." Unfortunately most of this political progress has extended no further than the paper on which it is written. The political reality, which is plain for anyone to see, is that China has many laws but no rule of law; it has a constitution but no constitutional government. The ruling elite continues to cling to its authoritarian power and fights off any move toward political change. The stultifying results are endemic official corruption, an undermining of the rule of law, weak human rights, decay in public ethics, crony capitalism, growing inequality between the wealthy and the poor, pillage of the natural environment as well as of the human and historical environments, and the exacerbation of a long list of social conflicts, especially, in recent times, a sharpening animosity between officials and ordinary people.

As these conflicts and crises grow ever more intense, and as the ruling elite continues with impunity to crush and to strip away the rights of citizens to freedom, to property, and to the pursuit of happiness, we see the powerless in our society—the vulnerable groups, the people who have been suppressed and monitored, who have suffered cruelty and even torture, and who have had no adequate avenues for their protests, no courts to hear their pleas—becoming more militant and raising the possibility of a violent conflict of disastrous proportions. The decline of the current system has reached the point where change is no longer optional.

II. OUR FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
This is a historic moment for China, and our future hangs in the balance. In reviewing the political modernization process of the past hundred years or more, we reiterate and endorse basic universal values as follows:
Freedom. Freedom is at the core of universal human values. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom in where to live, and the freedoms to strike, to demonstrate, and to protest, among others, are the forms that freedom takes. Without freedom, China will always remain far from civilized ideals.
Human rights. Human rights are not bestowed by a state. Every person is born with inherent rights to dignity and freedom. The government exists for the protection of the human rights of its citizens. The exercise of state power must be authorized by the people. The succession of political disasters in China's recent history is a direct consequence of the ruling regime's disregard for human rights.
Equality. The integrity, dignity, and freedom of every person—regardless of social station, occupation, sex, economic condition, ethnicity, skin color, religion, or political belief—are the same as those of any other. Principles of equality before the law and equality of social, economic, cultural, civil, and political rights must be upheld.
Republicanism. Republicanism, which holds that power should be balanced among different branches of government and competing interests should be served, resembles the traditional Chinese political ideal of "fairness in all under heaven." It allows different interest groups and social assemblies, and people with a variety of cultures and beliefs, to exercise democratic self-government and to deliberate in order to reach peaceful resolution of public questions on a basis of equal access to government and free and fair competition.
Democracy. The most fundamental principles of democracy are that the people are sovereign and the people select their government. Democracy has these characteristics: (1) Political power begins with the people and the legitimacy of a regime derives from the people. (2) Political power is exercised through choices that the people make. (3) The holders of major official posts in government at all levels are determined through periodic competitive elections. (4) While honoring the will of the majority, the fundamental dignity, freedom, and human rights of minorities are protected. In short, democracy is a modern means for achieving government truly "of the people, by the people, and for the people."
Constitutional rule. Constitutional rule is rule through a legal system and legal regulations to implement principles that are spelled out in a constitution. It means protecting the freedom and the rights of citizens, limiting and defining the scope of legitimate government power, and providing the administrative apparatus necessary to serve these ends.
III. WHAT WE ADVOCATE
Authoritarianism is in general decline throughout the world; in China, too, the era of emperors and overlords is on the way out. The time is arriving everywhere for citizens to be masters of states. For China the path that leads out of our current predicament is to divest ourselves of the authoritarian notion of reliance on an "enlightened overlord" or an "honest official" and to turn instead toward a system of liberties, democracy, and the rule of law, and toward fostering the consciousness of modern citizens who see rights as fundamental and participation as a duty. Accordingly, and in a spirit of this duty as responsible and constructive citizens, we offer the following recommendations on national governance, citizens' rights, and social development:
1. A New Constitution. We should recast our present constitution, rescinding its provisions that contradict the principle that sovereignty resides with the people and turning it into a document that genuinely guarantees human rights, authorizes the exercise of public power, and serves as the legal underpinning of China's democratization. The constitution must be the highest law in the land, beyond violation by any individual, group, or political party.
2. Separation of Powers. We should construct a modern government in which the separation of legislative, judicial, and executive power is guaranteed. We need an Administrative Law that defines the scope of government responsibility and prevents abuse of administrative power. Government should be responsible to taxpayers. Division of power between provincial governments and the central government should adhere to the principle that central powers are only those specifically granted by the constitution and all other powers belong to the local governments.
3. Legislative Democracy. Members of legislative bodies at all levels should be chosen by direct election, and legislative democracy should observe just and impartial principles.
4. An Independent Judiciary. The rule of law must be above the interests of any particular political party and judges must be independent. We need to establish a constitutional supreme court and institute procedures for constitutional review. As soon as possible, we should abolish all of the Committees on Political and Legal Affairs that now allow Communist Party officials at every level to decide politically sensitive cases in advance and out of court. We should strictly forbid the use of public offices for private purposes.
5. Public Control of Public Servants. The military should be made answerable to the national government, not to a political party, and should be made more professional. Military personnel should swear allegiance to the constitution and remain nonpartisan. Political party organizations must be prohibited in the military. All public officials including police should serve as nonpartisans, and the current practice of favoring one political party in the hiring of public servants must end.
6. Guarantee of Human Rights. There must be strict guarantees of human rights and respect for human dignity. There should be a Human Rights Committee, responsible to the highest legislative body, that will prevent the government from abusing public power in violation of human rights. A democratic and constitutional China especially must guarantee the personal freedom of citizens. No one should suffer illegal arrest, detention, arraignment, interrogation, or punishment. The system of "Reeducation through Labor" must be abolished.
7. Election of Public Officials. There should be a comprehensive system of democratic elections based on "one person, one vote." The direct election of administrative heads at the levels of county, city, province, and nation should be systematically implemented. The rights to hold periodic free elections and to participate in them as a citizen are inalienable.
8. Rural–Urban Equality. The two-tier household registry system must be abolished. This system favors urban residents and harms rural residents. We should establish instead a system that gives every citizen the same constitutional rights and the same freedom to choose where to live.
9. Freedom to Form Groups. The right of citizens to form groups must be guaranteed. The current system for registering nongovernment groups, which requires a group to be "approved," should be replaced by a system in which a group simply registers itself. The formation of political parties should be governed by the constitution and the laws, which means that we must abolish the special privilege of one party to monopolize power and must guarantee principles of free and fair competition among political parties.
10. Freedom to Assemble. The constitution provides that peaceful assembly, demonstration, protest, and freedom of expression are fundamental rights of a citizen. The ruling party and the government must not be permitted to subject these to illegal interference or unconstitutional obstruction.
11. Freedom of Expression. We should make freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and academic freedom universal, thereby guaranteeing that citizens can be informed and can exercise their right of political supervision. These freedoms should be upheld by a Press Law that abolishes political restrictions on the press. The provision in the current Criminal Law that refers to "the crime of incitement to subvert state power" must be abolished. We should end the practice of viewing words as crimes.
12. Freedom of Religion. We must guarantee freedom of religion and belief, and institute a separation of religion and state. There must be no governmental interference in peaceful religious activities. We should abolish any laws, regulations, or local rules that limit or suppress the religious freedom of citizens. We should abolish the current system that requires religious groups (and their places of worship) to get official approval in advance and substitute for it a system in which registry is optional and, for those who choose to register, automatic.
13. Civic Education. In our schools we should abolish political curriculum's and examinations that are designed to indoctrinate students in state ideology and to instill support for the rule of one party. We should replace them with civic education that advances universal values and citizens' rights, fosters civic consciousness, and promotes civic virtues that serve society.
14. Protection of Private Property. We should establish and protect the right to private property and promote an economic system of free and fair markets. We should do away with government monopolies in commerce and industry and guarantee the freedom to start new enterprises. We should establish a Committee on State-Owned Property, reporting to the national legislature, that will monitor the transfer of state-owned enterprises to private ownership in a fair, competitive, and orderly manner. We should institute a land reform that promotes private ownership of land, guarantees the right to buy and sell land, and allows the true value of private property to be adequately reflected in the market.
15. Financial and Tax Reform. We should establish a democratically regulated and accountable system of public finance that ensures the protection of taxpayer rights and that operates through legal procedures. We need a system by which public revenues that belong to a certain level of government—central, provincial, county or local—are controlled at that level. We need major tax reform that will abolish any unfair taxes, simplify the tax system, and spread the tax burden fairly. Government officials should not be able to raise taxes, or institute new ones, without public deliberation and the approval of a democratic assembly. We should reform the ownership system in order to encourage competition among a wider variety of market participants.
16. Social Security. We should establish a fair and adequate social security system that covers all citizens and ensures basic access to education, health care, retirement security, and employment.
17. Protection of the Environment. We need to protect the natural environment and to promote development in a way that is sustainable and responsible to our descendants and to the rest of humanity. This means insisting that the state and its officials at all levels not only do what they must do to achieve these goals, but also accept the supervision and participation of nongovernmental organizations.
18. A Federated Republic. A democratic China should seek to act as a responsible major power contributing toward peace and development in the Asian Pacific region by approaching others in a spirit of equality and fairness. In Hong Kong and Macao, we should support the freedoms that already exist. With respect to Taiwan, we should declare our commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy and then, negotiating as equals and ready to compromise, seek a formula for peaceful unification. We should approach disputes in the national-minority areas of China with an open mind, seeking ways to find a workable framework within which all ethnic and religious groups can flourish. We should aim ultimately at a federation of democratic communities of China.
19. Truth in Reconciliation. We should restore the reputations of all people, including their family members, who suffered political stigma in the political campaigns of the past or who have been labeled as criminals because of their thought, speech, or faith. The state should pay reparations to these people. All political prisoners and prisoners of conscience must be released. There should be a Truth Investigation Commission charged with finding the facts about past injustices and atrocities, determining responsibility for them, upholding justice, and, on these bases, seeking social reconciliation.
China, as a major nation of the world, as one of five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, and as a member of the UN Council on Human Rights, should be contributing to peace for humankind and progress toward human rights. Unfortunately, we stand today as the only country among the major nations that remains mired in authoritarian politics. Our political system continues to produce human rights disasters and social crises, thereby not only constricting China's own development but also limiting the progress of all of human civilization. This must change, truly it must. The democratization of Chinese politics can be put off no longer.
Accordingly, we dare to put civic spirit into practice by announcing Charter 08. We hope that our fellow citizens who feel a similar sense of crisis, responsibility, and mission, whether they are inside the government or not, and regardless of their social status, will set aside small differences to embrace the broad goals of this citizens' movement. Together we can work for major changes in Chinese society and for the rapid establishment of a free, democratic, and constitutional country. We can bring to reality the goals and ideals that our people have incessantly been seeking for more than a hundred years, and can bring a brilliant new chapter to Chinese civilization.
—Translated from the Chinese by Perry Link

Charter 08 for reform and democracy in China"

http://charter08.eu/2.html

http://www.thechinabeat.org/?p=1374

Some humans are more angelic than others, their aura just shines brighter, sometimes too bright.

Why a single international currency is bad.

Ideas Soviets tried this, i's are completely against a non bi-Parisian international currency, ideas of checks and balances when different currecneis are allowed to be used for international trade like we have the Eu and the Dollar.

  The basic theory of life is that there are opposites and they exist in majority for a reason. This is a basic element of balance. In the most basic molecules to the most advanced molecules, along with relation ships the best relationships are found with checks and balances. The world is to different to be under one international currency.

   These differences come from wanting everyone to be free and safe all the way to wanting to control via one sided control. Thus the international currency has be built upon a system of using more than one countries currency to use as a standard for product values. This then has allowed countries that the world deems the most balanced economy of civil rights, and freedoms and wishes for such to have a stance in the area of being used as a balance.

  Lately these currencies have become the Euro and the Dollar. This is mainly because these countries have found a good balance for freedom. Which is heavily political. As such these countries try and allow a balance of competition and economic fair competition. However, the Communist have long wished for a single international currency. This is mainly as the Soviets wished so that they could use their economic centralized strategy to control other countries. With the dark aura which is funnily seen around heavy communists. Thus the Soviet style one international currency did not have a balance our a check. It was mainly a domination currency, which was used much like Rome did to conquer other countries. We can see the same principalities coming out of China currently with their Communist and the idea of one single sided control. However, the Chinese Communist have not been able to gain the singular currency that the Soviets were able to gain against their conquered satellite countries.

    The check and balance of a currency left to be used by the trader or the trading company is freedom. As such if Australia wishes to trade with the EU as the bases for their trading then they can. If they wish to use the dollar then they can. However, this allowance makes sure that it is much harder to use a single currency for domination. Yet, I am so serious about the communist aura thing. Unless, they have been trained how to hide their aura, sometimes it just comes off really dark.

  However, on the lighter side. When we use a free international currency denomination. It allows countries not to be held under the one world dominance of currency. i.e. lets take the Chinese wish for a single currency. Their idea is heavily backed by their dominance of centralized economy and a long term plan that would allow more domination than actual fair competition and freedom. Then lets take the current idea of freedom of international currency. This allows a country lets say anyone country to choice between more than one currency to use as a trading post for their products in the international world. This decentralized international bi or tri currency of trading allows countries not to be stuck in Soviet Style one international currency economic warfare.

  Therefore, George Soros, you are still one of my heroes. However, I found your public conversation about one world currency very on the outs of the free society idea, along with a very lazy way of saying we should all work together to make sure that China becomes a healthy part of the world trading. I know this George, because I know you spoke without researching as you thought you had knowledge on the area However, if you had knowledge on the idea of one world currency you would have remember the Soviet Style one currency order and how it was used to heavily sedate and then conquer their satellites.

  Thus, a one international currency is not freedom, it is communism and a very old trick at that. The idea creates an allowance for easy economic warfare. Along those lines, China's Communist parties economic strategies are mirroring the study of communist idealists aura's. For the trained mystique in aura's it is easy to trace.

Rider i

Economists that blame the US do not look at the root of the problem.

  The reality is that I read all of these financial ideas of how the US caused the world's economic instability. However, I still have not read an empiracl paper on how neo-mercantalism plays a huge part in the imblance of the international market place. I mean basic data sets are easily used to undercutt economists that use leaf economics such as derviative markets, or credit markets to explain the world economic instability.

   I would love to read a full article on how neo-mercantalism actually caused the world's economic instability. Then again I am writing them so I guess that is my department. I have about 13 days left to collect and blog. As December is my shut down month. In which I start preparing for the two graduate tests and then saving for my graduate motor bike, along with strategically planning each possible combined programs living area. I plan to live in an area where it is self contained so that I can study, work out and then relax in a pool hall with friends without having to leave the closness of the lecture halls. However, living on campus is to cramped for me. Unless scholared. I really like how I have found a niche for my master thesis on economic warfare, or neo-mercantalism, etc This dig has been lots of fun for me and it will be a great resource when I go to write my thesis. I planned this out a long time ago, with many side trails along with this engine. This has taken many hours and knights out of my grad school years so I can properly attack the Professors versions of economic theories and legalities.

Rider i

China's SOE's hold back supplies in anticipation of Government price setting for higher profits later on.

"", which boosted demand at a time when industry analysts say China's major state-owned oil companies are withholding supplies in anticipation of a rise in the government-set price. That has led to rationing and long lines at filling stations, disrupting cargo shipments."

Look at China's new cartel and centralized strategy regarding resources on the market impacts of the US and itnernational markets. They are going anti-trust again.

http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/WRS0501/WRS0501.pdf

I have reports if you are in need I am your economic pusher man. LOL

"The state has always played a big role in China's economy, but for most of the reform era that started in the late 1970s, it retreated as state-owned collective farms were dismantled and inefficient state industrial enterprises closed."
Of if this is so how does a country with over 500,000 farmers have an inflation in food when that is what they do. I mean this natural act was surely thought of and properly prepared for by purchasing foreign goods until the next cycle if the storms were that big. Thus this could be a possible way to padd the Chinese economies from proper fair play. As the Commuist are still afraid of the free markets. Either that or still learning how to properly regulate and plan for them. As such, making laws were the US pays farmers to actually save. This will be a fun trace.

http://knox.villagesoup.com/discussions/view/chinas-state-capitalism-sparks-a-global-backlash/364305

Lunch starter

The Economic Sin Eater Theory

Young Lion's Saints Production

Sin Eater

    A sin eater is that angel who loves humans so much that it is willing to give up its heavenly being to save another. http://home.earthlink.net/~glepper/SinEaters.pdf Thus that angel was allowed to come to earth to save the souls of those humans who have acted much like an angel and forgave and thus gave. That does not mean that all sins will be eaten, nor does it mean that you will enter the gates if you sin. You must repent and mean it. This is usually in the form of economic transformation as the human soul feels worldly affects of natural needs of social, food, less stress and the such. For the sin eater finds and is allowed to by the way of divine inspiration to help those who it finds to be worthy.

  This worthiness can be considered in many ways from the sinner eaters point of view. Much like Constantine or other human like angels of closeness to the other world. The sin eater may eat the sin so as to keep a possible from become an enemy and thus causing war and death and destruction. On the other hand the sin eater can eat sin from another sin eater who has been on earth to long and needs to go home. This then allows that sin eater to take some of that sin eaters sins from them to give them time to rest and relieve from the sins that are holding down the angles soul.

Economic Consumption

      Consumption means to use or to take into ones possession. This idea of economic consumption is a mere fact of what one needs and then expends to a point for the necessary of what one wants, needs or  has a necessity for. Economics as the meaning is for one to manage their surroundings which  one takes in into their surroundings. Such things as food, clothes, housing, transportation, stress relieving activities, socializing, family rearing, and hobbies are all things that most humans need to survive. This is true whether in the rain forest on in the big cities. Something has to be traded for those things as one can't always afford to have those things and maintain them themselves. As such in the rain forest, they dance and sing and pray to the forest while giving back their ability to cut back on the living things in the forest so that one thing does not grow to be unbalanced to the others. This is human consumption on a basic level as applied to the forest. Where humans are the closest to the natural economics. They take what they need and thus that need allows for the proper growth of their population. As it creates sustainable growth form the forest. This growth can also be applied in a much more strategic and much more reliant economic environment like a big city.
  
   The economic environment in a big city is different from that in the forest. As it is more reliant on the human factor and less reliant on the natural factor. This is because the natural factor has been maximized for the benefit of the most. This is done through the allowance of one to own their own. This ownership allows those that find that part of life i.e. farming or tree growing to be their love and what they do. Then allowing the maximized levels of life for the individual that is allowed to compete for what they love and what they want to do. As such we take the farmer, at one point in time they had to make the decision that they loved it so they do it. As even those who do not love it but keep themselves stuck in it find a hate love relationship that dwells based on what ever socio or mental cognitive process that keeps them there. This of course is not true for the stone steppers. Which move up the ladder and always find a way to strive until they thus sit down by the river and find the peace they seek in their life. However, this maximization of individual management of the natural resources allows for the the other humans to maximize what they love to do the most. Some love to teach, others love music, some love to fight, some love to read and write. However, what it is that has drove them there is their ability to maximize their quality of life for the best that they can do.

   As such each individual takes their economics to the market place to trade with the other individuals that have their economics. They all get together and find a way to judge value. This value is thus based on what that person perceives as what they want to consume. This individual maximized ability to consume makes them want to maximize their economics.  Then allowing them to bring that to the market place for their consumption. As such we have then created a city. Were folks come together to bring their loves of their economics together to find and consume the things they like. We have the farmer creating a necessity consumption, we teacher thus teaching for socializing purposes so that the market place can be economically efficient to use counting and language to trade with each other for consumption. Then we have economists or managers who make the efficiency of the market even better through strategized and proper creation of values of each individuals economics.  The city then grows as the farmer needs tools, the teacher needs books and studies, the economists needs data and watchers etc. This then creates a place for more individuals to find their love of economics as their soul is drawn to it. The idea is that the freest soul creates the most maximization allowing others to do the same. Thus creating the most spread out economic market place. This then allows the welfare of each individual who pays into for the whole to be taken care of so the market place can be nice and efficient for the consumption.

  As the efficiency grows we find more and more cities will come together as the human density causes humans to not be able to have a marketplace so close to each other as they need room to live. This then causes cities individuals to trade with other cities individuals, as the specification for some items has a  small market place. As such some items are only able to be sustained in certain places. Therefore, cities individuals do business with others cities individuals. Along with those lines we find that when cities work together and pitch in they can create a safer and more efficient market place. Plus, the maximization of resources like food, can become even more maximized as the market places and cities spread out. We find the population grows. So the farmer can produce more resources and the teacher has more students to teach as more and more of the population seek to maximize their consumption of those marketing their economics. We then get streams that allow individuals to move from city to city to find areas of consumption that they like. For example we take one city were the specific markets tend to allow them to consume more for what they wish to consume. The individual will find a way to live there. As such we get then cities that turn into states. As the differences of individuals consumptions become greater and greater. With more and more need for individuals to have space and differences. Still though, those cities have to be efficiency and seek security. So they can band together and pay into the market place for security and efficiency.

  Then we have a country or a community as the individuals start to pitch in to create a market place for their consumption on a grander scale. This country then becomes a place of consumption of its own. The country then is able to be seen as an actor or a whole in certain parts. Thus a country who's individuals have all started to pitch in to create a more efficient market needs a place to grow. This growth thus becomes part of the international market place. International marketplaces are were countries individuals create  a bigger marketplace. The market places from cities to states to countries create huge amounts of economists that have actually become so micro specific that they have come to known as judges, legislators & President.  Then there is a myriad of other positions that microly get broken down into specifics to help the market place stay efficient for the individuals consumptions. These actors all play a party in the guiding of the bigger market place which is the international marketplace.

   This international market place is the consumption of a countries individuals as a whole. Which can been seen in bigger countries by areas of concentration of legal and legislative actions by the lead economists in the country. As such a simple shift or law this or that way can shift a countries economics in a huge way. As such, those international countries that participate in international trade on substantial levels have to been seen as part of the international market place for good or bad. Thrust then, we have countries that consume, those that produce and those that are unable to compete in the international market place because their domestic market places are to weak or to insecure to do so. However, those that can gain benefits from the international trade as it allows for more individuals to be able to consume more and to bring more to the market place. As such this then makes it possible for those who participate to be able to create a higher welfare for those that can't find their way or naturally are unable to fin their way in the market place. These countries then consume what they need to help their domestic market places grow and prosper. Some countries like the US currently believe in consume more than they produce. Which I theorize is because of the ability of one countries market place to help to develop another countries domestic development. Which will then allow more security for that country that the US consumes. As that country can then gain reserves and thus spend it on their domestic policy to create a higher welfare and more individual maximization's of consumption through freedom of economics. However, on the other hand you have those countries that use their economics for military purposes of conquering and control. In which ideas of politics or religion place a big part. These countries use their economics that are produce and gathered from the whole and from part in state actors to control or dominate other countries. This is done for two reasons: 1 so that their market place can become bigger and uncompetitive so that they can win win the so called trade wars or currency wars. (which are not wars they are just natural when a country has so much debt and so little to produce something has to be done). This idea of using economics for warfare or dominance then causes higher forms of insecurity. From urban poverty with gang creation all the way to rural creation of terrorism or extremists groups. This is because the natural flow of economics that is allowed through a balanced international economy is no longer and it is centralized in one are with that countries government using for its purposes, without the market being able to have those values flowing through the international vein's. 2. They are to afraid or do not understand how to legislate or legally propagate a freedom of economics that allows their individuals to maximize their consumption.

Safety through Economics

     The humans consumption of their economics and the trading of economics for individuals has become such a huge part of the world. Many wars have raged based on them and the inability of egotistical leaders to work together to better the world. Thus, there has been a movement in the ones they call economists to create a safety through economics. This has been done in many forms from Lock and Smith in their freedom views, to Marx who believe in feudalistic style of economics with certain centralized leaders holding the power while the others all are enslaved to those above, with a much smaller percentage of a change to climb the ladder or to own their own. The individualist believe in the maximization of the individuals consumption so as to spread out the wealth and market place. Through the natural flow of individuals seeking what they love to do, or what their soul is drawn too. This maximizes their consumption by giving them the humaniscity of succeeding for ones consumption. While the communists believe more in the idea that all should be forced to do what the highers tell them to do or decided based on the betterment of the consumption for the city, state or country. Even though the leaders could never know what the individuals soul could become, or desires to consume. Yet, they tell them to do, and the leaders create cognitive process for them to do. Both theories can been seen in each other and separately. The individualist needs the communist which we then call socialism as the all individuals pitch into the marketplace to keep it safe from those who would prey on the weak as the predators find their soul is to use their hatred against others.

     Thus we also see the individual in the communist were again they have to go to socialism as compete. This is because communism stops the flow of the market place and the individuals consumption through unnatural control of the few over the whole. Which then creates pockets of wealth and poverty. This classless system then creates a high disregard for each other as the impoverished see the rich/leaders as oppressors and the rich see the poor as those who can't make it/have to be taken care of like babies/or slaves for the leaders ends (let me tell you from a titans point of view ain't no leader nor rich person stronger than me, cause I am an American 300,000 million strong leaders all working together for their own individual consumptions, American Royalty). This spreading of the class less is a clear sing of a communistic style system. This system then creates less security. As the classes spread apart we see more centralization of the wealth. This happens by the government trying to take it from the rich and then give it to the poor. However, this is unnatural and does not work, as the poor still have not found their souls economics as they are given things from the government. The governments giving can become a souls economics. As the government has to take more care of that individual, like a baby. Instead of  maximize their own consumption by bringing to the market place its maximized economics. Which usually means that it has to create a value to the market place to be able to consume.

     However, we have seen battles and wars rage between both of the extreme theorists in these ideas as to how to create safety, which seems an oxymoron but it is true (my idea is safer, no mine, I will kill you , a gentle persons battle gone completely wrong it has, LOL). We have seen the individualist go to war for freedom and civil rights from in between each other or through the communist religious style of feudalism. We have also seen the communist go to war against the individualist as the capitalist are allowed to much power and are not properly regulated, so as to create a competitive market place instead of a economic devastated market place.  Those examples can be seen from country to country. Thus one of the ideas had the idea of taking account of the Acapella story. So that countries would not go to major war with each other.
   

The Sin Eaters Theory

    We saw this with the US and Russia. Who both had different ideas of economics to create safety and freedom. One country believed in centralizing the power the other believed in civilized chaos or in other words freedom (order through chaos). One tried to control the chaos and it created bubbles, the other just let it flow and made sure those trying to control the true freedom did not present a natural economically harm to their ability to feel freedom. It was not necessarily that Russia was economically attacked by the US as they really did not. It was more that Russia attacked itself. As the US was not able to do much of anything as the Soviet Union was tighter than diamond rock. Yet, the US just lived and made sure that the Soviet Union was not able to use their cartels, SOE's or anti-trust violations in a way to allow them to spread their idea of freedom, which was known as Communism. Different story now though. Freedom is a whole different ball game with more having to learn to live with everyone knowing and just doing right and striving to compete (chaos).

   The US decided to take a different approach with the Chinese communist instead of the watch and let die approach like the old guard did with the Soviet Union. This is mainly for reasons of world security and economic stability. As after the Soviet Union imploded itself, and no Putin we did not have to help it, unlike what mother and Miss tries to do to the US. Then again what attacks us makes us stronger. This still though was very scary for many families in the US as Russia had to sell military equipment to try and pay for the mass spreading out of debts which was done by centralizing and holding reserves from many of it satellites. Either way they imploded themselves by trying to spread out their idea of freedom through economics.
  
   As such I hypothesis the US has decided that to deal with the Chinese communist unfair competitive economics and the centralization of feudalistic style wishes for dominance in the Sin Eaters theory. This could not even be meant to do. However, as the cognitive process of the cold war is still in the minds of the elders of the US and they wish not for their offspring or those they guard to go through the same thing with China they could unconsciously through a myriad of laws and cognitive creations have found the sin eaters speaking in their ears.

  Thus we decided to engage the Chinese Communist in the economic game understanding that they had very long way to go to climb out of the dark ages. However, it would be better to deal with them in an engagement than in a stale mate, as death and destruction along with possibility of nuclear holocaust or world war is not appeasing to grandfathers and grandmothers. Therefore, the US has allowed China to play unfairly for sometime eating away at the US's first world cushion and pillow that was created from one of the world's freest market places. This then has allowed the US to take the bite of the economic theory rivalry out of the Communist. Basically this time by allowing them to see first hand how it is done and what a blessing for producing and safety that it individual freedom can be. Thus the Chinese started to maximize their individuals ability to consume by allowing and trusting their citizens with more rights. This then has allowed them to climb up the ladder faster than any other country in the civilized world. This has mainly been because the US has allowed it.

  The allowance of the Communist China to rise to the top was so that the world can become a stable place without such hostile economic warfare that the cold war saw. However, that time was better for the US than it was the world that the Soviet's tried to colonize and in the name of communism. The idea is that the US believed that it was cheaper for the US to consume the Chinese cartel made products, anti-trust violating centralized strategies and then the Chinese massive resource conquest. Which I can only hypothesize was done so as to create a new bigger market for more US goods and a competitive international market place.

  This competitive marketplace was created on oral and written contracts that the Communist would disband their centralized anti-trust violating economics, SOE cartels and their massive resource acquisition once they reached a point of ability to take care of their domestic economy and welfare so as to allow their individuals to compete fairly in the international market place. Thus leaving behind the Communist feudalistic style of dominating satellite countries with their uncompetitive economic theories of bigger state wins, instead of fair competition no matter how small or big, i.e the US pride and joys Hong Kong and Japan, bright free market places very small, love y'all (so did jac). This then allows the free markets to keep a communist country from collapsing and becoming a world nightmare of weapon's lose and hostility of countries once the communist economics fail to provide a spread out welfare of economics for the betterment of their dominated satellites. Much like what we have done for both China and Germany. Therefore, neither country crashed under the Communist style of economics. This then has allowed both countries to gain massive amounts of reserves to actually build their economy and strengthen it at their points of reconstructive. That means oh milk shake me baby. However, now we have to make sure they do not use our friend ship to dominate or conquer others. We created stable secure monsters, now we need to make sure they do not go and eat their neighbors. Possible like we have been seeing them do with my hypothesis/theory of the Chinese Communist Economic Blitzkrieg.

"The ability to bring security to those that do not have it through economics of consuming other countries sins, or lack thereof of natural law of economics. Which spreads out the welfare the best, while maximizing the individuals consumption." 

Rider i's hypothosizeye's

 

Excess Liquidity in the form of reserves should be used for building domestic economies not conquering those that that the liquidity was earned from.

   This is the problem with the US national economic security plan. Is that the US can create excess liquidity in a country via controls allowances and other maneuvers. In which the wish is that that country will use those reserves to create a bigger market at home and allow more into the market. However, especially with China this is not the case. We see China spending tons of its reserves on champion SOE's, centralized economic programs and cartel activities for which they wish to use to dominate the international market place.

   How to get China to build their domestic market instead of creating a massive uncompetitivce cartel of business entities in which they can use to conquer international economies?

Liquidity Shock due to over manufacturing (dumping tactics). China's Lead in the World economic instability.

   The problem with the business cycle of the US is that it is vulnerable to liquidity shock. As I have stated through my service bell curve, which is driven by the fact that the US can't compete with neo-mercantalist like China, who protect their markets from imports; to create a higher trade surplus and capital inflows instead of capital outflows. Which they then turn into negative capital inflows (or liquidity drowning of the US financial sectors) for the US, but more positive capital inflows for the neo-mercantalist, much like they do with their round tripping regarding Hong Kong investing.

      This reliance on a neo-mercantalist country or countries that have been known to round trip their capital inflows or liquidity right back into the market place they are draining of liquidity causes a market melt down. This market melt down is based on the lack of jobs being created by the negative capital inflow to the US. These jobs however, due create a sort of short term service job flow from the negative capital inflows.  This creates the service industry boom, by pushing more money in an industry that will boom and bust with the employment multiplier as the market shares for that service are tied up to providers. This is done as more and more financing comes back into the US as the US positive capital is exported out while negative capital is imported in. The US starts to drown in negative capital inflows. Which some economists incorrectly think balances out the account books. However, it does not.
   This is because the negative capital inflows which have thus caused a boom to peak and then spike, as the US has no reliance on manufacturing or high technology jobs anymore. Means that the US has to create an artificial negative capital inflow just to keep up its quality of life. This is the stimulus plan we have seen.

   Were instead of doing what China does just lowering imports into the US and raising exports to other countries. The US keeps consuming as it is part of a national security plan, to use our deficit spending and consumption to keep our international clout up. However, this liquidity rush by neo-mercantalist is not just being done during the service bell curve boom.

   The worst part is they know about the US's very old and archaic national security plan of consumption. So they have created a strategy to take advantage of it. This strategy not only includes the liquidity dumping that is created by the cheap manufacturing dumping that brings in jobs and high capital inflows, with many round tripping negative capital inflows for the Us turning into again another round of positive capital inflows for China and the neo-mercantalist. But also a liquidity use for purchasing market shares and power through industrial acquisitions in the free markets that have crashed. This then leads to further the international economic instability.

   This instability will thus start all over again. Once the US creates another service industry to bring its citizens quality of life up higher, while its ability to compete in international productivity will be drowned out by more liquidity dumping with another service industry bell curve boom bust. Much like the savings and loans, .com and the mortgage. The mortgage was the worst multiplier because it deals with the free markets most sacred civil right, the right to own property.

   Thus, this cycle is the true cause of the liquidity shocks. These shocks come after the service bell curve has run its toll and then has been normalized. This normalization is were the demand and supply connect and even out with the employment multiplier. This needs work, I bet it will look good for my thesis. This liquidity shock is then caused by a credit crunch. As at the end of the business cycle after the feeding frenzy to try and get rid of bad liquidity that did become non existent liquidity and many banks had to eat huge losses. This means this shock is a strategic counter to the US's national security idea of consumption. Were the liquidity shock caused in the world does not actually affect the neo mercantalist or communist but herds them into more market shares, and more round trip financing which creates more negative capital inflows for countries to rebuild their economy, while China gets a win win of positive capital inflows from the root cause of their manufacturing dumping.

   The problem is that economists do not seem to see that far down the line. As the communist and neo-mercantalits do not worry about upfront cheap dumping of products because they will just recapitalize their SOE's and centralized economy until the free market service industries normalize or crash. Once this happens there is usually a credit crunch which causes a liquidity shock. This means that country with the most reserves can easily override the shock and then complete their end game of domination instead of fair and competitive economics.

  This is all done basically because of liquidity pools created by massive amounts of reserves. These liquidity pools allow the communist to keep investing and round tripping their capital inflows over and over again. Which is much like an erosion tactic of the sea. As each round of negative capital inflows to the US means more inflation. Which then leads to more liquidity shock as we lose more liquidity and savings complete are used up just to pay for negative capital inflows.

   Thus the Solution is to make sure that countries like China and Germany which are very rich countries, which huge histories of totalitarian government economic control are not allowed to obtain such huge amounts of liquidity pools. This is easily done by creating the US's point of view of creating peacefully societies through consumption. The free markets theories that they would consume the communists sins of unfair economics and lack thereof of economic freedoms. Well it worked, both Germany old candle still gona get wiped when I have my crowd of people flocking down the DMZ to hold each other then build a capital city, ya what. However, China and the neo-mercantalist would rather blame the US and the free markets for the very things that they caused. As if they were doing some kind of new economic model or even if we did not allow them to compete unfairly for all these years. However, now if Germany and China would actually follow suit it would be better for all.

   This is because liquidity shocks would not be used for domination as the Communist and neo-mercantalist are doing now. This is because the liquidity pools would be in countries that are very poor and need to develop. Thus, while countries like the US, China and Germany could actually still consume poor countries products to build them up, this would then open up their domestic markets and other markets in the world. Thus allowing an export of products and a creation of jobs at home. At lass, China and Germany wish to stick with their historical views of conquest instead of the US's view of consumption. That is alright my thesis will also bring into light a new way to consume yet keep at bay neo-mercantalist and communist that use economic warfare to crash then devour. Instead of using economic warfare to develop and create sovereignty, with new markets for all.

Rider I