This one is for Detroit and all those who lost their Childrens homes to Communist EW.

This one is for Detroit and all those who lost their Childrens homes to Communist EW.
This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded. http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/ Currently being edited. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=H9AfqVIxEzg If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

US Innovation killer, via market share uncompetitiveness.

Global competition for US domestic growth is needed for  domestic growth of innovation. Today we have gigantic foreign Government SOE’s and Sovereign Wealth funds in the US buying up US and foreign free enterprise market shares and abilities. This kills the idea of free trade and free markets; as we can take the example of the Post office which is a US SOE; it undercuts its competition so much that it has to borrow billions from the tax payers to survive every year.  Communist SOE's in the US free market and US foreign free market areas are also being treated the same by the CCP as we treat our Post office. However, our Post Office does not go to China to set up post offices to take away their Post office Market shares. What are we doing about this CCP intrusion into the world’s most free market? I have found that free enterprises (FE) like Toyota or other (FE’s) are more competitive as they do not have as much government assistance. However, allowing CCP owned SOE's like Sinomach or Ansteel who are centrally controlled and managed by the SASAC CCP economic intelligence unit is unfair and uncompetitive. Especially since CCP SOE's have high uncompetitive ratings in free market rating groups. This  kills US innovation. As we can see through the US’s Understanding that the Communist are subsidized at home, then they received 80% of our green tech stimulus, then Senators Like Senator Reid of Las Vegas give the Communist SOE's hundreds of millions of more dollars to crush US innovation by stealing domestic and foreign free enterprises market shares through uncompetitive allowances of SOE's. What do you plan to do about the Massive Expansion of CCP SOE's in the US and international free markets?  CCP SOE's create an inability for (FE’s) to be able to compete with them. As their intelligence units steal our patents, unfairly compete for local and international market places through government power, military and intelligence gaining them unfair competition advantage; Making it almost impossible for US innovative citizens to compete in domestic or even international market places against massive SOE's. What you are doing about communist expansion killing US innovation and ability to compete for market shares that are supposed to be for (FE’s) and not Communist SOE's? SOE’s allow militaries and governments to be secure, why are they being allowed to kill US and foreign innovation through free enterprises by uncompetitivly destroying (FE’s) abilities.

No comments:

Post a Comment