Anti-Economic Warfare

This Lockique is for public debate, proper legislation, better economic civil liberties, ever changing economic theories and a well respected resolve to what international SOE’s inherently do. [def. of lockique (Use Tomb search before reading]. If China allows I would attend a SASAC meeting. If I had one sentence, it would be: neo-mercantlism crashes,then devours free enterprises and free trade. or comparative advantage needs work. Root Economics (R) Rootologist. The Cosmic Economist.

This one is for Detroit and all those who lost their Childrens homes to Communist EW.

This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. "The new order was tailored to a genius who proposed to constrain the contending forces, both domestic and foreign, by manipulating their antagonisms" "As a professor, I tended to think of history as run by impersonal forces. But when you see it in practice, you see the difference personalities make." Therefore, "Whenever peace-concieved as the avoidance of war-has been the primary objective of a power or a group of powers, the international system has been at the mercy of the most ruthless member" Henry Kissinger The World market crashed. There was complete blame from the worlds most ruthless power on the world's most protective and meditational power. So I responded. http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/ http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/ Currently being edited. http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=H9AfqVIxEzg If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Saturday, December 25, 2010

This idea of Win Win as perpetuated by the Economists is a falacy.

http://www.economist.com/node/17493390

Inside of natural world there are winners and there are losers. Win Win scenario at best hopes just to lessen the losers loses. That is what it is. Even in mediation which is what the idea of win win was created for. There is still the person who was wronged and the person who has to pay for the wrong.

Win Win is very communisqe and it has been wield very well for the benefit of the communists parties. The idea that the US should export all of its high skilled labor jobs like in the past four years with our high tech deficits in trade, and our old high skilled labor in manufacturing in textiles, and our new high skilled labor in nano tech and engineering is not a win win. The depletion of the US's, savings, infrastructure, high skilled labor pool, along with jobs that create nexuses taxes, is not a win win. It is a win lose scenario. For example, we take were I live. We just lost 100 engineering jobs in a very high skilled labor pool to a Chinese high tech company via export of jobs because they had a myriad of uncompetitive advantages. From the low paid engineers, to the low resource costs, to the shipping, to the actual market place that all business want that is protected to at the worlds 6th highest protected marketplace in the world for entrance from importation of foreign made products. This is not a win win, and is a compete psychological warfare perpetuated by the MSS and SASAC.

In Reality business is competition. In a Lockean world of individual ownership and freedom of economics along with a smithian un communist world, state ownership is at a minimum as both Locke and Smith did not like state political powers to intervene. However, in China as they are Communist their whole economic system is still most perpetuated by a centralized economic strategy and very military as per the MSS red phone tactics. Thus creating a very unfair competition between a free world and the communist world. Which is not a win win.

The predated leaders of the I's have documented oral contracts with the old Chinese Communist leaders. In which they were supposed to start to dismantle the communist party and the massive soe economic weapons. Neither has been held to honor at the highest part. The Communist party jails people ye the old elders of the communist party and the young communist party leaders (40-50's) agree that they need to reform their unfair political power structure. However, they have not allowing the communist economic unfair policies of centralized economics that the US and free world fought so hard against in the Soviet Union to persist. Along with that their economic statecraft weapons of SOE's were supposed to be disbanded so their individual citizens could become more competitive as a free market. They have not done that either. We see smaller SOE's being conglomerated with bigger SOE's while their private enterprises are feed uncompetitive loans to take on and aquire foreign business and market shares while the SOE's are prepared for economic warfare nuclearation. This was not the deal of my fore leaders, and it was not the deal I would have done, as I understand the communist cognitive side affects of Karl Marx's theories and sinister creation of power centralization that creates tyranny. Not saying China is a tyrant, they have come a long way. I am just saying this win win idea with the Communist party is not what it is placed to be by them.

However, to take trade with China as a win win is to tell me you are an economists who does not understand root economics. The trade with China again I dulled and took power, away from and thus it will change was not and is not a win win. There is winners and losers. The US has allowed as per cognitive creation of economists and political leaders that some how Adam smith's and Locke's theories of free trade and individual ownership of labor apply to statecraft weapons. They don't. The Wealth has been allowed to be centralized in the world in a few neo-mercantalist countries. Which I dare say are developing. As if China and Germany are still developing, then so is the US, European Union and the other so called developed nations. As they all sit in the same chairs on the international nexus, and they all hold the same military power, along with checks. Further, the economic might of each is the same. However, again, just some have more freedom than others, and some's economic centralized statecraft is more win than others. This is primarily because all of the or at least most of the old communist economic warfare guard from SOE's were told to literally go chase the grey's. Funny thing was, they found them. However, how can you tell a government that allows itself to be devastate economically that you have found the very thing that is the most interesting. I do not know. That is juts a little flair I like to do, if you understand Guardia-siochana and its historical implementations.

Either way,business is business. Win Win is an idea for toddlers and t-ball players. We should compete against our old rivals the Communist and understand their economic weapons of SOE's in all sectors of industry to be what they are economic weapons.

Rider I

No comments:

Communist Chinese Blast US's freedom of rights.

Where as the Communist Chinese will shoot you in the head for not paying your taxes or even arrest you for 11 years for speaking out against the corrupt leaders. After the Communist have given Clinton illegal funds then bought our satellite technology from his administration, then Reid gave the Communist hundreds of millions to destroy US domestic jobs I know what side I am on now. Check this out I love this one this is great "Unemployment rate in the United States has been stubbornly high. From December 2007 to October 2010, a total of 7.5 million jobs were lost in the country (The New York Times, Nov 19, 2010). According to statistics released by the US Department of Labor on Dec 3, 2010, the US unemployment rate edged up to 9.8 percent in November 2010, and the number of unemployed persons was 15 million in November, among whom, 41.9 percent were jobless for 27 weeks and more (data.bls.gov)." "Proportion of American people living in poverty has risen to a record high." I love the Communist views on us being racist. When they do not have one major women leader, nor do they have any other race in their whole Communist Party leadership. LOL WTF, are they talking about.

Au Introduction to Christian Economics

400 Pages of Wine Cigars and run out digital book reading batteries. Oh each book is like 400 pages of godly economicness ohhhhhh. Talk about a rush I almost felt like I was flying in the clouds on this one. I wish there was a certificate program for reading all of these things. I mean, I am flying right now, heart is about to burst. I know I do not need one I will just write my own and place it on the wall, like Jesus notes on paper. Then I will plaque it. I have read and studied such and such, authorized by the King I Druid of .... mmm I wonder if I could teach a bible class around here with this material. I bet I could, oh sunday class teaching about free markets and Christianity a double whammy against Communist single party rule. Ya mo fo's.

True Patriotism For Freedom and Liberty against single party rule starts at birth.

Obama's CIA "Mommy Dearest" — identifying Indonesians for assassination It was once the idea to take down one world orders and tyrants that wished to conquer the world and enslave their people that you had to be able to turn water into wine, and the very scary crush molecules and energy into gold or metal. The third was to show the symbols of dissent to single one world domination yet gain favor from the evils that wished it so to stop them, there are three stnbols that represent the anti tyrant party, can you see them. The idea that factions should exist in peace is the ultimate goal for any Freedom loving Patriot as the understand that they will always exist as nature is, is reality.

First job losses from JFCOM closure happen today

Closing down more US domestic bases, much like our weak leaders did during the last service bell curve trough cycle when we closed down substantial domestic military bases, which have left many parts of the coast vulnerable, like we saw when the Communist launched a ICMB off the coast of Catalina, and our interceptors were very late. Sound like Rome, close domestic bases, expand international bases? Communist expand and grow and are much more advanced in military power than the US, yet our leaders can't seem to understand why the US can't pay its bills. Could not be irregular economic warfare or what we call cold war, no of course not. Just like the closing of West Coast military bases really was not a problem,when the Communist launched a ICMB off the coast of Catalina and our interceptors where about 30 seconds to 50 seconds late from stopping a full scale hit on a major west coast city. Then again, not like El Toro could have got their faster than Northern California, or Central or Even Sand Diego. Then again it is not like our international cooperation intelligence base JFCOM will come in handy with the worlds biggest Communist lead Bric ever, collaborating their resources together in opposition to UN and NATO.

UN Interventions

"The mining itself violates the Tibetans' rights to self-determination (to freely determine their economic, social and cultural development and to freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources) and to religious and cultural freedom (because Tibetan culture abjures wholesale destructive mining). Moreover, none of the mining benefits the Tibetans, as the resources are routinely transferred out of Tibet." The Communist Party has before invaded a country purely for its resources, it will do it again. Unlike Democratic reforms in which countries go in to take out single party rulers and their abuses to their citizens. The Communist Party of China goes into a country to own the resources to expand their international desires to rule the world under a single party dominant system.

Chinese woman sentenced to a year in labour camp over tweet

Prominent Chinese blogger charged as crackdown deepens

'China may attack India to ensure its supremacy in Asia'

The real threat is to the Communist Parties consumption of resources to keep itself as the worlds producer and thus itnernational market holder. Currently India is the next country up that will be able to mass produce at very low prices, thus, causing the Communists high technoloigical and massive cities to turn into a more conumer friendly country thus, meaning they will lose their producer standard and international control. This has happened to all the worlds big countries. This will happen to the Communsit unless they bubble and fight against it like the Soviet's did or like the German Socialist party did. Which as a single party Kingship it is more likely they will use high technological weapons to unfairly keep control of the world. Probable tech tonic plate weapons and other high technological weapons like resource controll and telecommunications controll will be the new, economic warfare before full scale military movements.

Corruption up among China government officials

Why aren't Brown and Pak registered lobbyists?

With the Community believing that Rose Pak is working closely with the Chinese Communist Party and other Democrats turining check to gain communist power through her, why is she not properly registered as a Lobbyist agent, with proper funds checks on who she is doing debate battles for. I think she should be properly investigated and made to follow lobbyist agent rules and protocals. Anytime a community ties someone to a death and they have that much political power, as a debate war lord, they should be placed under public scrutiny.

Science turns monkeys into drones - Humans are next, genetic experts say

One of the most important reasons for a mutiple Democratic competition voting system. If one oppresses or allow, they are to be gutted and voted out. "Scientists have discovered a way of manipulating a gene that turns animals into drones that do not become bored with repetitive tasks." The reason why the Druid tribe will fight to death to stop one party or person governace of people. This is not even a half of what science acn do, if let into the hands of the unchecked and single sided. I have over 3,000 birds in programs world wide making sure science is not used for oppression by elititiest richies or politicus.

China Leads The Way

Twenty-one million electric bikes were purchased in China in 2008, compared with just under ten million cars. E-bike models typically cost around $300 US. Because the bikes are practically silent and emit no odors (let alone pollution), they are popular alternatives to motor scooters and motorcycles." I want somebodis arse on a silver plater when i wake up. I have not heard of one American company doing these kinds of international sales. If I wake, hippy and you do not have somebodies head on a platter for me, I swear the greys will not be able to hold me back when I use you for MMA practice. You mo f's.

Break through in Revolutionary Energy

The end of fossel fuels and the begging of world Democrazitation. If OPEC keeps its barrle prices high we will have no choice but to revolt, the higher the prices the more likley our represnentatives are to be pressured to revolt. I am already revolting and working on using up our nuclear waste while we make way for linless energy, motion energy and solar and weather energy. People should never place all of their eggs in one basket then use that basket to be bullies to their people or other peoples.

Jobs returning — but good ones not so much

"Several recent studies suggest that the new jobs pay less and offer fewer work hours than the ones they have replaced." That is because we have lost all of our high technological jobs that used to pay upwards of 50 a year to Communist China that pays 6 times less than we do for the same high technological product. What are we supposed to produce if we can't even compete for high technology jobs like engineering and produciton of high technology products. We can't that is why I have an intellectual legal hit on the Treasury for a horrible written report, legal of course. but hey those master and PHD degrees can be used to earn $15,000-$25,000 a year no problem, cause you have to compete with Communist China's pay scale.

Competition Advocacy: Voices in the Wilderness or Trusted Advisors?

OPEC

In less than two years prices hit nine year all time high. Think some folks are getting greedy. In my opinion OPEC countries should be forced to diversify and stop relying on the argument of that is how we keep up with other countries who produce and service. I mean, I watch OPEC countries, what I see is massive spending on things that is never used, then massive amounts of money being spent to upkeep things that are not any benefit to their people, or the world, just the rich elite who control the Oil and Lead OPEC. If OPEC was forced to diversify, then the world could have cheaper gas prices, allowing more spread of wealth for the common person. This is because the less we spend on gas the more the spread of wealth can be spent on families, consuming, traveling, space exploration, a whole group of things. However, OPEC, countries are lazy and their leaders seem to overly spend on things that do not help their people, nor the worlds people. It is the only industry in the world that could rise that fast, do to such a strong anti competitive behavior by the rich elite members. I mean diversification would make them richer too, and allow their overhead to be spread out more evenly so all humans could enjoy life, not just empty things sitting their for a few to enjoy.

This is amazing.

How a socalist country that is supposed to be helping spread its countries wealth via free enterprises and proper safety nets, allows its citizens to live in trash, and poverty, so the ruling class who can't be properly and fairly challenged can say it is even socalist is ludacris, like whips and chains, on a pretty girl who is singing my song while being whipped, nicley with fluffy whips of course ludacris I tell you. She asked me of course, but we are secret secret secret, secret, she calls me everyonce in a while. I am her lion in the concrete jungle when the world bores her.

Job numbers head in 'wrong direction' for Wisconsin 2010

The worst part about it is after the Communits Republicans get done licking Communist boots and they finish whipping their own people's quality of life to create Mexican style corrupt wages and quality of life, they are going to lose another 12,000 jobs. Which after taxes and generation of employment mutiplier they are actually shooting themselves in the foot by laying people off as, those people created jobs and held jobs, so 12,000 laid off over a period of time is usually around 36,000 jobs lost. Again instead of these people finding out how much deficit they have cutting back where it is fat like, mmm Mayor's gigantic salaries or major salaries above $200,000, they hurt the little folks getting under $80,000. It makes no sense, to me how those Republicans can call themselves Republicans when they are creating higher taxes, as per more job loss, and then kissing Communist Chinese and other Communist countries butts by allowing them to be empowered and take over the world economically, instead of concentrating purely on international market share growth and small fat cutting back, not creation of Mexican corrupt style wages for civil servants. Again this is why my Red White and Blue tattoes of Question marks are on opposite sides as per right and left wing, as the Right seems to be more left via empowering the worlds biggest Communist party than the Left does. As Democrats fight hand and foot to keep US jobs home and quality of life high, while the Right Pubs fight to make Communist China rich and raise taxes at home due to job loss. It makes no sense, that is why my tattoes are the way they are. I can read your mind with my tattoes, I have five points in each one, they are like the rochester ink blot tests, and the staring pictures. So what you think you see is your personal and cognition, after five points I can do a vague reading of who you are. I love it when the ladies see,flowers, beds, and water falls, and the guys see guns, trucks and kegs, non of which are in the tattoe. Then I show them the way and they go woa that was there.

Uprising in Wisconsin

US citzens against exportation of US jobs to Communist China and sweat shop dicatorships. You lick Communist boots and steal from your voters children, cause you can't figure out how to create more jobs or how to properly spread the market share across exporting business then help them gain more international market shares. You are weak and treading on US. Without Unions the small person and less educated person is treated horrible by the employer, trust me I know, I have sat in meeting since I was a kid regarding corrupt employers abusing their employees. Protect the US citizens from foreign economic warfare and stop taking our rights and childrens homes do to your inability to lead as business leaders of your state.

Elitism

Elitism is the belief or attitude that some individuals, who form an elite — a select group of people with intellect, wealth, specialized training or experience, or other distinctive attributes — are those whose views on a matter are to be taken the most seriously or carry the most weight or those who view their own views as so; whose views and/or actions are most likely to be constructive to society as a whole; or whose extraordinary skills, abilities or wisdom render them especially fit to govern"

Special report: China flexed its muscles using U.S. Treasuries

In June, 2009, the head of China's powerful sovereign wealth fund met with Geithner and requested that he lean on regulators at the U.S. Federal Reserve to speed up the approval of its $1.2 billion investment in Morgan Stanley, according to the cables, which were provided to Reuters by a third party. Although the cables do not mention if Geithner took any action, China's deal to buy Morgan Stanley shares was announced the very next day. I do not like weak leaders being bullied by Communists.

Trumka: Working-Class Anger Fueled by Right’s ‘Deeply Dishonest’ Message

This is communism and will not be had in our American Unions. Leaders in our Unions like this are destroying them by making the right and the middle attack our Unions: "we need to fundamentally restructure our economy and re-establish popular control over the private corporations which have distorted our economy and hijacked our government. That’s a long-term job, but one we should start now." Why would you say something like that are you not American. Restructuring our free enterprises is communism, it is one thing to gather for strength it is a whole other thing to gather to destroy free enterprises.

Rare Earth Materials in the Defense Supply ChainBriefing

"The United States previously performed all stages of the rare earth material supply chain, but now most rare earth materials processing is performed in China, giving it a dominant position that could affect worldwide supply and prices. Based on industry estimates, rebuilding a U.S. rare earth supplychain may take up to 15 years and is dependent on several factors, including securing capital investments in processing infrastructure, developing new technologies, and acquiring patents, which are currently held by international companies." Do we have any whippe snappers up there in the government worried about Communist who have any cowboy boots for arse whoopns "The United States has the expertise but lacks the manufacturing assets and facilities to refine oxides to metals." "According to industry data, refined rare earth metals are almostexclusively available from China. "China increased export taxes on all rare earth materials to a range of 15 to 25 percent, which increases the price of inputs for non-Chinese competitors."

Member of the Board, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

Some very soft slicking ideas towards China. The problem is that we need a more balance of reality of Communist China as a threat and less balance as they are not. If they are funding our enemies, they are attacking us through espionage, destroying our under water radars and tow radars, along with completely spitting in our faces with the idea of Democratic petitioners for freedom by imprisoning them for life because of signed petition that thought to do what the communist party has been saying they are going to do for decades now. I am not ok with being number two to a Communist dictorial religious genocidal country takening over for communist expansion country. Personally, I choose freedom. Number two is not cool now maybe number two to Canada, France, Britian or even India as they are just partially communist, might be less arse whooping about it. However, Pure Communism as number one, no way. or for you boot licker and sheep type, pure state capitalist. Which is just communism, as the elitiest leders own the economy, and the people have to bow to their whims instead of the leders bowing to the people's whims.

Chinese Submarine was not the frist on US coast

The firing of a submarine-launched ballistic missile by a Chinese Jin-class submarine off the coast of southern California last Monday at the height of evening rush hour in Los Angeles was. Chinese Communist fired a ballistic missle off the coast of Catalina during the world meetings in South Korea. It was a beautifull cite to behold. However, our interceptors where just a little late for scarmbling, if it would have been going the other way Catalina and Possible LA would have been gone. Most likely they did not like my humble request to speak on neo mercantalist centralization of international wealth, so they decided to ruin my little visit to Catalina and piss me off further when our interceptors did not get there in a proper timed secondry manner.

China bans Richard McGregor's book on the Communist Party

Foreign Companies Cop 84 Percent of Stimulus Green Economy Funds

China seeking $450 million in economic recovery funds to build a planned $1.5 billion wind farm in Texas. The farm will create 30 permanent jobs in the United States and 2,000 jobs in China. This happened due to some weird wacked economic national security allowance. The idea that we should be dependant on the worlds 6th highest country with barriers to entry, is unbelievable when there are hundres of other countries out there with much more potential for growth and US goods than the Communists.

Strong Economy and Corporate Desire to Diversify Operations to Overseas Markets Drive China's Outbo

There are a number of reasons driving Chinese outbound M&A activities. First, there is the need for China to acquire raw inputs and diversify foreign exchange reserves. Many Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have been instructed by the Chinese government to buy mining and oil & gas firms overseas. Many Chinese companies are now seeking to expand their market share and avoid home competition by outbound acquisitions. More importantly, Chinese companies are trying to move up the value chain by acquiring reputable brand names overseas and the rights to world-class technology know-how,"

Come in number one, your time is up

Economic intellegence units no longer take pensions, quality of life, ability to defend home by manufacutirng turning points, the advantage to high tech products, or a myriad of other economic factors that used to be the highest from of national security. Now it is a bunch of suicidal wackos, who get college students and farmers to blow people up. While the US's old guard is out to pasteur and most to old to remember when, the US lost a single job in a sector or even a whole industrie intellegence clekers used to poo and find out exactly what our economic national security was leaving us. Now we have overweight anti american loathing defeatist mindsets in our economic intellegence units who could not even keep the US number one in high technological production of necessary items for defense. They need an old school drill sergeant again, I guess I am the job. It is just getting up there through the thick cloud of anti-american economic national security perview that is up there. I will have to cut it hard to get there and stop this. This is is ridiculous. You should here some of the stories I heard from the old schoolers when the Communist markets or imperalist empire markets would try an take away US manufacturingt necesary to turn and build war production, or et alone high technological parks. Now for gods sake our defeatist intellegence units are allowing Communist markets to literally build high technological parks called Torch programs in the US. Cause they are weak and need an arse kicking, black ball me you mo fo's. I talk a lot of poo becuase I know the real old guard before their minds went up and started going for the after life, I have heard bar room heroes explain exactly what is wrong with todays economic intellegence units and their weak defeatist mindsets. Trust me, years of old school training at the bar and for tea.

U.S. Loses No. 1 to Brazil-China-India Market in Investor Poll

Emerging markets that is funny. They should be called like they are and Marshallian Economic Principles of Realities should be used they are communist markets, not emerging. They will never completely emerge so called, if you consider it that way becuase their communist markets create centralized wealth for international dominace which is only spread out domestically when they can conquer internationally, unlike free markets which spread out domestically first then go internationally once they have the free market clout to do so. Where as in Communist markets their SOE's are created specifically to go interntaionall and invade real emerging markets for their market shares and value.

Ten Industries in Which the US Is no Longer No. 1

This is primarily due to very bad economic intellegence units and the ability to weild free enterprises against such practice as Chinese and Russian Communal style ownership of farms, which creates economic autrocities to farmers and their families, along with such things as Japan's still slave mentality to the empire in which companies that make cars have Japanese citizens that volunteer their time to save the company monye to be more competitive. A Ford Hybrid and a Toyota Hybrid have a difference of about $7000. In a country where anti-american defeatist rhetoric is not checked anymore and just part of the norm after the Russian and Chinese Communist invasion of LSD to stop the stopping of Communist expansion, it is not about loyality to country anymore but what is cheaper that is what sells. This again, is primarily our intellegence units faults with huge defeatist mindsets I have traced in them. When the top intellegence is allowed to gather defeatist mindsets it seeps to the rest of the country. First and foremost, we are not number one because it is an unfair advantage from a free market to a communist market or an old empiralist market.

Chinese spy who defected tells all

"A veteran Chinese intelligence officer who defected to the United States says that his country's civilian spy service spends most of its time trying to steal secrets overseas but also works to bolster Beijing's Communist Party rule by repressing religious and political dissent internally." "The MSS, however, is unique from other nations' intelligence services in that it is patterned after the former Soviet Union's KGB political police. Its most important mission is "to control the Chinese people to maintain the rule of the Communist Party," he added." The old owl connection, souls never fail to want to be free, I can never see a soul then walk by them via a set of birds above and I know exactly who they are.

From the Gulag to the Killing Fields: Personal Accounts of Political Violence And Repression in

Communist States. I mean we have a huge movie about historical representation of the German SOE Sovereign Wealth Party genociding the Jews. I mean they have even made a movie making a hero like like an evil person about McCarthy's list in which all he did was go around and catch over 200 Soviet Communist Spies working to implode the US economy and to weaken us to stop our ability to stop their world domination like Korea and Vietnam. WTF big mind shifers where is the Stalin's List or something showing that the Communist Oppression was even bigger and still is bigger than the German Socalist Parties opporession. You ever heard of Venona you communist sympathizer anti-freedom lot of you. McCarthy donated every second of his life keeping his country the world as free as possible from Communism. Now look at the world. Because of him being such a hero, the Soviets have agreed Communism is a bad idea, the last dynasty only holds onto it for world economic donimation and where the Praise to McCarthy and the owls. Do you know how many freedom lovers we lost during those digs to find anti-freedom and communist spies in this country. No you have no f'ing clue how many people died because of Communist Spies on the freedom side. All you know is that a group of people who wish for world domination by helping the strongest international communist party where heavily targeted and hugely found to be destroying US intellegence. WTF man, y'all stupid and crazy if you want to be a communist. You can and become a slave to some rich elite leaders claiming communism. I will keep my gun, my business and my properties, along with my 12 kids and right to say FU buddy for being dumb arses.

I do not like the idea of the MSS building massive high technological communist bases in My Idaho

Barker: The Next INL should focus on new energy sources.

Would we allow a Communist SOE to come in and build our atom bombs or nuclear bombs? Along with that if high technology is the next atom bomb via tech war, then why would we allow the Communist MSS to build a torch program in the US? Why would not the US protect its national security market shares. Look little piece, the Communist consider their SOE's to be national security, which means if you allow Sinomach in you just allowed in a massive National Security unit of the Communist Party. Why would not we just keep out Communist SOE's and help build our own free enterprise via subsidizing to compete against the Communits SOE's that are being subsidized? What is wrong with you people, they lock people up for doing research reports on their SOE's that is their intentions, this is an economic communist national security unit that you are allowing in. Instead of creating more free enterprise domestic market share strength to help them export out. You Dam idiots, stupid!

The Politics of Ecstasy

Soviet Communist fought through propoganda (LSD) and machines, Chinese Communist fought through soliders and food and other staples, to take over Vietnam as they did invade. What to do when the Communist SOE's chemically engineer the free world with weaker genomes based on yearly adult inaculations, provided by infilitrated biological SOE's. Dr. Leary was a chemical weapons specialist for the world enslavement movment for the elite. He was so doped up we could not interven on his mind set with tons of data proving it.

SINOMACH

state-owned enterprise group "Its service covers a wide range of economic sectors including industry, agriculture, communication and transportation, energy, building, light industries, automobile, ship-building, mining, metallurgy and aerospace industries. SINOMACH has provided professional services for more than 140 countries and regions around the world. It is also engaged in resource integration and utilization." really sounds like they are disbanding their soes.it is ok though CAUSE NOT LIKE WE CAN FIGURE OUT WHERE OUR JOBS WENT.

China's state giants too big to play with

Equally significant is the fact that Beijing has no plans to open up numerous lucrative sectors that are monopolized by yangqi to the private sector, which is the country's largest provider of employment. According to Nanjing University social scientist Shen Kunrong, a major reason behind the inequitable distribution of national income is "the existence of monopoly and unequal competition" as manifested by the SOEs' privileged status. For famed economist Li Yining, "equal competition should be the basis for considering the question of whether SOEs or private firms should advance or retreat."

SINOMACH

China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH), established in January 1997 with the approval of the State Council, is a large state-owned enterprise group integrating technology, industry, trade and financial services into one entity. is a large state-owned enterprise group integrating technology, industry, trade and financial services into one entity.is a large state-owned enterprise group integrating technology, industry, trade and financial services into one entity. SINOMACH IS ONE OF THE COMMUNISTS SOE'S THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DISBANDED NOT PROLIFERATED INTO ECONOMIC INVASION ENTITIES BY THE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT. HOW THE F IS MY IDAHO BASED COMPANY SUPPOSED TO COMPETE WITH COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT BACKED SOE'S. IT FING CANT' AND WE HAVE ALREADY STARTED TO HAVE TO MAKE PLANS TO SHUT DOWN VIA 5 YEAR ECONOMIC OUTLOOKS BASED ON THEIR INFILITRATION

AN IDAHO-CHINA UPDATE

Hoku Corp., a subsidiary a Chinese company, has invested $270 million of the more than $400 million it expects to spend on its Pocatello plant to manufacture polysilicon for the solar market. All of the polysilicon will be shipped back to China. Idaho’s exports to China for the first three quarters of 2010 were $506 million, a 35 percent increase over 2009. Overall, Idaho imports rose to $3.8 billion from $2.7 billion in 2009. Idaho had $3.9 billion in three quarters in 2008." I want to know who the Shepard is that is allowing our flock to be lead to their slaughter?

Idaho: Chinese Communist Invasion?

"'The Chinese Communist Party is the majority owner of a company that is looking to build a self-sustained city, with international airport, in Boise Idaho. The fact that the Chinese Communist Party also owns the Chinese military, and has made repeated threats against American interests, is lost on Idaho politicians."The fact that Chinese Communists would have the ability to bring in military equipment undetected, if such a lease were given, seems to escape the Governor of the State of Idaho"

You Need To Understand Stealth Economic Warfare

"People may not want to shop at Wal Mart but their own budgets and deflation which makes "making ends meet" progressively more difficult forces them to give in sooner or later." "In the days of regulated international trade what is being done would be called "dumping." Where one industrial country's monopoly corporations dump their unsold surplus on another." Waging economic war against those who wish to take away our own individual rights to our labors. Must first start at the roots, which is Communism in China. Which as the capitalist are very dumb will eventually take over and win. Thus, for the good of the individual and the free market I must attack their roots through theory and logical, along with teams of researchers and I's to gather data, in which the our intellegence units and FBI for some reason are failing to gather on the economic warfare of the Communists.

Public footprints in private markets

"As large pools of government capital invested in private markets, SWFs raise several important issues. First, do they perpetuate undesirable underlying macroeconomic policies? Countries should not use them as a mechanism to accumulate more foreign assets to avoid exchange rate appreciation. Second, what is the potential impact of these funds on financial stability? SWFs are in principle long term, stable investors who can provide liquidity to the markets. However, they also represent large, concentrated - and often non-transparent - positions in financial markets. Third, are SWF investment decisions made on commercial grounds consistent with the free market principles? Finally, do investment decisions by SWFs have national security implications? In the United States, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States conducts its reviews of foreign investments in a manner that both safeguards national security and reinforces the U.S. commitment to open investment.

ECONOMIC AND U.S. INCOME TAX ISSUES RAISED BY SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

"If the investment in an economy is larger than that country’s domestic saving, the country must be running a trade deficit, or the country must be increasing foreign borrowing, or both Similarly, a country cannot run a trade surplus without also exporting capital, either by increasing its foreign investments, or by paying down (or reacquiring) previously acquired domestic assets or financial claims against the domestic economy held by foreign investors. Because the level of net investment income in any year is fixed by the level of previous foreign investment (except for changes in interest rates), changes in investment or saving that are associated with capital inflows will have a negative impact on a country’s trade balance.

There has been an international conspiracy to allow China to own more than 90% of the rare earth.

These conspirators should be sought out and tried for treason. If the federal government will not do it we will. There is enough countries out there with rare earth minerals that the ownership of such resources could easily be split up more competitively. However, the allowance of this specific instance of such a strategy and conspiracy leaves countries very vunerable to market price fixing and market jumping without competitive competition. Along along with that for the treason part it leaves countreis far behind in high technological advances. Treason is the charge. groups f-m find them deal with them. This country will not fall via economic conspiracies and Marxist wish for anarchy. I am tired of this hoss. Watching my people starve, go homeless live in one houses with 5 familes, unemployed making more than folks out there breaking their back to get a dollar, the Communist exapnding so much that we would now have to do a hyper intensive economic offensive just to try and tach up with them to balance our country, police officers being treated like Mexican police officers, school teachers being threatened with taking their pay and jobs while they have the most important job teaching our children, judges being fired, welfare attorneys being laid off, drug rates sky rocketing, defense intellegence bases closing down right and left, taxes going up on everything yet quality of living or pay has not increased. I am tried Hoss of waiting on you folks to save us from this economic warfare implosion strategy. I am tired of it, just tired. I want reports on all US government personnel who allowed this rare earth 90% imbalance and massive US lose in the industry to happen. These economic hits from this which is deadly to our national security, to children being backed intos school like sardens is going to stop. They will find us more jos through exportation and deveopmental competition between the Communists. You got it hoss,reports on all personnel who allowed this rare earth mineral economic hit and damge to happen. Don't care what chair they have.

Deep layoffs take effect in struggling NJ city

"About 335 workers, representing one-sixth of the local government work force, lost their jobs, according to Mayor Dana Redd. It was worst in the public safety departments, where nearly half the police force and close to one-third of the city's firefighters were laid off." ""Instead of protecting and serving the city, the residents of Camden, they're choosing to protect their high salaries," " In 2009, the city had 2,380 violent crimes per 100,000 residents -- more than five times the national average, the FBI said"

The Rules For Radicals

China Dragon

"Our Lady - "The eagle is plucked. He will not rise again. Veronica saw in vision an eagle stretched out flat on his stomach, with his head hanging weakly to the side, struggling to get up. His feathers were all about him, plucked out. There were three creatures by him. Two of them were leaving his vanquished form. These two had the forms of a dragon and a lizard. The lizard had a most unusually long tongue. There was the other creature, the third, that looked like a bear, still beating on the fallen eagle. (July 15, 1970)"

Bhutan Economy

Lets trad with Bhutan "Rugged mountains dominate the terrain and make the building of roads and other infrastructure difficult and expensive" "The industrial sector is technologically backward, with most production of the cottage industry type." "Model education, social, and environment programs in Bhutan are underway with support from multilateral development organizations. Each economic program takes into account the government's desire to protect the country's environment and cultural traditions." Investments are overrated and they take away the countries soverignty. However, trade on the other hand helps them spur their economy while producing domestic jobs at home. Sounds like they need some things we produce. We should trade with them, I like Budhists; and no Communist monk killers, the tombs are not there either. Anyways there is an aura test protecting them even if you found them you would have to have the aura to open it. Monks will die before givening up the key to the tombs, the German Socalist evil's tested them many monks died under gun and torture for their greed.

Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

This means that although independent members occasionally get elected to the lowest level of congress, it is impossible for them to organize to the point where they can elect members to the next higher people’s congress without the approval of the CCP or to exercise oversight over executive positions at the lowest level in the hierarchy. This means that a hypothetical opposition party would have no legal means to collect funds or own property in the name of the party. More importantly, there is a wide range of offenses, including the crimes of subversion, sedition and releasing state secrets, which can and have been used against the leaders of efforts to form an opposition party such as the China Democracy Party.

States Continue to Feel Recession’s Impact

Thanks to the Communists massive extravert economic unfair competition and their huge centralization of international trade wealth, our people the people you govern " the steepest decline in state tax receipts on record. State tax collections," and you want to take more from them instead of getting out there and getting jobs. I see the Communists in much every state and country in the world drumming up contracts and resources, yet where is our leaders and our economic warriors for our people to help stop international starvation by stopping here at home too with job creation and development competition. 25,000 jobs for each state could solve the budge deficts. That is easy to do in this world. You take our rights, you starve our children of home, schools, vacations, and necessary safety because you are weak.

Chief D says we should resist our own safety against the Communist.

""The culture of endless money that has taken hold must be replaced by a culture of restraint," he said recently." Ya, I will tell you what the culture of resistance is going to be. It is going to be a resistance from people like you who underestimate the communists and allow the US to get its butts handed to it like our economic warfare that is going. Who is this guy, resistance from what our own defense? Anyone can you tell me what are thinking? I know you are thinking we do not have money. So you whip your own country instead of trying to create money you steal safety from you people. What is this? "Another bone of contention is a second engine being developed for the fighter by General Electric and Rolls Royce in case the Pratt & Whitney engine is not up to par. Gates contends this second engine is "unneeded." You do not understtand that? Ok let me explain. If we get into it with the Communsit thanks to your generations and your underestimating the communists. We will be out produced. Folks like you have underestimated the communist and allowed them to gain huge amounts of resources. In which the reporst show that if went into a military production, as the next war we will be involved in no matter what thanks to the great idea of spreading out our military bases. Thus, we are going to need engines to further along our processs of building our only hope.Which now with satellite hack looks even bleaker. Geese, culture of resitance, you no da, not from our own people from them smart one. Do not internalize externalize. We do not have money not because of the US and I know you just spent a lot of time with the communist. But we do not have money because we can't compete against the Communist in interantional trade to bring in positive capital inflows. So there you have it, standing on my last legs. I say what are you thinking? Culture of resistance. Sure resist your countries safety and defense. Anyone have a nandryte check of this guy. Scan his brain and his nerve endings make sure he is not connected. Questions for Chief D on his medical exam from coming back from the Communist International Central power. Does any part of you head feel warm when you think about resistance? Do you have any place on your body that seems to be a new material growth? Did you obtain any bug bites while you were there? Do you feel a warm sinsation in any part of your body when you are driving or thinking certain things? Check this mo fo. Give him the Patriot Test. I know that it is hard for these people to understand what lies in the Communists regions and their holdings and massive testing of humans. But THX was not created for no reason,darlings. Please test the Chief and give him the proper signal testing for American Resistance to foreign feudal social occupation as that is our roots.

Gov. Quinn promises to quickly sign Ill. tax hike

More economic destruction from the communists economic warfare.In which will allow more business to offshore and close down more competition from our business do to bad leadership from economic generals on the forefront of the economic warfare between the communist and the free world. If you think that they are not communists or are not trying to cause economic implosion damage just hack their databses and look for it is easy to find as a huge number of the MSS are economists or engineers with emphases in economics. Another lead whipping his people. I bet he does not even know his economic basket or has not even been to a developing country to gain jobs that could allievate his tax problem. I bet you your soul. Licking the Communists boots and whipping thier own people. Love it what happened to the down and dirty dire hard leaders of old.Who stood up and said "where did all the money go". Then they were leader enough to find out and go oh the communists are playing unfair. I want to know how to compete with them so my area can be stable with economics and its expenditures. But no we have leaders who just lick boots and whip, instead of throw Dukes and give.

Chinese stealth fighter makes first test flight

This is BS it is more likely than not the flock of birds seen over the South Korean military ship was the Communist getting an ego again. "China is progressing faster than expected with the new technology, even while the plane's true capabilities aren't known. Analysts said two prototypes have been developed, with one employing a Russian engine and the other a Chinese one." " The military-backed space program has also conducted three manned flights, making China only the third country in the world to put a person into space." So as these people a threat to national securit via their unfair economics yet?

Could Mongolia be the next Rare Earth Exporter

If mongolia is able to create a mineral deposit wealth then we can purchase minerals from them while also exporting more products to them as they grow and become a bigger country. China, fewy on you we will find other places for rare earth resources. What you think we are just going to let you produce everything that needs rare earth minerals and then cartel your SOE's with a rare earth mine. Fewy on youy. And leave Mongolia alon they do not need your unfair communist economics takening their possible surplus industry from them like you are doing in the middle east, as you take over the mines instead of allowing Iraq and Afghanistan to run their own mines. You have enough rare earth minerals you economic warfare strategists, and centralized economic units. I know you have increased production of rare earth minerals while lowering exports and raising quotas.

China plans $1.3 billion knockoff of Dubai’s Burj Khalifa tower

Saudia Arabia is our best ally on OPEC. The Communist know they need Saudia Arabia to gain a one world currency. This is mainly because if they can get OPEC to start trading in a currency based on the communists rules of economics. Then the communists can use that currency to further dominate through economic warfare. In which they could easily discriminate. As the current system of being able to trade in EU, Dollar, Yen or what one likes does not allow for discrimination or massive concentrated economics. This is the same game the Soviets played when they started economically devouring countries and implementing a one world currency on them.

Economic Warfare Journal

The use of economic state craft, whether free enterprises, state owned economics, financing, debt rationing or otherwise use of economics to cause detrement to ones opposition for cause of imbalance for state unfair competition. (need a better definition) Purpose to enligthen world on econometrics used by governments to perpell their politics and military might; without the study of actual military presence. This is horrible just idea for later professional blog post. The idea is to create a journal that I can charge people to read in which will allow them to actually learn how to balance out their countries abilities against the main source of economic warfare or state econometrics the communist party. Thus as my audience is the upper echelion of society, like legislatures and free enterprise CEO's as i will probable screen, my price for my piece collection can be high. As I will need to pay cyber watchers to watch the doors of my future collection. or not just a thought back up door.

Something about Keanu Reeves keeps coming into my mind when I write.

Top U.S. Official Murdered After Arkansas Weapons Test Causes Mass Death

I want to know who is responsible for that test and if any of them have any connections to a communist party. Why would we test a poison in such mass quantity to kill that many things by testing deep in the earth where it will sit and kill things as it comes out of the ground. Find them, Buddha Punk stop the last one note in your trace books and move on communist infilitration on these people. Arms up it looks like they are killing folks about this one, wear protection make sure back up knows where you are all the time. If you find a nexus of communism on this one we report then wait for the word to take down and apprehend. You take Big papa and spider women with you, you keep in contact with at least 3 other teams. Not A or C as they are working on a very important project. If you find that anyone in that area has ties to communism or that they are going to try and make the US look like a country that uses biological weapons in mass quantity so we lose more face in the international community, you target tag and call it in. Sounds to me like a literal implosion theory just went through. Also look at all back draft plots also. Any reason to take down the area in which the order was given, i.e. researchers in connection all if. Try and salvage as much cognition as possible while finding the root cause of the problem I am now guestimating this might be a level 5-10 deep inititiative. There is no reason for the US to use biological weapons for mass genocide especiall the same ones that Saddam used. Get to it, if they get you I have gold coins for you all. The literal making us look bad in the international community to have them invade us is part of the implosion theory. It also works out that if the international community sees us using biological weapons which they will if we do, then NATO gets a hold in our country. We are not invinceable. The Communist would love nothing more than to see the leader of the countries who can stop the communist be destroyed and handed to them on a silver platter. This is important you remeber your oaths to this country and freedom. We have to make sure that we as the People of this country and its shadow watchers of ancients do not allow them to implode us through specific military use of such inhuman weapons as biological warfare or nuclear warfare without reasonable force of use against us. In which Biological should never be used. You know the implosion theory it was taught to us when we were kids by the light. The Biggest threat comes from within. The Communist next to the Extreme Islamists are the biggest internal threat. As they will destroy the US for their political ideological perspectives.While the Socialist extremist the Nazi's are under caps. Your media passes are being prepared for your investigative reporting, your military passes and security clearances are also being set up, your typical contact merlin will meet you when you arrive to debrief you on the situation as it has escalated to a possible close encounter with an implosion communist agent. I do not know it might just be idiotic retards, hoewver, I doubt it. We have spent trillions of dollar on regulating the extreme right (extreme Islamics and their wish for dominace, teams I am pushing very hard to get a public entity back on track to start spending more on regulating the extreme left, I am trying ladies and gentelment the US and the world appreciate you placing your lives on the line, I have been there.) Hippy I know you are cool with your project, Cowboy, Cowboy I know I recieved your message I need you to stay on path and project, even if we do not find Senator Reid as doing it on purpose we need to educate them, that is important for my team A. The starting use of Biological warfare and the heavy reliance is one of the reasons we lost the Vietnam war. Along with millions of our soliders like my uncle having to live with biological symptoms his whole which killed him with cancerous tumours all of his body and head after using pills to keep down the biological problems. The guy gave his life in the front lines and he got a long life full of pain and sorrow via friendly fire of biological warfare. I do not know how reliable the report is but I know those Rusky's would love to prove they can control our electronics "The GRU has full command of all intelligence-gathering assets of the Russian Armed Forces, including spy satellites, reconnaissance aircraft, ships, submarines and other equipment." Along with that the possible either communist or idiots who gave the order to use biological warfare do not understand business or economic warfare. If we start biological warfare then we are up ships creek when the folks of that country need someone to do business with. Guess who they will turn to, the Comunists. So I am just glad that the Russian's or Communist ego got to them before they let us use biological warfare that Sadam used. I hope my team comes back with a negative just Rusky propoganda on the matter. It will take some time though.

ShaShouJian

"Leveraging one's advantages while exploiting enemy weakness is not a unique insight into the conduct of war. While "Assassin's Mace" weapons are often perceived to be exotic technologies, such as high powered microwave weapons, electromagnetic pulse, or maneuverable warheads, the Chinese consider a much broader range of weapons to be "Assassin's Mace," including fighter bombers, submarines, anti-ship missiles, torpedoes, mines, nuclear weapons, and even rapid runway repair equipment. One American observer quoted a PLA officer that sha shou jian can be "whatever the PLA needs to win future local wars" [...] In this regard, the Chinese concept of "Assassin's Mace" is not that remarkable."

Competing with Intelligence: New Directions in China’s Quest for Intangible Property and Implicatio

"Chinese executives’ intense desire to succeed globally, combined with the Chinese government’s encouragement and support, 3 has driven some companies to develop corporate competitive intelligence (CI) programs that increasingly rely on illegal human and technical intelligence collection methods 4 , 5 to acquire intangible property from U.S. companies and government agencies. The plethora of industrial espionage cases involving Chinese companies in recent years reveals extensive Chinese government involvement in such activity 6 and the role of CI in facilitating the transfer of U.S. proprietary technology from civilian to military uses." Robert Slate is a lead systems engineer at the MITRE Corporation.

China's hi-tech industrial zones take lead in industrial innovation

More than 50% of the Chinese high tech markets are dominated by SOE's while their private enterprises have to compete for international shares while recieving unfair loans like Huwaei's almost 70% uncompetitive loan for international competition. So we either start competeting and working harder to compete against them with our free enterprises or we become communist and complete devoe our ideals of freedom, through SOE's and centralized economics. Which will lead to Marxists theories as that is what the lead Communist country will want once we start to allow it power, like we did with the Soviet's after China's invasion. Then guess what, they invade other countries. You know why they are humans, they are naturally greedy. Thus we either properly regulate them and stand up to them so we can compete or we go through the Soviet Cycle. However, this time as the Chinese have taken a different path with our allies it will be worse than Korea or Vietnam.

China's Drive for Indigenous Innovation. Many by way of anti-trust violations and cartels.

My name is I Rider I, maam I fight for freedom via fair competition and my weapons are anti-trust on the rocks, I like it cold, and my three piece suties of horizontal, vertical and cartel: I could not help it I had to hit the old cogny process of cheaters vs free markets, I am good at this: "The show ends with “Long Live the Great Communist Party” flashing on the screen." Many SOEs are flush with cash, especiallyseveral dozen largest SOEs that have been chosen to become national champions and currently enjoy monopolies or controlled competition " "Road of Renaissance” mixes two conflicting sentiments: victory and victimization. These clashing themes of unbridled national pride vs. distrust of foreigners are cross-stitched throughout the fabric of China’s national psyche and political culture. They are also deeply entrenched in China’s vast economic planning bureaucracy and fused into the DNA of the country’s extensive new industrial policies that Party leaders have hung under the banner of “Indigenous Innovation.” " complete the mission of even surpassing the West in science and technology." " The State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, or SASAC, which holds the government shares and manages China’s national level SOE behemoths responded by ordering state industry throughout China to come up with indigenous innovation strategies." "the majority of the wil be allocated by MOST from China’s Export Import Bank." "The goals of China’s indigenous innovation campaign and the megaprojects are implicit and clear – capture the market space for domestic Chinese firms with SOEs having the favored position." Um all my I's in the Senate tell Senator Reid I do not think that givening China our tax money is smart in anyway shape or form. And after the next Presidential ellection if not found by the public. I will see fit that I find out why 80% of our green tech stimulus went to China. Tell him I hope he has a good replacement for Nevada as I am not like him and do not want the political economic to go imbalanced. Then again, he could be completey void of any knoweldge of his actions, doubt it. I am tired of all these Broken Bells every were I look in the US and free socities and then I mature and start to see brighter and what do I see, the very political party that killed us in the millions oppressed intelectual civil and economic individual rights and we sit here, and take it like some body selling their soul for something they will never recieve. For all you leaders that think we can export jobs to the China and it is still somehow made by an American or free world company "The draft defined a “domestic product” as made within China’s borders with “domestic manufacturing costs exceeding a certain percentage of the final price.” MOF in 1999 had said that products with less than 50 percent of their value produced in China were considered imports." I will be dammed if we let the Communist gain power again like the Soviets then again kill millions of freedom lovers. Trust me we start fighting now before they grow to big like the Soviets did, then we hall in the anti-trust violations. You know darn well just like I do that the Communist Central Party has India on its next, Russia, China and Cambodia. There are millions of freedom loving Indian's. We will not leave them like we left the Chinese freedom lover, there is a new guard. You and I know that their communist economic warfare makes it so there is not a fair fight for freedom lovers. As by the time the normal person unbenounced to the owls souls and I's see it they are overwhelmed by the upset populace. China's Anti-Monoply Law "exempts state-sanctioned monoplies and SOE dominated sectors, thereby giving enforcement agencies and courts wide discretion to use the AML to protect domestic companies and boost the fortunes of national champions."

Torch Program

"In the operation of the program, the main functions of the government departments are macro-control" "it includes: organizing and carrying out projects of developing high-tech products with high technological standards and good economic benefits in domestic and foreign markets; establishing some high-tech industrial development zones around China; exploring management systems and operation mechanisms suitable for hi-tech industrial development. The program mainly includes projects in new technological fields, such as new material, biotechnology, electronic information, integrative mechanical-electrical technology, and advanced and energy-saving technology." this is the same program which cartelled 16 soe car manufactureres to beat out their free market competition.

China may stub its toe on rare earths quotas

Sovereign wealth funds: China's potent economic weapon

"SWFs are government-run investments financed by excess foreign reserves fueled by chronic trade surpluses. A SWF often acts as a nation's fiscal stabilizer. But China uses its excess foreign reserves in other ways – as a "loss leader" to achieve more nefarious economic goals." China's use of currency manipulation allows it to have a trade surplus in which it then places in its economic warfare arsenal and uses it to turn around its capital inflows. "Because China has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to use foreign reserves as an economic and political tool, America has much to lose from the rapidly growing ability of Chinese SWFs to acquire controlling interests in US corporations." "Chinese SWFs with controlling interests in US corporations may also try to offshore jobs, managerial best practices, and research and development to China. Even worse, they may also seek to promote technology transfer while nabbing customers in the US. The effect of offshoring jobs and poaching markets hits America's economy immediately – just ask Michigan. Moving America's R&D, managerial elite, and technologies to China significantly reduces future American productivity and growth."

A new Chinese wealth fund? Not quite

the pace has slackened recently and SASAC has missed its own target of reducing the number to between 80 and 100 by the end of this year." No this is just another way for the Communist to keep any left over SOE's in the SASAC instead of follow thier contracts to allow their free enterprises to take the market shares. Has everybod forgot the only reason we allowed China in was because they were supposed to stop being communist? They have not stopped as a matter of fact they have reversed polarity and are full steam ahead for bigger and more uncompetitive massive SOE cartels.

Communist China to take over US News Enterprises by storm China’s Latest Industrial Coup?

This is not allowed in a Democratic/Republic Society. To allow such massive Communist overthrow of freedom of speech. "While the West slashes newsroom budgets, the Chinese Communist Party's state-run news factory, the Xinhua News Agency, is growing like gangbusters. In the past year, Xinhua has spent billions launching a 24-hour English-language news station and populating a skyscraper in Times Square, with plans for 120 to 200 overseas bureaus and 6,000 additional journalists. Taking a page from its success in cheap electronics and questionable seafood, China plans to commoditize the news, but, you know, not like all the news. According to Xinhua, Tiananmen Square is a myth and the Dalai Lama's a conspiracy theorist. When the Pentagon published a report on China's military, Xinhua called it “‘unprofessional,’ guilty of ambiguities and inconsistencies.”

B ACKGROUND & G ENERAL C HARACTERISTICS

just in case you forgot: they are coomunist you weaklings. "As a monopolistic regime, the Chinese Communist Party is committed to the Marxist Lennist Maoist emphasis on the central control of the press as a tool for public education, propoganda, and mass mobilization. The entire operation of China's modern media is based upon the foundation of mass line governing theory, developed by China's paramount head of state, Mao Zedong. Such a theory, upon which China's entire political structure hinges, provides for government of the masses by leaders of the Communist Party, who are not elected by the people and therefore are not responsible to the people, but to the Party. When the theory is applied to journalism, the press becomes the means for top down communication, a tool used by the Party to educate the masses and mobilize public will towards communist progess" They seek and destory half bloods and those being different from their views. Freedom embraces all views of political and other ideas. However, allowance of the communist idea is a threat to the mutiplicty idea.

Outsourcing High-Tech Jobs: Why benign neglect isn't working.

"It's remarkably easy to outsource white-collar computer-related job overseas, especially because there's no heavy capital equipment to worry about." " I have a Computer Science degree, so I should go back and get a degree in. . . what?" "I'm nearly 50, with 20 years in the IT field, and can't get a job 2 years after being laid-off due to outsourcing. I'm supposed to go back to school -- and do what?" "We have a labor market of over 138 million people; 300,000 people [who lose jobs each year to offshoring] is almost a rounding error," says Ed Potter, president of Employment Policy Foundation in Washington, DC." I want the Bolsheviks in my countries intellegence and economics found out and their cognitive creation of thinking that outsourcing to communist countries is good crushed. This is way based balance and way in need of a good hedging. Both Republican and Democrat leaders follow orders from someone to outsource to our civil rights and economic rival the communist. Find them, bring them to me and I want justice. " Since it's now easier for multinational companies to move operations into more countries, he acknowledges, the lure of investing in the United States may be fading. The proof? Global capital investment in the U.S., which peaked in 2000 at $314 billion, dropped precipitously to one-tenth that level -- $29.8 billion -- by 2003." I am guessing who ever told our guards to chase greys would be a good start. whooo? The IEEE, a prestigious 30-year-old public-interest group that counts more than 225,000 American electrical electronics, computer and software engineers as members, concluded that "The offshoring of high wage jobs from the United States to lower cost overseas locations is currently contributing to unprecedented levels of unemployment among American electrical, electronics and computer engineers.""Continued offshoring of high-tech work threatens to weaken our leadership in technology and innovation, and has serious implications for national security and the privacy of sensitive information warned the IEEE." I want to look in their eye's and run an aura test on them. Bring them. "Even the ITAA industry study admitted that more than half the 516,000 new jobs it claims will be created in the software and services area over the next five years will go offshore." "In February, 2004 the Congressional Budget Office confirmed that we've lost 14.3 million manufacturing jobs in the past 4 years, partly because of low-wage foreign competition. (ITAA, CBO)"

Depression is caused by bad economics.

In the last big depression we had the major fail of the farming community and a mass exodus of famers to cities, when then also had major bank's fail due to such root econonomic devasation as the farm industry collapse. Today we see a service bell curve reliance that takes us on every rising troughts each crash. This is because our industries are being allowed to fail. Along with that we are not properly making sure our citizens can be competitive in the international market place through fair trade. Free trade with communism is not proper. Communist state craft speaks on end about SOE's and centralized strategies to create an economic implosion of their targets. Well we need to make sure that does not happen. We have lost our last trade surplus industry high tech 4 years ago. The currenty trend is bellowing on like our other industrial sectors we have lost. We can't go on like this without a sustainable positive capital inflow which means we need exports. We supposed to as per economic theorist be able to take high regard to the green high tech industries. However, the communist central international party made darn good sure that the free world would not be able to compete. This is traceable by who advised the prresident why and were the money came from on the person who advised him, and the specific moronic idea that we can keep up with unfair trade with the communist as some how it is presumed we have a comparative advantage on high tech. We do not. Communist countries pick and chose their comparative advantage becasue they are centraly economic controlled. They care not about us. Yet they do care about their main goals and single political party ideals of communist world domination. They are not like us. We beleive in mutiplicy which means more than one political poewr and check, freedom of economics so that the state can't wield our economics like nuclear weapons. These things have been lost to the US. Is this tomorrow. Do you think that the Bolchevecs or Mao's or Stalins of this world for some reason just stopped trying to collpase the USA or free socities? Well they did not stop.

International Center for Peace and Development

Communism in every form ever tried has starved its people to create a bigger miltiary and a bigger economic state craft of soe's than allowing proper individual free markets. Che helped kill millions and starve even more. While along the way he found a pieace of paper, from a monk. He then decided to change sides and helped us defend against the Soviets who had seen use the rule of communism to enslave the people he so wanted to free. As such Che became a monk and pictures were created to make him look dead. International peace comes when a monk appears with so much data that any thought or question you have about your idea that is causing the death of millions is stumped and you start to cry. That is peace and that is democracy/republic.

Communism, Espionage, and the Cold War

"A Unit of Study for Grades 9–12" To help our youth understand why compeition and individua ownership is so important. Lockeist. If You wisht o fight against homeland economic and anarchist Communist backed terroism. Please read this. I do not like anarchists and I do not like communist who believe in violent overthrow or the complete degregation of economic individual freedom to own their own labors, property or chose at will to earn freely from their own life's path. I am not saying folks can't redress peacefully through marching or the such. However, I am saying the idea of Communism has allwasy either been an overthrow of anarchism or the new Bollchevick idea of economic implosion. Which is about 60 years old or so. We do not wish that for the communist party. We just wish balance of power and checks. However, their leaders and youth wish for death, destruction, and complete enslavement of the human race for the idea of the communal leaders, country or world. That is bad news.

Acorn saga: Founder Wade Rathke Wants You - To Go on Welfare

A tribute to Communism the most sinister idea ever created for dicatators and tyrants by Karl Marx

Hugo Chavex Brings Autocracy to the Classroom

"First Hugo Chavez sileced the independent media by fining newspapers, and arresting journalists ultimately shuttind down the main independent television station. Now he's sileced unapproaved thought in the schools of Venezuela, rewritting the textbooks to refelct his version of histroy, writing Marxism into the curriculumat every level and threatening private schools with closure if they don't confrom to state approved educational guidelines." It is one thing to have a test in basic skills like English, Math and Science it is another thing to intertwin all aspects with Karls Marx's theories.

Hugo Chávez's Narco terroist and Extremist islamic problem

"To this end, Chávez has made common cause with FARC, a narco-terrorist group working tirelessly to overthrow the legitimately elected democratic government of Colombia, Washington’s closest ally in South America. No less ominously, he has aligned his government with regimes and terror groups that would otherwise seem to hold little attraction for a Spanish-speaking country on South America’s northern coast. These include Libya—which awarded Chávez the al-Qaddafi International Prize for Human Rights, named for the country’s dictator—as well as Syria, Hizballah, and Hizballah’s patron Iran." Hugo uses the same principles of mind warfare against the Jews as they believe in free enterprises that a certain socalist party did. See the problem is with karl is that he preyed on those how were not able to climb the ladder of a free world. Thuse those who's dreams did not come true due to their own choices. Therefore, allowing such practices that Karl tried to sell to the dictators and kings of his time. The funny thing is however. Those living in free socities that abrust Karl's anarchist views of war and dictatoriship of leadership live much better on weflare and poverty than those countries of communist dictators. That is because naturally freedom of economics allows for more philanthrophy and taxes. Were as communists countries like what Hugo is building feed off of and create no incentive for those who are natural more competitive to compete. Much like the US's current unemployment practices. Which I am currently doing a life study under.

How China Beat the U.S. and Became the New Green Tech Giant

The Economics of Insurance Intermediaries 2005

Some late night reading. Moosehead lagger a pipe full of tabacco and letting the battle field rests for the holidays. Can't be a scorge. "However, there are some risks (such as large, complex international" I need to trace Communist China's business entities with high risk of economic warfare in the next insurance service bell curve. I will make it a priority to check and watch all Communist Chinese entitities that enter or already are in, or own via stock portfolio or otherwise holdings cloaked, in the US's next service bell curve. We saw huge discrepanices in laws and massive cracks in watching programs for the mortage service industry. I am sure we will see the same thing. We will need full economic warfare games run by national security economic advisors to try and premp any cracks in the insurance industry, if the Chief's insurance force of everyone to pay for it goes through. Even if not it would be a great national security interest to that industry. we need war rooms and battle plan set up and run by all kinds of characters from the foreign governments, rich aristocratcs, middle class it is legal minded, and the rest of the possible characters. I will take of course China as I have matured and now go after the big dog in the cell (world). Good luck I expect reports by hawk, I hate those pigeos scared birds upset me. Hawks swoop right into the shoulder and are like what you going to do, here and they raise their claws. By hawks, get to it.

In these times of low economics due to bad competitive strategies against pretty much China.

Legalize it ya ya, and I will advertize it. I believe there still migtht be some areas of the country where it is illegal to use mutiple degree fighting in a cage. I think there is still, not to sure. Might be some discriminationa against mutiple degree fighting that we have not yet got rid of. Think you are big and bad, get in the cage and see what you got against the mutiple degree eaners. Ya ya na nan na it is a perfect world. Now I have to get into it with the school systems for stopping my folks of culture of earning mutiple degrees from being discriminated against. As I can't gain a Bachelors in Economics not because of application rejection but just because they do not have a process and they systematically discriminate against my culture of mutiple degrees. The head is spinning but it feels alright. It is perfect world. Gotta keep living in a perfect world. Ohhhh

China's Skyscraper Boom Buoys Global Industry

The economic destruction in their path's "The U.S. high-rise market is "pretty much dead," It should at least be a sustainable market not a dead one. We can compete with them you know. We do not have to kiss their butts. "Financial gloom has derailed plans for new towers in Chicago, Moscow, Dubai and other cities. But in China, work on the 2,074-foot (632-meter) Shanghai Tower, due to be completed in 2014, and dozens of other tall buildings is rushing ahead, powered by a buoyant economy and providing a steady stream of work to architects and engineers."

China trade costs jobs in every state

And now our smart senators are allowing them to come and buy up our market shares and give us jobs so we gain negative capital inflows and they gain more positive capital inflows. Which creates a deeper deficit and control of debt by China, along with a much bigger inflation rate that keeps the US citezens savings nill to void due to the massive disparity of negative v. positive capital inflows. Funny how the Communist blame the world crash on the US. But most free societies are going through the same disparity with China.

Cybercrime cost about $400 billion

The FBI estimates that cybercrime cost about $400 billion in 2004. So someone explain to me if Cyber crime is costing the US its taxable jobs, market share power, and ability to hold welfare through taxes, along with the ability to hold military bases. Yet our defenses against other types of crime are at a much higher propensity. I think there is something wrong here. No jobs, can't compete with China, and our cyber defense systems are inable to properly deal with the massive amount of lost earning potential for taxes and jobs.

Fisrt Annual Cost of Cyber Crime.

This reminds me of the stories my grandpa used to tell me about criminals takening from business like store's, ranchers and saloons. You think if it is costing us this much money we would have some kind of local police agency that is able to deal with it. Then a federal branch. Much like we have Police, and then the FBI. However, we don't so it is like the wild west, and I am Cysco, where is Pancho? Course then again Great Grandpa made a great deputized citizen during times of trying, and Grandpa made a great teamster, during those darn times of greedy employers. So I guess I make a good tracer during these times of net.

Cluster mapping project

"The Cluster Mapping Project uses detailed county level data and statistical techniques to profile regional economies and their performance over time, with a special focus on clusters. Clusters are geographically concentrated groups of interconnected companies, universities, and related institutions that arise out of linkages or externalities across industries. Regions and clusters are analyzed at various geographic levels including states, economic areas, and metropolitan areas. A more detailed description of the project, including its methodology, is accessible from the main menu within the site.

2010 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index 2010

China is ranked Number 1 in World Competitiveness pdf pg 21 Further, the costs of materials have been rapidly escalating because in part, they are fueld by speculative market prices driven largely by China's unbated hunger for commodities and this is now making its way through the supply chain. These factors are plausible causes underlying the rising cost pressures US and Canadian manufacturing are experiencing, espcially from the capital markets. pdf pg 11 Asian executives do see government investments in manfacturing and innovation as critical -- rnaking it the second most important driver for manufacturing competitiveness. This view is borne out by China's direct foreign investment in global resources -- steel, oil and minerals as inputs to its manufacturing sector. pdf pg 13 Another element of the green growth agenda that intersects with trade policy and helps drive Chinese manufacturing are China's policies favoring local technology and innovation, referred to collectivel as the indigenous innovation policies pdf pg 24

China Recieves $2.5 Billion in Foreign Aid From Countries in Debt to China and Running Deficits

9-10 Not only are we given them money to take our jobs from our own business but we are given them free money. Some is going to get a swift kick in the butt by a young man on a bike with ties to most ever security agency. Smiles and laughs. Dam Senators. So ya. We give China money for free. Yet those folks force us to go into debt for their help. Are our leaders and guardians are way behind on uppergrading this communist transition strategy of China. Next time they give my countries tax money to a country who is dominating the International market with unfair economics. kick in run, and you boys hold ground to make sure no one takes off after the butt kicker. Bomber jacket, baseball hat, cowboy boots. Heheh I can see the news now, Senators recieving rashion of kicks in the butt from American holagan. That is a lot of assault and battery chargers to the soft tissue of the buttox. I wonder if the Cheif C would pardon me. Pardon me Chief, I have some butts to kick. Buzz Flag on the play Senators Recieve ten yard penalty for kick backs instead recieve kick in the butt by a cowboy boot size 16. Just joking sounds funny though. I can here the Commnist Chinese now. You should not let him talk about you like that. you should arrest him. How you like our free money? I have whole reservations of cultural people out here with no jobs and no way to make money. I have whole blocks on wealfare. Time to kick butt legally and properly. Leaders, guardians and unions are falling hard. Manufacturing deficits, high tech deficits. It seems like this whole country has forgotten how to compete internationally against the Communist. By the way I have a pair of cowboy boots. I think the Chief C might pardon me for swift kicks in the soft tissue of the buttox, maybe, maybe not. Probable not, Chief has a sense of humor but still we can't have folks kicking Senators in the buttox, maybe maybe not, If I ever get to meet him i will ask him, if I can do it. Cause if he pardons me its all good baby. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9MszVE7aR4

Wind at their backs. Powerfull Democrats help Chinese firm chase stimulus money

"Top Democratic fundraisers and lobbyists with links to the White House are behind a proposed wind farm in Texas that stands to get $450 million in stimulus money, even though a Chinese company would operate the farm and its turbines would be built in China." This seems unfaif to the US unless the Communist Party is also givening US free enterprise $450 million to start high tech jobs and own the farms in China. If China has given the US free enterprises $450 million dollars to own a wind farm in China and fully allow it to be owned by US citizens then this is ok. However, if not young man you represent a Union. From a spiritual kin, and the looks of it it seems you do not hold sway over the leaders anymore if this is not true. $450 million dollars from a country that is in debt and can;t seem to get over a trade deficit or a high tech deficit. That is some mean, mean numbers there. I sure hope it is fair on both sides. We need some lean mean fighting machines up in the Unions. If that boy has to leave that meeting with the fund sucker and the opposition in arms and his head down. Obviously he has been getting a little to much to eat and not enough time at the gym. Let me know if China has given a US company $450 million dollars to start a wind farm company in China. If not, well then you know how this works. Lets see, those Chinese companies own our country our debts, our trade deficits, our high tech deficits, now we are going to give them money to do it. I have watched my people lose their jobs, their homes my schools, childrens teaching class have become bigger and yet we sit their and let the Chinese blame us and now we are handing them our money to do it to us. Dam, I have to make a run to see some Navo's I want a meeting regarding the Union and you knew once I saw this picture what my it would mean. Tell the Chieftians, I need to speak with the ancients. At the poing when we are giving half a billion plus aroun 60-80% of our high tech stimulus funds to create jobs else were. I believe the eagle is losing its ability to fly and be free. Navos Jorde's istmastas jistnastas scrugists economic.

Trade in Cyberstates

"The high-tech trade deficit was $111.2 billion in 2009, down slightly from 2008 ($113.5 billion)." Again these scholary reports are never fully equipped with economic warfare analysis. The fact is that the same kind of reports came out during the massive loss of manufactuirng too. These reports all use the very vague analysis of down turn, or recession. However, they never see the full picture of the systematic structure of neo-mercantalist going around and picking up huge international market shares while thet US and its report riders sit around going, Oh it is just the down turn. Plus the conquerors wnat you to think that so they go along with it. 3more hurdles and I am let out of the ivory tower. and I am coming out swinging. If they do not knight me then i will go around to each industry and create an individual claim and fight one and one without my knighthood. People with no rootolgy are starting to really piss me off. I mean did not everybody learn from their monk how to fix a tree that was dying or am I the only one.

High-tech plummet in Missour, Kansas

This artilce like most lose of jobs during the trough does not do justice to the truth. The truth is that there are massive SOE's that have created companies like Huwei in China for high tech products in which the US can't compete with their loans nor their strongly military backed projects of entrance into markets. it is not the trough that is stopping American jobs. These high tech jobs are just like the manufacturing jobs in which we have seen lost over the last 30 years, due to President Nixon's strategy.

Exporting US JObs an engineered exods of manufacturing and hitech jobs threatens to abolish

I wonder if any of you politicians who cling to those communist, their SOE's and their massive unfair economics know what it feels like to beaten down economically and lose your childrens homes, clothes, cars, futures, and then expect us to go find a job when they have all pretty much been exported. Those jobs left are so scarce and been fought for that CEO's and business are paying low wages. Do you know the sting of your child telling you they are hungry and you can't make them a good meal. Or the crush of having to lose your vacation and watch your friends go out while you have to sell everything you have just to keep your house. Or how about the bruse that is left when the industry you worked in for years and planned to retire from is gone. Knowing that you have to start all over from the bottom. I got threem more to go and your butts are mine. That has been green lighted since I was kid.

Economic Statecraft: Thinking About the Use of Commerical Actors in Grand Strategy 2010

"In particular, relatively little work has focused on the micro-foundats of how states might mobilize their economic interaction to further their security goals" pdf pg 2 Should have looked at other countries strategies and educational programs. Except for China and France as China's application shows and Frances educational systems for economic and business warfare shows. However, it does seem like that statement is applicable to the US. As it would seem the great economic statecraft of characters has been left to a few instead of the public like France or the military like China. " Just as military tools may be use to achieve strategic national objectives, economic tools may also be used" pdf pg 3 "At the same time that economics has largely fallen through the cracks of security studies, the field of economics has generally ignored the strategic secuirty consequences that arise in the course of international economic activities" pdf pg 3 However, the cold war was all about how the Soviet Union and block with their single currency domination and massive SOE use in international market places was all about the dominat use of their governance to crush free socities free enterprises and free market places. However, again I can agree in part. However, the idea that we lack understaning in a new globalized world especially to the old enemy of free markts which was SOE's cartels and the creation of unfair market places. Would seem true as the US runs a high tech deficit and manufacturing defecit. Which is a huge threat to national security. I can also fully agree with the lack of proliferated literature and the teachings to the mass public with regards to its business. This can also been seen by a lack of understanding of state economics as applied to competition to free enterprises. As we see more and more business selling out to foreign state economics. While US jobs and taxes are lost. Which in turn then cause American business owners to pay higher taxes. While corporations and corporate stock holders have to deal with a massive upset populationj due to lack of jobs and taxes. Which shows a non capacity for understanding economic statecraft in the public. I have to dissagree with your statment and completely refute it by using mutiple examples of failure in the statement you propsed to be true "states with a greater degree of control over their domestic economy will be better suited to direct their economic interaction and thus more likely to realize success in their attempts to engage in economic statecraft." pdf pg 13 This refutation can go two ways. In which the greater degree of control actually causes a loss of statecraft as it causes a bigger black market and the other way is a greater control of the marketplace does not allow natural market swings. In which the greater of the controll is and has been imperalically proven to be a worse case scenario for economic statecraft. The states with the most balanced control over their domestic economy will be better suited to direct their economic interaction and thus more likely to realize success in their attempts. This is because the balanced control allows for less corruption in which laws actually work, and a balanced control also allows economic statecraft to flurish as the power of the domestic market becomes stronger than those who have a greater controll. Like we saw with the communist. Mr. Norris your comment is very uneducated on the matter of economic statecraft. The best state crafters werem those who believed in freedom of economics. As they had more legal follow through and more power to use, than those with greater control of their market place. Balanced should be replaced with "greater control". refutted statement on pdf page 13. If that statement was true then we would all be using rubles and calling Karl Marx a god. However, it is not true and each country uses their own individual currency and Locke is a god.This statement also goes against your pdf pg 15 statement. As such a balanced control of the market allows the state craftist to wield . By the way the reason why the Communist Chinese wield so much power is because they have let go of control yet held

American Society of Civil Engineers 2009 New Report Details Impact of Crumbling Infrastructure

Foreign trade Statistics Trade in Goods Imports Exports with Advanced Technology Products. 2010

Well um lets see. this one looks very similar to the what the manufacturing deficit looked like when China took that from us too. You should see this. Seems to me that y'all are either dim or incabable of economic warfare analysis. Then again, that is what the candle told me. LOL So when does the loss of our manufacturing abilities and high technological abiliteis become national security? When I come up there after grad school and wear my cowboy boots? Cause you know they love to, well, you should see my boots. it has been a while since my boots brought any light to the dim, can you see it now? LOL whoah. These are dangerous stastics, much like a base jump off a 100 story building with a graple of shut, tuck and skate. 30 Seconds and no stopping for a beer at the bar. get it done.

US Census Bureau Foreign trade Monthly Trade Highlights September 2010 Highlights

"•The September deficit of advanced technology products ($9.0 billion) was the highest on record." "•September imports of advanced technology products ($32.0 billion) were the highest on record." So glad to see that your idea of fair trade is working and keeping the US flush with High tech jobs and tax money from those jobs. We lose manufacturing all goes. Simple economic warfare strategy. Little hard to swallow the bit about allowing unfair trade when the only benefit is not even a benefit.

I am godly like not the god though. Here I come baby stream, office workers niche

Public Welfare Crimes

White Colar Crimes

non violent crimes committed against an individual or corporation for gain from the person committing the crime, with specific knowledge in their profession to commit it. This is a key to defending against economic warfare for the local law enforcment. As many folks using crash tequniques to cause damage or harm to a business will use this matter. This along with the IT laws are important for legilsation to take an initiative in remedying. As currently their is not enough prosecution of such. I have a specific high degree in Criminal Justice. I found this part of my study during the gain of such very intersting as it plays a huge part in economic warfare.

Communist or Moaist activits tries to turn France Against Free Enterprises of the US.

While he propogates Communist economics. Christian Harbulot a Moaist revolutionary attacks US free enterprises and free markets via his position at the French Economic warfare school. If you ever go to a seminar act like they do and never say your true colors. Just listen and learn. Saint Cut h Bert wants one. How many times do I have to say that before the Moaist revolutionaries get all the key economic positions. The only problem is as the book goes onto show. The US's free enterprises are not like communist infilitrated countries SOE's.

Global Imbalances and China

very good graphs "China's trade surplus came from slowing imports." pg 13 I disagree with some of the conclusions like did China cause the subprime mortages. The actual question as stated properly should be does China's unfair SOE cartel protected markets cause exports of manufacturing jobs and imports of goods which then make the US dependant on service industries like the savings and loans, .com and mortage for its business cycles,instead of production and country development through exports like China does? Compex yet better in depth. My conclusion differs from this articles. As the Chinese did cause the liquidity pull from the US. This is primarily due to the fact that China uses a centralized strategy to crash then devour free markets. i still have to write mt thesisi on that.

Making Solar Panels

"New York Times website on 25 August an article was supported by the Chinese government deliberately emphasized that it is Chinese companies to sell low profile. . It is reported that since March, Chinese government at all levels, from local to central government, grants jurisdiction to the solar companies, including free land and funds for R + D state-owned banks in the industry "rescue" to provide low-interest loans. In addition, poor market for cheap labor in China has obvious advantages."

China's Global trade balance discrepancy 2008

"“Round-tripping” is a trade-tax-investment strategy whereby Chinese enterprises undervalue exports or artificially overvalue imports, in order to move Chinese capital across the Mainland border through current-account transactions.Specifically, Chinese enterprises export domestic capital from the Mainland to related-party enterprises situated outside China in offshore tax havens, such as Hong Kong, pursuant to non-arm’s length transfer-pricing transactions that are designed to circumvent Chinese capital controls. The exported Chinese domestic capital is then recycled abroad and returns to the Mainland in the form of foreign investment, and as such, receives a lower tax rate on profits." pdf pg 8-9 " In addition, since a majority of companies participating in round-tripping practices are SOEs, China may be reluctant to enforce the EITL on governmental officials." pdf pg 77 "Rather than provide an effective legal framework for the elimination of any of these tendencies, China’s new EIT Law, we concluded, may only partially address such non commercial activities." pdf pg 78

Neomercantilism

"Neomercantilism is founded on the use of control of capital movement and discouraging of domestic consumption as a means of increasing foreign reserves and promoting capital development. This involves protectionism on a host of levels: both protection of domestic producers, discouraging of consumer imports, structural barriers to prevent entry of foreign companies into domestic markets, manipulation of the currency value against foreign currencies and limitations on foreign ownership of domestic corporations."

Remarks by Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson, Jr

U.S. Current Account Deficit: Causes and Consequences 2005 "Although views differ as to when a correction will take place, nearly all agree that the current trajectory of the U.S. current account deficit is unsustainable. This consensus reflects the simple logic that the deficit is causing the net indebtedness of the U.S. economy to rise more rapidly than U.S. income." Again another economists, who learned nothing about economic warfare during their time in school or in the field. Becuase you know Communists don't do that, no! Oh you don't know. LOL well go to school and learn about it. Oh wait, you can't the US does not have economic warfare classes or even a school. France does, Saint Cuthbert wants one.

FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER The U.S. Productivity Acceleration

This has a great graph of the negative Account balance going pretty close in line with trade deficit. Again what this article does not take into account is economic warfare. Why after 4 years would a major country like China still invest in us debt and create negative capital inflows. Along those lines why would the US allow this. MMM maybe infiltration. Birdy said it is possible. Cheif C or his competitor, Sector Five and Heaven's gate. There is a point on this graph. I hope that you are pointing and saying I want to get to that point to the angels. Let them work.

Competitive Depreciation: Modern Economic Warfare 10-10

"If there is a surplus, the country has too much savings. If there is a deficit, it lacks adequate savings. Historically, developing countries such as China had to import foreign savings to finance development. This time around, developing or emerging countries such as China appear to be sending their savings to finance consumption in the advanced industrial countries, in particular the U.S. Outside wartime, we haven’t seen something like this since the days of the Roman Empire when rich Rome sapped the savings of its provinces."

U.S. Economy Grew at 2% Rate in Third Quarter 10-10

"The United States economy is a bit like a jetliner short on fuel these days, waiting for something to give it the oomph needed for takeoff." That is usually a service industry. You see if I was in politics on either camps. I would be out on the field getting new places for the US free enterprises to enteract with and new places for foreign companies to enteract with. I mean what is the score. Hu? Chief C? "City and state governments have shed tens of thousands of employees, and states face a sea of red ink as they look at next year’s budgets." This is due to a non relealizing of national security of job, retirement, pension, and good jobs as national security, as the old guard did. Because the old guard made sure that their employess had a fair fighting chance against economic warfare as implemented by Communist and neo-mercantalist. "Consumer spending, which accounts for roughly 70 percent of economic activity, remains the great unknown. Americans have shed some debt, which is good, but in an unsightly fashion, which is not so good. They have defaulted on credit card debt or have lost their homes to foreclosure in record numbers." This defaulting on debt which leads to credit crunches which lead to less employer spending on wages. Means American's save less. Which means we go right back into the cycle again and it over again. Dam vicious CCEB cycle it is. Imports grew at an annual rate of 17.4 percent, compared with a 5.0 percent gain for exports" "the result of a 159,000 decline in government jobs. Local governments were particularly hard hit."

Growth is good, but faster growth needed to address unemployment 4-10

"For another, the solid boost to growth over the past two and half years resulting from a closing trade deficit seems to be fading. Net exports fell in the quarter and subtracted 0.6 percentage points off of this quarter’s growth rate. This decline seems to ratify a trend of ever-weaker contributions from this sector to overall growth. In essence, trade flows acted as a very useful shock-absorber since the recession began, but it doesn’t seem that trade will continue to play this role as the recovery really gets underway." This theory needs to be made false. Meaning get the players on the field. "Given balanced budget rules at the state-level, this implies that states will be cutting spending and/or raising taxes for years to come and hence exerting a powerful drag on growth." "Given that sustained, high unemployment puts severe downward pressure on wages, it is hard to see where the private demand for goods and services necessary to drive a durable recovery will come from without ever-retreating savings rates." Thus in my opinion showing that the service or financial industries will not be the ones carrying us out. The production of goods that brings in positive capital inflows to balance our account sheets, and to incur personal savings via higher wages, and less inflation; will.

Faster growth needed 10-31-10

As the mortgage service bell curve created a bigger boom bust. There is the affects of trying to crawl out of a bigger crater. Oh by the way love my new glasses with up to date economics on the left side of the view finder. Nice for weakened warrior analysis. Just dreaming, maybe, maybe not. "difference in the speed of recovery this time around relative to the last recession in which unemployment peaked above 10%" "The Fed is forecasting real GDP growth for all of 2010 of 2.5%, rising to 3.5% in 2011. Those would be good to great growth rates for a rich economy at full employment. For an economy that continues to experience a real output gap about almost a trillion dollars, it's troubling."

U.S. Service Economy Expanded More Than Forecast in October 11-10

"the same time, growth isn’t fast enough to cut unemployment stuck above 9 percent" "We should be doing better than this at this stage of the recovery. Growth is not strong enough to bring down the unemployment rate significantly." That is because we need more players on the international field. Hu and company were out runing the field and gained huge amounts of new business parterns for China in the international marketplace. I have seen two so far for the US, Australia and India. Hu is also out to buy political clout with purchasing deals to spike into markets after the deals are done. This will mean that our team has to iron player it. With the ability to create imports and exports and new relations with governments to create fields for new countries to entertain imports and exports with the US. This is not a walk in the park for the non-neomercantalist countries.

October 2010 Manufacturing ISM Report On Business

Our growth rate is still not high enough. The mixture of the Chinese centralizing their strategy for aquisition and less on domestic production for output at this point in the business cycle. Plus a slow rise in pressure on china as charts have shown that China does react under the gun of a trough climb out. Shows that we are gaining. However, if you look at specific industries like telecommunications parts. I would wonder why such a massive giant unfair competitor as Huweia Communications would have in that part. As I have outlined such Chinese economic warfare strategies in the steel industry. Where they unfairly competed and even blocked out industries to protect them own. Then use a SOE steel company right after the unfair activities to purchase a US free enterprises steel company. I would wonder if the telecommunictions or telephone parts industry is being attacked in the same manner. I also believed I noticed in the growth change rate, that the non manufacturing jobs are growing at a faster rate than manufacturing. Which is a difference of 1 percent at these calculations. I would wonder, how are we going to balance our GDP and GNP reliance on service industries at that growth rate.

October 2010 Non-Manufacturing ISM Report On Business

This is a problem like I stated. The Chiense Communist Economic Blitzkreig is gutting us of high technological jobs and production jobs. Which create capital inflows of positive reserves. Instead of the service industries which have to have negative inflows of debt capital with interested tied to them. "The 11 industries reporting growth in October based on the NMI composite index — listed in order — are: Educational Services; Mining; Professional, Scientific & Technical Services; Information; Finance & Insurance; Wholesale Trade; Health Care & Social Assistance; Accommodation & Food Services; Management of Companies & Support Services; Retail Trade; and Public Administration. The three industries reporting contraction in October are: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting; Arts, Entertainment & Recreation; and Construction." We are being gutted and deboned as our econoimic infrastructure is bought up through negative capital inflows through, debt selling, bonds, and financial institutions investing and major uncompetitive industries aquiring necessary international market shares which is needed for a sustainable growth rate for the US and free markets.

Toxic products from China’s Forced Labor Camps

"Four to six million people forced into slave labor." Good to know we have 15 million people with no jobs but hey China can use slave labor to import to the US "Prison Farm exports frozen vegetables and fish to USA." pdf pg 2 This is much different than the US perspective of Prisons creating food for their own citizens to eat. As to the export to international markets. Self sustaining is different from market sharing via slave labor. I mean I am all for prisoners creating their own products for self consumption. However, when they are allowed to be used for free labor, to make the prisons money or states money on them that is another whole basket.

LAOGAI HANDBOOK 2008

"China has also frustrated the international community in recent years with its continuing support of other dictatorial regimes in Sudan Myanmar, and Zimbabwe. Not only has China provided these regimes with diplomatic protection, but it has also supplied them with arms. Also, although China still holds its champion status in the field of cheap exports, the health and safety standards of its products came into question last year when consumers in the US and throughout the world discovered they had been buying poisonous food and toxic toys from China." pdf pg 7 "The Laogai slogan “Reform first, production second,” pdf pg 7 "Laogai system and allows for the arrest and detention of petty criminals for up to three years without formal charge or trial." pdf pg 7 "Similar to the Soviet Gulag, a primary purpose of the Laogai system was to root out and isolate the vast numbers of political opponents that were created by the new regime’s consolidation of power:". id

Laogai Research Foundation Calls on EU to Suspend Preferential Trade Access for China Under the GSP

2009 "The Laogai Research Foundation (LRF), in association with the International Society for Human Rights (Frankfurt), formally call on the European Commission to suspend the People's Republic of China's non-reciprocal preferential access to the EU market provided under the GSP scheme until China stops exporting products to the EU made in the Laogai, China's vast system of forced labor prison camps." "The Laogai not only serves to suppress dissent; it also functions as a massive source of free labor. Inmates within the Laogai system are forced to labor long hours in abusive conditions. LRF has documented cases where inmates were working 16-18 hours a day in mines with no protective gear, handling battery acid with no gloves, and standing naked in vats of tanning chemicals" " Laogai enterprises not only continue to operate, but also to profit handsomely by exporting goods made by prisoners who are not compensated for their labor."

Chinese budget Defict 3.8%. US Budget Deficit 66%

"The state-owned banks, particularly the top-five which have been used in the past by the government to direct credit." "Minsheng’s bid to take over a Californian bank, the United Commercial Bank (UCB) was deplorably thwarted in November 2009 by FDIC’s intervention to save the bankrupt UCB." "While such requirements may seem plausible (if they are too weak, a worst case scenario would be that many badly regulated and managed foreign banks could own American banks and engage in excessive risk-taking and undermine US financial stability)"

Trade Deficit = Capital Inflow = BOP = 0

As suspected our value to the world is the service and financial sector. As the our main source of capital inflow is investment's from foreign countries purchasing our debt, our land, or our business market shares. This does not say much for the creation of real valued capital inflows which would come from products being traded and bartered for. This cite does not properly account for the inflation that comes with the reliance on foreign direct investment which if properly calculated over foreign financial aid keeping the dollar high in time. Thus meaning that a calculation of such study could be done to show a loss with inflation properly calculated in due to foreign debt and currency reserves while a constant loss in the financial sector due to foreign constant purchasing of those sectors. Really nice try though. I just think that the calculations could be done more thoroughly.

Chinese Soft Power and Its Implications for the United States

"China has been pursuing its national interests recently through the exercise of “soft power,” as it projects a nonconfrontational face to the developing world. It is China’s rapid economic expansion—and the country’s need for natural resources, export markets, and political influence—that has led it to step up its engagement with developing countries in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America." Economic markets was once the foremost national security for the US. As we used to understand how important it was for the US to have new trade markets to expand. However, as the US's growth rate is not even poverty leve at below 2% I find our national security on the matter is waining horribly.

China vs America in the Middle East

"China’s trade-investment interests in Iran are deepening alongside the growing strategic as well as ideological alignment between the two powers. In the last five years, China has emerged as the major investor in Iran, with an estimated $120 billion worth of energy investments. Despite the sanctions already in place, trade between the countries grew by 35 percent in 2008, to $27 billion. In 2009, China signed over $8 billion in new energy investments. Seemingly, there is an emerging China-Iran tandem." "In direct contrast to the unpopular American approach, China later developed the Beijing Consensus, which emphasized state-led development, non-interference in the affairs of other countries, and trade without political preconditions. As anti-U.S. sentiment grew in the Middle East, China found it easier to expand ties with all relevant regional powers, including America’s Arab allies, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. China’s strategic maneuverings have been a savvy fusion of mercantilist foreign policy and security-focused diplomacy." " China is the Saudis’ biggest export market, surpassing the troubled U.S. market." "In strategic terms, the Saudis are seeking to diversify their foreign relations — or wean themselves of dependence on the United States — by expanding ties with China. They also view their growing ties with the Asian power as a springboard to tap the growing market of Asia as the west struggles to absorb Saudi oil." We need to become more economically savy. "By 2008, bilateral trade stood at $6.2 billion and by 2010 China is expected to become Egypt’s largest trade partner." "Through a clandestine set of operations from the 1980s until the end of the century, Israel provided China with almost $4 billion in sensitive technology. These exports, some traced back to the United States, contributed immensely to China’s military modernization by upgrading Soviet technology and incorporating U.S. technology." We are turning into the soviets. "China’s push into the Middle East is a calculated extension of its rising global status. Already a major ally of the only Muslim nuclear power — Pakistan — China is deepening its ties with the main U.S. foe in the region, Iran, while wooing America’s main Arab allies. Consequently, China’s support has emboldened Iran’s defiance and dampened prospects of serious sanctions." "The United States remains the preponderant military power in the world. But while paying a heavy price — materially and ideologically — in its wars in the region and struggling with a troubled domestic economy, the United States watches as China positions itself at the center of regional politics and swiftly expands its investments, trade, and military relations with powerful regional players. Flushed with cash and clout, Beijing is changing the regional balance of power even as a relative newcomer to the Middle East. Washington, meanwhile, is too distracted by its wars to do much more than observe the tectonic shifts."

Welcome back Senator's NIC on Middle East

"The participants assessed that while some Middle Eastern countries have made progress in diversifying their economies, the area as a whole remains economically underdeveloped and highly dependent on hydrocarbon revenues." This is a problem a people without jobs are a poeple more likely to have hate and want destruction. So how do we foster productivity? pdf pg 5 How did we do it with China and Russia when they ran high risks of terroist activities? "As the 2020 Project Report emphasizes, energy consumption will increase significantly in the next 15 years as demand rises in China and India, impelling these two ascendant powers to play a growing political and economic role in the Middle East." pdf pg 7 "When oil prices are low, relatively better contract terms make investment more attractive for traditional profit-driven multinational oil companies (with their comparative advantages in technology, efficiency, and project management). But when prices are high, with correspondingly more costly contract terms, politically-driven parastatal companies such as PetroChina are more likely to invest." "Parastatal companies’ political agenda makes them more willing to tolerate financial risk and lower profits, because their actions are an extension of state policy instead of a purely financial calculation." pdf pg 7 This is why I think the US will not see its advantegous outcome that it seaks through stabilizing the middle east on the majorit of US taxes. Pure economics and supply and demand. "Parastatals’ greater willingness to invest in poor climates will allow their corresponding states to create closer political and economic ties with oil-producing regimes. China is the clear leader in parastatal influence and impact in the Middle East; India is also a player but is playing catch-up." China in the Region has a huge advantage already yet does China spend equal amounts for the security of the region or are they pigging backing off our our tax dollars? So my point is why not make them chip in equally? They are seeing more benefits than any other

My suggestion to all my Economic Warfare Defense Analysis.

This is the cheapest place I have found so far for a proper insurance financing course on the matters of hand at properly understanding our next business cycle. If am correct, if my trace of the savings and loan, .com and mortage keep following this cycle. We will need proper watching by the DOD economic department for any creation of peaking or spiking before the service normalizes. As such the target is to seek knowledge based on the next leading sector of the US business model to stop the peaking and spking process we saw in the last couple of service industries. This is a little much for my economic level. However, I will find one in my price range and probable make up the rest in personal readings. The only other comprehensive class I have found was around $1000 more. As this is currently at peak rate as only the true economists would understand and follow the Rider I. Maybe if you are lucky you will see the big dog himself. Maybe probable not because my economic levels are not there. However, you never know. LOL Maybe there might be a mystery person seeking to start the US's first economic warfare school to rebutt Frances. Maybe maybe not. You never know. Doubt it though my economic levels are not there. I believe that whether or not we are forced to purchase it it will still be a big indicator for the next service bell curve.

China’s Communist Party anoints Xi Jinping as the country’s next leader. He will have his work cut

Economists 10-10. Now placing a party whip is one thing. But voting in a countries leader based on a small group of political leaders is very Communisics. "It had long been assumed that Mr Xi, who is 57, would get the top job, and that this would be signalled by making him vice-chairman of the party’s Central Military Commission." That is the problem with Communism Marxism and Socalism. They want a few leaders to rule. Were as Lockean, Freedom, Democracy/Republicans want a diversity of leaders and rulers. This why the US keeps a bi party system. They may agree on points but they are different in many vast points. Checks and balances don't exist in Communist politics. "There are signs of serious disagreement among China’s elite over whether the party should change how it rules, at least a bit, to give people more say in who leads them." See that is the problem with playing the freedom game. The people will want to lose oppresive non voted in by populace rulers. "Liberals in Beijing have stepped up public demands for a loosening of the party’s grip, even as the authorities have detained dissidents for celebrating the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo, an imprisoned activist." "Zhejiang Experience and its Implication for the Development of China”. It stresses the importance of setting up party cells in private enterprises (by the end of 2004, it boasts, almost 99% of private firms with three or more party members had done so)." "Mr Xi is said to be an affable man. But there was a hint of irascibility in February 2009 when he told a group of Chinese in Mexico that “well-fed foreigners with nothing better to do” were “pointing their fingers” at China." That is because the ones who are not well fed nor have jobs and are on unemployment can't afford to read as much as us lazy ones. Da, what does your engineering degree not teach you anything about the mass of materials gathered away take away from the chi of the rest. Like SOE's v. Private. Fatties read a lot so what. " In an interview with China’s state television network, CCTV, in November 2003, Mr Xi elaborated on the benefits of table-pounding when dealing with aberrant officials. “If you don’t thump the table you can’t frighten them”, he said." You and cowboy would get along just fine. Thought was his argument for quantum jumping over China. Thump the table. Kind of like our knocking on the table. However, it is not one person who does it it must include a universal rapping on the table. Which is more than a simple thump on the table. LOL Daming up the political sector against voting are ya? Art School ya.

Dependence on China The indispensable economy? China may not matter quite as much as you think

Economists 10-10 "Moreover, just as expanding exports add to growth, burgeoning imports subtract from it. Most countries outside East Asia suffered a deteriorating trade balance with China from 2001 to 2008. By the simple arithmetic of growth, trade with China made a (small) negative contribution, not a positive one." This is we we need to go with China "This reflects China’s gradual “transformation from being the world’s factory, toward increasingly being the world’s consumer,” they write." Their massive size means that they should not control the production of interantional goods as it will stop needed countries from gaining economic security which stops terroism. "Its purchases of foreign assets keep the cost of capital down and its appetite for raw materials keeps their price up, to the benefit of commodity producers wherever they sell their wares." "Since the crisis, China has shown that its economy can grow even when America’s shrinks." Well there cosntant build up of developing economies through nuclear power and the US spending all of its economic power on religious terroists which kills huge amounts of foreign business. Which in reality is just because the US's ability to build economic security for its satellites is not even comparable to the ability of China and their friendly invasion tactics. Again our military and economics seem not to have a clue about each other. Have you met yet?

Chinese nuclear parts raise safety questions: By Kerri Toloczko 2010

China is one of the world's top exporter of nuclear parts. " Its infrastructure investment in these countries could pose a threat to the U.S., particularly in Iran, where Chinese capital has allowed the mullahs to militarily “harden” the Straits of Hormuz, through which two-fifths of the world’s oil supply travels." "Last year, China revealed plans to add 24 new reactors in 10 years – quadrupling its nuclear power capacity." "However, China has made an art form of creating a product-specific industry aimed at export and then becoming its global master. Will nuclear components be any different?" "America needs skill-based, sustainable jobs. Manufacturing unemployment remains at 13 percent, and our high-tech industry shed nearly 175,000 jobs in 2009."

Confronting the China-U.S. Economic Imbalance

China concentrates must of its foreign currency reserve and debt holdings at 65% of thier foriegn assets on US. This then holds high the US dollar. Which in turn has implications that destroy jobs, taxes and ability to militarily protect interests. As we know see huge amounts of intellegence being gathered to start to shut down intellegence dod bases because we can't afford this. This is bad because it hurts the US and it also does not allow China to free up its foreign assets holding for countries that need the help to civilize for sercurity purposes. China's high reliance on US foreign assets holdings then creates a two prong affect much like we saw Japan's similar actions of the past. 1. The US loses welfare because it is being held high at an inflation rate which is a tax on US savings. 2. Foreign countries that need the capital debt and foreign asset accumlation do not get to civilze their countries. Even though their countries would be a better investment as their is substantially more room for growth than there is in America. If China spread out their foreign assets holdings portfolio it would not only stop the detremental effects to the US by keeping the Buckaroo high but ti would allow it to help countries that need the help. So I apply this through lockean terms it is affecting the natural market forces as US production goes down and value goes down so should its buck. However, as it is being backed by the Chinese dollar it stays high. Then I apply this through the Marxist principles China is incurring a mountain of wealth centralized away from the people who need it the most. As such China should decentralize its holdings and thus spread the wealth out to countries that need it to produce a civilized infrastructuee and raise their welfare for children and families and to destroy micro economic socilological economic creations of terroists. This paper makes a statement to back up its conclusion. However, I believe that statement is flawed. Here is the logic: " The Congressional Research Service cites data showing that increasing productivity in Chinese export firms--a factor unrelated to exchange rates--has contributed to Chinese export growth." This statement is meant to back a statment that is being made to say that the currency is not as big a problem. However, then the paper makes another statement "There is also evidence to suggest that much of the U.S. trade deficit (which widened in September 2009 by 18 percent to $36.5 billion, the largest increase in a decade) from China comes from the many export-oriented U.S. multinational companies that have moved production to China to take advantage of its low labor costs." Now after reading those statments in the wish to create a logical inference that Chinese currency manipulation is not the problem but US firms exporting jobs to China is the problem. The logic is flawed. As such the reason why US companies are exporting jobs to CHina is becaues of the low currency compared to super high production rate. Which makes China an uncompetitive arena for its competition which can also produce at low costs but not such high production. The logic used in the paper would have you believe in inference that currency manipulation has nothing to do with job import or export. However, again that is not true. One sentence, if it is cheaper to have it made there via currency then jobs leave. As such for jobs lilke high tech engineers the currency makes a huge problem. As China is creating the same things that the US is at our highest leves of nano- and comm tech (quantum portal). However, it is just cheaper which is highly correlated to currency value. "These deficits in turn provoke industry leaders to ramp up pressure for protectionist U.S. trade policies, he argues, which in the past policymakers have responded to by drastically devaluing the dollar." In turn we lead back to the Chinese Currency and neo-mercantalism destroying free trade and free enterprises because for the US to stay stabil and secure it has to protect. Which is against our morals however, we have to eat and provide for our welfare."Even if China abandoned its dollar peg and allowed the yuan to appreciate in line with U.S. demands, the likely resulting slowdown in China's economic growth could lead to political unrest, some experts say. "China has an 8 percent growth target because it needs that growth level to maintain enough jobs to absorb surplus labor in China's rural areas. Without the labor, you breed conditions for instability," says CFR's Dunaway." This is the reason why China's currency rises very closely to the world inflation rate so as to incur as little of loss international economic dominace as possible. However, it has been proven that if China were to concentrate on domestic micro policies which brings higher quality of life as currency raises then these worries would be unfullfilled. As the rural areas would see a boost in service jobs. Much like we are seeing now with workers in China not wanting to go back to manufacturing jobs because service jobs pay higher. This then would allow other foreign countries that need the economic security more than China to pick it up. Which then would allow China to become more of consumption country. However, because of huge political extreme ideas of Communism. The party is to hard pressed to become a consumption because they are so believed in centralzied economic planning and international dominace than they are worried about their domestic quality of life. Much like a mother who never lets her son go. His quality of life sucks as she calls him to much, he can never leave home do to mental abuse and his ability to meet a women becomes improached upon. As we have seen China so wished to keep their communist centralized economics as security blanke and afraid to allow market forces to do much of like what we have seen being done in China . Which is create a stream of economics that flows and creates quality of life. However, China still needs to research micro governance economics without totalatarian control of the free markets. As being enlightened with proper education can usually rest fears, as they will be able to coop. ". Yet, as long as China remains the biggest creditor of the United States, it will be difficult for the United States to directly influence Chinese leaders on currency matters, some experts say." Is it me or has main stream media and educational institution economists lost logic. Lets see another flawed logical conclusion "Some say focusing on China's currency is merely a distraction from other drivers of U.S. debt. In an October 2009 interview, Morgan Stanley's Stephen Roach said the currency issue is a "red herring" for U.S. policymakers and that the United States should instead focus its efforts on boosting U.S. savings. "If we want to redirect our economy away from excess consumption towards more of a savings-based economy, then and only then, can we wean ourselves off of Chinese products," said Roach." Ok so lets think about this. INFLATION DIRECTLY AFFECTS SAVINGS. Trade deficit and loss of jobs directly affects inflation. Trade deficit and loss of jobs is directly affected by a country with the worlds highest ability for resources and production having a very low currency. However, don't worry about the root problem we will just skip that caclulation and force the free market to do as we say. No you are wrong look at the root of the problem. HIgh production and resource holdings whith low currency intake foreign jobs at high rate, costs tax payers and jobs domestically, US then has to inflate its economy and wait for another service bell curve to come around. Inflation thus eats away at savings as Americans have to pay higher taxes to pay for it. Anybody was it Buerlers day of in algorythms.

The Tenuous Hold of China Inc. In Africa

China uses SOE's to stop trade with Africa and Tawian in favor of more beneficial cartel members of China Inc. "In 2002 the government began selecting some 50 “national champions” from the most promising or strategic SOEs in China.These large corporations enjoy a range of benefits from the government, including information-sharing sharing networks, domestic tax breaks, cheap land, and low-interest funding fromstate-owned banks." pdf pg 4 "Big, state-owned Chinese construction firms have been particularly competitive in large-scale infrastructure infrastructure construction projects in sub-Saharan Africa, due primarily to their efficiency efficiency and low costs." pdf pg 5 "The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASACis either the sole owner of any given Chinese SOE or maintains a controlling share of stock in any public SOE." pdf pg 6 "the China Development Bank issued a low-cost $10 billion loan to Huawei, a major Chinese communications technology company, to promote its international operations. Soon afterward, Huawei won contracts worth $400 million to provide cellular phone service in Kenya, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe." pdf pg 8 "SOEs make up approximately 88 percent of all Chinese firms investing abroad, making provincial governments a key player in China’s corporate engagement strategy overseas." Sounds like a fair country to use such high government agencies for business investments. Not. "As China’s engagement in Africa deepens, Beijing’s strategy of relying on state-owned corporations to advance China’s broad political and strategic interests is becoming increasingly problematic.' pdf pg 8 "Mid-level Chinese manufacturing and construction firms generate tension with African businesses in which their market shares are eroding, and individual Chinese entrepreneurs and low-cost workers are criticized for taking African jobs and undermining traditional markets and goods." pdf pg 10 "the SASAC at the national, provincial, or city levels is in effect the “owner” of these SOEs." pdf pg 11 "Chinese corporations may feel free to act in a fiscally irresponsible manner because they can rely on China’s state-controlled banks for financial support regardless of their economic performance." pdf pg 13 "In Ethiopia, for example, some Chinese construction firms have been instructed by their provincial governments to make unprofitable bids to get a foot in the door for future undertakings." pdf pg 13 "It is worth recalling that China’s newly crowned national champions leading the go-out strategy are the same large-scale, inefficient, highly subsidized SOEs that have resisted previous reform efforts in China. It is unlikely that they have suddenly become models of efficiency simply because they are operating abroad, particularly given the political interests involved, the SOEs’ lack of experience, and the moral-hazard problem. Indeed, the World Bank recently reported that one-third of Chinese enterprises had lost money on their foreign investments and that 65 percent of their joint ventures had failed." pdf pg 13 "This poses not only a risk for China’s reputation but also raises a host of concerns in Africa and the international community regarding worker and product safety, fraudulent goods, unfair trading and investment practices, and lax environmental standards." pdf pg 13

Coercive Complementarity: Integrating the Military and Economic Instrument Power

"This primer details why globalization is changing the nature of economic and military power and increasing the importance of multilateral coalitions." pdf pg 7 "The differences between the instruments help understand how they complement one another. Not surprisingly, the most signigicant differences is how the instruments impose costs on the target, sender, and third parties." pdf pg 8 This paper is another good reason why JFCOM should not be merged or downsized. "First, military education provides military officers with little information about the economic instrument as a tool of coercion." pdf pg 13 Ya I think I talked to the elders about creating economic warfare and defense classes at higher levels of study and case application and getting ride of such trivial classes as defeatist classes. I have to make another round to the colleges to see if our cognitive creations are still strong or if they are being weakened impunitivly. "As a result, there isdisappointingly little in the way of cross-cultural thinking between military writers and economists on the combined use of the two instruments in a coercive strategy." pdf pg 14 "Some economists, such as Gautam Sen, support this idea arguiing, the balance of power in international political system and the relative power of a national actors is therefore primarily predicated on the relative levels of industrial and technological advancment. The basis of Sen's argument is that these two characteristics are prerequisites to developing a strong military capability." "Harvard's Joseph Nye, Jr notes that political leaders often rely on resource measures." "Accordingly, power depends upon “a country’s skill at power conversion as well as its possession of resources.” "there is no more valuable and cost-effective method of influence than to use the mass and capacity of the US economy to promote private international trade and facilitate international economic exchange—certainly a more optimistic, yet no less coercive view." pdf pg 19 "1) the United Sates should reject a return to isolationism and remainengaged in the world scene; 2) she should act to prevent political instability in Europe and Asia and prevent their domination by a single power; 3) she should support the establishment of an international collective security organization instead of the “spheres of spheresof- a system of multilateral trade based on stable currency exchange rates, moderate trade barriers, and an abundant international flow of investment capital." pdf pg 21 "These controls include import quotas, which limit." pdf pg 29 left off at pg 32 have to drink wine, and bubble with the ladies, plus crackers and cheese and hear about all the new styles I should be wearing but can't afford yet.

Protectionism by China Is Biggest Since World War II. New York Times 10-2010

"China has intervened in the foreign exchange markets by an average of $1 billion a day for the last five years, buying dollars to keep them expensive and selling renminbi to keep them cheap, building a gigantic reserve of $2.5 trillion in the process." This process along has kept the US at the lowest account balance. This is a serious impact to the US, as we are the biggest so called dissentors to Chinese single party politics imperalism. The reason for them to keep buying US currency and funding our debt is to keep an aritifically high dollar so the US can recliam a balanced GDP of production and services. This causes the US and other free markets that are under similar attacks to be highly reliant on service industries which again through my theory of the service bell curve leading the business model and George Soros boom bust economic model which can then be explained by my theory of the employment multiplier of supply and demand as crashing. Shows that China knows this as I know it, and thereofore wishes to keep their production and imbalances in Free markets so they can over take and controll. While being able to cloak themselves as poor when they are the richest country in the world. However, they economic policy macor policy of international expansionism impacts their domestic micro policy as their citizens lose qyality of life and pockets fo wealth and centralized economics cause their quality of life as a stream of economics to be low. I think Chins is a little to big for their training wheels and blanky. This is an important equation to remeber. The fact that long slow currency raise " But these views ignore the critical time lags, of two to three years, between currency changes and resulting changes in trade flows; the lag from currency change to change in product prices; the subsequent lag to changes in orders and therefore market share; and the third lag to actual shipment of the goods and services."

Never mind

This places the countries of neo-mercantalism at the top to deal with things they are using to actually cause global insecurity. It is like having the wolf watch over the rabbits den. As all countries now leading the panel are huge neo-mercantalist and are the actual economies that need to be checked by emerging markets. Not already grown markets. China for darns sake is not a developing market, what is wrong with you people. If they are a developing market so is the US. For geese sakes. Placing the richest neo-mercnatalist in the top share holding spots is like lets say this. China and the others use neo-mercantalism and even other monetary ways to pad their economy. Which then drastactly effects the poor developing countries as they can't compete. So now what the free market societies are being taken out of their own social order leadership roles there will be no check on them. This was a bad idea. Neo-mercantalist countries should always be checked by free market countries. Not allowed to run the darn thing at the highest level of shares with poor countries having no representation at an impactual level against them. While the free markets lose standing heavily in the social order. So now who is going to stand up at a veto level for the poorer countries if all the neo-mercantalist have the top spots. Oh wait I remeber now that is part of the strategy for them to gain access to free market socities and take leader ship roles so as to decline the influence of the free market and implement their neo-mercantalist beliefs over free markets. Again, impactually China is not a developing country as compared to the US. All things considered equal China is actually a head of the US in most facets except political and economic freedom. I seriously think that our economic departments are either under educated on that matter of this or infilitrated. As per mental cognitive writing of who wrote the paper I get they understand the communist's as per word lineage and application of writing style. I also get that now the neo-mercantalist countries are considered the most important countries. Again obsiously no one in educated on the impacts of how impotant it is that these countries at this time do not lead until their economies become fairly competitive and they abondan they uncomeptitive centralized economic strategies. They look like developing markets because of their slow turtle pace of economic freedom reforms and their wishes to keep high reserves and uncompetitive domestic markets.

China Surpasses U.S. in Technological Prowess

"The only problem is that the manufacturing sector has always been a key driver of technological innovation. When manufacturing goes, so does a large share of hi-tech R and D." We still have services which help with military defenses. I mean we can always sue China or even accountant them with numbers or better we can serve them to they eat to much. LOL ah darn economic espionage agents. We got a couple stuck in the hounds nose and that sent is strong. I hate traitors, not as much as Putin but enough to try them in court for life, if they do not give themselves up peacefull or turn.

The Huawei Security Threat 10-10

"Retired General Ren Zhengfei, the company's founder and current president, was formerly the director of the People's Liberation Army General Staff Department's Information Engineering Academy, an entity responsible for telecommunications research for the military." It is not becasue I do not like China. It is because I have seriously heard for decades all about China stealing our jobs unfairly and no one doing anything. That long means some knight needs to stand up and say something is going on and it is wrong. And after my dig into the very suspicious activities of our intellegence units after the supposed cold war was over. It seems I know exactly what deparemtnst were hit and have seen the outcomes of those economic pin pointed acts. "That makes this deal very different from the scenario if a major publicly listed telecom from a democratic American ally were to invest in an American company." Birds tell me if I came to you, well. "The Australian Security Intelligence Organization investigated claims by former employees that Huawei had engaged in cyber espionage against Australian interests." Just like the Econ Blitzkreig theories states " If Huawei were to provide infrastructure." "China has also perfected disruptive technologies, such as the outright blocking of text messages in western China for months following unrest in Xinjiang province in 2009." Every year China also does a ban on certain things to show its dependance from Japan via the Internet. " In this case, there are a number of competitive alternative suppliers of advanced telecommunications technology. Sprint Nextel should take national security concerns into consideration when selecting partners." The fact that our ally that Checks China India has moved on the matter. Britian who seems to think it was bad move, and Australia investigating this Company for causing internet errosions of free enterprises via past employees of this company as evidence. Along with that fact that China is the world's biggest espionage country, along with the fact that I have traced the world economic inbalance specificially straight to China's unfair competition and very low currency compared to it's mass economic power, and that a General is blantalty lying that he works with the PLA, even though our birds say otherwise. I would say, that well, what happens on the anniversary of China's independance from Japan. Well, personally, I think National security should be considered. As from, downed intellegence plains, birds in radar then downed boats, crashed and stolen infrastructueral stability, and China's massive unfair funding and anti-trust style polices much like what we saw with its first try to cloak anti-trust policies with their internationa export program that carteld all exports and tried to make major brands. CHINA DOES NOT YET UNDERSTAND FAIR COMPETITION AND FAIRNESS. They understand totalatrian controll and destruction of enemies. Especially from an old Communsist General.

I can ride my bike with no Handlebars. I can see you through the TV, without a camera. HEHE

Repercussion of China’s Internet Espionage of Indian Sites – Huawei and ZTE banned from India 2010. As technology goes up and the human being feels more oppresed by it it will create defenses against it. First gen's have already been seen and studied. "The government has sent letters to Indian phone companies saying they can’t buy equipment from Huawei, ZTE, and several other mainland companies due to security risks." "India imposed anti-dumping duties on transmission gear from Huawei and other vendors" " India banned many Chinese cell phones, also because of security concerns," "An Israeli company and California-based U.T. Starcom (which does most of its manufacturing in China) were hit, too."

Generic Giants 2009 MSNBC.com

"Founded in 1988 by a former People's Liberation Army officer." "now poised to overtake Nokia Siemens as the world's second-largest maker of telecom hardware." China is no longer a third world country and their currency along with anti-trust strategies is unfair and uncompetitive. "The company has built its success the old-fashioned Chinese way—by selling to other businesses, rather than directly to consumers around the world, and by competing on price rather than on innovation." I wonder why prices can be so low for them why we have to starve and be beat with a staff as their companies compete on price and ours die, go extinct and be bought up. I want my whistle and chair. :) Now or later. LOL "That means one out of six people on the planet uses Huawei hardware." I have seen knights full of pain, folks fall from money to poor, families lose more each decade and there is no room for cheating or uncompetitive makret sharing or price fixing. IT IS ON. I will hope up in my space ship and leave earth. I am gone. I will tell you. Lights off, with confidence. Rebirth or I am gone. It hurst and it is showing, how lonely we have become. The walls are closing in and markets shares are being pinned down, watching that cloak to bring this game up. It aint going to be the same now that the Rider I, you best not. Time to fly. Run Circles around you. What is military equipment? "What Two of its most recent products are bulletproof equipment for a Mexican telecom operator and gear capable of withstanding Russia's frigid winters, hardly items the average consumer is clamoring for" I mean it is hard to say that when a former military patriot man blantaly LIES regarding working with the PLF and its miltiary. I mean the man owns the biggest telecommunications business in the world, and he says he does not work with his own countries military. The probable lying is what worries me. "China's weak protection for intellectual-property rights—the patents and ideas that are the solid core of any brand—makes it risky for companies to invest heavily in innovations that could make them famous worldwide but could easily be stolen by rivals at home." "Most mergers fail when both companies are in rich countries, and mergers between the West and China are even more prone to culture clash, but that won't deter others from trying." What China Rich, no, not China they are not a world leader in enterprises and military no, not China? "China's banks have given hundreds of billions in loans to help companies expand, according to state media." How does that work their SOE banks fund them buying the West's and Free enterprises business names while we have to let them go because of their cheap prices and unfair competition. No more! We Compete they play fair that is the way it is. Even if Huawei wanted to, it would face big hurdles selling itself to the public, when its leadership and ownership are hidden in shadows. The company offers only a one-paragraph bio about its CEO, which leaves out details such as Ren's membership in the Communist Party." Hey that is kind of like the MSS leader's records going completely burned right before nomination. If that happened I do not know. "A 2007 report prepared for the U.S. Air Force by the RAND Corporation, a U.S. government–affiliated think tank, says that Huawei "maintains deep ties with the Chinese military, which serves a multifaceted role as an important customer, as well as Huawei's political patron and research development partner."

The Huawei Way: The telecom giant is either a security menace or a real comer 2006

"More important is the easy line of bank financing Huawei and other companies receive. In 2004, Huawei got a $10 billion credit line from the state-owned China Development Bank and $600 million from the Export-Import Bank of China to fund its global expansion. That, analysts say, has helped Huawei undercut competitors' bids by as much as 70 percent and offer vendor-financed loans." YOUR GUYS ANTI-TRUST LAWS SUCK AND MAKING FOLKS CHASE ALIENS IN THE DESERTY SUCKS EVEN MORE. Mr. Grey does not care duditis does.

Western spymasters believe China's first-strike cyber-warfare capabilities may give it the upper ha

China Telecom Gian Makes Push for US Market 10-2010

Man was a completely right a year ago when I said that this was their aquisition period. My CCEB theory is coming true. "Some in Congress and the national security establishment fear that Huawei’s close ties to the Chinese military might allow China to tamper with American communications gear." "Last week, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, and three other members of Congress wrote a letter to Julius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, raising the specter that an equipment sale might permit the Chinese government to manipulate parts of the communications network, making it possible to disrupt or intercept phone calls and Internet messages." "Huawei has hired a remarkable array of Washington lobbyists, lawyers, consultants and public relations firms to help it win business in the United States." "The company has repeatedly been linked to the People’s Liberation Army of China. And over the last decade, Huawei has been sued in the United States by two of its major competitors, Cisco Systems and Motorola, over accusations that it stole software designs and infringed on patents." Were are my bulls, are we run by lemmings now? "Cisco settled its suit with Huawei soon after filing it" "The senators, who are seeking a stringent government review of Huawei, said they were troubled by the company’s history, including evidence it had supplied communications equipment to Iran and Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s regime, possibly in violation of United Nations sanctions." This would be a Win Win for China access to first strike and then anti-trust uses of markets, like military espionage for trade secrets to destroy competitors. "In Europe, some competitors are now complaining about so-called subsidies that Huawei receives from the Chinese government." "Huawei denies it has ties to the Chinese military and disputes accusations of intellectual property theft."

Winning the New Cold War on Terroism 2002

"They need financial capital to make possible the establishment of private enterprises" pdf pg 4 Second, development requires physical capital, and not just for companies but forcommunities and countries" pdf pg 5 " This is the third dimension, human capital." However, as this article outlines the best way to defeat terroism is through industrilization and productive wealth for a country. Yet, countries like China who wish for neo-mercantalism make it almost impossible for under developed countries to compete as China is gigantic has a huge infrastructure and currently is holding a currency tarriff, along with now a resource quota tarriff. It is Paramount that China's economy is not seen as a miracle or a hybrid economy but for the truth of what it is a neo-mercantlist country which is causing the world to lose the New Cold War on Terroism. Which is indirectly sponsored by the old Cold war leaders China and Russia through their needs for massive energy needs without regard to what those countries sponsor, like Extreme Muslims terroist or Extreme Leftist guerrila's.

THE ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE ACT AND THE THREAT OF CHINESE ESPIONAGE IN THE UNITED STATES 2010

"This article seeks to fill a gap in the existing scholarship by focusing mainly on the provision thatcriminalizes trade secret theft intended to benefit a foreign power." "According to the FBI, China is currently linked to about a third of all economic espionage cases." pdf pg 4 "I argue that the Economic Espionage Act is a necessary, but not sufficient, response to the threat of Chinese-government-sponsored economic espionage activities that imperil American national security." pdf pg 4 "Congress should enact new federallegislation that makes it a federal crime to aid knowingly, conspire to aid, or to engage in computer hacking designed to steal trade secrets or to disrupt American corporate or governmental computer systems with the intent of benefiting a foreign government or entity." pdf pg 5 pg 6 should be implemented. " the economic well-being of the United States is a fundamentalcomponent of American national security." pdf pg 13 "“[i]ndustrial espionage has always played an important role in Chinese economic development." pdf pg 17 "it would signal the fact that Congress is taking the threat seriously." pdf pg 31 pg 42 needs to be implemented. This is a very good paper and has very good points. A Cyber Espionage Act should be created. Thus outlining proper enforcment for those who hack in which might cause death to American citizens or personnel via, military technology shut down or lose of life. This would mean if found viable, if a hacker was found to hack a base or otherwise security issue and it causes a military personnells death then they should be tried for death. Furthermore, diplomatic responsibilities need to be implemend similar to the Cold War were hacking or espionage was considered grave threat to US national security as these actions cause harm to the social welfare, national security and military defesnes of this country. Which could end in civil unrest, economic crashes, death or downing of miltiary equipment. The US has not made a proper stance on enforcment. These actions should be considered as treasonous as possible to the US in such an age were mere mega bites of inforamtion protect millions of lifes or billions of dollars. However, it is feared that to much intrusive force into cyber security could become a political tool. Balance needs to be found.

Canada in China's Grand Strategy - Jeremy Paltiel 2010

"The most outstanding aspect of China’s impact on the global political economy has been the impact of China on commodity and raw materials demand and pricing. The second has been on global finance andcurrency reserves. The dual outcome of these two factors has conditioned China’s transformation from the largest recipient of foreign direct investment to China’s growing role as a global creditor and investor." pdf pg 14 This statement is regarding the Writers point of view of China's SOE's "to secure a dominant position for the state in the domestic political economy by allowing it to dominate key sectors especially in the production and distribution of primary factors of production." This dominace in produciton has been a huge imbalance in my opinion in the world of free trade. As the recaptalizing of these SOE's and the centralized strategic economic planning of them allows them to work together in a cartels. Centralized economic SOE ownership has always been a huge worry for free markets because of their impacts to free trade and competitiveness. See all based articles on liberlization, privatization, anti-trust, cartel and basic economic freedom which creates growth and prosperity. "China is seeking to counter monopoly with monopsony, thus evening the playing field in commodity price negotiations" pdf pg 17 I dissagree with key points in this paper on strategic planning. However, the paper is a good balance. I will thus let it stand. "China’s ‘Go Out’ strategy of foreign investment is predicated on securing access to commodities andenergy resources and is being spearheaded by large state-owned firms, most of whom are among the 100 plus firms directly subordinated to China’s State Council. An additional focus of ‘going out’ is in the area of advanced technology. Examples include assembly and parts of electronics, telecommunications and automotive systems. A third focus of ‘going out’ that may overlap with the other priorities is the effort topromote beachheads..." pdf pg 17 This is were the problem comes in when China uses SOE's to compete it causes free market enterprises who can no longer make things affordable and have to then export their jobs to China were Chinese business also create similar products and still sell them back to the US cheaper than the US products that have to had to export their jobs to China to be created cheap. This then allows China to purchase industries that were owned by Americans but have exported their whole business to China anyways. This is becasue of unfair competition and a horrible economic national security defense, Still telling the bulls to chase aliens are you? You took our best SOE analysis and economic anti-trust warriors (cold war heroes) and told them to kick rocks just because the Soviet Union wanted to sell some military weapons, and losen up some economics so they could compete with the US. I got some boxing gloves I feel like getting my butt kicked you game? Well you are to hire some bullesses and bulls to get back to work. This is bull S so lets get to it. We have to compete to stay soverign, secure, and economically stable. I dissagree with the conclusion. That free markets should tolerate and deal with Massive SOE Champions. Seems to me obsurd. As it has been proven that China uses their military and intellegence units to further the SOE's advantages in international economics. Along with that their centralized economics has been show to have actuall red phones in their ceo's or board rooms right to intellegence MSS head quarters. Further that I see not why the West and Free Markest should break from our Anti-trust enforcment of tactics that China's SOE's are using just to continue helping China. China is in a place of no return. It knows that its SOE's are archaic institutes and do not flow with market forces and are seen as gigantic fire breathing enterprises. In which can seriously hamper competition in industries. The passe idea of further staying the path of tolerance on this matter seems to me obsurd. China has seen the advantages of free markets. Yet it holds onto its transitional state and WTO hall passes so that it can now start to expand internationally for its own domestic benefit. While under developed and developing countries can compete because of the allowance of China's massive hall passes and such weak opinions towards their unfair competitions. That is my opinion,. Then again, I am pretty harded right now as I have to sit down and complete the Chinese Communist Economic Bliztkrieg outline. Still pissed I spent 8 hours on that then it dissappeared. My opinion is that China is to lose its hall passes for unfair competition and its massive cenralized and SOE markets should be further pressured to liberalize and privatize. As the question of the day is: Is it reasonable for China to builda and maintain massive SOE's in industries that it has healthy free enterprise entities in? I think that freedom of economics is something that should not be allowed to wain so that the Commmunist can try and push for their failed SOE centralized economic policies on others. As the proliferation of SOE's in the world has regained strength because no one can compete with China. In my opinion. All in all, the Aliens can wait, I need anti-trust warriors back in the seats. The Communist are moving and moving strong with poliical clout and massive SOE's. Head the call, as the price is being paid no to the free markets with forced reliance on Service bell curves and massive lose of Free Market enterprises to the Chinese transitional market. As we are not properly shifting but allowing gears to grinded. You know who I think I am I am Buckaroo Banzai, now known as Rider I.

US Coalition of Business Against Chinese Espionage

Under Construction: Let see when Japan tried to use their newly found economic power as war and take over the world we had Buckaroo Bonzi and the 5th Dimension. Well this time now that China is no longer a baby and is getting to big for its training wheels we will have Rider I and Indi Max, with Indivisimus Maximus. Tell you what, i am sure good at seeing Niche's. I mean I bet I could make a whole lot of money filling in wholes against Chinese Espionage agents. They are really easy to track. I wonder how much that is worth. I would say at leat $70 an hour, I mean I am a still a pup. Anways, something I have always liked about America is when the Government comes under espionage attack by foreign infilitration and corruption, we the People hold the right to defend out county. If legally watching folks and tracing certain possible targets for the Justic system is valuable, I mean the Chinese market place is like the dream of most entreupeners and those espionage agents are stilling their dreams. If the product is stolen then pirated in China by MSS or equivalent then it becomes valueless for hte creator and the paten holder. I am sure we can get some business out of this. I mean 3,000 Chinese Espionage bases, should be like shooting fish in a barrel. Now I know the weak of heart will say we should take away their rights to defend against foreign and dometsic espionage as much as possible and then MSS is going to create a legal team to try and corrupt that into practice. But darlings this is America,it is so ingrained in our individual liberies of self proteciton and balance and check of government corruption and infilitration that will difficult. Plus, right now We have a legal team making sure that those rights do not become decreped or erroded. You know why, this is ridiculous. The fact of infilitration by infilitration is one thing. However, when the Washington Post does a full disclosure on Intellegence DOD bases in America so as to draw attention to wish to close some down. I WOULD SAY IT IS TIME TO DO THE SAME THING TO OUR COMPETITORS. This is purely Defense I do not do offense. I think it is fair and in good hear.

China's Quest for Energy. Here on my Niche the Big House of Hoover.

"China’s huge appetite for energy and resources — it is the world’s No. 1 consumer of coal, steel, and copper and as an oil and electricity consumer is second only to the U.S. — has contributed to the soaring of prices on global oil and commodity markets. At the same time, cheap Chinese goods of high and ever higher quality are flooding world markets and endangering jobs both in industrialized countries in the North and developing countries in the South." The rise of China has a global impact in a host of different ways and requires in-depth analysis. The purpose of this article is to examine how China is attempting — notably through an “energy-driven foreign policy” — to secure the fuel supplies it needs and to reflect on the implications this may have for the international community as a whole."

I have to turn purpose after January 1, 2011.

I am just a citizen who is poor in wealth but found to be rich in spirit. I have spent lots of time and money on this matter. I have given up my graduate test, a wonderfull lady, and age to this. I have been proud to spend my life making sure that long ago promises stay true and freedom holds a steady path. I shall now begin to organize for my depature to try and find new lectures to compete with and listen too. My 6 degrees are not enough and I want two more. I will of course never leave this study. But I most prepare to turn purpose and full steam towards my next goal. It is time. Dark glasses and some cool outro music though. I though this was fitting as the implosion of the interntaional economies seems such a necessary study for me. I will still prepare my movement to stop the JFCOM bases from merging and closing, with a blow back of hoping to enlighten on the impacts of centralization of military spending.

California Watch Recession takes toll on Schools

Notice the correlation of loss of houses do to mortgages and the loss of jobs fits well with my service bell curve theory which has been forced upon the US as China does not share the production with the world and has created an influx into their country. Yet, held high SOE market shares, obvious uncompetitive currency value as China is now the worlds 2nd biggest market place, and has the worlds biggest resource contracts, still they wish to create quotas for more for them less for the world. This has created a service bell curve reliance which is faulty to the supply and demand curve of the employment part of the curve. This is a no no. The Dukes are coming out, and we are going to talk to folks. When are we supposed to roar? after the next weak service bell curve does not take care of our debt and it worsens for another crash, or when China feels like they should let other countries compete fairly, which by the way it is going will not be until China has complete controll of the international currency and market places, in my opinion. Dukes just mean folks who will speak with authority for those who can't or don't understand.

Intellectual Property 2010

"According to CBP data, seized counterfeit goods are dominated by products from China. During fiscal years 2004 through 2009, China accounted for about 77 percent of the aggregate value of goods seized in the United States. Hong Kong, India, and Taiwan followed China, accounting for 7, 2, and 1 percent of the seized value, respectively." pdf pg 12 That was just seized in America alone. "For example, in 2009, CBP seized a shipment of counterfeit sunglasses from China and reported an estimated total domestic value at $12,146 and a manufacturer’s suggested retail price at $7.9 million." pdf pg 24

Economic Freedom and Growth Determining Growth Factors. 2000 HKTDC

"Hong Kong has built economic strength from an impoverished economic infrastructure, whilst Venezuela's economic health has declined despite its relatively strong economic structure." "Hong Kong came under tremendous economic and social pressure due to an influx of immigrants from China and a lack of natural resources to support growth. Meanwhile, Venezuela was resource-rich and had a relatively stable population. In the 1950's, economists may have bet on Venezuela to pursue sustained economic growth. Instead comparisons in the 1990s showed Venezuela's income per person was much lower than 1950 in real terms while Hong Kong's was dramatically greater." "Hong Kong continued to achieve higher levels of economic freedom than Venezuela. More importantly, economic freedom in Venezuela deteriorated during the same period. By 1997, Hong Kong had over 50% more economic freedom than Venezuela." "Measuring economic freedom consists of three main elements:1. The right to engage in voluntary acts of trade and exchange, without interference by government or others via force or fraud; 2. The ability to access an impartial judiciary or the enforcement of property rights;3. The right of citizens to retain a majority of the income they earn." " Community well-being and human development has been achieved primarily through economic freedom." " These results are also affected by other economic measures such as life expectancy, adult literacy, human poverty, infant mortality, child malnutrition, and access to health care and income inequality. Similarly, cereal yield, access to safe drinking water, labor productivity and research and development as a percentage of GDP are also related to economic freedom. Factors such as size of the underground economy, corruption levels, political stability, degree of political rights, civil liberties and bureaucracy also add up to the level of economic freedom ensured in a country."

House of Harvard Economics Resolving the Global Imbalance: The Dollar and the US Saving Rate 2008

MUST READ PAPER: By China rebuying American Debt and Currency it has deleted the natural revaluation of the US Dollar to a lower value to lessen trade deficit and job loss. As China again has started to rebuy US debt, the market forces have played a different hand. As such laisse will not work. This paper illustrates a natural law economics causation of the dollar value lowering. If folks keep buying our debt and currency then our dollar can't lower and then our trade deficit will not lower either. "A nation that buys more than it sells must finance the difference by borrowing from the." pdf pg 6 Funds are coming into the US not because we sell things to them but because they buy our debt. Which keeps the dollar at a higher vavlue instead of shrinking the us currency account deficit. "The funds are coming into the U.S. economy now because foreign governments are willing to buy amounts of debt that can finance the U.S. current account deficit.The foreign governments are willing todo that to sustain their export surpluses with the United States " pdf pg 7 As such if the trade deficit is the cause of loss of employment, taxes, and high R&D in high tech. We should stop selling our debt and let the dollar decrease. As China is not going to raise their currency up fast enough, a way to help bring high tech and jobs to the US is to stop selling our debt. "Foreign governments that artificially depress their currencies in order to run large tradesurpluses and therefore accumulate dollar investments are foregoing the opportunity to invest those resources in their domestic economy." pdf pg 9 "But the primary reason why it would be unwise for foreign portfolio investors to continue to accumulate dollar securities is that the dollar must eventually decline as part of the trade adjustment process." pdf pg 9 Unless of course darks persist to try and conquer and destroy, then defense becomes offense. "But as long as the United States has a large trade deficit, the U.S. economy must continue to attract sufficient funds from foreign sources to finance the trade and current account deficits." pdf pg 11 Which means a neo-mercantalist country that did not wish to raise its quality of domestic life would keep up debt buying to keep up their trade deficit. Which cause the US the same detrements it has seen with losses of jobs, technology and welfare. This paper is good, however, again it does not take into account the possibility of economic warfare that MSS might be implementing. "While this strategy may be reasonable in the short run to increase aggregate demand and employment, it makes no sense in the long run to stimulate exports in exchange for perpetual IOUs when a similar stimulus to aggregate demand and employment could be achieved by better domestic policies." pdf pg 12 Well young padawon if zero sum game is a foot, then they would keep it up. end of pdf pg 12 -13 is the light, love it. oh it is better than cold meed, this is good stuff to bad it is 12:00 midnight darn hate when I dig and find treasure in the middle of the night takes for ever to trace things "household saving in the U.S. economy is now essentially zero" pdf pg 14 oh Page 16 puts the blade in the ground.ok listening to Metallica while readinh this and good stuff. "A variety of forces have delayed the full adjustment of the dollar." pdf pg 18 pdg pg 18 goes well with my China is not even doing anything with their currency because other factors keep it relatively pegged at such a low revaluation percentage. pdf pg 19-20 show how exactly my point that China's service industry and domestic concentration has been lacking and would absorb any possible loss in exports, which has been very high compared to other brothers and sisters.

Putting the Cart Before the Horse? Capital Account Liberalization and Exchange Rate Flexibility

Then again my anger is directed at the elders of mine and not China. As our welfare work pay would have properly placed pressure a long time ago that would have stopped this recession. "This paper concludes that greater exchange rate flexibility is." I do not wish to crash them again, no matter how much I think I see SOE cartel and anti-trust violations to conquer. I just wish for a proper worry about US citizens, and international growth and security through proper globaliation and sharing of export and imports.

China allows the IMF to share the results of the economic report. 7-30-10

"There were the expected broad conclusions -- that the country's currency is undervalued, growth is vigorous" "The IMF assessment concluded that the yuan, also known as the renminbi, was "substantially" undervalued and that China needs to lets its currency appreciate if the country is to become less dependent on exports and encourage more local spending." " According to reports in the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere, the IMF staff deleted a footnote estimating the undervaluation at as much as 25 percent." "But he noted that China has accumulated $2.5 trillion in foreign currency reserves -- a stockpile expected to hit $3 trillion next year -- and that this is not consistent with a properly valued yuan or a well-balanced economy." "The IMF projects that China's current account surplus -- the overall inflow of money from around the world, driven by the country's export juggernaut -- is rising now that the recovery is underway and will soon approach the same level as in 2007." The world can't sustain if China keeps its juggernaught going. As we crashed hard after the high export levels of China after 2007, as we all have to scramble to make up for our embalanced economies of GDP. Of course that should mean that China should be creating proper agencies to deal with the balancing. As I thought I was correct. I am sure that I am correct again about China's market place being able to be competitive at a balance. Then again, I am ok with 25-40% revalue. Mainly because at some point China's currency will have to rise above the rest due to its high resource holdings. In my unprofessional belief. I just think that resources are a big deal.

For all you oldies excuse me while I roar. I have taken one seat via a dull, just let me know. HOW COULD WE ALLOW THIS COUNTRIES BUSINESS TO BE WIPED TO THE POINT OF EXTENCTION AND BANKRUPTCY BECAUSE OF CHINESE UNFAIR ECONOMICS AND THEIR ECONOMIC MODEL WHICH WISHES TO KEEP THEIR CURRENCY AT AN UNCOMETPTIVE LEVEL, EVEN THOUGH THEY HOLD 95% OF THE WORLD RARE RESOURCES, JUST PLACED A HUGE QUOTA ON THEM. AND THEY HAD THE WHER WITH ALL TO STATE THAT THE FALL WAS THE US'S FAULT WHILE THEY SAT THERE AND DID NOT EVEN TAKE INTO ACCOUNT HOW THEIR MARKET PLACE IS A 1 TO 1 COMPETITIVE MARKET PLACE TO THE US EXCEPT FOR THE CURRENCY. CHINA HAS THE RESOURCE EDGE, LABOR EDGE, TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT EDGE, TAX EDGE, SHALL I GO ON. CHINA USES MULTIPE CARTEL STRATEGIES TO BENEFIT THEIR INDUSTRIES AND MAKE THEM UNCOMPETITIVE TO FREE MARKET BUSINESS, THEIR SOE'S USE HEAVY ANTI-TRUST RED PHONE TACTICS TO STAY UNCOMPETITIVE AS A WISH TO DOMINATE. YET free market business world wide collapse each business trough and China advances do to our allowance of unfair treatment to their economic model. WHICH IS NOT A MIRACLE NOR A NEW ECONOMIC MODEL IT IS A BASIC TRANSITION PERIOD MODEL IN WHICH WE ALLOWED THEM TO CREATE AS LONG AS THEY KEPT TO THEIR ORAL ARGREEMNT OF TRANSFORMING INTO A FREE MARKET. Which lately, seems they wish to forget and do for themselves. However, again I welcome China's advancemnt to the table. I am more upset at my own as they have not properly placed economic movements forward to stay competitive, and have allowed lax welfare by not forcing folks to work for their pay which would have placed the proper economic pressure on politicians to move faster and proper like regarding this fisacow which has been happening for some time now. Ladies and Gentlemen, I apologize. 16 SOE cartels, along with resource quotas make China very uncompetitive further their currency is killing the international market place. As China is equall to us in most every way except their currency, civil rights, economic models, and political checks and balances. So if they wish to stay in the transition stage we have no choice but to proper walk by their side and teach them again.

China Drawing High-tech Research From US 3-17-09 Global Times

"The Chinese market is surging for electricity, cars and much more, and companies are concluding that their researchers need to be close to factories and consumers alike" "Not just drawn by China’s markets, Western companies are also attracted to China’s huge reservoirs of cheap, highly skilled engineers — and the subsidies offered by many Chinese cities and regions, particularly for green energy companies." Cost of an employee is directly rated to a countries currency. Well lets see if we times China's engineers by their padded economy so $730 times 6 equalls about $52,000 a year. That is what a starting engineer makes in the US. Woa, wonders what a currency tariff can do for a country. I mean they have everything else to be competitive from the resoruce edge, to the technological edge, to the labor edge. Really it seems to me the only difference between the US and China is currency. Were as other countries do not have all the necessary market place factors to be 1 to 1 competitive.

After furloughs, states mull permanent cuts

Court officials predict there could be up to 500 more layoffs by September 3-18-10

House of The Heritage. Confronting the Unsusttainable Growth of Welfare Entitlements

The Message that needs to be heard. Is they can get help, but they will have to work for it. This sitting at home recieving a check that is the same amount as people like me who barley make $1300 a month is ridiculous. Especially when most of those folks on welfare not sick, or elderly, making above $900 a month are not even as close to as smart as me. Unless free riding is considered smart. This is a little political and can see both sides at fault in it. However, makes my necessary point. " Promoting personal responsibility and work. Able-bodied welfare recipients should be required to work or to prepare for work as a condition of receiving aid. Food stamps and housing assistance, two of the largest programs for the needy, should be aligned with the TANF program to require able-bodied adults to work or to prepare for work for a minimum of 30 hours per week." " Slowing the growth of the welfare state. Unending government deficits are pushing the United States toward bankruptcy. The U.S. simply cannot afford the massive increases in welfare spending planned by President Barack Obama. Welfare spending is projected to cost taxpayers $10.3 trillion over the next 10 years.[1] Congress needs to establish reasonable fiscal constraints within the welfare system. Once the current recession ends, aggregate welfare spending should be rolled back to pre-recession levels. After this rollback has been completed, the growth of welfare spending should be capped at the rate of inflation." Well as this article speaks on a Democrat. I should balance as the House of I tries not to poloarize as much as possible. As such our trade deficit to China I beleive has caused a huge economic deprivation as I hypothesize which has forced higher taxes to pay for more welfare as we have no more lower end of middle wages. That my friends is a 76 member vote for higher taxes. Pist I was to hear.

Gangs In Rural America

The basic study of economic centralization and of economic deprivation shows that each as together or as seperate economic models cause higher forms of intra civil unrest. As such economic centralization causes people to cram together causing more stress points and even higher strain on taxes, and quality of life. Along with economic deprivation causing loss of jobs and normal students to look more into gang activity or otherwise criminal ways to find monetary sustance. As such it would not make sense to show that Military base spending should be centralized and have money taking away from spread proper strategic placement of bases by the elder I's to centralize it and then cause huge amounts of economic warfare impacts due to improper long term strategic planning. Any city builder taught in the tombs of the Monks can tell you that economic centralization is not the key. However a proper balanced spread out stream is better for quality of life than deprivation and centralization. Furthering that Washington DC is already the highest per captial death and gang area than any other area if I am correct. This means that furthering the deprivation in Virginia or surrounding areas around Washington DC would be in my eyes a proper economic warfare impact wished for by an offensive movement. If I was to set strategy if told so, that is an objective I would work for. However, my training and beleifs per the US notion is defensive, not offensive.

China South China Sea Claim. Asian Sentel 10-11-10

China wishes could possibly take land from smaller countries with less resources and land and even further cause detrements to the free trade commerce by not allowing international waters to stay international waters. It hurts, the world has fostered China to such a secure state and then they wish to take land that should be allowed to be the smaller islands. I like my picture is a symbol of old protection of a certain study. It is very old that study of peace and harmony. I came and stood right beside you, you smiled and sat by the river, pondering life. Sidharta. This is a really cool symbol. I mean the heritage behind it is so cool. So take my strong advice. Remeber she looked at me, she may cry. Smile young one, your big brother/sister shall be nice and play fairly and competitive. We shall hope to mediate a peacefull resolution, of China's wishes to test out its new found strength and armorment.

Office of investment security

I think that CNOOC might not have filled out the proper papers. Kind of a National Security thing when a country has to borrow money to keep going then from that same country need its investment in economic infrastructure to create an economic infrastructure. Most say that is a national security issue. It is like this it is simple. You have thos that roll over and die and you have those that pry. I am a pryer, China is going to start purchasing American farm land and other economic infrastructures like I said they would do with steel and oil. They are able to do this with their manipulated currency. As obviously China has the 2nd FDI right now I believe. As such they should have the worlds second highest currency. CHina should be forced to come up to at least 2.5 to 3. As they are now the biggest threat of expansionism via economic wafare in much the same way that the Soviet Union was. They think more about expansion than intra quality of life via servic jobs. So Instead of placing more pressure on Bejing to privatize and stop market sharing and price fixing, we allow them to use the SOE cartels to invest in the US's economic infrastructure. Wow what a bunch of lemmings. Can't wait till I graduate to the next chair. Your butts are mine. We believe in freedom of economics and private ownership, we don't believe in cartel activities, market sharing and price fixing through uncompetitive economics. What is wrong you people. Do you really think this strategy of patty cake is going to work. It is passed the next shift point and we are allowing the US economic gears to be torn apart because China is not willing to further transition from a neo-mercantalist or for the oldies a communist country into a free country. Now we are letting their biggest economic weapons buy and own our economic infrastructure. This creates uncompetitive advantages for free enterprise of China and the US who could benefit from that merger or aquisition. However, though I going to kick someone butt old cage fightint style. Knuckle to knuckle. Ya lets keep rolling over for the Chinese and their uncompetitive economics. Get it through your head they do not have a new economic model it is part of the transition that takes time. However, some very upsetting folks seem to think that uncompetitive markets which was allowed for safety and security should be used to the point of detrement. The WTO already has stated and held that China no longer falls under a undeveloping market.

Then New Investment Power how will it affect your portfolio? TRIPPON FINANCIAL RESEARCH INC. 9-7-10

Chinese End game specific to old Soviet Union Wishes and strategies. "Beijing has ordered state-owned companies to find ways to block BHP Billiton's $39 billion takeover bid. The most likely new bidder is Sinochem, which is holding meetings with Citigroup, HSBC and Morgan Stanley. Sinochem might also team up with sovereign wealth fund China Investment Corp (CIC)." Funny China wants to purchase other countries resources. However, I would love to see them be purchased by a foreign company. "China's future investment goals are surprising. Due to a shortage of agricultural land, China may actually buy up farmers' fields in foreign countries. And that's just one of the unexpected trends in a study by the Petersen Institute."

The Road to Serfdom. Friedrich A. Hayek 1945 Economic Afairs, Readers Digest.

"Nobody saw more clearly than the great political thinker de Tocqueville that democracy stands in an irreconcilable conflict with socialism: Democracy extends the spehre of individual free-dom he said. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man, he said in 1848, while socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restsrain and servitude." pg 39 This is a little harsh. I mean I believe in poverty level socialism were those folks who are poor, sick or elderly can be taken care of.

Captilism and freedom by Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman 2002

The Road to Serfdom is through Centralized planning. Much like the Soviet Union wanted to do, and similar to a possible satellite world that China wishes to create via their style of currency domination. Just in case the young dragon hopefully soon lion forgets who its master is or is to dishonorable to accept that it has been taught by a master: "The limited increase in economic freedom has changed the face of China, striking confirming our faith in the power of free markets. China is still very far from being a free society, but there is no doubt that the residents of China are freer and more prosperous." pg ix Everyone has professors and masters, it is those only wicked of heart that do not respect and properly give thanks to theirs. You may find that rude and I may find you weak of heart. As China has constantly in the government owned media portrayed the US as being wrong and at fault for the US economic collapse, blaming captalism and freedom of economics through stocks and bonds. While never once coming out and being old and honorable like the Chief and Commander and saying yes we agree we have a problem and we are going to regualted it properly. China comes off with we are going to Start SOE champions and we are going to stop exporting rare resources, along with that we are going to cartel our publically owned business to work on technology via 16 SOE's in the car industry. Yet they blame the US. As such, I find wickedness of heart and that the disrepect is not healthy competition but yet possible black hearted desire for destruction of a fair competitive industry. Possible. It is so young grasshopper that the liberalization of Chinese economics and freedom of economics is being placed on hold so that China can greedily obtain certain SASC, military and political positions. Instead of fair comeptitions. I humble myself not. That is why I have been chosen. I can take a butt whopping and keep on going, then again I can whoop butt and stop before detrement.

Economic Freedomin the "Bolivarian Andes" Is Metling Away 7-7-10 Transform America's

"Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela are among the worst performing countries in the 2010 Index in all of Latin America. Several of the other poor performers in the region—such as Cuba and Nicaragua— are also governed by statist regimes. Meanwhile, the performance of market-friendly and democratic countries such as Peru, Colombia (the most improved country regionally in the 2010 Index), and long-time Latin American economic freedom leader Chile are proving that Andean governments can deliver true economic and political freedom to their citizens if leaders govern with the correct mix of policies favoring private property, rule of law, and market-based democratic institutions." The funniest part of the whole thing is that Hugo Chavez's neo-mercantalist strategy of high exports to the US but low imports still isn't helping him. Thats funny. Neo-mercantalist never learned that being selfish is morally bad.

Cosco to make Greece its 'gateway' to Europe. May 2010

Greece Europe Economy 2009

I am a genious and all my economic peers at least the majority are idiots. My theory holds water: Greece has a predominately service economy, which (including tourism) accounts for over 73% of GDP" Much like Pinochio Greece's deficit will not be helped by China but left to their mercy. Instead of balancing out Greece's economy to some more manufacturing for themselves through proper security of economics. They will lose that ability all together now. I am king, OH ya noble peace prize baby here I come. Me and Indivisums Maxiumus are going to wipe up the competition. I know what is next. China moves in Champion SOE's and padded economy duopolies into Greece. Making the economic conquering and lose of Greec'es soverignty complete. China is sure enjoying their joy ride from their economic training wheels.

China firmly Supports Greece 10-03-10

At the point when China is helping more countris on their feet than the free markets. It should be a complete show of economic force through political and guardian watch over economic warfare. Again the Free markets are lagging behind Chinese international economic expansionism. This is another show of why China should again have to equlize their economy and balance out their currency. As any econ warfare observers knows that low currency is used to create high surpluses which is then used to prop up countries it has torn down through unfair trade.

Chinese aquanauts plant flag in deep-sea depths. Nation and World.9-11-10

"The global seabed is littered with what experts say is trillions of dollars' worth of mineral nodules and many objects of intelligence value: undersea cables carrying diplomatic communications, lost nuclear weapons, sunken submarines and hundreds of warheads left over from missile tests" "The small craft that made the trip — named Jiaolong, after a mythical sea dragon — was unveiled in August after eight years of secretive development. It is designed to go deeper than any other in the world, giving China access to 99.8 percent of the ocean floor" "Russia, France and the United States lag behind in the game of going deep." "The move resembles how Russian scientists, in summer 2007, plunged through the ice pack at the North Pole and planted their flag on the bottom of the ocean. Upon surfacing, the explorers said the feat had strengthened Russia's claims to nearly half the Arctic seabed."

China's Giant New Investment Agency Businessweek.com March 12, 2007

"China's investment arm will definitely aim to get a rich return on investment, but its decisions will also be guided by political and strategic considerations. China is likely to focus on large equity stakes in oil and gas concerns, minerals such as gold, and possibly shipping assets" "HSBC China economist Qu Hongbin. "This will easily be one of the largest asset management companies in the global market." teach you to bet on boxing with me. We never bet for money but boy do you look funny. Your famous.

China Dangles Rare-Earthh Resources to Investors. Wall Street Journal 8-16-10

" China is cautiously using rare-earth resources as bait for foreign investment that could bring sophisticated technologies that it needs." It is also using it to aquire foreign free enterprises via their SOE's like Ansteel which is merging with one of the only rare earth metals high output for certain metals. ".. a senior official with China's Ministry of Inudstry and Information Technology, said lasst week that while China has used a "Technology for material" strategy before --offering foreign companies low labor costs and access to its fast growing market -- now we have the expression "technology for resources." The official cited the rare earth market as a workable for this strategy." Well that really rebuts your whole enviroment excuses for being uncompetitive and centralizing your market place for resources while rainsing 72% protection for that industry. Wonder why Japan is made, they build hybrids that is part of their economy. You just shut them down to further your domestic centralized strategy. House of Levy, knows it they stated it in the backwards primary statement paper. Shielding through centralized strategies. "China controls around 95% of the worlds rare-earth output, a near monopoly it has slowly built to help its exports quotas to achieve higher prices" You know why, because our free market intellegence agencies well, lets say forgot to shift gears. The only countries that could possible compete against them has allowed China to grab the worlds rare-earth markets so it can bully countries like Japan in which it is doing now so that it can use expansionism campaigns. "decrease its rare-earth shipment by 72% for" "China has accelerated the speed and intensitty of consolidating the fragmented industry and has been cutting down the export quota for rare earth since 2005 to gain clout on pricing the rare metals" That is an anti-trust violation to centralize an industry. Globilzation is so that each country has a different part. Not so that one country gains it all. Again absolute advantage. "Against the backdrop of the shortage. plenty of foreign companies will start moving their rare-earth procession plants to Chinaas early as this year" That is a centralization of an industry all in one country, much like the manufacturing industries went through. These types of activities cost the international community more money than the cheap products they prouce. I really want to say something like were is your quickening y'all were is the we are not going to take this. What is wrong you people. This is obviously why we have anti-trust laws and cartel laws. I am mean they just used this strategy to start aquiring US steel companies because of lack of incite in our economic security division to see past tomorrow and probable because the economist have never been in a ring before and felt fear and adrenaline and anger all at the same time to proper and precisely direct and control it. Ah just read the article this is so bad. You need me.

The Heritage Foundation

"The state still directs most economic activity, and the Communist Party, while allowing some response to market forces, still maintains ultimate authority over economic decisions."Foreign investment is controlled and regulated, and the judicial system is highly vulnerable to political influence. The state maintains tight control of the financial sector and directly or indirectly owns all banks." "State ownership of enterprises persists in most sectors. Mergers have been more frequent than divestments." "The market determines the prices of most traded products, but the government maintains prices for petroleum, electricity, pharmaceuticals, coal, agricultural products, and other “essential” goods. Subsidies allow state-owned enterprises to produce and sell goods to wholesalers and retailers at artificially low prices." Why is ANSTEEL ALLOWED IN OUR FREE MARKETS? Chief C really, China is not going free they are stating they are pushing for Champion SOE's which accordinlgy China is the worlds 6th highest government subsidizer. Still Chief.

China Using Government Muscle to Turbo Charge its Auto Industry. Money Morning 9-03-10

Car Industry Chinese Cartel and anti-trust activities. "The tone of policies is not to boost the already-rapid growth" in the auto industry, Jenny Gu, a Shanghai-based analyst at J.D. Power and Associates, told AFP. It's to encourage purchases of "green" cars." This is Cartel Activities "China's State-owned Asset Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) last month announced that 16 state-owned companies would form an alliance to research, develop, and produce electric and hybrid cars. Beijing will invest as much as $15 billion (100 billion yuan) in the venture by 2012." Along with the Rare earth resource export quotas that are need for Japan and the US and others to create Green Tech cars. This will cause China to have a very uncompetitive market place for the car industry.

Economic Policy . The Rising Trade Deficit with China will cost half a million jobs. 2010

The basic idea is that there is statistics that show that our exporting of jobs to increase imports of products is not benefitting the US at all. We are not gaining enough jobs to keep our people employed from the one sided trade with China. Something is fishy about this whole thing. Something is seriously wrong with our guardians. It has to be infilitration. Has to be. This is just not right. What Patriotic guardian would allow his country to be sold off one piece at a time trough, recession, then ? You need me, blatant need. Not even a want you need. ME

Economic Policy Institute. Unfair China Trade Costs 2.4 million jobs in every District

Lower wages, less jobs, Again this writer does not calcuate the Chinees SOE cartel activities which has its surplus trade strategy, act as if they are impacted by the trough of the free market business cycle, then the aquisition strategy. The writer states that even though the trade deficit has gone down. This is only because they want to take heat off of themselves while they aquire economic infrastructures by SOE cartels. The trade surplus strategy will kick back in after 2014 when the US starts up its new business cycle driver the insurance service industry. Watch it I have it happens. Fishy, how come professional economists can't see that out lack of liquidity during our trough's is causing China to advance each time we go into a trough. We get set back through inflation and loss of more jobs and China advances with more strategic holdings like resources, major economic infrastructures and the US loses its liquidity value. telling you the Soviet Union crashed because of loss of liquidity in their country. I can do this all day and all night. Plus I can do it politicaly correct and internationally polite if properly compensated. Rigth now I am broke as the US manfacutring GDP percentage.

China's Container Ship Fleet: Economic Savior or Trojan Horse? Global Politician 4-11-05

Guarda Síochána1.1 Communist Cartel Ship Building Communsit Cartels do not need to own ports and unload their own Material.There needs to a proper check and balance of seperation from foreign government owned companies and our port security of unloading, storing and watching. As such individuals or corporations avoid of foreign ownership should own the ports and unload the economic destroyers with each container being properly scanned. Allowing the Communist to do both is a threat to our economic soveringty as cloaked threats or perceptions could cause less soverign economic deals for countries being invaded by Communist Economic Cartels. I am tired of it.

Freedom Leadership Conference. American Port Security. 2009

Law at the End of the day. CCP SOE's Upholding the Party's Core Political Status in SOE's 2009.

China's Banking CrisisSolved . Motley Foul. 5-20-10

Who will pay for Chinese Banks bad loans " the selling of bank equity to government institutions. In fact, we may have seen this strategy resurrected in the March announcement that China Mobile (NYSE: CHL) would be purchasing a 20% ownership stake in Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (SPDB) for almost $6 billion. Although companies such as China Mobile don't have enough cash to be a long-term solution if events take a turn for the worst, they could at least buy the government some time." This then allows China to keep up its high investment in SOE's as Seen in 2009. While not having to take to much a risk of a loss in market shares because another SOE will just buy up the debt and eat it. This then stops SME's and PCB's from being able to gain a fair chance in areas of high market concentration of SOE's like Steel, as Ansteel is trying to merge with a rare earth producers SOE, cars as China has major SOE invesemtnn in them and the rest. This then creates a risk free financial institution for the SOE's and China's SOE financing. As if one SOE goes under another will just eat its debt and market shares. Leaving unfair practices for foreign and domestic free enterprises. It is called recapatilzing as is considered a public cartel activity. As if one SOE institution fails as per the WTO agreement they are supposed to be sold off to privitization not other SOE's.

Times 2009 Chinese SOE's making a come back.

"Many of China's state owned enterprises (SOEs) have grown into giants, eclipsing the relatively young, private companies that have contributed heavily to the country's progress. That trend is being reinforced as China implements[ed] economic stimulus measures that in practice boost state-owned giants while private companies are left largely to fend for themselves." Now why would any normal intellegent single party communist rule I mean economic analysts do that. That is another form of Cartel activity. Using the financing arms to prop up and make bigger state owned enterprises to drive political funding and foreign economic acquisions. Or as the SOE Board calls it their creation of Economic Champions. I see it more as the creation of massive dragon like cartels that even their own individuals and opposing political parties have a hard time competeting against. This action of unbalanced financing causes the SOE's to eat their market share and lead to a form of protection from foreign markets. As the SOE's decided what market shares will survive and which ones will be eating by the SOE's. That is another form of Cartel activity market share setting, via unbalanced loans. This leas to a cycle recreating of the protected SOE cartel markets we have all tried to stay away from and create antitrust and cartel laws to prevent. A

ZF ZF English. Government wants 90% of SOE profits. 2010

Wall Street Journal. Australians Warm to Chinese Mining Investments. 2009

Communist Cartel activities further detrements. After they padded their economies, dumped on others, forced only service industries with little ability to purchase resources, used cartel like activites to control and keep their prices down, they are now on a massive Cartel acquisition of reources because no one has been watching their Cartel like activites, because other countries cannot compete with their Government Cartels. Old Communist Economic Warfare strategies allowed to go unchecked.

Asia Paper Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies. Investments Strategic SOE Owners 2009.

Chinese SASAC board has centralized control and wishes for Massive Champion SOE's. Reality is one centralized board with few other political boards controlling the SOE's all strategically work together to build a public cartel system. Which is used to further a natural business progression of dominance, unfailry through their massive vertical meetings of strategy and economic military principles. This idea is a detrement to the world as government SOE's will lead to wars were as Business v Business lead to couperation. Marx's never did talk about that except the part where he stated there would be massive anarchy. That massive anarchy he speaks about is war. As one country's SOE's v another Countries SOE's inherantly lead to it, as the regulatories agencies and the owniing agencies are both government entities, with militaristic ties. Unlike free market Lockean and Smithian ideas of individual and corporations avoid of government onwernship creating free trade and markets.SOE's are a form of government protectionism. Through investments, loans, funding, legal protection and regulator agencies controlling and regulating the cartels centrally as the SASC does. It is like the referee playing the game, or like the Chinese Communsit Party says "win win" for them.

How and Why The Communist Party Helps our Enemies in the War on Terror

Where is the help? Where is my defense board? Why has this been allowed to go on so long? Why is an extreme left wing political party legally allowed in American government positions; after years of known espionage and economic warfare? Questions I have, answers I am not finding. Why is China being allowed to reep resource contracts in areas that the US is securing while the US free enterprises gets beat out by SOE cartel's? I know why it is the same startegy that the communsit part has had for over 30 years . ECONOMIC WARFARE. Chinese SOE cartels should be regulated fairly. Along with that it needs to be understood what is going on. We can't understand something that is not even studied.

China E Lobby. On the War on terror part III: Communist China's Support for anti-US Terroists. 2005

"I have written a book on this subject). Sadly, the consensus inside and outside the “movement” is that Communist China and the War on Terror are separate and distinct issues. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, when one examines our enemies in the War on Terror – the Taliban, al Qaeda, the Ba’athists in Iraq, and for the more expansive among us, the regimes of Syria, Iran, and Stalinist North Korea – one finds only two things they all hold in common: hatred for America, and support from the Chinese Communist Party."

2nd Causalty after Venezueals Chinese backed SOE closures of American free enterprise business.

Chinese Economic Warfare Imperalism.

Over 800 Communist SOE's in Africa. They try and say they are getting rid of their SOE's but really they just fly under different names and use subsidies to pass Communist Government Protection laws. However, the Imperalist Economic Army of China is still using Communist Warfare. While you sit there, the Communist gain more and more while freedom and civil individual economic's is losing. Our legislatures sit there and have no clue. The biggest infilitration of Communist Economic Government Soldiers

The US and Countries like her depend on imported Resources to manufacture and create things.

This means if the Communsit SOE's keep up their economic campaign to the biggest contractor of technological resources like gold and silver. Then there could be serious consequences for countries that do not follow the political national interest of the Communist Party. or Countries who speak out against them. Personally, I like being soverign and I do not think that countries should be allowed touse their governmetns to purchase other countries minerals or contracts. I think that individual or corporations avoid of national political interest should obtain the resources and then sell the minerals to producers based on a non political party interest.

Share the World's Resources China's New Colonialism 10-05-09

"According to the secretive development agreement, China received a 25-year tax holiday, despite profits projected within the first eight years; 90 percent of the profits thereafter; and some regulatory exemptions, including environmental ones such as alleged cheapened access to forested regions and rivers, as well as significant control over the country's infrastructure, which the Chinese are to develop" "Meanwhile, China has been dispatching its predatory investors to other African countries, pushing the construction of megadams in Sudan and Mozambique, $2 billion in oil-backed loans in exchange for development projects in Angola, and a $3.5 billion investment deal allocated to Zambia's Copperbelt province. Hopefully the dangers posed by Belinga will inspire NGOs and activists across the region to resist such exploitative deals with a new breed of colonialists before it's too late."

California Uneducated on Communist Terroism Legilsature Votes in the Communist Party

Should it be ok to be a Nazi or a Black Panther or a Taliban as it has been allowed to be a Communist Member? As all three extremist groups advocate a theory backed by their own political books. In which the Communist Party states only the physical overthrow and revolution of capitalism which is what we stand for should forethought and believed that it will happen. So if the Nazi's wish for violent overthrow for their beliefs or the Black panthers wish for their violent wishes and all three parties including the Communist have had violent pasts in the US, with local terroism. Even being able to prove that the Communist Vile Party, has helped foreing governments to sabotage our economic, military and political, infrastructure. So should they be allowed in our inner most circles of our government, or should that party be banned like Nazi's, Black Panthers, or any extremist group that backs a theory which wishes for the overthrow of our political bi partisian, and individual consitutional Bill of Rights? All have the same principle the violent overthrow of our government to inpute thier ideas of government. I mean not even the KKK or the Panthers party would sell out their country to another country. The Communist party is the lowest of all terroist political parties as they wish to take our rights to own our own and replace them with the feudalist style rights that create peasants and masters or workers and leaders. There are communist party violent movements in India, Venezuela, and the Phillipines backed by the riches communist party members. So I think some folks might be a little close to this threat to our constitution. Should we let members of an American Taliban in? As they attack Americans and our allies just like the Communsit do in India or the Phillipines, and they all have ties to the richest communist states. Oh even better you know that Party that killed millions of American soliders because they invaded our Allies in Korea and Vietnam and currently still hate the US and have huge ties also to the richest Communist state, should we let them in our government? This legislation should be repealed as the Communist Party has ties to the richest Communist states who then have ties to terroist actions who wish for Maoist, or Lennin/Stalin Style violent revolutions. The ties are still there. I wonder why California Economics have been in such a threat as to cause state and national poverty but that is a whole nother theory and I am working macro here. Basicly any extremist group that wishes for the overthrow of our political structure, via military, or political restructure of our system is a threat, has been a threat and up until the day the Communits see the theory as it is and has been known for hundreds of years as an over exagerated Feudalist style theory. In which it reverts back to the basic instinct of tribal instead of freedom and liberty which is valued in free countries and is an excelled and progressive type of civil governance. To be a communist is to wish for slavery and feudalism. As the loss of the American class system is a threat to our well being. There will always be classes, and the Communist party is richer more than it has ever been at this state, and with the aquirig of their rogue military threat of North Korea and nuclear arms. I find it is to instable to allow Communist in our government structure. We did not like communism at its highest point with a so ordaned leader then and we sure will not like Communism with a popular leader now. Libtery and Freedom is for courage of individually free to own their labors and self natural rights.

The reality is we spend so much time on the right wing terroist we forget about the Communist.

However, it has always been the left wing that poses the bigest espionage threat to the US. Selling secrets to the bigger Communist countries they believe can help them further their violent overthrow of the individual ownership rights placed down by John Locke, we own our labors and our production as individuals. Most communist if they thought it woudl help the theorized revolution of the individual rights back to feudalist rights would help a foreign Communist Country. As a matter of fact some of our biggest Espionage leaks and threats have been from such beliefs as the Communist manifesto. It might be a little to soon to allow Communist political members to work for the government. Especially after blatant Economic Warfare that has gone on. This site places side by side left wing and right wing and shows why left wings are more likely to committ espionage. Basically because Right wingers are to dumb to figure it out. I will edit this later. I just liked the side by side on pg. 9 that proves my espionage theory of selling out the country. Usually racist groups like Right wingers of the KKK or Black Panthers are not as smart as the leftist Communist, Maoist, types. However, again the same miss calculation I am finding in most government reports is the Abuse of the Communist Cartel's and huge economic and espionage advantage it has given then and does give them. This report like the others I am reviewing misses that calculation for threat levels of fundng.

Congressional Research on Communist Political Party Threat to American and Internal Security

"The clandestine organization of the Latin American Communist Parties is being improved with the help of training by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and of China." As both China and Russia have ties to training and arming Venezuela I do not see how this report is not still relevant. Seems to me that Internatl Security. I was born owning my own rights, with dreams of individual ownership of job, defense, land, home, family, body and the spiritual right to believe in what I want. How about you? Along with that the Communist SOE Cartel arm of finace just gave Venezueal 20 Billion to seize Ameican individual companies property and rigs. So um what is wrong with California Legislatures? Do they really like having no jobs, a huge deficit, some of the highest individual coroprate or business taxes in the state. Yet, hey if you are communist you can get a job working for the government making sure the books are unbalanced. Repeal the law that allows the Communist Party to work in the Government I have provided enough information on why they should not be considered alright to work in government. I mean they want to destroy our system of individual ownership to replace it with a communist system of fedualistic style communistic economics, or we can all just go on welfare and not work and allow the Communist Party Central in China to come and infilitrate after we lose the Economic Warfare battle and the technological deficit, oh wiat we already have a tech deficit. Your bad.

Left Wing Extremism

The Current threat Report Dated 2001 "In addition to the Soviet Union and other state sponsors including China and Cuba, leftist revolutionaries in the United States have gained inspiration, if not support, from members of the Communist Party of the U.S.A. The Communist Party of the U.S.A. operated a brother-son network in the United States that assisted Soviet intelligence agents operatingin the country and was heavily subsidized by Moscow during its early years (Beichman,1995)." pg. 10 The Dreams of every American to someday own their own individual business, and to be able to trade without government interest of totalatarian commerce, or to be able to freely express ones own freedom of economic opinions lives deep inside the soul of all Americans and free souls. One which can't be changed not even with so called biological therapy.

Sticky Fingers

COFCO Ineternational Interests of Aquisition.

Should a monopoly at home be allowed to have enter the international commerce with its disadvantaged to the Free Markets Anti-Trust Laws? Or How about an SOE having a financial investment firm attached to its Monopoly at home so it can use strategy to invest to weaken then monopoly power to crush and acquire. I think the allowanc of Communist Naitonal Interest COFCO and their conglomeration was the reason my grandfather lost his job because his employer could not afford to compete with Communist national interests and their non-anti-trust following. Love you Grandpa, this cite is for you your little rider.

SOE banks and finacial institutions

Communist bank and invest and lend in foreign markets but will not allow non-Communist Government corporations to create a financial infrastructure in China. The Third Party system of Free World makets anc corporations avoid of government ownership currently has to go through a Communist SOE making it harder and more expensive. As they use an Economic block to keep out competitors while they use their National Interest Third Party SOE's to acquire enternet paysites and foreign third payer sites. STOP THE CATCH 22 ECONOMIC WARFARE.

When Negotating with Communsit SOE's

You take into account that their Communist Political agenda is also part of the negotation. If this is a truth in the market place then there is a serious problem with allowing them to be used with such Communist Political Nationa Interest unregulated in the interantional market. I believe it would be in the national interest of the Communist to destroy and plunder economically with hundreds of SOE's cloaked under just 100 different names. Zero sum game is if the Communist political agenda is not part of the deal there is no deal. The heads (or) (are) now boards so they can enter the Canadian market and acquire Canada's business by allowing them a Canadian citizen one seat on their board. However the boards or leaders are always High ranking Communist Political figures (economic warfare generals or majors in my mind). Link back into Feudalistic style leadership (king butt kissing, except in a popular feudalistic style political arena). By the way Canada if you think that by sitting on their board of the named SOE that is acquiring your free market business will stop their national Communsit Political agenda you are wrong. That defensive strategy from political economic conquering will not even put a dent in their national strategy. They will just run over you one watcher, while he or she has no clue what is going on.

Communsit Controll of their National Interest Economic Weapons.

They have actuall departments that look at their SOE's to see how it can better their military. See the Office of National Economic Mobilization on this cite. This is a must read cite for anyone wondering why the Communsit Government takes so many jobs, and creates so much debt for so many countries. They have people who just sit around and try and figure out how their Communsit SOE's can conglomerate bigger, and stronger and how they can control the world's economy for their national interest. Do not be fouled by their powerpoint. Read deeper and see the basic operations of each of their departments. It is ridiculous.

Wow I am good y'all should pay me for this.

The Communist National strategy as theorized is "To facilitate the adjustment of product structure and enterprise organization, leading enterprises will receive support to grow more powerful to improve industrial concentration and enterprise competitiveness by acquisitions, mergers and restructuring." pg 20. This strategy becomes a problem when they use their National Interests to crush economies either on purpose or on accident with unfair business (or should I say government ownership) practices.

Communist Cartels cost consumers Billions.

It is imperically researched that Cartels cost consumers billions while actually trying to cloak that they make it cheaper. Further it is imperical that most countries to not have the proper BOARDS to defend against Cartel activities. Not nice at all using strategies like you are. By the wat at the point we have a tech deficit, manufacturing deficit, trade deficit, technological deficit, resource deficit, any argument you bring is false as I now take my zero sum game of regulating Communist Cartels. I figured I would have to wait till the crash as no one would hear any thing else but zero sum game. So my theory win win, China, and those blinded by their cloaks. The biggest fears and hopes of the Cartel regualtions committee of the WTO was that Cartels controll distribution like, mmm resources, shipping, manufacturing, finances, etc. the list goes on in the Communst Cartels. I think I will be most likely to win even with Communist Financial fraud against me. Vote Rider I baby. We gona bring peace through proper regulations. I am your Chairperson for the Committee. My theory is going to be in and as such backed by eye's.

Chief, Pres, Sir,

The best way to do it in our free market it to get the Oil giants to realize the wealth in tech advance and updates plus upkeep in green tech and get them to move their operations at a faster rate. This does not mean force, however, a good middle ground stand would be nice. Plus as usual we need to make a showing of Centralized Cartels of China are now way worse than our first Cold War Adversary. Centralized Cartels are not fair business and should be regulated so individuals and corporations avoid of government ownership can compete. A

Green tech Money still going abroad.

Our Chief and Commanders Wishes to have a New Green Deal American Revolution job market and industrial know how and ability to manufacture is being stumped from someone inside. Probable an infilitration unit. 80% of Green Tech Stimulus went to foreign firms in the first send out of stimulus money. That is a huge loss of manufacturing and the ripples of creation of new high technology fields. On the same bases as the Economic Spy infilitration unit. To keep America unable to compete in the high technology sector. At least if they exist i would believe that they would be one of their operative motives. There is a movie coming out. I think I might like it as the plot intrigues me. I would like the economic spy ring that has infilitrated our government, or has turned our government workers, if I am correct, spotted and at least one brought to justice before I am eating my popcorn during this movie. It is a shame when I have to read that our Stimulus money is going to fund more foreign jobs than American jobs, while tha foreign country USES THEIR HOSTILE CARTELS TO COMPETE UNFAIRLY IN THE INTERANTIONAL ECONOMIC MARKETS for the same logic that is used to keep up our deficit of trade, technology, ship building, military soldiers. As such I am now asking that anybody found to be furthering foreign interest before their own countries interest with help of foreign money or agents to be removed and placed some place else. It comes at a time when we have tried to get the Communsit to be humble and help the world be civil and safe. However, they would rather keep up their cartel activities than to help their fellow neighbors compete. It makes no sense to think that we should keep allowing our high technology to be produced else where and then use that same theory of we allow the Communist to build because it allows us to prodce high technology when we have a deficit and we lose thousands of jobs to the Communist Cartel padding. Then we try and find some service law we can create to keep the circular reasoning of loss of jobs going with the Communist. The theory is rebutted. I love Greenspan, but Sir, you forgot to calculate the Cartel Activities being a problem. As such Greenspan Sir, I need some money, cause this is not childs play Sir and you know you forgot to calculate the Cartel activities in your theory. Check it again.

China's Relations with Technological Resource Rich Afghansitan.

Should the US help Afghanistan develop their Resource trade and get rid of Afghanistan's drug trade. I think so, we should wing Afghanistan off of Drugs and re-construct them to be a high technological producer of resources and production. The key to Battery technology is a resource rich countries ability to be secure so that they can make money off of their resources and then gain jobs and security. Start the mining jobs for Afghanistan's and not outsiders and they will stop the terroism as they will have good jobs paying for their citizens to live. Thousands of jobs could go to Afghanistan. The US could sell them machines like China loaned Venezuela money for their energy. You want to stop Terroism give them jobs. Afghanistan can make deals for resources via Machinery and the US could get back into helping develop underdeveloped countries with Resources, while also being able to secure the Middle East. It has been known that if you give a person who the terroist pay to be a terroist solider a job paying better and making them feel like they are doing something for their country they are a lot less likely to kill people as they can feed their wife and children. The US, China, Russia, Britain, France at one time all had to quell hungry men with resource mining jobs so as to stop them from starting tribal wars inside of their own boarders. I am sure the same logic of putt the bad butts to work doing manly labor and they will be less likely to want to kill when they come home because they are tried from making a good days wage for their kids futures and wifes, need to tour the city. Give em a job, we know what they can do. And yes in case you are interested the Show Cased Company behind this article is a Communist Government Owned Company. Which makes no sense on any theoritical value how one could propose taking a countries resources from them by use of their massive government cartel. As an Afghanistan person should be made rich to support his country men and build pride not the Communist Government. Along with that this is another form of Economic Warfare. Where one country will not pitch in militarily but then uses its uncapped and unroofed massive amounts of government SOE Cartel funding to purcahse resources on the Backs and tax dollars of the US security forces. Thanks China for all the help.

US President Misshapp cloaked by false cheating?

Maybe, or maybe there was some other reason why President Clinton (admin) did not get hit harder for leaking National Security to the Chinese, and being caught by both the Dems and Pubs in a Chinese Campaign Finance Scandal. Maybe, but that is a little to conspiratory for me, maybe, maybe not or maybe she was used a possible cover leak to cover the real story which seemed to never hit the air waves. Communist Red Herring diversion. You are pissing me off. Messing with my President's relationships is really crossing the line. China is pissing me off.

The Asia Pacific Antitrust Review

I think that they need to do an article on Communist SOE Cartel activities. "Essentially, a cartel provision is a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding which has the purpose or effect of price fixing, or the purpose of preventing, restricting or limiting production, market sharing or bid rigging by parties that are (or would be) competitors" What about those entities via scope SOE's that possible compete for the same purpose? I have to find that provision, if they have it. I guess I am looking for the Conglomeration and Centralization of possible cartels clause. That would be good, I will find it. "The Guidelines provide an outline of factors which determine a relevant market. These include product characteristics and user sales channels, price differentials, production processes, and transportation and switching costs." Seems to me that is a relevant market, I can expand,resources, shipping, production, packaging, financing, marketing, and then shipping again, all done by one government agency and its mass SOE cartels that keep Conglomerating bigger and bigger while centralizing power and strategy for each SOE. Seems to me that is a relevant market too. "This is because having a larger number of prosecuting jurisdictions can increase the exposure of cartel participants to greater fines, which acts as a greater deterrent to cartel arrangements." Brothers and Sisters, lets share data; shall we? "International cooperation, including exchange of information, is seen as a critical factor in controlling international cartels, and also in controlling domestic cartels where companies involved have foreign offices." I can expand this too. We need to share information on Government Cartels along with free market cartels. As such government owned cartels are much more dangerous and need proper attention also. Lets have some tea and share some information, I think that there might be a cartel out there that needs to have a good ride in the international anti-trust enforcement. Welcome China to the 2nd Place spot, now time to play fair. Green tea maam, please.

The Communist Push for Extra Large Centralized Soe's Called Champions in each Sector

by effectively not enforcing the AML against the largest SOEs, China for all practical purposes will have elevated industrial policy above competition policy for those industries." They think that they are special and that their SOE's do not have to comply with international Anticartel and Antitrust laws. They are wrong. The Communist SOE board specifically thinks that it is ok for them to centralize their SOE's in steal and automotive to create champion intra business cartels for use in international markets. Creating an uncompetitive edge for free markets business who's governments wish not to start SOE wars. The Communist theory of SOE centralization only works as long as other countries do not follow suit. As if the other countries start full scale massive champion SOE Cartels it will lead to military wars and not business v. business competition. This needs to be regulated, and it needs to be shown that SOE cartels will be regulated and properly watched.

An Article Warning about Non Tarriff Protectionism like SOE style Champions.

Pg. 8 "In China, fiscal stimulus and state-directed bank lending fortify already subsidised and protected state-owned enterprises (SOEs). They increase SOEs’ market and political power at the expense of the unsubsidised (and much more productive) domestic private sector. As the Chinese saying goes, “The state advanceswhile the private sector retreats”. This is tantamount to a halt to, indeed a creeping reversal of market reforms." I would also note that I have found in other places a SOE Boards saying is they wish to create SOE economic "Champions". Love that mindset for their predatory SOE Cartels. This goes against "the benefits of recent decades of globalisation are as much a story about increasing competition in home markets – the result of microeconomic deregulation of capital labour and product markets -- as it is a story of increasing trade volumes.". pg 8. Which by the Chinese massive SOE lending and spending would show a reverteration back to a centralized nation. Instead of a open economic trade nation as it has moved to and come so far. I just do not want to see them slip back or think that they can use their SOE cartels in a warfare manner and get away with it. It is one thing to be nice to show them the ropes and help them out. It is a complete other thing to self deprevate and eat if they wish to further revert. " Adam Smith saw this link in the eighteenth century." [....] "... legislatures should be “particularly careful neither to establish any new monopolies of this kind, nor to extend further those which are already established." I guess the Chinees Economists did not read that chapter in Adam Smith's book. Chinese reliance back to the SOE's and their massive market share is a form of government subsidized protectionism in my eyes. Along with that I can see the trade blocs of the 1930's starting to repare through SOE cartels v. free markets as through Venezuela's and China's huge financial investment in their SOE government subsidized non tariff protections. This could and is leading to either a proper regulation of such SOE cartels or further trade blocs which China is trying to avoid by purchasing up massive amounts of economic infrastructure's with their SOE's. So that they can have a win win, SOE protectionism and no tariffs against their SOE's. As China will own key infrastructure in countries economics and those countries politically through SOE economic bullying will not want to equalize the equation. Thus possible leading to a full scale economic domination through SOE acquisition. Not "" are my thoughts. After reading this article. I still see this as a huge problem for free trade "...measures to promote selected sectors and “national champions”, mainly SOEs."pg. 16 This use of SOE cartels leads to "Externally, surplus savings contribute mightily to global economic imbalances and generate extra trade tensions. Which is the line of my cite. SOE's as cartel members create non-tarrif protectionism along with price fixing, market share fixing, and protective markets for the SOE's through government legalities. However, "...China’s crisis response essentially an investment binge – bolsters the public sector and state power at the expense of the private sector." pg. 17 Furthering the link into the Public cartels. This leads to a "....real risk of surplus manufacturing capacity flooding into shrinking export markets in Europe and North America, thereby inviting protectionist retalation against China." pg 17 More or less because China is being allowed to go the way of their SOE cartels along with many other world community issues addressed on this page. It can and will lead to mass scale protectism wars as no one can compete against the Chinese SOE cartels and their massive government backing. "Overall, limits to government intervention and a well-functioning market economy are of a piece with open markets, economic globalisation and international political stability." pg 18 However, do not get me wrong by bringing in this cite. I still believe if China goes with their SOE cartel style activities without proper regulation and or prosecution, then yes, we should not allow our markets to fall to them. As I do believe in economic soverignty and military ability to defend against foreign single political party movements.

Levy Economic Institute. Why has China Suceeded and why it has continued to do so

"While the analysis shows that China has strong revealed comparative advantage in laborintensive" pg 24 "In the case of China, this was done by protecting certain capital and' pg 29. This strategy in my opinion has not changed much. Which is "As we argued in the previous section, this phenomenal progression is the result of pathdependency." pg 32 " Once China had set a foot into the core, it could diversify and upgrade its export" pg 32 That theory is the same theory that they are using to conglomerate their SOE's in many different factors of the market. In which if they can have a comparative advantage in one industry they can find a way to make a link through the space theory to others. This however, I believe is being done through SOE cartels and unfair competition through red phone tactics. This statement by the author Explains exactly what they are doing in their suggestion, again writing pasie, "In our view, China needs to devise an optimal combination of horizontal and vertical." However I do agree with the allowing of SME. This statement is also a statement I believe in. I also think that it would allow for more market sharing and less market cartel activities, creating a fair international market place "To increase the possibility of success, China’s government needs to tailor" pg 38 "Experience shows that coordination with the private" pg 38 " China has been heavily involved in supporting its industry for decades. However, as itadvances in its quest to become more a market-oriented economy, the role of the state should be." pg 38 " One key policy concern is how to redistribute wealth from the wealtheir to the poorer areas" pg 39 That is simple lossen financial restraints on SME's and PCB's stop the market cartel activities with SOE's and all should start to streamline out and create a better market for the whole world. Instead of pockets of SOE protected market shares. All and all I think that this was a very good paper in regards to economics without institutional or political perspectives. However, truly it lost its gusto as it can easily be seen as China's State Capital investments are what allowed it to excel so fast. As such a paper regarding the effects of the unfair market place that China's institutional strategies has created would be instore to rebutt or to lengthne this paper. As this paper is narrowly tailored specifically for China's benefit without regards to the world. Which was its scope. Good Paper.

Make no mistake: In China, state-run firms rule. The Tech 8-31-10

"“The problem is that the reforms of the first 20 years, from 1978 to the end of the ‘90s, actually did not touch on the power of the government,” said Yao Yang, a Peking University professor who heads the China Center for Economic Research. “So after the other reforms were finished, you actually find the government is expanding, because there is no check and balance on its power.” Yet we allow that no check and balance power into the US economic infrastructure via Ansteel the Chinese major Steel SOE. ?